Is This a Shell Sabot?

skb8721

Corporal
Joined
Sep 10, 2014
Location
New Iberia, Louisiana, on Bayou Teche
Someone asked me today to identify this artifact sitting on a bookshelf because they really didn't know what it was. (See below images.)

My immediate reaction was, "It looks like a sabot! Of the type fitted to a conical shell so that it will catch the groove of a rifled cannon and spin, to improve range and accuracy."

But . . . I confess I'm not certain it is a sabot.

I partly doubt my own conclusion because the artifact in question was found near an old salt mine where there is plenty of old rusting metal to be found if one looks.

On the other hand, there was a small artillery engagement known to have occurred about a half-mile away (as it's mentioned in the Official Records of the Union and Confederate Armies). However, the only projectiles known to have come from that "affair" (as it was classified) are one small cannonball and five or six pieces of grapeshot that have been dug up over the years.

What do you all think it is? (I'd say it's about 4 inches in diameter, by the way, but as you can see it's not exactly round, at least not anymore.)


IMG_2242.JPG
IMG_2243.JPG
IMG_2244.JPG
IMG_2245.JPG
 
This relic site has some artifacts that look similar:

AR22 - Sabot Fragments - These are fragments of sabots from various shells. Some of these pieces have small shell fragments on them. The sizes vary (bullet shown for reference). The largest will go first. They are from the Richmond area. $5.00 each

sabots.jpg


http://btreasure.web.iglou.com/artillry.htm
 

Attachments

  • sabots.jpg
    sabots.jpg
    27.6 KB · Views: 163
At first glance I thought it might be a Harding sabot but the lips to the flange doun't match. I will dig thru my books when I get home.

A0148B.jpg
 

Attachments

  • A0148B.jpg
    A0148B.jpg
    23.5 KB · Views: 81
I found this object described as a brass sabot for a Parrott shell:

sabot known.jpg


And here's the one I examined in person:

IMG_2242.JPG

They are similar but not identical: the one I examined in person has more than 8 protrusions (facing upwards in photos), while the known sabot shown at top has exactly 8 protrusions.

I did hold a strong magnet next to the object this morning, and there was no reaction: the object in question was not drawn to the magnet.

I then thought the object might be made of brass, which does not attract magnets. (It doesn't look like lead, and it's not soft like lead.) Yet, when I put the object on a grassy area (that my metal detector had just beforehand found to be sterile), my metal detector reacted to it as if it were "iron/foil". The manual for the detector explains "IRON/FOIL: All sizes of iron and
aluminum objects will register on the far-left side of the scale. This could indicate a worthless item such as a nail, or a more valuable historic iron relic."

One more bit of info: the object in question measures almost about 4 inches in outside diameter (though it's a little hard to measure it because the object has been bent and isn't perfectly circular).

So . . . I'm still unsure what to think.
 
Last edited:
Well, it kinda fits this Parrott shell (found in a different location).

Note I polished a spot on the object, hoping to be able to tell if it was made of bronze or brass. But all I got was a shiny silver area. What kind of silver metal does not attract a magnet (as this metal does not in fact attract a magnet).
IMG_2318.JPG
IMG_2319.JPG
IMG_2321.JPG
IMG_2325.JPG
 

Learn About Us
About CivilWarTalk
Contact the Webmaster
Meet the Staff
Link to CivilWarTalk
Join Our Community
Register
Browse Forums
View Today's Discussions
Search the Forum
Get Help
FAQ
Student Guide
Forum Rules & Etiquette
Copyright / DMCA

     Contact Us CivilwarTalk on Facebook CivilWarTalk on YouTube CivilWarTalk on Twitter RSS Feed

Bringing the American Civil War and More to Life.
© 1999 - , CIVILWARTALK, LLC - Site Version 10.0

SlaveryTalk.com - SecessionTalk.com - CivilWarTalk.com - ReconstructionTalk.com
Back
Top