CSS Albemarle

The Union might have the solution to the Albemarle problem if the Casco class monitor program had been managed properly. That's the sort of situation the shallow-draft monitors were intended for, and AFAIK the original Ericsson design was basically sound. Without all the changes that both delayed and ultimately ruined the ships, the first Cascos should have been in service in time to engage Albemarle.

Albemarle and her Union opponents had drafts of 9' or less, while the Passaic class monitor drew about 10 1/2'. Was that enough to keep them from operating in the North Carolina sounds, or were they considered more needed at points like Charleston?
Albemarle Sound is rather shallow. 10'+ drafts would be problematic. The canals from Norfolk were too shallow for them to come down and only Hatteras Inlet would normally be deep enough for them to enter through, and then they would have to deal with the inside bar shoaling up to 7 or 8 feet.
 
Last edited:
Two questions:

1. Was the Albemarle a twin of the Neuse, or were there any major differences?

2. What was her bottom covered in? Copper or tar?

That floating model looks impressive, but aren't her proportions - particularly the casemate - out of whack?
The casemate doesn't look to scale to me, either. If it was to scale, there wouldn't be much wiggle room. The superstructure is mounted on pontoons.
Concerning question #2: On May 18, 1865, an in-depth review of her structure was completed by Commander Henry N. T. Arnold, Naval Constructor J. Hanscom, and Chief Engineer John H. Long. They found that: "The bottom is not covered with anything to protect it from worms, and in the repairs it is contemplated to cover it with sheet. zinc." That definitely eliminates copper having covered her bottom.
 
This model definitely looks authentic with the grated roof on the casemate.
jr_albemarle_interiorJohnRatzenberger.jpg
 
Do you have ANY IDEA how tiny the little digital hammers and nails are?

Oh, I'm well aware of that, but I have come up with a special solution to the problem :giggle:
But with that special solution, I'm dreading when this happens...
unionshop.jpg


I mean, I can try pointing out the irony of the situation, what with them working on a Confederate ship, but I dunno how that will pan out.
 
There were three "Albemarles" begun, only one fully completed. So far as I know the Tarboro vessel " CSS Pamlico" and CSS Albemarle would have been twins, CSS Neuse had the quarter ports which the original plan called for but the fist two didn't have. She also never received her deck armour ,only the casemate was ironed as she was dreadfully overweight.
I have always thought the hulls were tarred.
Wasn't that replica built on a small boat?
Yes. The replica was built on a pontoon party boat.
 
I hadn't realized until I started drawing it out to scale how small and cramped the interior of that casemate must've been. We think of these vessels as being enormous beheamoths, but that's frequently not the case.
The 1:1 of the Neuse is very surprising. First to imagine something that size in the river right beside it. The Neuse replica sits 100 yards from where the Neuse hull was recovered. Second, visitors can go inside and see/feel how cramped it was. The foward gun and pilot house platform and bracing make it tight. Reenactors have tried loading procedures on the gun and found that the only way to get the rammer in the tube is to stick the end out of an open gun port.
 
The 1:1 of the Neuse is very surprising. First to imagine something that size in the river right beside it. The Neuse replica sits 100 yards from where the Neuse hull was recovered. Second, visitors can go inside and see/feel how cramped it was. The foward gun and pilot house platform and bracing make it tight. Reenactors have tried loading procedures on the gun and found that the only way to get the rammer in the tube is to stick the end out of an open gun port.
I'm nor sure the replica is 1:1 It looks too small.
That's what they did in early periods too. There is a description I think from HMS Royal Sovereign at Trafalgar of how one poor guy was shot by a sharpshooter as he leaned out of the port with the rammer in his hand.

later in the ironclad era the end the chain rammer was invented, but that was forced by the guns being too large to run fully back in turrets, together with the arrival of quick firers.
 
The 1:1 of the Neuse is very surprising. First to imagine something that size in the river right beside it. The Neuse replica sits 100 yards from where the Neuse hull was recovered. Second, visitors can go inside and see/feel how cramped it was. The foward gun and pilot house platform and bracing make it tight. Reenactors have tried loading procedures on the gun and found that the only way to get the rammer in the tube is to stick the end out of an open gun port.

Another option would be to use a flexible rammer. These were made of thick rope. The end was placed in the muzzle, then by twisting it one direction it would stiffen enough to ram the charge or projectile home. They were used by the British navy in the Napoleonic period, not sure how widespread they were.
 

Learn About Us
About CivilWarTalk
Contact the Webmaster
Meet the Staff
Link to CivilWarTalk
Join Our Community
Register
Browse Forums
View Today's Discussions
Search the Forum
Get Help
FAQ
Student Guide
Forum Rules & Etiquette
Copyright / DMCA

     Contact Us CivilwarTalk on Facebook CivilWarTalk on YouTube CivilWarTalk on Twitter RSS Feed

Bringing the American Civil War and More to Life.
© 1999 - , CIVILWARTALK, LLC - Site Version 10.0

SlaveryTalk.com - SecessionTalk.com - CivilWarTalk.com - ReconstructionTalk.com
Back
Top