Member Review Shenandoah Summer

Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Location
Jupiter, FL
Shenandoah Summer
by Scott Patchan
University of Nebraska Press (2007)

In 1864, the Shenandoah Valley was the scene of a series of interlinked campaigns spanning just over five months. The first and last are the best know: Sigel's, Hunter's, Early's, Crook's, and Sheridan's. Sigel is remembered because New Market became one of the most famous small battles of the war. Early's campaign into Maryland brought the war to the doorstep of Washington, DC. Sheridan's crushing defeats helped seal Lincoln's reelection. Hunter's campaign garners too little attention. Scott Patchan has written about the first half of that campaign, centered on the Battle of Piedmont. But at least Hunter lives to some degree in infamy. The latter half of July 1864, primarily between Crook and Early, has been badly overlooked and Patchan rectified that here with an excellent book.

The book starts with Early's retreat back to Virginia and the subsequent sloppy Union pursuit by George Crook and Horatio Wright culminating in bloody, bungled attempts to force crossings of the Shenandoah River (Cool Spring and Berry's Ferry). Edward Ord also shows up briefly, commanding the troops at Baltimore before he's called away to the Army of the James. I'm once again amazed at that's guy knack for showing up briefly and contributing nothing beneficial (see also Powell's Union Command Failure in the Shenandoah and Newsome's Gettysburg's Southern Front). What an odd Civil War career that guy had.

The Union does score a small but dramatic victory at Rutherford's/Carter's Farm north of Winchester. Crook and Wright then badly misinterprets Early's intentions, resulting in Wright's departure pursuant to orders. Crook is unwittingly left outnumbered by Early, resulting in one of the worst routs of the war at Second Kernstown. The battle and retreat cover about a third of the main text of this book. George Crook should have been ridden out of Virginia on a rail because he basically pulled a John Pope.

Rutherford Hayes and William McKinley were both at Second Kernstown. Had the battle gone even worse for the Union it's possible those two future presidents might have both ended up dead, which is an interesting What If to think about.

Failure to pursue and crush Early with overwhelming force in July 1864 and instead shift forces away from the Shenandoah to the Richmond area is reminiscent of similiar Union mistakes against Stonewall Jackson in the summer of 1862, with similarly disastrous results for the Union.

Other authors might have called the story done with Crook's retreat across the Potomac, but Patchan directly connects McClausand's infamous raid on and burning of Chambersburg, Pennsylvania as the final act of this campaign. The raid ends with one of the most dramatic cavalry charges of the war at Moorefield. It's on the level of Custer's counter-charge at East Cavalry Field. The raid was only possible because of Kernstown, which was only possible because of Wright's departure. Burning Chambersburg directly results in the wrecking of Early's cavalry, the transfer of Sheridan and his cavalry to the Shenandoah, and Sheridan's harsh and destructive actions in the Valley. Patchan does a fantastic job of putting all the events in context and showing why these obscure events were quite important. (He's also got me thinking about the "cycle of fire" in 1864 which I think I will start a separate thread about.)

This is a university press publication so as you would expect there are extensive endnotes and bibliography. Maps are decent. A few relevant photographs are located at appropriate places. Patchan is a pretty good writer.

Highly recommended to American Civil War buffs and a must-read for anyone interested in the Shenandoah Valley campaigns of 1864.
 
Last edited:
Shenandoah Summer
by Scott Patchan
University of Nebraska Press (2007)

In 1864, the Shenandoah Valley was the scene of a series of interlinked campaigns spanning just over five months. The first and last are the best know: Sigel's, Hunter's, Early's, Crook's, and Sheridan's. Sigel is remembered because New Market became one of the most famous small battles of the war. Early's campaign into Maryland brought the war to the doorstep of Washington, DC. Sheridan's crushing defeats helped seal Lincoln's reelection. Hunter's campaign garners too little attention. Scott Patchan has written about the first half of that campaign, centered on the Battle of Piedmont. But at least Hunter lives to some degree in infamy. The latter half of July 1864, primarily between Crook and Early, has been badly overlooked and Patchan rectified that here with an excellent book.

The book starts with Early's retreat back to Virginia and the subsequent sloppy Union pursuit by George Crook and Horatio Wright culminating in bloody, bungled attempts to force crossings of the Shenandoah River (Cool Spring and Berry's Ferry). Edward Ord also shows up briefly, commanding the troops at Baltimore before he's called away to the Army of the James. I'm once again amazed at that's guy knack for showing up briefly and contributing nothing beneficial (see also Powell's Union Command Failure in the Shenandoah and Newsome's Gettysburg's Southern Front). What an odd Civil War career that guy had.

The Union does score a small but dramatic victory at Rutherford's/Carter's Farm north of Winchester. Crook and Wright then badly misinterprets Early's intentions, resulting in Wright's departure pursuant to orders. Crook is unwittingly left outnumbered by Early, resulting in one of the worst routs of the war at Second Kernstown. The battle and retreat cover about a third of the main text of this book. George Crook should have been ridden out of Virginia on a rail because he basically pulled a John Pope.

Rutherford Hayes and William McKinley were both at Second Kernstown. Had the battle gone even worse for the Union it's possible those two future presidents might have both ended up dead, which is an interesting What If to think about.

Failure to pursue and crush Early with overwhelming force in July 1864 and instead shift forces away from the Shenandoah to the Richmond area is reminiscent of similiar Union mistakes against Stonewall Jackson in the summer of 1862, with similarly disastrous results for the Union.

Other authors might have called the story done with Crook's retreat across the Potomac, but Patchan directly connects McClausand's infamous raid on and burning of Chambersburg, Pennsylvania as the final act of this campaign. The raid ends with one of the most dramatic cavalry charges of the war at Moorefield. It's on the level of Custer's counter-charge at East Cavalry Field. The raid was only possible because of Kernstown, which was only possible because of Wright's departure. Burning Chambersburg directly results in the wrecking of Early's cavalry, the transfer of Sheridan and his cavalry to the Shenandoah, and Sheridan's harsh and destructive actions in the Valley. Patchan does a fantastic job of putting all the events in context and showing why these obscure events were quite important. (He's also got me thinking about the "cycle of fire" - my words, not his - in 1864 which I think I will start a separate thread about.)

This is a university press publication so as you would expect there are extensive endnotes and bibliography. Maps are decent. A few relevant photographs are located at appropriate places. Patchan is a pretty good writer.

Highly recommended to American Civil War buffs and a must-read for anyone interested in the Shenandoah Valley campaigns of 1864.
Scott is also a great tour guide. I have done two tours with him through BGES, one of which was Sheridan's 1864 valley campaign. Great tour guide and great person.
 
I don't consider Black Dave Hunter to be 'infamous' in any way. His military career was not a brilliant one, but he served faithfully and to good effect for many years. He was only infamous if you have a problem with his abolitionism...
 
Hah! I lived in Lexington for a number of years and have read many accounts of Hunter's Raid. Reports of plundering were greatly exaggerated and Lexington was in no way destroyed. And most historian agree that VMI was very much a legitimate military target.
I have to agree that VMI was a legitimate target and that most of the destruction was focused on industries that supported the Confederate cause. I don't think former Governor John Letcher's home and Washington College (now Washington and Lee) fell into those categories.
 
Shenandoah Summer
by Scott Patchan
University of Nebraska Press (2007)

In 1864, the Shenandoah Valley was the scene of a series of interlinked campaigns spanning just over five months. The first and last are the best know: Sigel's, Hunter's, Early's, Crook's, and Sheridan's. Sigel is remembered because New Market became one of the most famous small battles of the war. Early's campaign into Maryland brought the war to the doorstep of Washington, DC. Sheridan's crushing defeats helped seal Lincoln's reelection. Hunter's campaign garners too little attention. Scott Patchan has written about the first half of that campaign, centered on the Battle of Piedmont. But at least Hunter lives to some degree in infamy. The latter half of July 1864, primarily between Crook and Early, has been badly overlooked and Patchan rectified that here with an excellent book.

The book starts with Early's retreat back to Virginia and the subsequent sloppy Union pursuit by George Crook and Horatio Wright culminating in bloody, bungled attempts to force crossings of the Shenandoah River (Cool Spring and Berry's Ferry). Edward Ord also shows up briefly, commanding the troops at Baltimore before he's called away to the Army of the James. I'm once again amazed at that's guy knack for showing up briefly and contributing nothing beneficial (see also Powell's Union Command Failure in the Shenandoah and Newsome's Gettysburg's Southern Front). What an odd Civil War career that guy had.

The Union does score a small but dramatic victory at Rutherford's/Carter's Farm north of Winchester. Crook and Wright then badly misinterprets Early's intentions, resulting in Wright's departure pursuant to orders. Crook is unwittingly left outnumbered by Early, resulting in one of the worst routs of the war at Second Kernstown. The battle and retreat cover about a third of the main text of this book. George Crook should have been ridden out of Virginia on a rail because he basically pulled a John Pope.

Rutherford Hayes and William McKinley were both at Second Kernstown. Had the battle gone even worse for the Union it's possible those two future presidents might have both ended up dead, which is an interesting What If to think about.

Failure to pursue and crush Early with overwhelming force in July 1864 and instead shift forces away from the Shenandoah to the Richmond area is reminiscent of similiar Union mistakes against Stonewall Jackson in the summer of 1862, with similarly disastrous results for the Union.

Other authors might have called the story done with Crook's retreat across the Potomac, but Patchan directly connects McClausand's infamous raid on and burning of Chambersburg, Pennsylvania as the final act of this campaign. The raid ends with one of the most dramatic cavalry charges of the war at Moorefield. It's on the level of Custer's counter-charge at East Cavalry Field. The raid was only possible because of Kernstown, which was only possible because of Wright's departure. Burning Chambersburg directly results in the wrecking of Early's cavalry, the transfer of Sheridan and his cavalry to the Shenandoah, and Sheridan's harsh and destructive actions in the Valley. Patchan does a fantastic job of putting all the events in context and showing why these obscure events were quite important. (He's also got me thinking about the "cycle of fire" - my words, not his - in 1864 which I think I will start a separate thread about.)

This is a university press publication so as you would expect there are extensive endnotes and bibliography. Maps are decent. A few relevant photographs are located at appropriate places. Patchan is a pretty good writer.

Highly recommended to American Civil War buffs and a must-read for anyone interested in the Shenandoah Valley campaigns of 1864.
Excellent review. I read the book a number of years ago and it now resides on one of my book shelves.
 
I have to agree that VMI was a legitimate target and that most of the destruction was focused on industries that supported the Confederate cause. I don't think former Governor John Letcher's home and Washington College (now Washington and Lee) fell into those categories.

The Washington & Lee campus today boasts some of the finest examples of original ante bellum public building in that part of Virginia. Why? Because they were untouched by Black Dave, who understand perfectly well the difference between a private educational institution and a state-run military installation like VMI. The Union cavalrymen were rude, and stabled their horses on the College's great lawn, and committed minor acts of vandalism, but otherwise the campus was left intact. I agree the case of the Letcher home is more questionable...
 
I loved this book. When you find yourself thinking that you know just about everything there is to know about the Civil War, it's books like this that grandly open up new areas of study. It's almost like picking up the first book you ever read about the war and reading it all over again.
 
As promised, I started a separate thread about the burnings...
 

Learn About Us
About CivilWarTalk
Contact the Webmaster
Meet the Staff
Link to CivilWarTalk
Join Our Community
Register
Browse Forums
View Today's Discussions
Search the Forum
Get Help
FAQ
Student Guide
Forum Rules & Etiquette
Copyright / DMCA

     Contact Us CivilwarTalk on Facebook CivilWarTalk on YouTube CivilWarTalk on Twitter RSS Feed

Bringing the American Civil War and More to Life.
© 1999 - , CIVILWARTALK, LLC - Site Version 10.0

SlaveryTalk.com - SecessionTalk.com - CivilWarTalk.com - ReconstructionTalk.com
Back
Top