Reading Sears' book on the Peninsula Campaign. I admit I never heard of "coffee mill" guns before. After reading his description, my reaction was, does he mean Gatling guns? Was this a colloquial name for Gatling guns?
But looking at pictures, it looks completely different. So was this just a completely different weapon by a completely different inventor that just so happened to be very similar to Gatling?
Why did the Union abandon them? Were they defective? Was Cameron griping about wasted ammunition again? Or was it actually a useful weapon that just never got the benefactor it needed?
But looking at pictures, it looks completely different. So was this just a completely different weapon by a completely different inventor that just so happened to be very similar to Gatling?
Why did the Union abandon them? Were they defective? Was Cameron griping about wasted ammunition again? Or was it actually a useful weapon that just never got the benefactor it needed?