Farnsworth's Charge

infomanpa

1st Lieutenant
Joined
Feb 18, 2017
Location
Pennsylvania
I have been reading @Eric Wittenberg 's book on this subject and when doing some research, I was not prepared for the apparently diverse interpretations of the path of this charge. I understand that it's difficult to precisely locate the movement of cavalry, but I would think that when the veterans of these units came back to Gettysburg, they would at least know the location from where they started.

Any insight on this would be appreciated. I know that @Tom Elmore studies mostly infantry and artillery, but his comments are especially welcome.

First map is a primary source from Captain H. C. Parsons, who was a leader in the charge. You would think that it would carry a lot of weight. He believes that the charge started west of Bushman's Hill. Notice the complicated paths.
Farnsworth.jpg


The second map is a overlay combination of 2 of Phil Laino's map, which most resembles Parson's map. Notice how far to the west all (except for the 5th NY) of Farnsworth's regiments are located.
Farnsworth.jpg


Finally, we have the most commonly distributed maps from Stanley and the American Battlefield Trust that show all regiments beginning their charge from on the slopes of Bushman's Hill, itself. I can't understand why cavalry would want to locate themselves in the woods on a high hill. Also notice the circular shape of the charge's path. A simplification, perhaps?
full_1.jpg


This map is the most extreme of all. Farnsworth's regiment extends almost to Emmitsburg Road!

Gettysburg_South_Cavalry_Field.png
 
Last edited:
The veterans knew precisely where it was located. The bottom map adopts the refuted, unsupported, speculative theory espoused by a licensed battlefield guide that the historic evidence simply does not support. Its thesis is that because the monument to the 5th NY Cavalry was moved, the entire location of the charge had to be moved, which is pure, unadulterated poppycock.

Please read this, which I stand by entirely: http://civilwarcavalry.com/?page_id=540

It is my humble but informed opinion that the Steve Stanley map is accurate; it matches the maps in my book.
 
The veterans knew precisely where it was located. The bottom map adopts the refuted, unsupported, speculative theory espoused by a licensed battlefield guide that the historic evidence simply does not support. Its thesis is that because the monument to the 5th NY Cavalry was moved, the entire location of the charge had to be moved, which is pure, unadulterated poppycock.

Please read this, which I stand by entirely: http://civilwarcavalry.com/?page_id=540

It is my humble but informed opinion that the Steve Stanley map is accurate; it matches the maps in my book.

Thank you. I read Appendix D of your book, which appears to be the same article that you linked. I agree that the monument movement is not an issue. So, I am wondering if Laino's map was influenced by Andrea Custer's theory or more by the Parson map? Regardless of anyone's modern theory, there is still the eye-witness Parson's map to reconcile.
 
Thank you. I read Appendix D of your book, which appears to be the same article that you linked. I agree that the monument movement is not an issue. So, I am wondering if Laino's map was influenced by Andrea Custer's theory or more by the Parson map? Regardless of anyone's modern theory, there is still the eye-witness Parson's map to reconcile.

It was definitely influenced by Custer's theory. I tried very hard to talk him out of that map, and failed.
 
I have been to Fort Stark in New Castle NH many times. There is a portion of the fort that has the name Farnsworth painted on it. I wonder if this was named for Elon Farnsworth of the infamous charge at Gettysburg?
 
It was definitely influenced by Custer's theory. I tried very hard to talk him out of that map, and failed.
I find it interesting that Phil Laino adjusted his map to suit a theory as opposed to the information the NPS, you and J.D. Petruzzi presented.

Wow. It IS very interesting. Thanks, Eric, for helping to explain the discrepancy between the maps.
 
I'm sorry but out of all the expletives we hear employed today ( and you can't post any of them ), you still can't do better than " poppycock ".

Have to say, when we were shown where Farnsworth's charge actually happened it gives you the worst kind of chills. The thought a cavalry charge took place there is absolutely- I'm not sure what the word is- astonishing doesn't do it. Makes you want to go dig up Kilpatrick and yell at him more.
 
The American Battlefield Trust map shows 4 arrows "returning". Should there not be a fifth? One for the PA unit, one for the WV unit, and three for the VT unit? Or did not enough of one of the VT thirds not make it back in enough number?
 
I have been to Fort Stark in New Castle NH many times. There is a portion of the fort that has the name Farnsworth painted on it. I wonder if this was named for Elon Farnsworth of the infamous charge at Gettysburg?
Hey Dan...It's been 8 yrs since I saw you at the Burg....Hope you are doing well in these uncertain times...
 
The American Battlefield Trust map shows 4 arrows "returning". Should there not be a fifth? One for the PA unit, one for the WV unit, and three for the VT unit? Or did not enough of one of the VT thirds not make it back in enough number?

The 1st West Virginia was repulsed at the stone wall. The 18th Pennsylvania didn't even make it that far. The 1st Vermont's three battalions all went forward, and two of them them met up and made the charge together.
 
As a disclaimer, I have not yet studied this portion of this field to a great extent, but with just some preliminary research, I find no reason to dispute Eric's conclusions (post #12). My attached rough map depicts but a portion of the 1 VT Cavalry - the part described in detail by Law. It turns out to be a rather good match with a hand drawn map from the Bachelder Papers, 1:479 (Plate 15). Just a couple of points:

The 18th Pennsylvania Cavalry moved through the woods in a northwesterly direction until approaching a clearing, taking some casualties while still in the woods, based on accounts from Lt. Col. John W. Phillips and Sgt. Thomas J. Grier of Company B. Apparently some went beyond the woods and close to the wall, since six were captured and one was wounded and captured, but the 18th sustained only 14 casualties altogether, which hardly defines a pitched battle. (Phillips, Dedication of Monument, 18th Regiment Pennsylvania Cavalry, September 11, 1889, Pennsylvania at Gettysburg, p. 889; Grier, Bachelder Papers, 3:1543 - Grier also included a hand-drawn map.)

I have quite a few helpful first-hand accounts from men of the 1st Texas. While Capt. George T. Todd claimed Farnsworth fell in front of his company toward the left and front of their line, he is clearly wrong. It might have instead been Captain William Harris of the 1st West Virginia. H. W. Berryman reported killing a captain and wounding a lieutenant (Hiram Robinett?). Alfred C. Sims of Company F said 17 dead cavalrymen were left on the field. By the way, at that time the 1st Texas only had about 200 men deployed in a single line, which would not extend much beyond 150 yards, if that far. They were posted behind a stone wall three and a half feet high per W. T. White, but it was actually a stake and ridered fence per T. L. McCarty, with [some of] the rails removed by the Texans just prior to the charge. Law wrote that toward the end of the charge a half dozen Federal cavalrymen passed around the right of the 1st Texas line after turning away from Bachman's guns, which helps to define where the right of the 1st Texas stood (approximately).
 

Attachments

Last edited:
As a disclaimer, I have not yet studied this portion of this field to a great extent, but with just some preliminary research, I find no reason to dispute Eric's conclusions (post #12). My attached rough map depicts but a portion of the 1 VT Cavalry - the part described in detail by Law. It turns out to be a rather good match with a hand drawn map from the Bachelder Papers, 1:479 (Plate 15). Just a couple of points:

The 18th Pennsylvania Cavalry moved through the woods in a northwesterly direction until approaching a clearing, taking some casualties while still in the woods, based on accounts from Lt. Col. John W. Phillips and Sgt. Thomas J. Grier of Company B. Apparently some went beyond the woods and close to the wall, since six were captured and one was wounded and captured, but the 18th sustained only 14 casualties altogether, which hardly defines a pitched battle. (Phillips, Dedication of Monument, 18th Regiment Pennsylvania Cavalry, September 11, 1889, Pennsylvania at Gettysburg, p. 889; Grier, Bachelder Papers, 3:1543 - Grier also included a hand-drawn map.)

I have quite a few helpful first-hand accounts from men of the 1st Texas. While Capt. George T. Todd claimed Farnsworth fell in front of his company toward the left and front of their line, he is clearly wrong. It might have instead been Captain William Harris of the 1st West Virginia. H. W. Berryman reported killing a captain and wounding a lieutenant (Hiram Robinett?). Alfred C. Sims of Company F said 17 dead cavalrymen were left on the field. By the way, at that time the 1st Texas only had about 200 men deployed in a single line, which would not extend much beyond 150 yards, if that far. They were posted behind a stone wall three and a half feet high per W. T. White, but it was actually a stake and ridered fence per T. L. McCarty, with the rails removed by the Texans just prior to the charge. Law wrote that toward the end of the charge a half dozen Federal cavalrymen passed around the right of the 1st Texas line after turning away from Bachman's guns, which helps to define where the right of the 1st Texas stood (approximately).

Excellent. I have taken the liberty of re-posting your map below: Yours most closely resembles Captain Parson's map whereas the 1st Vermont (as well as the rest of Farnsworth's brigade) begins the charge from WEST of Bushman's Hill. The Stanley map is the only one that I can find that shows the 1st Vermont beginning the charge on the EAST slope of Bushman's Hill. Did you consult the Parson map?
Farnsworth-Elmore.jpg
 
Yes, the Parson map and his narrative, in conjunction with an account by Lt. S. A. Clark, Company F, 1st Vermont (National Tribune, February 3, 1887, p.3). Parson described the attack and repulse of the 1st West Virginia "at our left and front" upon the 1st Texas. ... "As we passed out from the cover of the woods the 1st West Virginia was retiring in disorder on our left." That would appear to place him on the west side of the hill.

Clark wrote: " ... a line of Confederate infantry was plainly in view and well posted behind a stone wall ... Away they [Wells' battalion of four companies] went, with drawn sabers, making a turn around a small hill, and then struck out boldly for Lee's army.
 
Attached map attempts to clarify the encounter near the Slyder buildings between the 1st Vermont Cavalry and 4th Alabama Infantry, principally relying on the accounts of Lieutenant Parsons of the 1st Vermont Cavalry (who includes an account by Captain James T. Jones of Company D, 4th Alabama) and a detailed account from another officer from the 4th found in Coles' History of the 4th Regiment Alabama Volunteer Infantry.

These accounts agree that the encounter was a surprise for both parties, the men of the 4th Alabama emerging from the woods to find a portion of the 1st Vermont Cavalry moving upon them at close range. (It reminds me of Wofford's men emerging from the woods to find the 4th Michigan right in front of them, on July 2.)

My previous research had positioned the 4th Alabama on the west slope of Big Round Top as shown. Facing to the rear and advancing in disorder would have them emerging from the woods with the Vermont cavalry coming down the road (per Parsons) to their right. This contention is sustained in the Coles' account, when the officer stated that Private Samuel T. Whitworth of Company F swung his weapon around to the right so quickly that he struck the officer in the head with the barrel.

What happened next is not so clear cut. The 4th Alabama was said to have cleared their front and advanced eastward toward their artillery across the valley. In that direction they soon saw Federal cavalry – my guess is the same force they had just repulsed. Parsons seems to describe another route taken, back in the direction they came from, so I have put question marks on the retreating lines. Neither of the 4th Alabama sources indicate that some of the Federal cavalry went past them to skirt the base of Big Round Top.

Pertinent portions of the aforementioned accounts:

(Farnsworth's Charge and Death, by H. C. Parsons, Captain, 1st Vermont Cavalry, Battles and Leaders of the Civil War) We rode through the enemy's skirmish line across the fields, over the low stone fences, past the Slyder house, and down the road. The sun was blinding; Captain Cushman shaded his eyes with his hand and cried, "An ambuscade!" We were immediately upon the enemy, within thirty paces, and the deadly volley, which is referred to in Confederate reports, was fired, but it passed over our heads; although they report that half our saddles were emptied, not a man was shot, yet the fire was the close and concentrated volley our a regiment. Captain (afterwards Colonel) Jones, who commanded the right of the 4th Alabama, says: "I was ordered to face about to resist cavalry; we marched rapidly to the rear over the rocks, and the Vermonters were upon us before we could form. They were within a few paces when we gave the order to fire." … The whole regiment fired, but when the smoke cleared I only saw one horse fall. A private at my left said, "Captain, I shot that black." I said, "Why didn't you shoot the rider?" He replied, "Oh, we'll get him anyhow, but I'm a hunter, and for three years I haven't looked at a deer's eye – I couldn't stand it." Taken by surprise, they had shot over us; the next, a random volley, was effective. With the head of the column we cleared the wall at the right and formed under cover of the hill. The rear companies fell back and formed behind a cross fence and in the edge of the timber.

(From Huntsville to Appomattox: R. T. Coles' History of 4th Regiment Alabama Volunteer Infantry, C. S. A., Army of Northern Virginia) A courier [Law's staff officer, Lt. Wade] came rushing up to the regiment at full speed with orders to double quick to the right. Without awaiting orders from Lt. Col. Scruggs, who had early that morning returned from the hospital partially recovered from his [heat] exhaustion of the evening before, everyone, without the semblance of order, with rear in front, and only keeping with each other, companies all commingled, the most fleet-foot leading, ran through the woods in the direction of the firing. … Just as we were about to emerge from the timber into the open field, we saw a squadron of Union cavalry bearing down upon us at a gallop. It came in smashing style from the direction of Capt. Reilly's battery … men … unusually nervous … limbs were stiffened and sore from over exertion … One little fellow of C Company was particularly rattled … when Lt. Vaughn of his company called out in a loud voice, "Cavalry, boys, cavalry' this is no fight, only a frolic; give it to 'em." … In the confusion Sam Whitworth of F Company, not seeing me in his front, threw his rifle around to his right as the Vermonters came down in gallant style from that direction, and struck me on the left side of my head with the barrel of his piece and fired. I was only shocked for an instant … When Sam fired, the Union troopers leading the charge were not ten paces from us, and our whole line scattered along the edge of the timber was pouring a deadly fire into their ranks. A young trooper's beautiful sorrel mare fell, shot in the breast only a few paces from our line. The trooper came down with her, standing erect on his feet, astride of her. Instead of surrendering he quickly threw up his carbine and discharged it directly in our faces, but fortunately no harm was done. Then, throwing down his gun, he jumped from over his horse and ran. A puff of dust flew out of his blouse … as the bullet penetrated between his shoulders, and he fell, meeting the same fate as his horse. Clearing our front we rapidly advanced eastward across the open field … in the direction of Capt. Reilly's battery could be seen a small force of Union cavalry.
 

Attachments


Learn About Us
About CivilWarTalk
Contact the Webmaster
Meet the Staff
Link to CivilWarTalk
Join Our Community
Register
Browse Forums
View Today's Discussions
Search the Forum
Get Help
FAQ
Student Guide
Forum Rules & Etiquette
Copyright / DMCA

     Contact Us CivilwarTalk on Facebook CivilWarTalk on YouTube CivilWarTalk on Twitter RSS Feed

Bringing the American Civil War and More to Life.
© 1999 - , CIVILWARTALK, LLC - Site Version 10.0

SlaveryTalk.com - SecessionTalk.com - CivilWarTalk.com - ReconstructionTalk.com
Back
Top