Lt.Arty Field Howitzer Use In The War?

jr baker

Private
Joined
Feb 1, 2011
Location
covington tn
1576027520351.png


How were the 12 pdr and the 24 pdr Field Howitzers used? I know later in the war they weren't used as much with the rifled artillery pieces. Was there ever 32 pdr used in the Civil War?

I was at a reenactment years ago in Mississippi and a unit had a 32 pdr. Bronze Howitzer and I have never seen one since. I think they were from eastern Kentucky, or west Virginia.

Thanks!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
To simplify.... In the prewar era the howitzers were a lighter shorter barreled field gun intended predominately to only fire shells... They came in 12, 24 and yes 32 lb caliber field gun size howitzers in bronze. Lighter guns using lighter charges for short to moderate ranges, which was fine for that time.... It was not uncommon in a light artillery battery to have four 12lb howitzers and two 6lbrs. Once the larger 12lb Napoleon came around that was a bit more hefty and strong enough to handle both shot and shell and with better ranges and accuracy.... intended to generally replace the howitzers..... along with the steady desire to obtain more range and accuracy.... the field howitzers were becoming outdated.... When the war broke out many of these older guns were still out there in abundance... so they ended up being brought into service in the field anyway... and replaced with something better when and if it could be obtained.... There were lots of 12lb howitzers in service.... and occasionally see the 24 lbr...... the 32 lbr howitzer did exist, but cant immediately recall seeing one on record assigned with a given battery in the field.... but doesn't mean they weren't... or at least utilized somewhere...

There also were 12, 18, 24, 32, and 42lbrs guns that were much larger, cast in Iron used for Siege-Garrison and Sea-Coast defenses..... bigger guns, bigger charges, greater ranges... but not something you could drag around the field easily... So yes it can be a bit confusing when one mentions a 32 lbr.... one generally will image the much larger barbette mounted iron siege-garrison classed gun..... not a short barreled bronze field howitzer..... Same holds true for the 8in... which "caliber" was found in both the huge massive Rodman/Columbiads.... as well as a thick stubby barreled siege howitzer... on down to a mortar...
 
E. Porter Alexander ANV corps artillery chief called the 24 pounder howitzer his favorite artillery piece. He valued it both for weight of shell and versatility of firing angle. Alexander used the 24 pounder as both a howitzer and a mortar. In this latter role he dug in the trail and raised the axle on skids to reduce the recoil.
 
E. Porter Alexander ANV corps artillery chief called the 24 pounder howitzer his favorite artillery piece. He valued it both for weight of shell and versatility of firing angle. Alexander used the 24 pounder as both a howitzer and a mortar. In this latter role he dug in the trail and raised the axle on skids to reduce the recoil.

I agree... the 24 gives a good punch... There is at least one reenactment artillery unit out there that has a 24lb bronze howitzer.... impressive and will rattle your back teeth when fired if your anywhere close...

Oddly they and the 6lb didn't find the continued favor like some others... used what existed and they had.. but rather few new ones made.... but lots of 12lb, and rifled versions....

32's... good find... you find them occasionally in fortifications or siege artillery trains... but not so much with field artillery...
 
I agree... the 24 gives a good punch... There is at least one reenactment artillery unit out there that has a 24lb bronze howitzer.... impressive and will rattle your back teeth when fired if your anywhere close...

Oddly they and the 6lb didn't find the continued favor like some others... used what existed and they had.. but rather few new ones made.... but lots of 12lb, and rifled versions....

32's... good find... you find them occasionally in fortifications or siege artillery trains... but not so much with field artillery...
I'm waaaay late on this, but the 1st Battalion New York Light Artillery, Battery D (aka 32nd Independent Battery, Capt. Charles Kusserow) had 6 of the 32-pounders employed as field artillery at Antietam on 17 September 1862. It looks like they were in reserve there, but in action at Boteler's Ford on the Potomac near Shepherdstown on 19 September.
 
Purpose: To fire explosive shells in a high trajectory over terrain & enemy fortifications for plunging and ricochet fire, and also for short range defense using canister.

How about the example of Fredericksburg, E.P. Alexander used Howitzers to great effect:

… Monday morning was again thick and hazy, but when the sun was about an hour high the nest of sharpshooters in the tanyard announced their ability to see by opening a very lively fusillade. I happened to be nearby, & I at once determined to try & route them. But the building was so nestled in the hollow, & hidden by intervening low hills & trees, that only one gun, one of Moody's 24 pr. howitzers, could even the peak of its roof be seen. But I knew that if I only skimmed the top of the low intervening hill the shell would curve downward & probably get low enough for the loop holes. The howitzer was on the south of the Plank Road & some 400 yards off. I got the line of the obnoxious corner of the roof & sighted in that line, & then fixed an elevation which I thought would just carry the shell over the low hill, aiming myself, & taking several minutes to get all exact. Then I ordered fire. Standing behind we could see the shell almost brush the grass, as it curved over the hill, & then we heard her strike & explode. At once there came a cheer from our picket line in front of the hill, & presently there came running up an exited fellow to tell us. He called out as he came – "That got 'em! That got 'em! You can hear them just a hollering & a groaning in there."

Then later...

… we discovered that quite a little body of the enemy were lying down in a shallow depression about 400 yards from another of Moody's 24 pr. howitzers, which were my favorite guns. Partly to make the enemy unhappy, & partly to show my companions how effective the gun was, I carefully aimed & fired four shrapnel (each of which contained 175 musket balls) so as to burst each one about 15 feet above the ground & about as many yards in front of the little hollow. While we could not see into it, the bullets & fragment would probe it easily. From the very first shot, we saw, at the far end, men helping three wounded to get out to the rear, but our infantry sharpshooters opened on them & ran them back. The next day, [Lieutenant Colonel Briscoe G.] Baldwin & [Captain Samuel] Johnston visited the spot together to study the effects, & told me that they found 13 dead which they were sure from the fresh wounds & blood were killed by those four shrapnel.

From - Edward Porter Alexander, Fighting for the Confederacy: The Personal Recollections of General Edward Porter Alexander, edited by Gary Gallegher, University of North Carolina Press, 1998. Pages 181-182.
 
Purpose: To fire explosive shells in a high trajectory over terrain & enemy fortifications for plunging and ricochet fire, and also for short range defense using canister.

How about the example of Fredericksburg, E.P. Alexander used Howitzers to great effect:

… Monday morning was again thick and hazy, but when the sun was about an hour high the nest of sharpshooters in the tanyard announced their ability to see by opening a very lively fusillade. I happened to be nearby, & I at once determined to try & route them. But the building was so nestled in the hollow, & hidden by intervening low hills & trees, that only one gun, one of Moody's 24 pr. howitzers, could even the peak of its roof be seen. But I knew that if I only skimmed the top of the low intervening hill the shell would curve downward & probably get low enough for the loop holes. The howitzer was on the south of the Plank Road & some 400 yards off. I got the line of the obnoxious corner of the roof & sighted in that line, & then fixed an elevation which I thought would just carry the shell over the low hill, aiming myself, & taking several minutes to get all exact. Then I ordered fire. Standing behind we could see the shell almost brush the grass, as it curved over the hill, & then we heard her strike & explode. At once there came a cheer from our picket line in front of the hill, & presently there came running up an exited fellow to tell us. He called out as he came – "That got 'em! That got 'em! You can hear them just a hollering & a groaning in there."

Then later...

… we discovered that quite a little body of the enemy were lying down in a shallow depression about 400 yards from another of Moody's 24 pr. howitzers, which were my favorite guns. Partly to make the enemy unhappy, & partly to show my companions how effective the gun was, I carefully aimed & fired four shrapnel (each of which contained 175 musket balls) so as to burst each one about 15 feet above the ground & about as many yards in front of the little hollow. While we could not see into it, the bullets & fragment would probe it easily. From the very first shot, we saw, at the far end, men helping three wounded to get out to the rear, but our infantry sharpshooters opened on them & ran them back. The next day, [Lieutenant Colonel Briscoe G.] Baldwin & [Captain Samuel] Johnston visited the spot together to study the effects, & told me that they found 13 dead which they were sure from the fresh wounds & blood were killed by those four shrapnel.

From - Edward Porter Alexander, Fighting for the Confederacy: The Personal Recollections of General Edward Porter Alexander, edited by Gary Gallegher, University of North Carolina Press, 1998. Pages 181-182.
Alexander had an inordinate fondness for Howitzers, especially the M1841 12 lb, that was definitely not shared by Hunt. Reading Alexander's various accounts, it's clear that at least part of his view was based on the poor quality of Confederate "knock offs" of the M1857 Napoleon and the rifles. For exmple, Alexander favored them for Confederate horse artillery. The short effective range of the M1841 12 lb and its ordnance limitations were at the heart of Hunt's campaign to get rid of them in the Army of the Potomac, which was virtually complete by Gettysburg.
 
To simplify.... In the prewar era the howitzers were a lighter shorter barreled field gun intended predominately to only fire shells... They came in 12, 24 and yes 32 lb caliber field gun size howitzers in bronze. Lighter guns using lighter charges for short to moderate ranges, which was fine for that time.... It was not uncommon in a light artillery battery to have four 12lb howitzers and two 6lbrs. Once the larger 12lb Napoleon came around that was a bit more hefty and strong enough to handle both shot and shell and with better ranges and accuracy.... intended to generally replace the howitzers..... along with the steady desire to obtain more range and accuracy.... the field howitzers were becoming outdated.... When the war broke out many of these older guns were still out there in abundance... so they ended up being brought into service in the field anyway... and replaced with something better when and if it could be obtained.... There were lots of 12lb howitzers in service.... and occasionally see the 24 lbr...... the 32 lbr howitzer did exist, but cant immediately recall seeing one on record assigned with a given battery in the field.... but doesn't mean they weren't... or at least utilized somewhere...

There also were 12, 18, 24, 32, and 42lbrs guns that were much larger, cast in Iron used for Siege-Garrison and Sea-Coast defenses..... bigger guns, bigger charges, greater ranges... but not something you could drag around the field easily... So yes it can be a bit confusing when one mentions a 32 lbr.... one generally will image the much larger barbette mounted iron siege-garrison classed gun..... not a short barreled bronze field howitzer..... Same holds true for the 8in... which "caliber" was found in both the huge massive Rodman/Columbiads.... as well as a thick stubby barreled siege howitzer... on down to a mortar...
Hello, My name is Frank Strickler and I found this piece very interesting. I am a third generation cannoneer. My dad was a cannoneer and my great grandfather and three of his brothers were cannoneers. He and two brothers were in the first Rockbridge battery and another brother was in the second Rockbridge. The First guns that the first Rockbridge used were the six pound cadets from VMI. After being used on Henry House Hill they were replaced by rifled guns captured from Ricketts Battery. I'm proud to say, I touched the same guns used by my great grandfather and his older brother William.
 
During the Maryland Campaign, the Madison (LA) Light Artillery (4 guns) had 2 3-inch Ordnance Rifles and 2 24-pounder howitzers. Also the Rowan (NC) Artillery (6 guns) was comprised of 2 10-pound Parrott Rifles, 2 3-inch Ordnance Rifles and 2 24-pounder howitzers. Like one of the other posters noted, I sure would hate to hear my Colonel order a charge to take a battery with those 24-pounders blasting canister at me. Just sayin'...
 
Purpose: To fire explosive shells in a high trajectory over terrain & enemy fortifications for plunging and ricochet fire, and also for short range defense using canister.

How about the example of Fredericksburg, E.P. Alexander used Howitzers to great effect:

… Monday morning was again thick and hazy, but when the sun was about an hour high the nest of sharpshooters in the tanyard announced their ability to see by opening a very lively fusillade. I happened to be nearby, & I at once determined to try & route them. But the building was so nestled in the hollow, & hidden by intervening low hills & trees, that only one gun, one of Moody's 24 pr. howitzers, could even the peak of its roof be seen. But I knew that if I only skimmed the top of the low intervening hill the shell would curve downward & probably get low enough for the loop holes. The howitzer was on the south of the Plank Road & some 400 yards off. I got the line of the obnoxious corner of the roof & sighted in that line, & then fixed an elevation which I thought would just carry the shell over the low hill, aiming myself, & taking several minutes to get all exact. Then I ordered fire. Standing behind we could see the shell almost brush the grass, as it curved over the hill, & then we heard her strike & explode. At once there came a cheer from our picket line in front of the hill, & presently there came running up an exited fellow to tell us. He called out as he came – "That got 'em! That got 'em! You can hear them just a hollering & a groaning in there."

Then later...

… we discovered that quite a little body of the enemy were lying down in a shallow depression about 400 yards from another of Moody's 24 pr. howitzers, which were my favorite guns. Partly to make the enemy unhappy, & partly to show my companions how effective the gun was, I carefully aimed & fired four shrapnel (each of which contained 175 musket balls) so as to burst each one about 15 feet above the ground & about as many yards in front of the little hollow. While we could not see into it, the bullets & fragment would probe it easily. From the very first shot, we saw, at the far end, men helping three wounded to get out to the rear, but our infantry sharpshooters opened on them & ran them back. The next day, [Lieutenant Colonel Briscoe G.] Baldwin & [Captain Samuel] Johnston visited the spot together to study the effects, & told me that they found 13 dead which they were sure from the fresh wounds & blood were killed by those four shrapnel.

From - Edward Porter Alexander, Fighting for the Confederacy: The Personal Recollections of General Edward Porter Alexander, edited by Gary Gallegher, University of North Carolina Press, 1998. Pages 181-182.
Here is a piece of a 24Lb caseshot fired during the battle of Chancellorsville. I found this in an area that would have been shelled by the Artillery of McLaws Division on or about May 2nd and 3rd. I suspect that it may have been fired from Moody's battery

24.jpg
 
During the Maryland Campaign, the Madison (LA) Light Artillery (4 guns) had 2 3-inch Ordnance Rifles and 2 24-pounder howitzers. Also the Rowan (NC) Artillery (6 guns) was comprised of 2 10-pound Parrott Rifles, 2 3-inch Ordnance Rifles and 2 24-pounder howitzers. Like one of the other posters noted, I sure would hate to hear my Colonel order a charge to take a battery with those 24-pounders blasting canister at me. Just sayin'...
But if my Colonel turned to the adjacent battery of 10 lb Parrotts or 3" Ordnance Rifles and asked them to start lobbing bolts at the Howitzers from 1700 yards or so, I'd pull up a chair and watch. :smile:
 
Hello, My name is Frank Strickler and I found this piece very interesting. I am a third generation cannoneer. My dad was a cannoneer and my great grandfather and three of his brothers were cannoneers. He and two brothers were in the first Rockbridge battery and another brother was in the second Rockbridge. The First guns that the first Rockbridge used were the six pound cadets from VMI. After being used on Henry House Hill they were replaced by rifled guns captured from Ricketts Battery. I'm proud to say, I touched the same guns used by my great grandfather and his older brother William.

Greetings and welcome aboard Frank.
Very familiar with both.. They werent very fond of the VMI guns. The light weight of both gun and carriage commonly would result in the guns scooting off quite far to the rear with the recoil of service loads.. One of the several reenactment artillery units I serve with portrays the 1st Rockbridge Va Artillery Battery (and 5th US).
rockbridge-36809147.jpg
 
I found an interesting telegram or letter addressed to Maj. Gen. J. G. Foster on June 21, 1864 written by R. P. Parrott from his Office West Point Foundry, 30 Broadway, New York; [Series 1, Volume 35, Part II, Page 143]. He begins,
"Though I suppose most of the importance in regard to the service of my guns are by this time understood..."
and I thought it might interest the general idea of 'mortar firing' to others. Mr. Parrott goes on to explain his experiments and results of his guns being fired and finally says;
"I have used the 100-pounders as mortars by loading them with a very small charge of powder, 3 1/4 pounds, and setting out the ring of the projectile in one place only as to nearly fit a groove, by this means, which admits of the shell going down, merely placing the expanded portion in one of the grooves of the gun, and have got a high-curve traveling, say a range of 2,000 yards, with 20 degrees elevation...."
I admit he is speaking of heavier, rifled guns (his own Parrott manufacturing) but the theme is consistent with current discussions had on weaponry, and believed the letter could be a good reference point.
Lubliner.
 
In 1841, the U.S.& Army fielded the first U.S. designed & manufactured artillery. The 1841 model six pound cannon & 12 pound howitzer were light & very mobile. The extremely expensive bronze used to cast those guns was a result of trials using cast iron guns of the same caliber. Both of the iron guns were extremely heavy. Of the six horses that were hitched to artillery pieces, only four provided the vast majority of the pulling power. The fifth & sixth horses were spares. On the march, they were often hitched to the rear in order to keep them fresh. A few hundred pounds more or less made a big difference in how well the horses performed. Bronze had the additional advantage in that a worn out gun could be melted down & recast easily.

The tactical basis for having both cannon & howitzers has to do with the nature of how they were used. A 6" cannon could only elevate 5 degrees. A 12" howitzer used the same charge as the six pounder. The howitzer breech is a dimple shape that accepts the charge which is smaller than the bore. Rather than pounding the wall to pieces, the howitzer sent shells in arching trajectories to explode over or onto targets.

The two guns were designed to do two different tasks in attacking a fortification, e.g. The bore of the six pounder was not large enough for a powerful explosive shell. It fired case shot, which contained a relatively small bursting charge & had a hand full of balls that exploded above infantry. The rain of pieces of the casing & balls, traveling at just below the speed of sound, was a vicious combination. It was invented by Sir Henry Shrapnel. The howitzer would lob shells into the forts or onto formed troops or structures.

IMG_2776.jpg

A three gun section of two 1841 six pounders & 12 pound howitzer at a living history battery program at Stones River National Battlefield. These guns were the types that were essential to the victory in the war with Mexico. They were far more mobil & hard hitting than the types that came before.

With the advent of rifled cannon, the tactical situation changed dramatically. As the Confederates at Fort Pulaski were the first to discover, a rifled gun could hit harder, longer & more accurately than anything that had come before. If you visit the National Park near Savannah, walk around to the other side of the upper gallery from here. Down at the base of the wall is where an over hit, leaving a perfect impression of the blunt nose of a solid 30 pound rifle bolt.

IMG_1884.jpg


The walls of Fort Pulaski still show the impact of 30 pound Parrott rifle fire at a range of about two miles. The fort's construction was supervised by Robert E. Lee & was considered impregnable. Guarding the mouth of the Savannah River, there was no dry land within range where an attacker could mount their batteries. The defenders literally laughed when they saw the foolish Yankees mounting their guns so far out of range. The red brick, camera left, is the repair that replaced the breach where the thick masonry wall collapsed. These casements were where the Immortal 600 were held.

IMG_1882.jpg

30 pound Parrott rifles like this one were siege & fortification weapons. They were extremely powerful, accurate & hard hitting, but were not mobile. It was the 10 pound Parrott & ordinance rifles replaced the six pound 1841 pound smoothbores that were the new. standard batteries.

IMG_3721.jpg

This battery of two rifles & two six pound cannon shown firing by piece form the left at Stones River National Battlefield display the crazy quilt of guns that made up the batteries during that battle. Imagine the challenge of supplying ammunition to 58 guns firing 12 pound howitzer, 12 pound Napoleon, 2.9" Parrott rifle, 3" ordinance & Parrott rifle, 14 pound Ames rifle, & Weird rifle rounds. Note, the the gun crews' reflect the erect posture of Civil War drill.

images-2.jpeg

A 12 pound Napoleon gun-howitzer that is a veteran of the battle is sited where a battery of these versatile guns were deployed during the first day of the Battle of Stones River. Their fire shattered desperate Confederate Infantry attacks & saved the day for General Rosecrans.

General Roscrans' solution to his impossible artillery logistical challenge was to convert his collection of smoothbore howitzers & cannons was a gun developed by the French army during the reign of Napoleon III. Three 1841 model six pounders were melted down & recast as 12 pound gun-howitzer. The Napoleon, as it is popularly known, could do the job of both of the guns in a traditional battery. With a relatively minor increase in weight, the Napoleon needed the same number of horses & men to serve it. Mr. Newton's laws being what they are, the increase from 6 to 12 pound cannon ammunition was exponentially more powerful.

In time, four gun half batteries consisting of either 10 pound rifles or 12 pound Napoleon smooth bores replaced the four rifle & four smoothbore Napoleon full battery. An eight gun battery, deployed in column, was a mile long. Even when doubled, it was challenging to bring into action. Eventually, the half battery of homogenous guns was halved again, two gun sections were found to be nimble & tactically more effective than the more ponderous battery could ever be.

FORO-Battery-Mitchell-CDV2.jpg


This image taken at Fortress Rosecrans in Murfreesboro, Tennessee shows the fate of the six pounders that contributed to the Union victory at the Battle of Stones River. Look carefully, there is a mark on the barrel & a chunk out of the wheel where a solid shot hit the gun. In the background, a crew is drilling with a preposterous 70 pound howitzer. The sponge rammer looks like a prop from a Three Stooges movie. Needless to say, the living history cannoneers at Stones River N.B. are more than ready to demonstrate one of those babies... needless to say, our adult supervision does not share our boyish enthusiasm. Fort Negley in Nashville had six pounders & a single 30 pound Parrott. Other obsolete curiosities were mounted in works scattered all over backwaters of the war.

images-3.jpeg


Mortars were not field guns. Their job was to lob huge shells over the walls & destroy the interior of fortifications. The shell camera right clearly shows the hole where the fuse was inserted. The sparking trail left by the shell as it sailed up & over in its 45 degree trajectory was a sight that nobody who saw it ever forgot. At Vicksburg, Union troops improvised wooden mortars that tossed 12 pound shells into Pemberton's works.

Needless to say, this is just the merest coat of paint over the subject of Civil War artillery, but I think it answers the question posed.
Apart from the historic images, all photos are by the author.
 
Last edited:
Here is a piece of a 24Lb caseshot fired during the battle of Chancellorsville. I found this in an area that would have been shelled by the Artillery of McLaws Division on or about May 2nd and 3rd. I suspect that it may have been fired from Moody's battery

View attachment 338102
Nice piece.
 
In 1841, the U.S.& Army fielded the first U.S. designed & manufactured artillery. The 1841 model six pound cannon & 12 pound howitzer were light & very mobile. The extremely expensive bronze used to cast those guns was a result of trials using cast iron guns of the same caliber. Both of the iron guns were extremely heavy. Of the six horses that were hitched to artillery pieces, only four provided the vast majority of the pulling power. The fifth & sixth horses were spares. On the march, they were often hitched to the rear in order to keep them fresh. A few hundred pounds more or less made a big difference in how well the horses performed. Bronze had the additional advantage in that a worn out gun could be melted down & recast easily.

The tactical basis for having both cannon & howitzers has to do with the nature of how they were used. A 6" cannon could only elevate 5 degrees. A 12" howitzer used the same charge as the six pounder. The howitzer breech is a dimple shape that accepts the charge which is smaller than the bore. Rather than pounding the wall to pieces, the howitzer sent shells in arching trajectories to explode over or onto targets.

The two guns were designed to do two different tasks in attacking a fortification, e.g. The bore of the six pounder was not large enough for a powerful explosive shell. It fired case shot, which contained a relatively small bursting charge & had a hand full of balls that exploded above infantry. The rain of pieces of the casing & balls, traveling at just below the speed of sound, was a vicious combination. It was invented by Sir Henry Shrapnel. The howitzer would lob shells into the forts or onto formed troops or structures.

View attachment 338799
A three gun section of two 1841 six pounders & 12 pound howitzer at a living history battery program at Stones River National Battlefield. These guns were the types that were essential to the victory in the war with Mexico. They were far more mobil & hard hitting than the types that came before.

With the advent of rifled cannon, the tactical situation changed dramatically. As the Confederates at Fort Pulaski were the first to discover, a rifled gun could hit harder, longer & more accurately than anything that had come before. If you visit the National Park near Savannah, walk around to the other side of the upper gallery from here. Down at the base of the wall is where an over hit, leaving a perfect impression of the blunt nose of a solid 30 pound rifle bolt.

View attachment 338790

The walls of Fort Pulaski still show the impact of 30 pound Parrott rifle fire at a range of about two miles. The fort's construction was supervised by Robert E. Lee & was considered impregnable. Guarding the mouth of the Savannah River, there was no dry land within range where an attacker could mount their batteries. The defenders literally laughed when they saw the foolish Yankees mounting their guns so far out of range. The red brick, camera left, is the repair that replaced the breach where the thick masonry wall collapsed. These casements were where the Immortal 600 were held.

View attachment 338794
30 pound Parrott rifles like this one were siege & fortification weapons. They were extremely powerful, accurate & hard hitting, but were not mobile. It was the 10 pound Parrott & ordinance rifles replaced the six pound 1841 pound smoothbores that were the new. standard batteries.

View attachment 338797
This battery of two rifles & two six pound cannon shown firing by piece form the left at Stones River National Battlefield display the crazy quilt of guns that made up the batteries during that battle. Imagine the challenge of supplying ammunition to 58 guns firing 12 pound howitzer, 12 pound Napoleon, 2.9" Parrott rifle, 3" ordinance & Parrott rifle, 14 pound Ames rifle, & Weird rifle rounds. Note, the the gun crews' reflect the erect posture of Civil War drill.

View attachment 338798
A 12 pound Napoleon gun-howitzer that is a veteran of the battle is sited where a battery of these versatile guns were deployed during the first day of the Battle of Stones River. Their fire shattered desperate Confederate Infantry attacks & saved the day for General Rosecrans.

General Roscrans' solution to his impossible artillery logistical challenge was to convert his collection of smoothbore howitzers & cannons was a gun developed by the French army during the reign of Napoleon III. Three 1841 model six pounders were melted down & recast as 12 pound gun-howitzer. The Napoleon, as it is popularly known, could do the job of both of the guns in a traditional battery. With a relatively minor increase in weight, the Napoleon needed the same number of horses & men to serve it. Mr. Newton's laws being what they are, the increase from 6 to 12 pound cannon ammunition was exponentially more powerful.

In time, four gun half batteries consisting of either 10 pound rifles or 12 pound Napoleon smooth bores replaced the four rifle & four smoothbore Napoleon full battery. An eight gun battery, deployed in column, was a mile long. Even when doubled, it was challenging to bring into action. Eventually, the half battery of homogenous guns was halved again, two gun sections were found to be nimble & tactically more effective than the more ponderous battery could ever be.

View attachment 338800

This image taken at Fortress Rosecrans in Murfreesboro, Tennessee shows the fate of the six pounders that contributed to the Union victory at the Battle of Stones River. Look carefully, there is a mark on the barrel & a chunk out of the wheel where a solid shot hit the gun. In the background, a crew is drilling with a preposterous 70 pound howitzer. The sponge rammer looks like a prop from a Three Stooges movie. Needless to say, the living history cannoneers at Stones River N.B. are more than ready to demonstrate one of those babies... needless to say, our adult supervision does not share our boyish enthusiasm. Fort Negley in Nashville had six pounders & a single 30 pound Parrott. Other obsolete curiosities were mounted in works scattered all over backwaters of the war.

View attachment 338803

Mortars were not field guns. Their job was to lob huge shells over the walls & destroy the interior of fortifications. The shell camera right clearly shows the hole where the fuse was inserted. The sparking trail left by the shell as it sailed up & over in its 45 degree trajectory was a sight that nobody who saw it ever forgot. At Vicksburg, Union troops improvised wooden mortars that tossed 12 pound shells into Pemberton's works.

Needless to say, this is just the merest coat of paint over the subject of Civil War artillery, but I think it answers the question posed.
Apart from the historic images, all photos are by the author.
Interesting material, as always. The four "flying artillery" companies used in the War with Mexico were equipped with the 6 pounders. Taylor's army also had 12 lb howitzers and 18 pounders but the howitzers weren't used by the four "mounted" companies, including Ringgold's true "horse artillery" company. Instead, they used only the 6 pounders. The 18 pounders were moved around by teams of oxen.
 

Learn About Us
About CivilWarTalk
Contact the Webmaster
Meet the Staff
Link to CivilWarTalk
Join Our Community
Register
Browse Forums
View Today's Discussions
Search the Forum
Get Help
FAQ
Student Guide
Forum Rules & Etiquette
Copyright / DMCA

     Contact Us CivilwarTalk on Facebook CivilWarTalk on YouTube CivilWarTalk on Twitter RSS Feed

Bringing the American Civil War and More to Life.
© 1999 - , CIVILWARTALK, LLC - Site Version 10.0

SlaveryTalk.com - SecessionTalk.com - CivilWarTalk.com - ReconstructionTalk.com
Back
Top