Manassas 1861
Sergeant
- Joined
- Dec 30, 2023
- Location
- Somewhere on Henry Hudson's river.
Did the US Army use any dragoon regiments during the ACW?
It appears that in several primary and secondary sources by the mid-18th century dragoons were considered, and used as, a form of less prestigious cavalry by most of the major powers and their spheres of influence. Although the carbines allowed them to dismount and act as light infantry without suffering the same issue as most other types of cavalry when dismounted.
Thanks, I'd never heard of that.Actually, that is not true. What about the 1st New York Dragoons, which became part of the Army of the Potomac's Reserve Brigade in 1864?
Neither had I.Thanks, I'd never heard of that.
Careful. You are getting into an area of great interest to me ! Somewhere with my way too many books there is a volume covering mounted units of the Revolution. There was even a mounted black Loyalist unit. Ok , back to the Civil War.I'll take "who got sent south from Canada without horses in 1777?" for 100 Thalers, Trebek.
I understand the foot march in Cavalry boots was uncomfortable.
- Braunschweig Prinz Friedrichs Dragoner [Dragoon] Regiment (1 squadron)
- https://www.nps.gov/sara/learn/historyculture/the-germans-at-saratoga.htm
- From what I've read, they not only had to carry their saddles but also 1740 Potsdam carbines. https://www.jstor.org/stable/44229246
![]()
View attachment 498020
I think there´s a certain truth to that. Militaries have fads just like other cultures and the flavor of the month in the late 18th century for cavalry was the Hussar - even though they´re really just light cavalry and could even be called dragoons. But their clothes were so exotic! Kind of like how airborne is sexier than leg infantry, but once they´re on the ground they´re exactly the same.It appears that in several primary and secondary sources by the mid-18th century dragoons were considered, and used as, a form of less prestigious cavalry by most of the major powers and their spheres of influence. Although the carbines allowed them to dismount and act as light infantry without suffering the same issue as most other types of cavalry when dismounted.
I would love to see that!!Tangential but I've been working primary sources on a surprise Crown Dragoon mounted night attack (one troop, @ 40 troopers) on a Connecticut troop dismounted and dispersed for the night. So that's the cavalry factor in action for RevWar Dragoons in action.
Dragoon regiments started out with a smaller price tag than most of the other cavalry.I think there´s a certain truth to that. Militaries have fads just like other cultures and the flavor of the month in the late 18th century for cavalry was the Hussar - even though they´re really just light cavalry and could even be called dragoons. But their clothes were so exotic! Kind of like how airborne is sexier than leg infantry, but once they´re on the ground they´re exactly the same.
They were important at Cowpens. William Washington's Continental Dragoons counterattacked and routed Tarleton.The "Dragoons" had an impact in Colonial America that few appreciate, .......
civilwartalk.com
What about dismounted cavalry? It can't be all clash on horseback. I know, on the opposite side, that Forrest essentially used his troops as dragoins.No. The dragoon regiments had been converted to standard cavalry regiments prior to the war.
Ryan
Most of the cavalry regiments on both sides fought dismounted pretty extensively. But I still wouldn't classify them as dragoons because they were much more than mounted infantry.What about dismounted cavalry? It can't be all clash on horseback. I know, on the opposite side, that Forrest essentially used his troops as dragoins.
The 1st and 2nd Dragoons were the senior cavalry regiments. When they converted over to regular cavalry the 2nd Dragoons kept their orange piping well into 1863, the reason was that they had plenty of orange rank stripes and piping in their depot and until they ran out they refused to covert over to yellow like the rest of the cavalry.Did the US Army use any dragoon regiments during the ACW?
Not trying to belabor the point at all, but the tactics changed somewhat. With evolution comes adaptation to a greater or lesser extent. There in is the crux of the entire war though. Tactics hadn't caught up.Most of the cavalry regiments on both sides fought dismounted pretty extensively. But I still wouldn't classify them as dragoons because they were much more than mounted infantry.
Ryan
I've handled a lot of Spencers over the last roughly ten years, but I can't say a significant percentage of them had notable wear in that location. Some certainly did, but I wouldn't necessarily say that they were the norm nor that the wear could be attributed to mounted troops. Most of them are actually in pretty solid condition even if the finish is mostly gone, and I've generally found more wear at the upper edges and corners then the underside of the forearm. The "near new" ones with the original vibrant case colors are a real treat to behold.View attachment 497988
The Spencer repeating rifle balances perfectly forward of the trigger guard, Original examples that were carried by mounted men have a wear spot where the fingers are in this photo. The rifle rode securely athwart the saddle.
Anecdotally, many men preferred the rifle over the carbine. The broad leather strap & awkward weight of the carbine on a long ride was uncomfortable.
I've handled a lot of Spencers over the last roughly ten years, but I can't say a significant percentage of them had notable wear in that location. Some certainly did, but I wouldn't necessarily say that they were the norm nor that the wear could be attributed to mounted troops. Most of them are actually in pretty solid condition even if the finish is mostly gone, and I've generally found more wear at the upper edges and corners then the underside of the forearm. The "near new" ones with the original vibrant case colors are a real treat to behold.
I'd love to see some examples. I haven't personally studied the examples ID'd to the brigade, but the examples below from ID'd to them don't seem to have much distinctive wear there from what I'm seeing and instead have more wear at the upper edges and corners like I'm used to seeing on Spencers and similar arms from the era more broadly. I'm certainly not saying you are wrong, just that I've personally not noticed this on many Spencers.You have examined Spencer rifles that did not have the wear mark that indicates use by a mounted individual. All of the Spencers issued to Wilder's Lightening Brigade have that wear mark. The same is true of other Army of the Cumberland cavalry that were armed with Spencer rifles.
My personal Spencer rifle does not have a mounted soldier's wear mark. It is what it is.
civilwartalk.com