Belfoured
Colonel
- Joined
- Aug 3, 2019
As you and I well know, if you're going to bring litigation it's a great idea to objectively assess your client's case first. I'm envisioning a deposition where the plaintiff here is interrogated about that ludicrous bio and the unhinged conspiracy rants. It reminds me of a deposition I took in a case I was defending for a municipality brought by somebody who claimed he had been libeled, etc and suffered damages. When we got to his alleged emotional distress and I asked him about the specific cause that triggered it, he said it was his lawyer's press conference announcing the lawsuit. Needless to say, that one went the summary judgment route.I published one of the man's books. I would never publish anything else he has ever written.
I live rent free in his head. He became obsessed with me personally and I even made his bio on Amazon ("the Greek Napoleon"), which he trimmed down from about 9,000 words to whatever it is today. He thinks I have taken special pleasure in hurting his publishing career, which is just ridiculous. Any damage he has done, he has done to himself.
At least two different attorneys have contacted me on his behalf threatening to sue me, for what remains unclear. Tortious this, and fraudulent that. I encouraged them to do so because I have recorded calls from him late at night, a notebook of contemporaneous notes, emails back and forth that are not particularly favorable to him, and of course through discovery we might be able to find out about other things that I would be more than happy to pursue. I never hear back from the attorneys.
I wish Mr. Tucker well and hold no animus against him. I would just never publish him again or recommend his books to anyone, ever.
