- Joined
- Dec 4, 2011
In practice, you're right. The typical reenactment isn't the place for that kind of realism or depths of emotion or accuracy. It's where visitors go to take the kids, have fun, buy some souvenirs, see the show, go home happy--and that's pretty much what it is for a lot of reenactors too.This is why in my posting above I excluded reenacting the Waffen SS, and also why, although I have a nice militaria collection, I refuse to have NAZI stuff in it. Collecting and reenacting are ways of keeping alive a memory that deserves to be kept alive. In a sense we honor these people when we recreate them. I don't mean we should forget Hitler and Stalin, far from it, but let's not give them an honor of remembrance they do not deserve. I understand that reenacting a historical event requires somebody to be the other side but can we not do WW II with regular Wehrmacht troops, most of whom were draftees, not ideological supermen bent on genocide? Would anyone doing Civil War reenactment really want to recreate Major Wirz and Andersonville? There are some things better left undone.
Unfortunately, by definition that gives a sanitized view of what happened, showing the "good" parts, making the "bad" parts seem as easy to take as the violence in a pirate movie.
I think a lot of people do see remembering as the equivalent of honoring, in reenacting, but I don't get it. That's not true elsewhere, except maybe in erecting memorial statues--and the reason people want to see statues come down.
Surely someone can write a book on Major Wirz or a member of the Waffen SS without honoring him. I wish the same could be done at more reenactments, as AndrewJacksonMiller said, to show what the "good guys" were facing. And that goes for whoever one defines as the good guys. If it's the Confederates, I'd like to see pro-Confederate reenactors own the real world they're endorsing, same as pro-Union reenactors.
