Nytram01
First Sergeant
- Joined
- Sep 13, 2007
- Location
- Portsmouth, Hampshire, England
I'm watching a documentory on the American Civil War in on a UK channel called "Discovery Knowledge" and we're into 1864. We've had about 20 minutes of the hour thus far on Grant and Lee and the East and the death of Stuart, Early's invasion of the North and the seige of Petersburg.
Then it mentioned the Atlanta Campaign. Specifically it said something along these lines:
McCellan seemed to be close to getting his revenge as he challenged Lincoln for the Presidency but Sherman was coming to the rescue. Sherman decides to go for the industrial heart of the Confederacy slightly ignoring Grant's orders. Atlanta was in a panic and was being deserted. Jeff Davis decided to replace Joe Johnston with Hood. Despite Hood being a veteran commander he was not cut out for army command and he only brought bloody defeats and Atlanta fell.
All this took about 3-5 minutes.
How is it possible or even acceptable to go through such an important campaign as the Atlanta Campaign was in a couple of minutes? Without mentioning any battles, any movements, any moments of interest (such as Cassville), without mentioning the mistakes of either side or the backstabbing going in in the AoT.
It's just done the same for the Franklin-Nashville Campain (about 3 minutes) and with Sherman's March to the Sea (about 4 minutes) and the Carolina's Campaign (about 2 minutes without mentioning Bentonville).
Then it mentioned the Atlanta Campaign. Specifically it said something along these lines:
McCellan seemed to be close to getting his revenge as he challenged Lincoln for the Presidency but Sherman was coming to the rescue. Sherman decides to go for the industrial heart of the Confederacy slightly ignoring Grant's orders. Atlanta was in a panic and was being deserted. Jeff Davis decided to replace Joe Johnston with Hood. Despite Hood being a veteran commander he was not cut out for army command and he only brought bloody defeats and Atlanta fell.
All this took about 3-5 minutes.
How is it possible or even acceptable to go through such an important campaign as the Atlanta Campaign was in a couple of minutes? Without mentioning any battles, any movements, any moments of interest (such as Cassville), without mentioning the mistakes of either side or the backstabbing going in in the AoT.
It's just done the same for the Franklin-Nashville Campain (about 3 minutes) and with Sherman's March to the Sea (about 4 minutes) and the Carolina's Campaign (about 2 minutes without mentioning Bentonville).