Handguns Percussion Derringer

OldSarge79

Sergeant
Joined
Jul 12, 2017
Location
Brevard, North Carolina
This is an old family gun passed down to me from my father's side, a percussion derringer, made by Derringer, about .36 to .38 caliber, 5 inches total length. I played with it as a child. The problem I have is that we don't know which ancestor owned it. After considerable research on dad's ancestors and a lot of contemplation, I have narrowed it down to two men.

One was a Confederate private in Morgan's 2nd Kentucky Cavalry. He was also a county constable in the post-war years (Warren Co., KY).

The other was a lawyer and probate judge in Bolivar County, Mississippi from the 1840's to about 1890, when he moved to Warren County, Ky.

If anyone knows of any Confederate cavalrymen who carried a little derringer like this, I would love to know. Or, did lawyers back then pack a pistol in their pocket while they traveled or on business. Lawyers, as we all know, are sometimes not well-liked.

Anyway, any well-considered thoughts on this would be welcome, as well as, perhaps, an approximate date of manufacture on the pistol.

DSC04399.JPG


DSC04397.JPG


DSC04398.JPG
 
I often wondered why a soldier or cavalryman would Not carry one. I've read where soldiers didn't like carrying extra weight, but it would seem the extra pound or two would be worth the effort. If they could get their hands on one of these little pistols, why not? I would.
I guess if you're in the cavalry, it's the horse who is carrying the extra weight. But talk about a last-ditch weapon.....
 
A lot of "derringers" were made by people other than Henry Deringer, and the name is spelled correctly on your pistol. I believe it is probably .41 caliber. Most likely made between 1852 and 1868, when Deringer died. I am far from being knowledgeable about these guns. It looks to have withstood use a kid's playtoy fairly well.

Regards,

Jim
 
I've shot a repro Derringer and they are very inaccurate . They are meant to be used at very close range . My vote would be for t
 
Derringers are at best "Poker table accurate." They go with the theory that the pistol in your pocket is better than the one at home in the sock drawer. In every good Civil War Museum you will see some kind of little single shot percussion pistol as a battle field pick up. I don't know who carried them or why but some soldiers carried them.
 
Find a copy of Turner Kirland's book SOUTHERN DERRINGERS OF THE MISSISSIPPI VALLEY. Pioneer Press. Neat little book full of info on Derringers made by Henry as well as his dealers. The guns were genuine Henry D. but for a small fee you could become a dealer/distributor of his products and have your name or company name stamped on the barrel (Not as the maker, but as the seller) The photos in Kirkland's book are not so hot, but they're adequate. Also look at Wilson's book on Derringers from the percussion period. Now there are some nice photos! As far as who carried them and why, well, if you were playing cards and had FIVE ACES this little pocket blaster could help you get out of the room. Congressmen and senators often carried pocket pistols and knives while in session. Fights broke out often. And fireplace pokers also came into play................
 
I have no rational reason for this decision, but my instinct says it was the property of your lawyer ancestor....
 
Well, I may have stumbled onto an answer.

First, I found this similar, albeit slightly larger deringer for sale, identified to a Confederate soldier:

Second, while looking for information on another Mississippi relative on the Mississippi Department of Archives & History website, I came across the county tax records for Bolivar County. I discovered that in the 1870's and 1880's, the county levied a personal tax on certain items owned by residents. One of those items taxed were pistols! My focus immediately changed from the ancestor I was researching to my lawyer ancestor.
With considerable anticipation, I looked through the 1879 tax records until I found him in District 3. That year he was taxed for a horse and a carriage, but not for a pistol.
In other words, it appears that my lawyer ancestor did not own a pistol in 1879.

Could he have obtained it after 1879? Possibly, but it was rather obsolete by that time, and I would have to believe that possibility very unlikely. In addition, if he hadn't been carrying a pistol up to that time, why would he have gotten one later?

Obviously I can't declare with absolute certainty that the Confederate/constable ancestor was the owner, but it certainly now appears to be the case.

Thoughts?
 

Learn About Us
About CivilWarTalk
Contact the Webmaster
Meet the Staff
Link to CivilWarTalk
Join Our Community
Register
Browse Forums
View Today's Discussions
Search the Forum
Get Help
FAQ
Student Guide
Forum Rules & Etiquette
Copyright / DMCA

     Contact Us CivilwarTalk on Facebook CivilWarTalk on YouTube CivilWarTalk on Twitter RSS Feed

Bringing the American Civil War and More to Life.
© 1999 - , CIVILWARTALK, LLC - Site Version 10.0

SlaveryTalk.com - SecessionTalk.com - CivilWarTalk.com - ReconstructionTalk.com
Back
Top