Document Interpretation - Decipher Handwriting

lelliott19

Brigadier General
Moderator
* OFFICIAL *
CWT PRESENTER
Forum Host
Silver Patron
Regtl. Staff Chickamauga 2018
Joined
Mar 15, 2013
@AndyHall can you help with the writing here? Or anyone else who likes to decipher handwriting.

The document snips are part of estate papers regarding division of "property."

1. In the first example below.....its the "Lucy __ Matilda" entry that has me puzzled. I dont think its supposed to be Lucy & Matilda because I havent seen that particular symbol used anywhere else in the document. I thought it might be the word "of" -- Lucy of Matilda? Or "viz" but in another place, where viz would be appropriate it says "Jim called Darden." Then the assigned "value" of $200 is more than other female slaves listed elsewhere in the document, so I suppose it is possible that Matilda could be an infant? (Im sure its Lucy because of how the L is written in Lemuel in the third example below. Its my family and the name is definitely Lemuel and not Samuel.)

2. Also in the first example--the "for Keeping old Phillios $50" part. That is a deduction so assuming it was a way of providing credit/financial benefit for upkpeep of Phillios for the year? Or is it a charge against William for use of Phillios - like rental? In other places, where an enslaved individual was rented out to work for others, its listed as a payment into the estate.

3. In the last example -- Harrell or Harriett? I'm thinking Harrell because of the assigned value.

Any help appreciated. If you need more samples of the handwriting, Ill PM you the link. Thanks so much.

1546445027005.png


Here's another example from the same document where the word "and" is used. To Cyprian Cross...
Rose and Carolina
1546445174401.png


To Lemuel Cross - old Jim, old Luke, old Sarah, old Henery
1546445238523.png


To Isaac Cross Benjamin, (Harrell or Harriett) and Sam.
1546445492110.png
 
"Lucy & Matilda"...mother, and a daughter still too young to separate from Matilda, might explain why the price is different than the other females you mention....Lucy & Matilda are being offered as a package deal
 
Last edited:
Thanks for taking the time to help. @AndyHall @JAGwinn @Jimklag @Arioch I really appreciate it.

"Lucy & Matilda"...mother and a daughter, still too young to separate from Matilda, might explain why the price is different than the other females you mention....Lucy & Matilda are being offered as a package deal
Right Arioch. Thanks for your reply. But just to clarify, these were values assigned for estate purposes. The enslaved individuals were inherited by family members.

My gg grandfather was the Wm C listed. His father died in 1823 and his mother died in 1825. My gg grandfather is the Wm C who inherited Lucy & Matilda, Mike, and Moses. His brother Isaac inherited Sam (b. 1815-1820) and other enslaved individuals Benjamin and Harrell. My gg grandfather's brother Lemuel inherited Sarah and other enslaved individuals Jim, Luke and Henery.

When Isaac died in 1828, Sam came to my gg grandfather. When Lemuel died in 1845, Sarah came to my gg grandfather. He was a doctor and served as a surgeon in the CS Army. Sam went with him as his "body servant." After the war, in Feb 1866, Dr. Cross entered into agreements via the Freedmens Bureau with Sam and Sarah (and also a younger man named Jake, who I believe was Sam's son.) In 1869, Dr. Cross deeded a house and land to Sam in the town where they lived, making Sam Cross one of the first freed African Americans in Alabama to own real estate. I wish I knew more about Mike, Moses, Lucy & Matilda. Need to do some more reading in the Freedmen's Bureau records. Thanks again for your reply.
 
On the first document, the first highlight says Lucy & Matilda and the second says Keeping Old Philleas
Next question.....would Philleas be a male or a female name in 1820's?
 
Male - remember Philleas Fogg? Around the World In 80 Days?
Thanks! So "Old Philleas" was an enslaved man. The intended division was penned in 1828, and he may have died soon after. I don't find him listed anywhere else in the estate documents. Good to know my 13 year old gg grandfather saw to his care. One of the brothers (Isaac age 14-16) also died in 1828. Must have been some sickness going around?
 
It's astounding sometimes...I've looked into a large family's background before, and the number of folks who died before age 50 is heartbreaking.....Here's to the age of antibiotics!
 
Thanks for taking the time to help. @AndyHall @JAGwinn @Jimklag @Arioch I really appreciate it.


Right Arioch. Thanks for your reply. But just to clarify, these were values assigned for estate purposes. The enslaved individuals were inherited by family members.....

I note your correct point....It is interesting to see that they are being accounted, somehow, as a joint situation...
 
I've heard the name applied to males....I've also heard it applied to horses...are we sure 'Philleas' was a person?
Yes, Im sure he is a person. The use and care charges for horses, mules, cows, etc. is in another section.

Which brings me to a few more questions. I know you guys are probably tired of all my Qs but since I have a fine group of willing participants, I might as well pick your brains while I can :D

1. Is a "pide cow" the same as a pied cow? As in piebald, spotted, like a paint cow?
1546471914912.png

2. Does this say "flag bottomed chairs" If so, I think we still have these in the family. And just above it 3 lines up....what is a Bofat & furniture
1546472156085.png

Im sure there will be more. If yall get tired of helping me, just ignore the subsequent comments. Unless I @TAG you. In which case, it will because Im really stuck. Thanks again for your help!
 
Yes, Im sure he is a person. The use and care charges for horses, mules, cows, etc. is in another section.

Which brings me to a few more questions. I know you guys are probably tired of all my Qs but since I have a fine group of willing participants, I might as well pick your brains while I can :D

1. Is a "pide cow" the same as a pied cow? As in piebald, spotted, like a paint cow?
View attachment 216295
2. Does this say "flag bottomed chairs" If so, I think we still have these in the family. And just above it 3 lines up....what is a Bofat & furniture
View attachment 216301

Im sure there will be more. If yall get tired of helping me, just ignore the subsequent comments. Unless I @TAG you. In which case, it will because Im really stuck. Thanks again for your help!

Found this:
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/flag bottom
"flag bottom
noun
Definition of flag bottom


: a rush seat of a chair or settee
— called also flag seat "
Also wondered if "Bofat & Furniture" might not have meant "Buffet & Furniture". Pure conjecture on that one.
 

Learn About Us
About CivilWarTalk
Contact the Webmaster
Meet the Staff
Link to CivilWarTalk
Join Our Community
Register
Browse Forums
View Today's Discussions
Search the Forum
Get Help
FAQ
Student Guide
Forum Rules & Etiquette
Copyright / DMCA

     Contact Us CivilwarTalk on Facebook CivilWarTalk on YouTube CivilWarTalk on Twitter RSS Feed

Bringing the American Civil War and More to Life.
© 1999 - , CIVILWARTALK, LLC - Site Version 10.0

SlaveryTalk.com - SecessionTalk.com - CivilWarTalk.com - ReconstructionTalk.com
Back
Top