East TN Unionists

CPTBeaty62

Cadet
Joined
Jan 23, 2024
In my research for my historical fiction I have not been able to find any solid answers as to why so many east Tennesseans were pro Union. There have been many shorts statements as to the economy being different than that of middle and west Tennessee, but there had to be more reasons than that. I wonder what someone in East TN who supported the union thought and why... What do y'all think?
 
Political concerns were a factor. The TN State flag has 3 stars on it. Reflects the 3 Tennessees. East, middle and west. So the idea of these sections being of some independence was reflected before the Civil War. East TN farms were smaller and less profitable. Middle and West had a larger number of slaves. So there was a conflict. East TN didn't want their tax dollars to support, by what they considered Aristocratic Slave owners. East TN was pretty solid Whig. Middle and West Democrat. East TN Democrats tended to be wealthier. There were influential wealthy East TN Whigs. However the Unionist tended to be poorer. Wanted government assistance. infrastructure to support manufacturing. East TN had plenty of water power etc. Also they had a couple of influential politicians that Unionist could rally around. Brownlow an influential Whig and Andrew Johnson a Unionist Democrat. Johnson hated Aristocrats. Thought he was outcast because he was poorer than them. The war was more a conflict between Southern Democrats and the Republicans.

East TN did have a RR that ran North to South. It did not run West to East. So this alone help to split them off from the rest of the State. So they had access to the slave south. And actually supported Slavery economically. Before the RR, East Tennesseans herded Cows, Hogs etc to SC. Imagine herding animals over the Smokies to SC. So, their attitudes majority wasn't anti Slavery. Brownlow was accused of being Anti Slavery. Adamantly he denounced it. East TN had slavery. Probably a 20% Black Population. Estimated that 20% of East TN slave owners remained Unionist. They thought, like the Kentuckians that their Loyalty would save their Slaves. Even after the EP, they remained Unionist. However, as a War Measure Brownlow and Johnson do become anti slavery. If ending slavery could help win the war and give them the political power they wanted. They were all for it. Did this change their attitudes toward Blacks? Like most others, very little. Post war the Unionist will unite with Blacks to obtain some political power.

Some thought that the Unionist were more patriotic. Rallied around the old flag, etc. No doubt that feeling persisted. Was it the overwhelming reason? They wanted to remain neutral. Confederacy thought eventually they would become loyal. Confederacy treated them less harshly until the Bridge Burning incidents. Then the gloves came off. Conscription started. This forced the Unionist to take a firmer stance. Going to KY to join the Federals. East TN will have their own Civil War which will last longer than the original conflict.

So, there are a lot of misnomers about East Tennessee. Fun to study.
 
In my research for my historical fiction I have not been able to find any solid answers as to why so many east Tennesseans were pro Union. There have been many shorts statements as to the economy being different than that of middle and west Tennessee, but there had to be more reasons than that. I wonder what someone in East TN who supported the union thought and why... What do y'all think?
"So, there are a lot of misnomers about East Tennessee" " As @uaskme accurately stated East Tennessee in the Civil War is a very complicated issue. Modern historians are quick to describe the whole region as a "hotbed of Unionism". Some of the mountainous counties could probably be described that way. Many of the valley areas close to rivers and railways had economic ties to the lower south and were pro-Confederate. There were two Brigades of East Tennesseeans among the garrison at Vicksburg.
 
Knoxville and Chattanooga were majority Democrat. Economic centers had a higher level of wealth per person. Mercantile. Hotels and industry, RR centers. All of these had economic ties to the Confederacy.

Brownlow said himself. That Democrats losing the election lost their political power and the graft that came with it. Caused them to be secessionist.
 
In my research for my historical fiction I have not been able to find any solid answers as to why so many east Tennesseans were pro Union. There have been many shorts statements as to the economy being different than that of middle and west Tennessee, but there had to be more reasons than that. I wonder what someone in East TN who supported the union thought and why... What do y'all think?
Confederate Conscription created a good number of East Tennessee Unionists.
 
Political concerns were a factor. The TN State flag has 3 stars on it. Reflects the 3 Tennessees. East, middle and west. So the idea of these sections being of some independence was reflected before the Civil War. East TN farms were smaller and less profitable. Middle and West had a larger number of slaves. So there was a conflict. East TN didn't want their tax dollars to support, by what they considered Aristocratic Slave owners. East TN was pretty solid Whig. Middle and West Democrat. East TN Democrats tended to be wealthier. There were influential wealthy East TN Whigs. However the Unionist tended to be poorer. Wanted government assistance. infrastructure to support manufacturing. East TN had plenty of water power etc. Also they had a couple of influential politicians that Unionist could rally around. Brownlow an influential Whig and Andrew Johnson a Unionist Democrat. Johnson hated Aristocrats. Thought he was outcast because he was poorer than them. The war was more a conflict between Southern Democrats and the Republicans.

East TN did have a RR that ran North to South. It did not run West to East. So this alone help to split them off from the rest of the State. So they had access to the slave south. And actually supported Slavery economically. Before the RR, East Tennesseans herded Cows, Hogs etc to SC. Imagine herding animals over the Smokies to SC. So, their attitudes majority wasn't anti Slavery. Brownlow was accused of being Anti Slavery. Adamantly he denounced it. East TN had slavery. Probably a 20% Black Population. Estimated that 20% of East TN slave owners remained Unionist. They thought, like the Kentuckians that their Loyalty would save their Slaves. Even after the EP, they remained Unionist. However, as a War Measure Brownlow and Johnson do become anti slavery. If ending slavery could help win the war and give them the political power they wanted. They were all for it. Did this change their attitudes toward Blacks? Like most others, very little. Post war the Unionist will unite with Blacks to obtain some political power.

Some thought that the Unionist were more patriotic. Rallied around the old flag, etc. No doubt that feeling persisted. Was it the overwhelming reason? They wanted to remain neutral. Confederacy thought eventually they would become loyal. Confederacy treated them less harshly until the Bridge Burning incidents. Then the gloves came off. Conscription started. This forced the Unionist to take a firmer stance. Going to KY to join the Federals. East TN will have their own Civil War which will last longer than the original conflict.

So, there are a lot of misnomers about East Tennessee. Fun to study.
Some good thoughts here. Do not believe many thought highly of the Blacks/Slaves though. Thirteen Tennessee Cavalry, Union in Middle Tennessee fired on freed slaves sitting on fence cheering them as they went by, killed killing & wounding several. In foothills & mountains regions not many Blacks or Slaves. Post war much resistance to blacks. Believe the people in that area wanted to remain neutral and not separate from the US.
Do not believe Confederacy was that kind to Unionist at beginning according to all the incidents that are recorded. As stated after the bridge burnings things got harsh & conscription forced many to the Union that standing on the fence on one leg. Also, the mountain did not like to be told what to do, just be convinced into it. You can still see that now in in flood area od ET/NC dealing with FEMA/TEMA. Also, even prior to Civil War & now, East Tennessee treated as step-child from middle & west TN. Also, read in diary of upper east Tennessean herding hogs over mountains to Charleston, SC and could not wait to get out & back to ET after hearing the fanatic rebellious people in Charleston just prior to firing on Ft. Sumter. Like stated, complicated but fun to study. Hard to understand how some strong Unionist or Secessionist families had a close strong family member in it on the other side.
 
6 East Tennessee counties voted for secession.

Polk County
Monroe County
Rhea County
Meigs County
Sequatchie County
Sullivan County

Almost all of them laid on primary rail links connected to states that had seceded.
I agree. Most of those counties were in constant warfare locally though during war.
 
I wonder what someone in East TN who supported the union thought and why...

Some free reading...

Internal Dissent: East Tennessee's Civil War, 1849-1865.
by Meredith Anne Grant

"Mere Supplicants at the Gate": Northeast Tennessee Politics in the Antebellum Era
by O.J. Early

The diary of Fannie Fain of Blountville : defining allegiance in Civil War era East Tennessee
Jennifer M. Brickey

The Civil War in East Tennessee: A Social, Political, and Economic Study
Charles Faulkner Bryan Jr.

Divided Loyalties: A Socioeconomic Comparison of East Tennessee Unionists and Secessionists
Elijah T. Settlemyre

Abraham Lincoln and Unionism in East Tennessee
Cameron Smith

The Confederate Government and the Unionists of East Tennessee
Beatrice L. Garrett

HTHs,
USS ALASKA
 
East TN did have a RR that ran North to South. It did not run West to East. So this alone help to split them off from the rest of the State.

1646529643190.png


http://www.outlookmaps.com/map-images/tennessee-topographic-map.jpg

Sirs, kinda rough terrain out that way...

In this time frame, that area was a railroad dead zone...like western Penn...

1646530373151.jpeg


https://railroads.unl.edu/views/sources/US 1861.jpg

A better map with metropolitan centers labeled...

1646664624955.png


https://www.nps.gov/chat/learn/education/classrooms/the-atlanta-campaign-lp.htm

Cheers,
USS ALASKA
 
Last edited:
THE GEOGRAPHY OF CIVIL WAR: CONFLICT AND LEGACY IN UPPER EAST TENNESSEE, 1861-1865
Spurgeon C. King
Middle Tennessee State University
Degree of Doctor of Philosophy
DECEMBER 2009
Copyright 2010 All rights reserved

ABSTRACT
This dissertation, "The Geography of Civil War: Conflict and Legacy in Upper East Tennessee, 1861-1865," documents how geography shaped warfare in Upper East Tennessee during the American Civil War, and how contemporary terrain holds significant instructive potential for modern observers. East Tennessee's topography, which features a long valley with low ridges surrounded by high mountains, suggested logical points of attack and defense to Civil War commanders, depending on strategic and logistical requirements of each occupying army. Heavily forested terrain facilitated partisan and guerilla warfare, with nearby states providing sanctuary for irregular combatants. The region's single railroad, the East Tennessee and Virginia, assumed enormous logistical importance as the major means of supply for both armies, North and South. This dissertation shows how each side used the unique geography of East Tennessee under changing operational circumstances to pursue strategic ends, and suggests that natural terrain features influencing military decisions during the Civil War embody potential to inform contemporary observation today. East Tennessee's geography helped determine both strategy and tactics. The Great Valley, actually a series of smaller valleys separated by low ridges, is oriented along a northeast axis from Alabama all the way up to Virginia. Surrounded on all sides by high mountains, the Great Valley is accessed through mountain passes, which assumed major strategic importance for defense, particularly during the period of Confederate occupation from 1861 to 1863. When the Union army finally captured Knoxville in 1863 and fighting erupted throughout the region, mountain valleys became convenient avenues for flanking movements, while interior gaps in the ridges became points which cavalry could exploit to appear behind an enemy. Rivers, natural impediments to transportation, also fueled fertile farmlands filled with food and forage, sparking battles for possession of these vital resources. The Great Valley's most valuable strategic asset east of Knoxville, however, remained the East Tennessee and Virginia Railroad, which wound its way through the lesser valleys up to Bristol, and thence into Virginia. Throughout the war, much military activity revolved around defending or targeting the vital railroad lifeline. Geography stands not only as a legacy to the natural world, but to the workings of humankind, as well. And if geography shapes human actions at a defined period of time such as the Civil War, then it stands to reason that later generations can better understand past events through observation of the setting where those events occurred. By standing on the mountain at Bull's Gap, Tennessee, for example, one gets a sense of what it was like to charge up the mountainside, or, conversely, to defend against such a charge. Through an examination of terrain, one can better understand why commanders chose to locate railroad facilities north of the Gap, and how they orchestrated what came to be known as the first "railroad" war in history. Bull's Gap, which is featured in a separate appendix, is thus a good representative example of the military uses of geography, suggesting how a contemporary examination of topography can lead to a better understanding of Upper East Tennessee's civil war past.


Please use above link.

Cheers,
USS ALASKA
 
In my research for my historical fiction I have not been able to find any solid answers as to why so many east Tennesseans were pro Union. There have been many shorts statements as to the economy being different than that of middle and west Tennessee, but there had to be more reasons than that. I wonder what someone in East TN who supported the union thought and why... What do y'all think?


Below is a map from the 1860 census showing the slave population of the Southern States (Darker = more dense population of enslaved people). You can basically draw higher union support in the counties with less ties to the cause of slavery. It's not a coincidence that the free state of Jones has the lowest rate of slavery in Mississippi or that the Free State of Winston has the lowest rate of slavery in Alabama, or that Winn County Louisiana with the lowest rate of slavery in the state was the only county in the state to not support secession. You can basically draw West Virginia there from the demographics of the enslaved.

Governor Isham Harris was largely the mouthpiece for the secessionist movement in Tennessee with his base in Central and Western TN. He publicly sent out a list of proposed Amendments that Tennessee would not secede/rebel if they were taken up (along with 21 complaints Tennessee had). EVERY proposed Amendment was about protecting and expanding the institution of race-based chattel slavery (as well as 19 of the 21 complaints). They were the usuals... Protect slavery in slave states. Protect slavery in slave territories, ensure its expansion would be protected, put more teeth in the Fugitive Slave Act. Stop abolition movements. If you've read the Crittendon Compromise, you get the point. This cause and list didn't motivate people in the areas of the South where enslaving people was less prominent.

In Knoxville "King Harris" or Benedict Arnold Harris as local leaders and papers would often call him was not well received for his pro-secession/pro-slavery movement. In order to try and secure a pro-secession vote, Harris had been using the state militia to overrun federal installations (much Like other upper south states). The Federal Arsenal in Nashville was taken, Ft Brown... Ft Wright. Basically, every military depot or armory they would come across, they'd send an armed group in to take it. BEFORE a vote on secession. In Eastern TN they saw these raids on federal bases for what they were... a way to push the TN vote to secession. Those pre-emptive raids didn't sit well with a group that wasn't really wanting secession in the first place.


In the east, you had Andrew Johnson as a political leader representing their interests who was a staunch unionist/Jacksonian Democrat, believing nothing good would come of secession for Tennessee. One of the few Democrats to win out there. Largely Eastern Tennessee rather than send their vote to the extremes (Southern Democrats for example) chose the more moderate political party which had been the Whigs that campaigned there for the most part.
1741720813225.png

It was Geographic in part. You had mountainous terrain that somewhat isolated it from the rest of the state, particularly the plantation heavy areas in the west. It was economic, more small-scale farming, subsistence agriculture/industry and less reliance on slavery-based plantation economics.

And you had where the people came from. During the early 19th century, Eastern TN wasn't being populated by plantation owners and slavers so much as those from the Northeast, and in fact some that had moved away from slavery, not to expand it west.

Religion played a huge part here too. By the time of the secession crisis the major protestant denominations had their splits over the morality of slavery. But one of the more interesting bits of history was in Eastern TN, you had some of the strongest abolitionist/anti-slavery religious leaders in the South. Rev. Isaac Anderson (founder of Maryville College), Rev Samuel McPheeters, Rev. James Lyon, Rev Robert PL Jackson, and Rev William Brownlow (Would become governor in 1865). The moral idea that slavery was evil was something that had more of a foothold there than arguably anywhere else in the South. Multiple pro-slavery/pro-secession arguments through the south calling out the evils of abolitionists were based on the example of Eastern Tennessee of what the rest of the South may end up being if that movement wasn't stopped.
 
Below is a map from the 1860 census showing the slave population of the Southern States (Darker = more dense population of enslaved people). You can basically draw higher union support in the counties with less ties to the cause of slavery. It's not a coincidence that the free state of Jones has the lowest rate of slavery in Mississippi or that the Free State of Winston has the lowest rate of slavery in Alabama, or that Winn County Louisiana with the lowest rate of slavery in the state was the only county in the state to not support secession. You can basically draw West Virginia there from the demographics of the enslaved.

Governor Isham Harris was largely the mouthpiece for the secessionist movement in Tennessee with his base in Central and Western TN. He publicly sent out a list of proposed Amendments that Tennessee would not secede/rebel if they were taken up (along with 21 complaints Tennessee had). EVERY proposed Amendment was about protecting and expanding the institution of race-based chattel slavery (as well as 19 of the 21 complaints). They were the usuals... Protect slavery in slave states. Protect slavery in slave territories, ensure its expansion would be protected, put more teeth in the Fugitive Slave Act. Stop abolition movements. If you've read the Crittendon Compromise, you get the point. This cause and list didn't motivate people in the areas of the South where enslaving people was less prominent.

In Knoxville "King Harris" or Benedict Arnold Harris as local leaders and papers would often call him was not well received for his pro-secession/pro-slavery movement. In order to try and secure a pro-secession vote, Harris had been using the state militia to overrun federal installations (much Like other upper south states). The Federal Arsenal in Nashville was taken, Ft Brown... Ft Wright. Basically, every military depot or armory they would come across, they'd send an armed group in to take it. BEFORE a vote on secession. In Eastern TN they saw these raids on federal bases for what they were... a way to push the TN vote to secession. Those pre-emptive raids didn't sit well with a group that wasn't really wanting secession in the first place.


In the east, you had Andrew Johnson as a political leader representing their interests who was a staunch unionist/Jacksonian Democrat, believing nothing good would come of secession for Tennessee. One of the few Democrats to win out there. Largely Eastern Tennessee rather than send their vote to the extremes (Southern Democrats for example) chose the more moderate political party which had been the Whigs that campaigned there for the most part.
View attachment 542219
It was Geographic in part. You had mountainous terrain that somewhat isolated it from the rest of the state, particularly the plantation heavy areas in the west. It was economic, more small-scale farming, subsistence agriculture/industry and less reliance on slavery-based plantation economics.

And you had where the people came from. During the early 19th century, Eastern TN wasn't being populated by plantation owners and slavers so much as those from the Northeast, and in fact some that had moved away from slavery, not to expand it west.

Religion played a huge part here too. By the time of the secession crisis the major protestant denominations had their splits over the morality of slavery. But one of the more interesting bits of history was in Eastern TN, you had some of the strongest abolitionist/anti-slavery religious leaders in the South. Rev. Isaac Anderson (founder of Maryville College), Rev Samuel McPheeters, Rev. James Lyon, Rev Robert PL Jackson, and Rev William Brownlow (Would become governor in 1865). The moral idea that slavery was evil was something that had more of a foothold there than arguably anywhere else in the South. Multiple pro-slavery/pro-secession arguments through the south calling out the evils of abolitionists were based on the example of Eastern Tennessee of what the rest of the South may end up being if that movement wasn't stopped.
Many of the leading Unionists in East Tennessee were slave-owners. T.A.R. Nelson, who had two sons in each Army, almost changed sides over the Emancipation Proclamation.
 
Many of the leading Unionists in East Tennessee were slave-owners. T.A.R. Nelson, who had two sons in each Army, almost changed sides over the Emancipation Proclamation.
Some were. Andrew Johnson was one but also took actions to end slavery in TN. Cheatham of course was from a very prominent slave family that divided pretty much right on who owned slaves to which side they chose.

Thomas AR Nelson was actually not a slave owner, so wouldn't be a good example that you are using there (though you are right, he did oppose the emancipation proclamation and was part of a smaller group of unionists in the area who felt that it would alienate their cause and thought about switching sides though ultimately would reject that idea).

Horace Maynard was a US Congressman and eventual postmaster under Hayes who was a leading unionist from Eastern TN that didn't own slaves.

William Brownlow ran the Knoxvill Whig newspaper, later governor of Tennessee and non-slaveowner.

Samuel McElwee ended up being a unionist Rep in the state legislature and didn't own slaves.

John Netherland helped organize union resistance against Confederates in Eastern TN during the war and didn't own slaves.

James Spears of course, David Patterson (13th gov of TN eventually), William Campbell (later a congressman), Robert Hatton (Dem from East TN in their legislature), Clement Evans, William Lenoir, George Jones, John Rhea, William Gwin, Alfred Lenoir, William Hickerson...

You can find some who did own slaves yes if you look, but overwhelmingly you see a HUGE shift from the pro-secession leadership elsewhere in the state in that a large number were non-slavers leading in Eastern TN.

But for many, to gain power one needed wealth, and you saw a much higher rate of slave ownership among the leaders of Southern political power.
 
This is a down list research topic for me. That said, the preponderance of the evidence makes East Tennessee look much more deeply divided than overwhelmingly pro-union. Between 25,000 and 30,000 East Tennesseeans wore the gray, and the "31,000" number for Unionists is cited for both Statewide and ETN.

While ETN didn't vote for secession, neither did Jubal Early. One East Tennessee Confederate Veteran said later in life that Lincoln and Seward did what all the secessionists in ETN couldn't- made him a Confederate.

Madisonville native John Vaughn's 3rd East Tennessee turned 1st Manassas/Bull Run, His Brigade was at Vicksburg and in the Valley with Jubal Early. Early spoke well of Vaughn's Brigade at 2nd Kernstown, and Rutherford's Farm might have looked quite different if Dodson Ramseur listened to Vaughn's updated intel.


Thomas's Leigon was in the Valley as well. While some companies were formed in ETN (Co. K in what's now Oliver Springs), there are East Tennesseeans in many companies according to the official State of NC history. Even a few from Morgan County.

East Tennessee Confederates served in virtually every major battle in the War. The senior Tennessee officer of the Immortal Six Hundred was Col. Abram Fulkerson from Rogersville. CO of the 63rd Tennessee Infantry.

The largest Tennessee regiment at Appomattox was the 63rd, East Tennesseeans, and there were several locals in the Thomas's Legion detachment that came to Knoxville to negotiate surrender and were instead incarcerated for refusing to take the oath of alliegence.

The 4th Consolidated (?) Infantry at Bentonville contained remnants of the 26th Tennessee Infantry, a Regiment so numerous they were known as "the Confederate army" when they formed in Knoxville in 1861.

There were UCV, SCV, and UDC camps and chapters all over East Tennessee between about 1880-1930, the Confederate Veteran era. If a Confederate Veteran lived here, it's reasonable to presume he had an UCV camp he could participate in, his wife and daughters had an UDC chapter to participate in, and his sons *probably* had an SCV camp he could join and be active in, as well.

Why, in the face of a growing body of evidence to the contrary, does the Conventional Wisdom insist ETN was a stronghold of fanatical Unionists?

The answer appears pretty straightforward- Unionist Veterans wrote, and their Confederate neighbors didn't. William Worsham's book, "The Old Nineteenth Tennessee," is virtually the entire East Tennessee Confederate bookshelf of the era.
 
Last edited:
One could be pro slavery and not own slaves, which the vast majority was. Brownlow is a good example. As a war measure and as a way to gain political power, he became anti slavery. Didn't change his attitudes toward blacks. Estimated that about 25% of slave owners remained Unionist. The Unionist Slave Owners thought that they would be rewarded for their loyalty by their slavery being protected. Which it was till the end of the war. Most remained loyal after the issuance of the EP.

War wasn't all about Slavery.
 
Some were. Andrew Johnson was one but also took actions to end slavery in TN. Cheatham of course was from a very prominent slave family that divided pretty much right on who owned slaves to which side they chose.

Thomas AR Nelson was actually not a slave owner, so wouldn't be a good example that you are using there (though you are right, he did oppose the emancipation proclamation and was part of a smaller group of unionists in the area who felt that it would alienate their cause and thought about switching sides though ultimately would reject that idea).

Horace Maynard was a US Congressman and eventual postmaster under Hayes who was a leading unionist from Eastern TN that didn't own slaves.

William Brownlow ran the Knoxvill Whig newspaper, later governor of Tennessee and non-slaveowner.

Samuel McElwee ended up being a unionist Rep in the state legislature and didn't own slaves.

John Netherland helped organize union resistance against Confederates in Eastern TN during the war and didn't own slaves.

James Spears of course, David Patterson (13th gov of TN eventually), William Campbell (later a congressman), Robert Hatton (Dem from East TN in their legislature), Clement Evans, William Lenoir, George Jones, John Rhea, William Gwin, Alfred Lenoir, William Hickerson...

You can find some who did own slaves yes if you look, but overwhelmingly you see a HUGE shift from the pro-secession leadership elsewhere in the state in that a large number were non-slavers leading in Eastern TN.

But for many, to gain power one needed wealth, and you saw a much higher rate of slave ownership among the leaders of Southern political power.
For the most part, the East Tennessee Union soldiers fought to restore the Union and cared no more for the slaves than their opponents. This is from the history of the Union 13th Tennessee Cavalry.

"Contrabands," who did not seem to think they had anything to do but parade the sidewalks. Our men soon concluded they needed good strong walking sticks. Provided with these the colored gentry soon found it convenient to vacate the walk in ample time when he saw a "Thirteenth" soldier approaching. These mountaineers had known the colored man only as a slave and had lost little sleep over him in any way; they were not fighting to free the slave but to restore the Union. He might be free for all they cared, but his place was not in front; he must "go way back and sit down," and not be "sassy." Page 141

"Not only will I throughout this discussion openly and boldly take the ground that Slavery as it exists in America ought to be perpetuated, but that slavery is an established and inevitable condition to human society. I will maintain the ground that God always intended the relation of master and slave to exist; that Christ and the early teachers of Christianity, found slavery differing in no material respect from American slavery, incorporated into every department of society ... that slavery has existed ever since the first organization of society, it will exist to the end of time"......Parson Brownlow in an 1858 debate with an abolitionist editor. He was to debate Fredrick Douglass but refused because Douglass was a Black Man.
 
Some were. Andrew Johnson was one but also took actions to end slavery in TN. Cheatham of course was from a very prominent slave family that divided pretty much right on who owned slaves to which side they chose.

Thomas AR Nelson was actually not a slave owner, so wouldn't be a good example that you are using there (though you are right, he did oppose the emancipation proclamation and was part of a smaller group of unionists in the area who felt that it would alienate their cause and thought about switching sides though ultimately would reject that idea).

Horace Maynard was a US Congressman and eventual postmaster under Hayes who was a leading unionist from Eastern TN that didn't own slaves.

William Brownlow ran the Knoxvill Whig newspaper, later governor of Tennessee and non-slaveowner.

Samuel McElwee ended up being a unionist Rep in the state legislature and didn't own slaves.

John Netherland helped organize union resistance against Confederates in Eastern TN during the war and didn't own slaves.

James Spears of course, David Patterson (13th gov of TN eventually), William Campbell (later a congressman), Robert Hatton (Dem from East TN in their legislature), Clement Evans, William Lenoir, George Jones, John Rhea, William Gwin, Alfred Lenoir, William Hickerson...

You can find some who did own slaves yes if you look, but overwhelmingly you see a HUGE shift from the pro-secession leadership elsewhere in the state in that a large number were non-slavers leading in Eastern TN.

But for many, to gain power one needed wealth, and you saw a much higher rate of slave ownership among the leaders of Southern political power.
Thomas A.R. Nelson in 1850 owned 12 slaves. In 1860 he owned 8.

Andrew Johnson: https://www.nps.gov/anjo/learn/historyculture/slaves.htm

Horace Maynard owned 3 in 1850 4 in 1860

John Netherland owned 10 in 1850. He may have freed them by 1860 but being a Democrat, supported George B. McClellan in 1864.

Colonel Daniel Stover, Union 4th Tennessee Infantry and Andrew Johnson's son-in-law owned one of the rare plantations in East Tennessee and 9 slaves in 1860.

Brigader-General James G. Spears owned a 14-year-old female in 1850. He owned 13 slaves in 1860. He was eventually dismissed from the service in 1864 for his opposition to President Lincoln's Proclamation.

 
Last edited:

Learn About Us
About CivilWarTalk
Contact the Webmaster
Meet the Staff
Link to CivilWarTalk
Join Our Community
Register
Browse Forums
View Today's Discussions
Search the Forum
Get Help
FAQ
Student Guide
Forum Rules & Etiquette
Copyright / DMCA

     Contact Us CivilwarTalk on Facebook CivilWarTalk on YouTube CivilWarTalk on Twitter RSS Feed

Bringing the American Civil War and More to Life.
© 1999 - , CIVILWARTALK, LLC - Site Version 10.0

SlaveryTalk.com - SecessionTalk.com - CivilWarTalk.com - ReconstructionTalk.com
Back
Top