HeroPrentiss
Cadet
- Joined
- Jul 11, 2020
I was enjoying the Shiloh videos despite the inaccuracies in them. Then I came to this one. My great-great-grandfather fought with the 58th Illinois in Duncan Field and was taken prisoner at the end of the day. Like other men who fought in the Sunken Road/Hornets' Nest he was proud to have fought beside General Prentiss and considered him a hero.
It was stunning to watch the three of them stand on hallowed ground and desecrate it in front of Peabody's mortuary monument and gleefully declare that Prentiss was not a hero but a villain. I had not seen before such virulent hatred of Prentiss as displayed here by men who should know better.
For those of you who approach the history of Shiloh battle and park with an unprejudiced mind (a favorite phrase of David Wilson Reed) I introduce William A. Morton, the brother of Major General Charles Morton, brother of John Morton and brother of Mark Morton who served as an aide to Colonel Everett Peabody. All four of these brothers were in the 25th Missouri and survived the war to live long lives. Charles was sixteen years old at Shiloh; afterwards attended West Point; and stayed in the service until forced to retire. He wrote a couple papers of his experience at Shiloh. William was an older brother who was a sergeant. The Morton's brother-in-law also served in the 25th Missouri and they found his body near that of Colonel Peabody's once they regained their shattered camp.
Charles Morton hosted annual Shiloh dinners where the guests would gather and reminiscence about the most memorable day of their lives; April 6, 1862.
After the 1908 dinner William Morton wrote an article for the HAMILTONIAN. In it he wrote who they blamed for the lack of recognition Colonel Everett Peabody received after the battle.
"I have often wondered why historians have not given Colonel Peabody the credit which newspaper correspondents and army officers accorded him immediately after the battle, when the facts were fresh in memory."
William Morton, who was there, blamed the historians. He never blamed Prentiss. The historians did it and based on what we witness here in this video it seems like a pretty good call.
William broached the subject of Powell's early morning patrol.
"Why Col. Peabody took the steps he did, without reporting to Prentiss, is a mystery. It could not have been on account of ignorance nor lack of respect to a superior officer, for he was a man of fine intelligence and was ever courteous to both inferior and superior officers, besides every inch a soldier."
What could be more disrespectful to Colonel Peabody than to use his mortuary monument, with Peabody's name framed in the background, as the participants falsely declare Peabody's superior officer to be a liar and a villain and then, later in the video, declare him even more of a villain. Such disrespect to Colonel Peabody to assume he would condone, or encourage, such a thing.
Since Colonel Peabody cannot do so. I will speak for him and the men of the 25th Missouri to the American Battlefield Trust and its representatives:
"Get the hell out of our camp! And stay out!! We don't want you here!!!
<iframe width="709" height="399" src="
" title="YouTube video player" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen></iframe>
"Any man who is good enough to shed his blood for his country is good enough to be given a square deal afterwards. More than that no man is entitled to. Less than that no man shall have."
Teddy Roosevelt
July 4, 1903
I noticed that those of us who do believe Prentiss is one of the heroes of Shiloh are subjected to ad hominem attack and described with disdain and derisively dismissed as falling into a trap. But you cannot dismiss us that easily. Facts are stubborn. They shouldn't have done that. I am not intimidated by these guys. My research is backed up by men who were there. They don't know what I've got in my files.
A couple points: Observe that Mr. Hills states emphatically that Prentiss did not mention Peabody in his after-action report and that Prentiss threw a dead Peabody under the bus. But facts are stubborn things. Prentiss did indeed mention Peabody in his after-action report. He could not give details of what Peabody had done because he did not know. The last time he saw him was when he told Peabody he would hold him responsible for bringing on the engagement. Most times a division commander has the benefit of reports from his brigade commanders to assist him in preparing a report but Peabody didn't make a report. If Major James E. Powell made a report that was published in the Official Records as claimed it came up from underneath the ground.
Prentiss was not aware Peabody had sent out Powell's patrol at 3 a. m. and he never took credit for it. If there is a liar in this story it isn't Prentiss.
Prentiss did not write the history of the Hornets' Nest leaving out Peabody. The story of the heroics of Peabody was published by John Gilmary Shea in a book, The American Nation, which was printed in 1862, possibly while Prentiss was still a prisoner down South. The entire story was also published by Shea in 1872 in a children's book; A Child's History of the United States, Vol. III., page 81-91. It was also published in a book in 1867 by William Swinton titled The Twelve Decisive Battles of the War. In 1867 the Peabody's story is told in Harvard Memorial Biographies. The Philadelphia Inquirer had a reporter in Peabody's camp and his story was published in the April 18, 1862 issue. The Chicago Evening Journal noted that Peabody sent out the patrol in its April 12, 1862 issue.
"And you ought to take very great care when you are about to praise or blame any man, that you speak correctly." – Plato
Dr. Mackowski appeared on camera to set up Mr. Hills with an opportunity to make another slam at Prentiss with a totally inept question that didn't make any sense. Shiloh has more than one hero. There's room for plenty. Peabody is identified as a hero for what he did at the opening of the battle. Prentiss is considered a hero for what he did in defending his camps; holding the Hornets' Nest and Sunken Road; and fighting a "last stand" for an hour, or so, with the entire Confederate army while Grant is strengthening his "last line." It is not a question of Prentiss instead of Peabody. It looks like the makers of this video were working with a script. This video probably impresses those who are not deeply immersed in the history of Shiloh and they will make glowing remarks in the comments section. There are over 5000 views and 400 thumbs up. But I am deeply immersed in the history of Shiloh and this video sucks.
Without taking any credit away from Peabody it should be noted that the true, driving force, behind the early morning patrol was Major James E. Powell. For all you Shiloh revisionists who falsely claim that Powell's patrol was against Prentiss's orders and unauthorized here is the statement of a man who was there.
Wm. J. Hahn, 1st Lt., Co. H., 25th Missouri wrote on April 12, 1914 – "With the assistance of Colonel Everitt Peabody commanding the 1st Brigade of the 6th Division, Major Powell finally got General Prentiss's permission to reconnoiter Sunday morning, but under no circumstances to bring on a general engagement. Major Powell explained these points to me at 10 P.M. Saturday, April 5th and directed me to visit every tent of Co. H and instruct the men to be fully dressed and be ready to march at 3 A.M. Sunday, April 6th……If ever a man deserved a monument it is our brave Major Powell….."
There are several versions of what was said between Prentiss and Peabody the morning of April 6, 1862. This one shows that, while Prentiss was angry and would hold Peabody responsible, he showed respect to Peabody and ordered him forward with his best regiment. Basically he told Peabody--you created this problem now go fix it. F. E. Peabody was Colonel Peabody's nephew and he was attempting to discover what happened the morning his uncle fell in battle.
F. C. Nichols, senior Captain of the 25th Missouri at Shiloh, to F. E. Peabody, Feb. 27, 1902. "At early morn before breakfast the line of Battle was formed, with the right of Brigade resting on the right of our regimental color line. My company was on the right of Brigade. A few minutes after the line was formed, General Prentiss rode up near Colonel Peabody, who was mounted and in front of my company, about the center of the first platoon and said to him, "Colonel Peabody, I hold you responsible for bringing on this fight." Saluting, Colonel Peabody said: 'If I brought on the fight I am able to lead the van.' General Prentiss ordered him to take his best regiment….the next words I heard were: 25th Missouri forward.'"
In response to Mr. Adelman's enthusiastic implication that the villain Prentiss walked on the grave of William Hervey (it is not Harvey) Lamm Wallace in order to steal credit from him there is no evidence to back that up and is an injustice to Prentiss. Mr. Adelman declared Prentiss a villain but it is obvious he doesn't even know anything about him. When speaking of Shiloh, Prentiss always gave credit to Wallace. Prentiss and WHL Wallace fought in the same Illinois regiment in the Mexican War. Prentiss was the captain of the company while Wallace was a lieutenant. Wallace wrote to some friends on September 23, 1846: "Our Company is now commanded by Captain Prentiss, the late Adjutant, and the best officer in the two regiments." That is the story that should be told about Prentiss and WHL Wallace. They fought together in the Mexican War and fate brought them together to defend the Sunken Road at Shiloh. They were friends and respected each other.
Instead we get Mr. Adelman wanting to heap more villainy upon Prentiss by claiming he threw Wallace under the bus too. What are the odds that Mr. Adelman even knows of the Mexican War relationship between Prentiss and Wallace? Also, a well-known Shiloh historian wrote "Prentiss gave Wallace full credit for his actions," in his after-action report. (Timothy B. Smith. Rethinking Shiloh. Page 78). The idea that Prentiss threw Wallace under the bus is nothing more but Shiloh revisionist nonsense. Mr. Adelman spouts another falsehood about Prentiss on hallowed ground.
In video no. 16 of this series Mr. Adelman whines how if he says something negative about someone he is accused of hating the person. Let's see. – You are standing on hallowed ground. You've accepted Mr. Hills description of Prentiss as a villain but you want people to believe Prentiss is even a greater villain than Mr. Hills thinks he is (how that could be possible, I don't know). To do that you concoct a totally vile scenario that even Tim Smith has written in a book isn't true. But you do it anyway. You do it because you do not expect to be called out on it because very few people will know that the scenario you are gloating about is not true. You did it because you hate Prentiss and you want everybody who watches this video to hate him too. By the way; when you stand on hallow ground and tell falsehoods about a man who fought there that is called desecration and you should stop it.
The American Battlefield Trust states their mission is to preserve, educate and inspire. Well, they inspired me all right. They inspired me to start this thread.
On December 27, 1894 the United States Congress passed "an act to establish a national military park at the battlefield of Shiloh.
"The Shiloh National Military Park was established by act of Congress in order that the armies of the southwest may have the history of one of their memorable battles preserved on the ground where they fought. It is the desire of the commission having this work in charge that this history shall be complete, impartial, and correct, so that when the monuments of granite and bronze shall have been erected their inscriptions shall publish to the world nothing but the truth."
That includes General Prentiss and the men (North and South) who fought in the Hornets' Nest and Sunken Road. The Shiloh National Military Park and the American Battlefield Trust should reread why the park was established and adhere to it.
This video is an injustice to General Benjamin Mayberry Prentiss and the men who fought with him, and against him, in the Sunken Road/Hornets' Nest and consider him a hero.
I would rather take the word of a soldier from the 18th Missouri who actually fought all day with Prentiss as to whether Prentiss was a hero or not. Rather than Shiloh revisionists who make things up to craft a false narrative about Prentiss more than 150 years after the battle.
In 1890 James Price, Capt. of Company K, 18th Missouri applied for a pension and requested an affidavit from Jesse Abel as a witness to Price's service. The two men fought with Prentiss in the Hornets' Nest at Shiloh. It was that experience Abel wrote about in the affidavit dated July 3, 1890.
"I was a corporal in Company K, 18 Mo. Volunteer Infantry at the time of the battle of Shiloh. Jas. A. Price was the Captain of that company. Toward evening of the 6th of April 1862, the day of the battle I was with Capt. Price when hero (emphasis by me) Genl Prentiss rode by and told Capt. Price that if he ever expected to get out of his position he must get out within five minutes, as the enemy were then on both flanks and in our rear. Genl Prentiss rode on and in less than five minutes was made a prisoner. After considerable persuasion Capt. Price was induced to leave his position and attempt to escape through the rebel forces which were fast closing around us. The Captain and myself and fifteen others were all of our company together at this time. 12 of us (illegible) that escaped capture, and in fact nearly all of Gen. Prentiss command that escaped. No braver man ever looked into the muzzles of Rebel muskets than Capt. James A. Price. I was with him in the times that tried mens souls and I know whereof I speak."
Jesse A. Abel
After over twenty-eight years Abel remembered Prentiss riding amongst the men encouraging them to get out. To Jesse Abel, Capt. James Price and my great-great grandfather, Benjamin Prentiss is a hero, and they were there.
Prentiss and the men who fought with him and the Shiloh National Military Park deserve better than this.
Not content to just slander Prentiss in front of Peabody's monument; David Wilson Reed gets a dose too.
Everyone should note that Mr. Adelman was more than willing to criticize Shiloh's first historian but didn't even know his name. His name was David Wilson Reed and he was with the 12th Iowa in the Hornets' Nest where he was wounded. He is known as the "Father of Shiloh National Military Park" and was entrusted by the Shiloh Military Park Commission to produce a truthful history of the battle to honor all the men who fought here. In order for the Shiloh revisionists to craft their false narrative they are willing to disparage the work of Reed by claiming he violated his trust by producing a history of the battle which emphasizes the area of the battlefield in which he fought. Reed would be appalled at the injustice heaped on him. One would think that before you slander someone you would at least know his name.
"Truth once crushed to earth shall rise again." William Cullen Bryant
The video ended on a light note when Mr. Hills stated "the first guy who gets it wrong everybody foot notes it."
No better example of this phenomenon can be found than in the recently published (2019) Attack at Daylight and Whip Them. The book is part of The Emerging Civil War Series of which Dr. Mackowski is the editor. Wiley Sword did it wrong in his book, Bloody Shiloh, around fifty years ago and the same mistakes slandering Prentiss are repeated in the book Dr. Mackowski edited.
Shame on these guys. What a disappointment.
PS. The American Battlefield Trust's Shiloh Animated Map produced by Shiloh revisionists sucks too.
It was stunning to watch the three of them stand on hallowed ground and desecrate it in front of Peabody's mortuary monument and gleefully declare that Prentiss was not a hero but a villain. I had not seen before such virulent hatred of Prentiss as displayed here by men who should know better.
For those of you who approach the history of Shiloh battle and park with an unprejudiced mind (a favorite phrase of David Wilson Reed) I introduce William A. Morton, the brother of Major General Charles Morton, brother of John Morton and brother of Mark Morton who served as an aide to Colonel Everett Peabody. All four of these brothers were in the 25th Missouri and survived the war to live long lives. Charles was sixteen years old at Shiloh; afterwards attended West Point; and stayed in the service until forced to retire. He wrote a couple papers of his experience at Shiloh. William was an older brother who was a sergeant. The Morton's brother-in-law also served in the 25th Missouri and they found his body near that of Colonel Peabody's once they regained their shattered camp.
Charles Morton hosted annual Shiloh dinners where the guests would gather and reminiscence about the most memorable day of their lives; April 6, 1862.
After the 1908 dinner William Morton wrote an article for the HAMILTONIAN. In it he wrote who they blamed for the lack of recognition Colonel Everett Peabody received after the battle.
"I have often wondered why historians have not given Colonel Peabody the credit which newspaper correspondents and army officers accorded him immediately after the battle, when the facts were fresh in memory."
William Morton, who was there, blamed the historians. He never blamed Prentiss. The historians did it and based on what we witness here in this video it seems like a pretty good call.
William broached the subject of Powell's early morning patrol.
"Why Col. Peabody took the steps he did, without reporting to Prentiss, is a mystery. It could not have been on account of ignorance nor lack of respect to a superior officer, for he was a man of fine intelligence and was ever courteous to both inferior and superior officers, besides every inch a soldier."
What could be more disrespectful to Colonel Peabody than to use his mortuary monument, with Peabody's name framed in the background, as the participants falsely declare Peabody's superior officer to be a liar and a villain and then, later in the video, declare him even more of a villain. Such disrespect to Colonel Peabody to assume he would condone, or encourage, such a thing.
Since Colonel Peabody cannot do so. I will speak for him and the men of the 25th Missouri to the American Battlefield Trust and its representatives:
"Get the hell out of our camp! And stay out!! We don't want you here!!!
<iframe width="709" height="399" src="
"Any man who is good enough to shed his blood for his country is good enough to be given a square deal afterwards. More than that no man is entitled to. Less than that no man shall have."
Teddy Roosevelt
July 4, 1903
I noticed that those of us who do believe Prentiss is one of the heroes of Shiloh are subjected to ad hominem attack and described with disdain and derisively dismissed as falling into a trap. But you cannot dismiss us that easily. Facts are stubborn. They shouldn't have done that. I am not intimidated by these guys. My research is backed up by men who were there. They don't know what I've got in my files.
A couple points: Observe that Mr. Hills states emphatically that Prentiss did not mention Peabody in his after-action report and that Prentiss threw a dead Peabody under the bus. But facts are stubborn things. Prentiss did indeed mention Peabody in his after-action report. He could not give details of what Peabody had done because he did not know. The last time he saw him was when he told Peabody he would hold him responsible for bringing on the engagement. Most times a division commander has the benefit of reports from his brigade commanders to assist him in preparing a report but Peabody didn't make a report. If Major James E. Powell made a report that was published in the Official Records as claimed it came up from underneath the ground.
Prentiss was not aware Peabody had sent out Powell's patrol at 3 a. m. and he never took credit for it. If there is a liar in this story it isn't Prentiss.
Prentiss did not write the history of the Hornets' Nest leaving out Peabody. The story of the heroics of Peabody was published by John Gilmary Shea in a book, The American Nation, which was printed in 1862, possibly while Prentiss was still a prisoner down South. The entire story was also published by Shea in 1872 in a children's book; A Child's History of the United States, Vol. III., page 81-91. It was also published in a book in 1867 by William Swinton titled The Twelve Decisive Battles of the War. In 1867 the Peabody's story is told in Harvard Memorial Biographies. The Philadelphia Inquirer had a reporter in Peabody's camp and his story was published in the April 18, 1862 issue. The Chicago Evening Journal noted that Peabody sent out the patrol in its April 12, 1862 issue.
"And you ought to take very great care when you are about to praise or blame any man, that you speak correctly." – Plato
Dr. Mackowski appeared on camera to set up Mr. Hills with an opportunity to make another slam at Prentiss with a totally inept question that didn't make any sense. Shiloh has more than one hero. There's room for plenty. Peabody is identified as a hero for what he did at the opening of the battle. Prentiss is considered a hero for what he did in defending his camps; holding the Hornets' Nest and Sunken Road; and fighting a "last stand" for an hour, or so, with the entire Confederate army while Grant is strengthening his "last line." It is not a question of Prentiss instead of Peabody. It looks like the makers of this video were working with a script. This video probably impresses those who are not deeply immersed in the history of Shiloh and they will make glowing remarks in the comments section. There are over 5000 views and 400 thumbs up. But I am deeply immersed in the history of Shiloh and this video sucks.
Without taking any credit away from Peabody it should be noted that the true, driving force, behind the early morning patrol was Major James E. Powell. For all you Shiloh revisionists who falsely claim that Powell's patrol was against Prentiss's orders and unauthorized here is the statement of a man who was there.
Wm. J. Hahn, 1st Lt., Co. H., 25th Missouri wrote on April 12, 1914 – "With the assistance of Colonel Everitt Peabody commanding the 1st Brigade of the 6th Division, Major Powell finally got General Prentiss's permission to reconnoiter Sunday morning, but under no circumstances to bring on a general engagement. Major Powell explained these points to me at 10 P.M. Saturday, April 5th and directed me to visit every tent of Co. H and instruct the men to be fully dressed and be ready to march at 3 A.M. Sunday, April 6th……If ever a man deserved a monument it is our brave Major Powell….."
There are several versions of what was said between Prentiss and Peabody the morning of April 6, 1862. This one shows that, while Prentiss was angry and would hold Peabody responsible, he showed respect to Peabody and ordered him forward with his best regiment. Basically he told Peabody--you created this problem now go fix it. F. E. Peabody was Colonel Peabody's nephew and he was attempting to discover what happened the morning his uncle fell in battle.
F. C. Nichols, senior Captain of the 25th Missouri at Shiloh, to F. E. Peabody, Feb. 27, 1902. "At early morn before breakfast the line of Battle was formed, with the right of Brigade resting on the right of our regimental color line. My company was on the right of Brigade. A few minutes after the line was formed, General Prentiss rode up near Colonel Peabody, who was mounted and in front of my company, about the center of the first platoon and said to him, "Colonel Peabody, I hold you responsible for bringing on this fight." Saluting, Colonel Peabody said: 'If I brought on the fight I am able to lead the van.' General Prentiss ordered him to take his best regiment….the next words I heard were: 25th Missouri forward.'"
In response to Mr. Adelman's enthusiastic implication that the villain Prentiss walked on the grave of William Hervey (it is not Harvey) Lamm Wallace in order to steal credit from him there is no evidence to back that up and is an injustice to Prentiss. Mr. Adelman declared Prentiss a villain but it is obvious he doesn't even know anything about him. When speaking of Shiloh, Prentiss always gave credit to Wallace. Prentiss and WHL Wallace fought in the same Illinois regiment in the Mexican War. Prentiss was the captain of the company while Wallace was a lieutenant. Wallace wrote to some friends on September 23, 1846: "Our Company is now commanded by Captain Prentiss, the late Adjutant, and the best officer in the two regiments." That is the story that should be told about Prentiss and WHL Wallace. They fought together in the Mexican War and fate brought them together to defend the Sunken Road at Shiloh. They were friends and respected each other.
Instead we get Mr. Adelman wanting to heap more villainy upon Prentiss by claiming he threw Wallace under the bus too. What are the odds that Mr. Adelman even knows of the Mexican War relationship between Prentiss and Wallace? Also, a well-known Shiloh historian wrote "Prentiss gave Wallace full credit for his actions," in his after-action report. (Timothy B. Smith. Rethinking Shiloh. Page 78). The idea that Prentiss threw Wallace under the bus is nothing more but Shiloh revisionist nonsense. Mr. Adelman spouts another falsehood about Prentiss on hallowed ground.
In video no. 16 of this series Mr. Adelman whines how if he says something negative about someone he is accused of hating the person. Let's see. – You are standing on hallowed ground. You've accepted Mr. Hills description of Prentiss as a villain but you want people to believe Prentiss is even a greater villain than Mr. Hills thinks he is (how that could be possible, I don't know). To do that you concoct a totally vile scenario that even Tim Smith has written in a book isn't true. But you do it anyway. You do it because you do not expect to be called out on it because very few people will know that the scenario you are gloating about is not true. You did it because you hate Prentiss and you want everybody who watches this video to hate him too. By the way; when you stand on hallow ground and tell falsehoods about a man who fought there that is called desecration and you should stop it.
The American Battlefield Trust states their mission is to preserve, educate and inspire. Well, they inspired me all right. They inspired me to start this thread.
On December 27, 1894 the United States Congress passed "an act to establish a national military park at the battlefield of Shiloh.
"The Shiloh National Military Park was established by act of Congress in order that the armies of the southwest may have the history of one of their memorable battles preserved on the ground where they fought. It is the desire of the commission having this work in charge that this history shall be complete, impartial, and correct, so that when the monuments of granite and bronze shall have been erected their inscriptions shall publish to the world nothing but the truth."
That includes General Prentiss and the men (North and South) who fought in the Hornets' Nest and Sunken Road. The Shiloh National Military Park and the American Battlefield Trust should reread why the park was established and adhere to it.
This video is an injustice to General Benjamin Mayberry Prentiss and the men who fought with him, and against him, in the Sunken Road/Hornets' Nest and consider him a hero.
I would rather take the word of a soldier from the 18th Missouri who actually fought all day with Prentiss as to whether Prentiss was a hero or not. Rather than Shiloh revisionists who make things up to craft a false narrative about Prentiss more than 150 years after the battle.
In 1890 James Price, Capt. of Company K, 18th Missouri applied for a pension and requested an affidavit from Jesse Abel as a witness to Price's service. The two men fought with Prentiss in the Hornets' Nest at Shiloh. It was that experience Abel wrote about in the affidavit dated July 3, 1890.
"I was a corporal in Company K, 18 Mo. Volunteer Infantry at the time of the battle of Shiloh. Jas. A. Price was the Captain of that company. Toward evening of the 6th of April 1862, the day of the battle I was with Capt. Price when hero (emphasis by me) Genl Prentiss rode by and told Capt. Price that if he ever expected to get out of his position he must get out within five minutes, as the enemy were then on both flanks and in our rear. Genl Prentiss rode on and in less than five minutes was made a prisoner. After considerable persuasion Capt. Price was induced to leave his position and attempt to escape through the rebel forces which were fast closing around us. The Captain and myself and fifteen others were all of our company together at this time. 12 of us (illegible) that escaped capture, and in fact nearly all of Gen. Prentiss command that escaped. No braver man ever looked into the muzzles of Rebel muskets than Capt. James A. Price. I was with him in the times that tried mens souls and I know whereof I speak."
Jesse A. Abel
After over twenty-eight years Abel remembered Prentiss riding amongst the men encouraging them to get out. To Jesse Abel, Capt. James Price and my great-great grandfather, Benjamin Prentiss is a hero, and they were there.
Prentiss and the men who fought with him and the Shiloh National Military Park deserve better than this.
Not content to just slander Prentiss in front of Peabody's monument; David Wilson Reed gets a dose too.
Everyone should note that Mr. Adelman was more than willing to criticize Shiloh's first historian but didn't even know his name. His name was David Wilson Reed and he was with the 12th Iowa in the Hornets' Nest where he was wounded. He is known as the "Father of Shiloh National Military Park" and was entrusted by the Shiloh Military Park Commission to produce a truthful history of the battle to honor all the men who fought here. In order for the Shiloh revisionists to craft their false narrative they are willing to disparage the work of Reed by claiming he violated his trust by producing a history of the battle which emphasizes the area of the battlefield in which he fought. Reed would be appalled at the injustice heaped on him. One would think that before you slander someone you would at least know his name.
"Truth once crushed to earth shall rise again." William Cullen Bryant
The video ended on a light note when Mr. Hills stated "the first guy who gets it wrong everybody foot notes it."
No better example of this phenomenon can be found than in the recently published (2019) Attack at Daylight and Whip Them. The book is part of The Emerging Civil War Series of which Dr. Mackowski is the editor. Wiley Sword did it wrong in his book, Bloody Shiloh, around fifty years ago and the same mistakes slandering Prentiss are repeated in the book Dr. Mackowski edited.
Shame on these guys. What a disappointment.
PS. The American Battlefield Trust's Shiloh Animated Map produced by Shiloh revisionists sucks too.
Forum Host
Bringing the