Selecting subordinate commanders.

major bill

Brev. Brig. Gen'l
Forum Host
Joined
Aug 25, 2012
How much flexibility did army commander have over who was their subordinate commanders? It would seem like army commanders would have a great deal of say over who were their Corps commanders, but both sides had some interference by their presidents. So who got to pick division commanders? it seems like seniority not ability was the usual determining factor.
 
Major Bill, from what I read in the latter years, a Corps commander such as Q. A. Gilmore would request an area of operations to the Army Commander, or Halleck, the chain of command to the secretary and to the President. In this case Grant's decision on the Tenth Corps as Gilmore's preference to relocate his command to a more active district was granted. Gilmore had requested, by outlining his strength in numbers available, and what could be left behind to safeguard Hilton Head operations. His case was possibly special, being that General Seymour screwed up his entire campaign, leaving him with a miscarriage of operations. He wanted another chance to prove his Corps and leadership. The channels of command all approved because he did his paperwork and submitted detailed possibilities, good morale, and separate requisition for sub-commanders such as Hatch, on a time schedule that did not interfere with current ops, and was wise with the Navy Transport system. So division commanders could come by request, and they in turn (div. com.) could request their Brigades. Chain of Command approval upon active, on-going campaigns. Replacements were necessary in this case.
Lubliner.
 
How much flexibility did army commander have over who was their subordinate commanders? It would seem like army commanders would have a great deal of say over who were their Corps commanders, but both sides had some interference by their presidents. So who got to pick division commanders? it seems like seniority not ability was the usual determining factor.

From some of the cases I've studied, it seems that many army generals chose their cronies for corps commanders whenever the political situation allowed them to, regardless of seniority. Both McClellan and Hooker did that. I think some of that went on in choosing division commanders as well, but that seniority and ability were honored more at that level. In some cases, some corps generals of senior rank weren't even considered for army command. (Slocum. for example)
 

Learn About Us
About CivilWarTalk
Contact the Webmaster
Meet the Staff
Link to CivilWarTalk
Join Our Community
Register
Browse Forums
View Today's Discussions
Search the Forum
Get Help
FAQ
Student Guide
Forum Rules & Etiquette
Copyright / DMCA

     Contact Us CivilwarTalk on Facebook CivilWarTalk on YouTube CivilWarTalk on Twitter RSS Feed

Bringing the American Civil War and More to Life.
© 1999 - , CIVILWARTALK, LLC - Site Version 10.0

SlaveryTalk.com - SecessionTalk.com - CivilWarTalk.com - ReconstructionTalk.com
Back
Top