ID tags

JH1961

Private
Joined
Sep 27, 2023
3+ years later, I am still sorting through my late dad's (Dr. Gerald Hovater) Civil War collection. In his collection, aming other things, are what some call 'dog tags'.
1000002510.webp
1000001686.webp
 
Very Nice. Thanks for sharing them with us.
 
I couldn't resist trying to look them up. I couldn't find Cpl. Ted Cobbs, 4th Tenn Regt, Co B (?) CSA, but a possible W. Ham popped up….

Hamm, William
Battle Unit: 1st Alabama Infantry
Side: Confederate
Company: F
Rank In: Private
Rank Out: Private
Alternate Names:
Note(s):

1ST ALABAMA INFANTRY

1st Infantry Regiment completed its organization at Pensacola, Florida, in March, 1861. The men were from the counties of Tallapoosa, Pike, Lowndes, Wilcox, Talladega, Barbour, and Macon. For a year it manned the batteries at Pensacola, then with 1,000 men moved to Missouri where all but a detachment were captured at Island No. 10. The prisoners were exchanged during September, 1862, and it was soon ordered to Port Hudson. Here the unit endured many hardships, and nearly 500 were captured on July 9, 1863. Exchanged and reorganized with 610 effectives the 1st joined the Army of Tennessee and served in General Quarles" and Shelley"s Brigade. It took an active part in the Atlanta and Tennessee Campaigns, and ended the war in North Carolina. Its casualties were high at Peach Tree Creek and were again heavy at Franklin and Nashville. Less than 100 surrendered in April, 1865. The field officers were Colonels Henry D. Clayton and I.G.W. Steedman, Lieutenant Colonel Michael B. Locke, and Majors S.L. Knox and Jere N. Williams.

Source : Crute, Joseph H., Jr., "Units of the Confederate States Army" (Midlothian, VA: Derwent Books, 1987), 2nd Edition.

Edited to add
Source:
 
Last edited:
That first dog tag reminds me of the zinc dog tags used by Germany in WW1 and WW2, except the German ones were stamped instead of engraved free hand. Is that jagged piece in the hole for the string something we should expect to have broken off with wear or something we should expect the maker to have removed before use? Does the hole show wear from use or was this never used with a string through the hole or was it lost by the owner almost as soon as it was made? Is it made of zinc or something else? Zinc was used on cleaner bullets so there must have been some around somewhere.
 
That first dog tag reminds me of the zinc dog tags used by Germany in WW1 and WW2, except the German ones were stamped instead of engraved free hand. Is that jagged piece in the hole for the string something we should expect to have broken off with wear or something we should expect the maker to have removed before use? Does the hole show wear from use or was this never used with a string through the hole or was it lost by the owner almost as soon as it was made? Is it made of zinc or something else? Zinc was used on cleaner bullets so there must have been some around somewhere.
I've not looked that closely,, but I wouldn't be surprised if a WWII German or Italian POW camp ended up on more than one Civil War site.
 
I've not looked that closely,, but I wouldn't be surprised if a WWII German or Italian POW camp ended up on more than one Civil War site.
You didn't address any of the questions I suggested. Is the disc zinc, lead or something else? Does it have evidence of wear? I would also be curious if other similar badges have been found and what that might suggest. Also, I would be curious if any type of dog tags/ID badge were used by veterans of either side after the war. Is there a source on Civil War dog tags/ID badges? Your badge opens up so many questions about how Civil War soldiers saw themselves and each other.
 
You didn't address any of the questions I suggested. Is the disc zinc, lead or something else? Does it have evidence of wear? I would also be curious if other similar badges have been found and what that might suggest. Also, I would be curious if any type of dog tags/ID badge were used by veterans of either side after the war. Is there a source on Civil War dog tags/ID badges? Your badge opens up so many questions about how Civil War soldiers saw themselves and each other.
It doesn't appear to be heavy enough fir lead, but is heavily oxidized. There doesn't appear to be any wear evident in the hole.
 
Last edited:
More. Pics of both sides. Perhaps some more of you sharp-eyed individuals will see something that stands out, or otherwise rings a bell.

1000013152.webp


20260709_113743.webp
 
Last edited:
Yeah...and know little about them. I never developed my dad's fascination for the Civil War, much preferring WWII history. That's why I must rely on the 'experts' here.
 

Learn About Us
About CivilWarTalk
Contact the Webmaster
Meet the Staff
Link to CivilWarTalk
Join Our Community
Register
Browse Forums
View Today's Discussions
Search the Forum
Get Help
FAQ
Student Guide
Forum Rules & Etiquette
Copyright / DMCA

     Contact Us CivilwarTalk on Facebook CivilWarTalk on YouTube CivilWarTalk on Twitter RSS Feed

Bringing the American Civil War and More to Life.
© 1999 - , CIVILWARTALK, LLC - Site Version 10.0

SlaveryTalk.com - SecessionTalk.com - CivilWarTalk.com - ReconstructionTalk.com
Back
Top