Confederate Bank Note: Circa 1862

Eaglebuttons

Cadet
Joined
Sep 7, 2021
I just thought this was cool and wanted to share it with you. It isn't in good condition, but it's my first one.
image.jpg
 
Just don't do something STUPID like I did with my first one and LAMINATE it:

View attachment 413520
I think you have a rare H-A plen error!!! These are very very rare! The "H" on the left looks more like an A! Don't get excited about the value though. If it is an error, since you can't see it that well, it's probably worth just what it would be as a type note. Congratulations either way though!
 
I think you have a rare H-A plen error!!! These are very very rare! The "H" on the left looks more like an A! Don't get excited about the value though. If it is an error, since you can't see it that well, it's probably worth just what it would be as a type note. Congratulations either way though!
I don't know how I could be so STUPID... there is no H-A plen error, but rather a C-A error. Sorry for any inaccuracies I may of caused. Leave it to @Bur Oak ---(a fellow currency collector) to set this right.
 
I don't know how I could be so STUPID... there is no H-A plen error, but rather a C-A error. Sorry for any inaccuracies I may of caused. Leave it to @Bur Oak ---(a fellow currency collector) to set this right.
Sounds like I struck a nerve. Sorry if I've offended you in the past.

You were originally correct in saying there is a type 68 H-A error. Check out the variety listed as PF-58.

I think you have a rare H-A plen error!!! These are very very rare! The "H" on the left looks more like an A! Don't get excited about the value though. If it is an error, since you can't see it that well, it's probably worth just what it would be as a type note. Congratulations either way though!

It's difficult to see. I may be wrong, but to me, the left leg of the suspect letter looks wide, like it would be on an "H" rather than a small triangle like it would be on an "A." I agree with the rest of the post.

Considering that the example listed in Fricke's 2014 book was unique, the odds of the note posted above being another one are extremely slim.
 

Learn About Us
About CivilWarTalk
Contact the Webmaster
Meet the Staff
Link to CivilWarTalk
Join Our Community
Register
Browse Forums
View Today's Discussions
Search the Forum
Get Help
FAQ
Student Guide
Forum Rules & Etiquette
Copyright / DMCA

     Contact Us CivilwarTalk on Facebook CivilWarTalk on YouTube CivilWarTalk on Twitter RSS Feed

Bringing the American Civil War and More to Life.
© 1999 - , CIVILWARTALK, LLC - Site Version 10.0

SlaveryTalk.com - SecessionTalk.com - CivilWarTalk.com - ReconstructionTalk.com
Back
Top