I want to point out that Gen. Longstreet and Gen. Meade were similar as generals. I want to point out that both would fight if forced to or had to but neither never went out looking for a fight. When either one had independent command nothing ever happened. Longstreet command would always end in a siege of a city and Meade command marched around Virginia somehow never engaging the enemy. It seems they both could administrate and move a large force of troops and supplies effectively but could never effectively use their large force in engaging the enemy. It seems they lack the ability to bring the fight to the enemy on their own unless directed to. They both filled the same role for the superior commanders Grant and Lee. They were great second in commands, Great Lieutenants.
Neither Meade nor Longstreet could commit their forces to combat if they were in command but could commit their forces to combat if directed to and fight well...