Finding "missing" US Census records

lupaglupa

Lt. Colonel
Forum Host
Joined
Apr 18, 2019
Location
Upstate New York
US Census records are among the most helpful records genealogists in the USA have to work with. But finding each set of records over any individual's life can be a challenge. It's terribly frustrating to have all the facts input correctly and yet have Ancestry tell you no record exists for the family you are certain is there.

Over the years I've developed a set of techniques I use when I can't find the records I'm looking for - even though I know the correct names and locations. Since I assume other folks have had similar challenges, I thought I'd share my tips.

1. Drop the last name. The most common barrier I have in finding Census records is an incorrect last name. These usually occur for one of three reasons: the Census taker misspelled the name in the record, the Census taker's handwriting is illegible and the transcribing of the name was thus done incorrectly, or the record is grouped under the wrong surname. When you think of the huge variety of names used in the United States, many from different ethnic groups with different spelling conventions, it's not surprising that names are wrong in records. Ancestry does a good job using fuzzy logic to guess at misspellings. But sometimes the mistakes are odd enough that the result remains hidden.

2. Drop the birth year. Ancestry is pretty picky about ages and a wrong number in the age field can entirely remove results from a search. Sometimes the number on the form is wrong, sometimes it's been misinterpreted. More often than not the notes for very young children get messed up and their months become years. Removing birth dates will often give you the real result, even though the age is wrong.

3. Search by relationships, not facts. When using specific facts is not working, you can sometimes find the family you want by simply searching for a record that includes the correct combination of Christian names. Looking for every family with a man named Thomas who has a wife named Winifred can pull up the whole family when a more detailed set of search terms didn't work. The more unusual the name, the easier it is since you have fewer results to deal with.

4. Use initials only searches. Ancestry uses asterixis for wild card searching and employing an asterisk can improve search results. This works especially well when names have been oddly abbreviated or misinterpreted. Searching for "J* Cotton" will give you every, John, James, and Joseph, along with a host of others. A search for "Joseph C*" will give a wide range of results in the surname category. You can place the asterisk anywhere in the word - a search for "Jo* Co*" can help narrow results when the list is overwhelming. Fold3 works the same way and it's very helpful.

How does this work in practice? When I'm looking for a missing record in a family on my tree, I usually open up a fresh search panel in Ancestry. I find searching without the facts I already have is very helpful. I generally start by restricting the search to a single location, exactly at or near to where I know the family lived. I then search using a combination of other facts. So if a search for Joseph Cotton born in Mississippi in 1839 and living in Grimes County, Texas doesn't work, I look for every man in the area named Joseph who was born in Mississippi in 1839. Dropping the last name from the search gives me a list of results which I can scan.

If that doesn't work I begin to play with my search terms. Each new search I try comes at the record in a new way, using a different combination of the facts I know. Somewhere in the original record is a mistake that is keeping the record I want from coming up in my search results. All I have to do is to find a combination of search terms that eliminates the error(s) and then I find what I want.

This can be a time consuming process but I rarely end up without the information I want.
 
Fantastic tips, @lupaglupa! I'm definitely saving this post! A number of times, I've been searching seemingly in vain for something on Ancestry, then I do something different and I get a hit! The problem is always trying to remember what I did differently that got me the result I needed...
ARB
I've had many misadventures as I learned these skills.
 
Is my recollection correct when I recall that much of the Ancestry indexing is crowd sourced? I've seen some weird things in Ancestry. Frequently I go to the original image and cannot understand how the indexer arrive a his decision.
 
Is my recollection correct when I recall that much of the Ancestry indexing is crowd sourced? I've seen some weird things in Ancestry. Frequently I go to the original image and cannot understand how the indexer arrive a his decision.
I believe almost all of it is now done by computers. It was done by real readers in the past.
 
I've wondered how the census worked in those days. Did census takers travel town to town, village to village and go farm to farm in the rural areas? Or was it a big, well advertised event day in a city or a rural county when they set up shop at the courthouse or another public building and people showed up to be counted. Somehow I get the feeling that it was a big deal for the proud citizens in a young country to have their names in the public record unlike today where it just seems like a chore.
 
I've wondered how the census worked in those days. Did census takers travel town to town, village to village and go farm to farm in the rural areas? Or was it a big, well advertised event day in a city or a rural county when they set up shop at the courthouse or another public building and people showed up to be counted. Somehow I get the feeling that it was a big deal for the proud citizens in a young country to have their names in the public record unlike today where it just seems like a chore.
I just did some reading about the 1860 Census. US Marshalls did, the count in their own districts, either alone or with deputies. The start date was June 1st. They visited every house in person.
 
How common was it for one of the 1860 Census Marshalls to end up recruiting a company from the county in which they recorded? It seems like they would have had a good knowledge of all the eligible young men in the county to be recruited.

My CW ancestor (company K, 44th OVI) was recruited by John Bell, a local school teacher who served as census marshall in Fayette county for the 1860 census, and recorded my ancestor living with his older brother and family in 1860. Captain Bell served as the first company commander until he died in a drowning accident on the Kanawha River in November 1861.

ETA: more info on Capt Bell --- https://cincinnaticwrt.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/John-M-Bell_website.pdf
 
Last edited:
How common was it for one of the 1860 Census Marshalls to end up recruiting a company from the county in which they recorded? It seems like they would have had a good knowledge of all the eligible young men in the county to be recruited.

My CW ancestor (company K, 44th OVI) was recruited by John Bell, a local school teacher who served as census marshall in Fayette county for the 1860 census, and recorded my ancestor living with his older brother and family in 1860. Captain Bell served as the first company commander until he died in a drowning accident on the Kanawha River in November 1861.

ETA: more info on Capt Bell --- https://cincinnaticwrt.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/John-M-Bell_website.pdf
I imagine it's not unusual because many early companies were organized by locally prominent men. The local US Marshall would be just that sort of person.
 

Learn About Us
About CivilWarTalk
Contact the Webmaster
Meet the Staff
Link to CivilWarTalk
Join Our Community
Register
Browse Forums
View Today's Discussions
Search the Forum
Get Help
FAQ
Student Guide
Forum Rules & Etiquette
Copyright / DMCA

     Contact Us CivilwarTalk on Facebook CivilWarTalk on YouTube CivilWarTalk on Twitter RSS Feed

Bringing the American Civil War and More to Life.
© 1999 - , CIVILWARTALK, LLC - Site Version 10.0

SlaveryTalk.com - SecessionTalk.com - CivilWarTalk.com - ReconstructionTalk.com
Back
Top