Shenandoah Valley 1864 Kitching's Provisional Division

Luke Freet

1st Lieutenant
Forum Host
Joined
Nov 8, 2018
Location
Palm Coast, Florida
I've been getting back into Wert's From Winchester to Cedar Creek (best book I got discussing Fisher's Hill & Cedar Creek in detail), and am on Chapter 10 (on Tom's Brook and the leadup to Cedar Creek). Page 171, he discusses Kitching's Provisional Division. And I'm pretty certain he made several errors.

He claims that the division was "an amalgam of regiments from the VI, VIII, and XIX Corps, numbering 6000 men in three brigades". There are three things wrong with this:

1.) According to the Cedar Creek OOB (trusting Wikipedia for a moment until I dig up the O.R.s), the division contained only two brigades, not three.
2.) None of the regiments had served with any of the three named corps. I believe they were from the D.C. garrison, so they may have been part of VIII Corps (which is different from Crook's Army of West Virginia, though made of from troops from similar departments). I don't know how he came to this conclusion.
3.) The claim that this division had 6000 "muskets" as he later reiterates is ridiculous. The division was small, containing five regiments: the 41st & 103rd New York Infantry Regiments; the 104th Pennsylvania Infantry Regiment; and the 6th & 10th New York Heavy Artillery Regiments. For them to field 6000 rifle armed men on the line would have to assume that every regiment is at full strength with a few over regulation size.

The only source used in this paragraph is from a Memorial to Colonel Kitching, killed in the battle. I haven't read it myself, but if the 6000 number is there I doubt there is a paper trail from there to wherever on earth they got the number from.

I guess I'll lay out the info I have dug up. The division was divided between two different sectors. The two heavy artillery regiments had been assigned to Grant's army during the Overland Campaign, the 6th New York to V Corps and 10th New York to XVIII Corps. The three infantry regiments were drawn from postings in South Carolina.

The German 41st New York (reduced to a 6 company battalion as of June 9th 1864) had served in XI Corps before being transferred to Folly Island, South Carolina, where it stayed until August 1864, when it was transferred to D.C; on September 27th, it was assigned to the 2nd Brigade, Provisional Division.

Another German regiment, the 103rd New York, was also serving around Charleston, particularly on James Island, until it was transferred August 1864 to D.C. It was then assigned to the 1st Brigade, Provisional Division on September 22nd.

The 104th Pennsylvania bounced around on the Atlantic coastal garrisons between Hilton Head and Florida, until it was transferred to D.C that August. In September it was assigned to 1st Brigade, Provisional Division.

The 6th New York Heavy Artillery had served as part of Kitching's Brigade, V Corps, during the Overland & Petersburg Campaign, until July, when it was transferred to D.C. It and its colonel were assigned to Provisional Division, with the regiment assigned to the 2nd Brigade, September 27th.

The 10th New York Heavy Artillery had originally been part of the D.C. Garrison, but like other Heavy Artillery units, had been called up by Grant on May 24th, and joined the XVIII Corps. It served around Petersburg until August, when it was transferred back to D.C. It then joined the 2nd Brigade, Provisional Division September 27th.

With the exception of the 103rd New York and the 104th Pennsylvania, it seems all the units were assigned to the division on September 27th. We don't have a date for the 104th Pennsylvania, but I have a guess it was the 22nd, as those two formed the 1st Brigade, while the units assigned the 27th became 2nd Brigade.

Colonel J. Howard Kitching, aged 26, commanded the division. He was the son of a British merchant who made money betting on the telegraph, the transatlantic telegraph and the inventions of John Ericsson. Colonel Wilhelm Heine, the well travelled German artist and soldier, commanded the 1st Brigade, while Lt. Colonel DePeyster Arden of the 10th New York Heavy Artillery commanded the 2nd Brigade.

It appears the second brigade, sans the 6th New York Heavy Artillery (temporarily assigned to 1st Brigade) was absent at the time of the Battle of Cedar Creek. I have not read far enough on the battle to know the combat performance of the Provisional Division elements (though from what I've gathered, wasn't great). Colonel Kitching was mortally wounded, along with Major Edward Jones of Kitching's 6th New York Heavy Artillery. Colonel Heine took command of the division.

After the battle, the division was transferred to the Petersburg front, placed under the command of Edward Ferrero, and saw service manning the Bermuda Hundred defenses, where it ended the war.

OOB Cedar Creek
  • Provisional Division: Col. J. Howard Kitching (mw October 19th): Col. Wilhelm Heine
    • 1st Brigade: Col. Wilhelm Heine; Lt. Col. Thompson D. Hart
      • 103rd NY IR: Maj. Joseph Morrison
      • 104th PA IR: Lt. Col. Thompson D. Hart; Capt. Theophiles Kephart
    • 2nd Brigade: Lt. Col. G. DePeyster Arden
      • 41st NY IB: Lt. Col. Detleo von Einsedel
      • 6th NY HAR: Maj. Edward Jones (mw October 19th)
      • 10th NY HAR: Lt. Col. G. DePeyster Arden
Anyone got more info on this rather obscure formation?
 
I believe that, as you pointed out, the only regiments present for Cedar Creek were the 6th New York Heavy Artillery, 103rd New York, and 104th Pennsylvania. I've never seen a strength breakdown of the brigade so I'll refer to a pretty well-researched wargame, Wargame Design Studio's Campaign Shenandoah. They have the following numbers for Kitching: 6th NYHA (176), 103rd New York (276), and 104th Pennsylania (366) for a total of 818. The only one that I'm not sure about is the 6th NYHA which I would have expected to be a bit larger. But with that said, they had suffered 450 casualties during the Overland and Petersburg Campaigns and so, perhaps, the number isn't far off.

As for with what other units that these regiments served, the 6th NYHA bounced around quite a bit and served in a number of corps. They started with the Eighth (March-July 1863), Third (July-August 1863), Artillery Reserve (August 1863-May 1864), Fifth (May-July 1864), Twenty-Second (July 1864-September 1864), Army of the Shenandoah (September 1864-December 1864), Army of the James (December 1864-August 1865).

10th New York Heavy Artillery: Twenty-Second (September 1862-May 1864), Eighteenth (June 1864-August 1864), Twenty-Second (August 1864-September 1864), Army of the Shenandoah (September 1864-December 1864), Army of the James (December 1864-June 1865).

The odd thing that I've noticed is that the 103rd New York, according to their records, suffered no casualties at Cedar Creek. Considering that Kitching's men were hit very early on by Ramseur's Division, I find that hard to believe.

Ryan
 
I believe that, as you pointed out, the only regiments present for Cedar Creek were the 6th New York Heavy Artillery, 103rd New York, and 104th Pennsylvania. I've never seen a strength breakdown of the brigade so I'll refer to a pretty well-researched wargame, Wargame Design Studio's Campaign Shenandoah. They have the following numbers for Kitching: 6th NYHA (176), 103rd New York (276), and 104th Pennsylania (366) for a total of 818. The only one that I'm not sure about is the 6th NYHA which I would have expected to be a bit larger. But with that said, they had suffered 450 casualties during the Overland and Petersburg Campaigns and so, perhaps, the number isn't far off.

As for with what other units that these regiments served, the 6th NYHA bounced around quite a bit and served in a number of corps. They started with the Eighth (March-July 1863), Third (July-August 1863), Artillery Reserve (August 1863-May 1864), Fifth (May-July 1864), Twenty-Second (July 1864-September 1864), Army of the Shenandoah (September 1864-December 1864), Army of the James (December 1864-August 1865).

10th New York Heavy Artillery: Twenty-Second (September 1862-May 1864), Eighteenth (June 1864-August 1864), Twenty-Second (August 1864-September 1864), Army of the Shenandoah (September 1864-December 1864), Army of the James (December 1864-June 1865).

The odd thing that I've noticed is that the 103rd New York, according to their records, suffered no casualties at Cedar Creek. Considering that Kitching's men were hit very early on by Ramseur's Division, I find that hard to believe.

Ryan
Yeah that figure for the 6th New York is ridiculously low. I need to talk with @Hannover (not sure if he has information on Kitching's Heavy Brigade or not but I don't know who else would), but I'm pretty sure that the regiment was, like 99% of Union Heavy Arty regiments, was overstrength, so I'd say at least 1100 officers & men as of May 1864. WDS' Campaign Overland has them (including all their battalions) at 1046.

I wish Patchan could release a book detailing both Fisher's Hill & Cedar Creek (Tom's Brook would be a nice bonus), with similar research on unit strengths & casualties.
 
Yeah that figure for the 6th New York is ridiculously low. I need to talk with @Hannover (not sure if he has information on Kitching's Heavy Brigade or not but I don't know who else would), but I'm pretty sure that the regiment was, like 99% of Union Heavy Arty regiments, was overstrength, so I'd say at least 1100 officers & men as of May 1864. WDS' Campaign Overland has them (including all their battalions) at 1046.

I wish Patchan could release a book detailing both Fisher's Hill & Cedar Creek (Tom's Brook would be a nice bonus), with similar research on unit strengths & casualties.
Agreed on the need for a new book on Fisher's Hill/Cedar Creek.

I'll have to see what I have on the 6th and if there any details we're missing (detached companies, etc.). Less than 200 seems quite low even when factoring in their previous combat casualties (450 out of more than 1000).

One would think that I'd have more on the 6th NYHA since they were partially a hometown unit and my great x3 grandfather served in the Regiment from January 1864-August 1865, including at Cedar Creek.

Ryan
 
A follow-up with some further information on the 6th New York Heavy Artillery.

July 20, 1864: reported 21 officers and 685 men

I can find no further official count for the regiment between July and October (they were shuttled back and forth between Washington and the Shenandoah, relieving and being relieved by various VRC troops).

A memorial book published in 1873 for Colonel J. Howard Kitching mentions that the only troops that he commanded at Cedar Creek was 1 battalion of the 6th New York Heavy Artillery. In addition, with some of the things that I was reading in the ORs, I'm not entirely sure how many men of the 103rd New York and 104th Pennsylvania were present there. The Provisional Division suffered just under 100 casualties with the 6th NYHA accounting for more than 90 of them.

Ryan
 
Took a look at the records of the 41st New York Infantry in Fredick Phisterer's New York in the War of the Rebellion.

Casualties for October 19th, 1864 show 1 killed, 3 wounded, and 2 missing, for a total of 6.

For comparison, the OR's show Detachment First Brigade sustaining 1 killed, 6 wounded, and 2 missing, for a total of 9.
 
Series 1, Volume XL/3, page 361.

Headquarters Army of the Potomac
July 21, 1864 - 1.15pm

Lieutenant-General Grant,
In compliance with your instructions of yesterday, I have designated the Sixth New York Heavy Artillery as the regiment to be sent to the defenses of Washington. The regiment will leave here as soon as the Sixth Corps begins to arrive. The strength of the regiment present for duty is 21 officers and 685 men.

Geo. G. Meade
 
Series 1, Volume XL/3, page 361.

Headquarters Army of the Potomac
July 21, 1864 - 1.15pm

Lieutenant-General Grant,
In compliance with your instructions of yesterday, I have designated the Sixth New York Heavy Artillery as the regiment to be sent to the defenses of Washington. The regiment will leave here as soon as the Sixth Corps begins to arrive. The strength of the regiment present for duty is 21 officers and 685 men.

Geo. G. Meade
I cannot thank you enough man.

I am currently working on a Cedar Creek OOB + Strengths & Losses tables, Union & Confederate. This stuff's quite useful.
 
I cannot thank you enough man.

I am currently working on a Cedar Creek OOB + Strengths & Losses tables, Union & Confederate. This stuff's quite useful.
Excellent. I think that I have the official losses for the Union forces at Cedar Creek that were compiled in the ORs but the accuracy of those can be hit or miss.

Looking at what was written about Kitching's Division, I have no idea who was actually present at Cedar Creek. We have at least a battalion from the 6th NYHA and at least a handful from the 41st NY. Maybe a few from the 103rd NY and 104th PA? I'm beginning to think that Kitching had a few dribs and drabs from some of his regiments rather than whole formations.

Ryan
 
Excellent. I think that I have the official losses for the Union forces at Cedar Creek that were compiled in the ORs but the accuracy of those can be hit or miss.

Looking at what was written about Kitching's Division, I have no idea who was actually present at Cedar Creek. We have at least a battalion from the 6th NYHA and at least a handful from the 41st NY. Maybe a few from the 103rd NY and 104th PA? I'm beginning to think that Kitching had a few dribs and drabs from some of his regiments rather than whole formations.

Ryan
Bates' History of the Pennsylvania Volunteers indicates that a detachment, roughly the equivalent of a company in number, under the command of then Captain Theophilus Kephart (later Lt. Col.) participated in the Battle of Cedar Creek. They suffered 5 wounded. The remainder of the regiment was escorting a wagon train to Martinsburg.
 
Yeah that figure for the 6th New York is ridiculously low. I need to talk with @Hannover (not sure if he has information on Kitching's Heavy Brigade or not but I don't know who else would), but I'm pretty sure that the regiment was, like 99% of Union Heavy Arty regiments, was overstrength, so I'd say at least 1100 officers & men as of May 1864. WDS' Campaign Overland has them (including all their battalions) at 1046.

I wish Patchan could release a book detailing both Fisher's Hill & Cedar Creek (Tom's Brook would be a nice bonus), with similar research on unit strengths & casualties.
Could the low figure be a result of the Union tendency to refer to artillery and especially cavalry in terms of battalions? As in "this regiment of cavalry is actually subdivided into 3 battalions"? Perhaps the 6th NY was partitioned similarly and this records only a battalion part of the whole regiment...
 
Could the low figure be a result of the Union tendency to refer to artillery and especially cavalry in terms of battalions? As in "this regiment of cavalry is actually subdivided into 3 battalions"? Perhaps the 6th NY was partitioned similarly and this records only a battalion part of the whole regiment...
I think it may be a case of WDS getting numbers wrong, basing it off of random guesswork.

There's a reason people don't (usually) cite wargames for unit strength figures.
 
I'm beginning to think the sub-200 number is about right for the 6th NYHA. One battalion would have been able to put about that number of combatants into the line at Cedar Creek. As for the other regiments, some of the evidence indicates about 1-2 company strength or about 50-75 each. I think that for Kitching as a whole, 400 would be about the maximum that you could expect that day, barring more evidence of greater numbers.

Ryan
 

Learn About Us
About CivilWarTalk
Contact the Webmaster
Meet the Staff
Link to CivilWarTalk
Join Our Community
Register
Browse Forums
View Today's Discussions
Search the Forum
Get Help
FAQ
Student Guide
Forum Rules & Etiquette
Copyright / DMCA

     Contact Us CivilwarTalk on Facebook CivilWarTalk on YouTube CivilWarTalk on Twitter RSS Feed

Bringing the American Civil War and More to Life.
© 1999 - , CIVILWARTALK, LLC - Site Version 10.0

SlaveryTalk.com - SecessionTalk.com - CivilWarTalk.com - ReconstructionTalk.com
Back
Top