Shoulder stocked beauties!

Rusk County Avengers

Captain
Muster Stunt Master Stones River / Franklin 2022
Joined
Apr 8, 2018
Location
Coffeeville, TX
Last weekend I attempted a virtual tour of the Mason-Dixon Line military museum in Jefferson, TX, and these two beauties were brought out of the vault to share here for everyone to enjoy.

https://civilwartalk.com/threads/mason-dixon-line-museum-jefferson-tx.173940/

The owner of the museum, Tom Moss was present with me at "CWT Invades Vicksburg" last fall and made waves, and CWT has touched him so, lots of stuff from museum not normally on display, or on display will get brought out from time to time to take pictures of and share here.

But on to the guns!!! These were taken with my phone camera, and I'm still getting used to it so I apologize if they're not the best. In the future I see me taking a light and maybe a digital camera to get better pictures.

20200614_123640.jpg


Before anyone gets too excited, the Dragoon isn't what it seems....

20200614_123559.jpg


20200614_123740.jpg


Its a Brevette Colt Dragoon from Belgium. From the CW era though. The apparent Beaumont-Adams revolver is mint, but it being shoulder stocked and some other details make it a headscratcher.


20200614_123931.jpg


Hmmm, serial number didn't come out well. I'm not sure I like the camera on my new phone because its a lot clearer there than here!

20200614_123918.jpg


Feel free to leave comments, I'm curious to hear everyone's thoughts, especially on the Adams revolver! (Which I wish I was allowed to shoot, even if stupid due to its condition and all.)
 
That is not a Beaumont Adams revolver; it is a Webley Wedge Frame revolver or sometimes called a Webley-Bentley revolver, a less expensive revolver than the one-piece frame Adams. These were made by many Birmingham makers, often not marked with the maker. Were the proofs on this the London proofs with a Crown over a letter V and Crown over letter P, or the cross-scepter mark of a Birmingham proof?
The stocking was likely a post-factory addition.
 
That is not a Beaumont Adams revolver; it is a Webley Wedge Frame revolver or sometimes called a Webley-Bentley revolver, a less expensive revolver than the one-piece frame Adams. These were made by many Birmingham makers, often not marked with the maker. Were the proofs on this the London proofs with a Crown over a letter V and Crown over letter P, or the cross-scepter mark of a Birmingham proof?
The stocking was likely a post-factory addition.

Shows how much I know of English revolvers. Except for that knob on the grip it looks "Adams-ish"

Except for the proof marks on the frame I tried to get a good picture of, and a Birmingham proof, (I think it was on the cylinder) its completely unmarked.

I knew that knob was very Webley-esq, but having never even heard of a Webley Wedge Frame/Webley Bentley I called it an Adams. I've never even known Webley had a cap'n'ball revolver. Which its owner calls it Webley.
 
Going back and looking at photos of Beaumont-Adams revolvers, and this oddball, I'm really able to forgive myself for falling into an Adams trap.

I've always read and studied American percussion revolvers and very little of foreign ones. That needs to change...

On the other hand, is there any known shoulder stock variations for this gun?

Also the gun here came from a Louisiana home if I remember right.
 
Likely the London mark on the barrel was intended to be a misleading mark meant to suggest quality; these were made by many Birmingham makers, and sometimes they were marked and sometimes not; that Birmingham proof on the cylinder suggests it was made there.
 
The Webley Wedge frames which came to the South, appear to have been in the 2,xxx to Bentley marked types in the 31xx-32xx serial number range. Later presentation types are in the low 5xxx range.

Nelson Clements had a contract to deliver 5000 revolvers to the Houston Quartermaster. It would appear that far fewer made it through the blockage if the contract was completed, which is unlikely as the known examples are in a very narrow serial number ranges of the total production of around 6500 pieces.. One of these revolvers adorns the cover of The English Connection. The big bore revolvers were 54 bore or .442 caliber.

The cased example below is s/n 2525. Also notice the very distinctive "micro groove" rifling on these revolvers. The brown leather holster is English made.
20200621_095112_resized (2).jpg


20200621_095210_resized (2).jpg


20200621_095609_resized (2).jpg
 
Safe to say this is the only Webley Wedge Frame revolver that I've ever seen with a stock attachment. I think the revolver and stock were manufactured post-Civil War by a few years.

Next time I'm over there I'll see about getting better pictures. This was kind of an off the cuff "Hey lets post pictures to advertise the museum and see if anyone notices this oddball English revolver!" I don't know if the stock was added later as someone suggested, the stock and its oddball attaching mechanism is very high quality.

How long after the war were these made by the way?
 
Next time I'm over there I'll see about getting better pictures. This was kind of an off the cuff "Hey lets post pictures to advertise the museum and see if anyone notices this oddball English revolver!" I don't know if the stock was added later as someone suggested, the stock and its oddball attaching mechanism is very high quality.

How long after the war were these made by the way?

The Webley revolvers we are talking about in the 2xxx to 5xxx serial number ranges were probably all made between 1857-1861. The revolver you pictured is different in that our pictured guns all have flat sided frames, the gun in your photos seems to have a small recoil shield integral with the frame on its left side. Your pictured gun appears to have a five digit serial number while our revolvers have very low four digit serial numbers. Lastly the cylinder on your pictured gun does not have rings etched around the front while our guns all have rings around their cylinders. These design differences indicate to me that your Webley is a late production (post-war, 1868-70?) gun.
 
Nice pieces. You be sure to tell Tom he will be missed at Shiloh. Who am I going to get to do the welcome CWT artwork?
 
Nice pieces. You be sure to tell Tom he will be missed at Shiloh. Who am I going to get to do the welcome CWT artwork?

Oh I'm sure something could be arranged on the artwork, I know Tom's been busy drawing some of the most evocative, and unflattering artwork I've ever seen concerning a certain Speaker of the House here lately....

I'll let him know and see what kind of artwork he can cook up for CWT next time I see him.
 

Learn About Us
About CivilWarTalk
Contact the Webmaster
Meet the Staff
Link to CivilWarTalk
Join Our Community
Register
Browse Forums
View Today's Discussions
Search the Forum
Get Help
FAQ
Student Guide
Forum Rules & Etiquette
Copyright / DMCA

     Contact Us CivilwarTalk on Facebook CivilWarTalk on YouTube CivilWarTalk on Twitter RSS Feed

Bringing the American Civil War and More to Life.
© 1999 - , CIVILWARTALK, LLC - Site Version 10.0

SlaveryTalk.com - SecessionTalk.com - CivilWarTalk.com - ReconstructionTalk.com
Back
Top