Chickamauga Chickamauga thoughts

bdtex

Major General
★★ Sr. Moderator
Silver Patron
Annual Winner
Regtl. Quartermaster Chickamauga 2018 Vicksburg 2019
Joined
Jul 21, 2015
Location
Texas
I visited Chattanooga/Chickamauga NMP for the first and only time so far in June 2016. My only prep work before that visit consisted of reading Lee White's Bushwhacking On a Grand Scale,The Battle Of Chickamauga September 18-20,1863 and studying the Civil War Trust maps of the battle. That visit was a 4 night,3 day guided tour centering on Gen. Hood and Hood's Texas Brigade at Chickamauga so there were many places on the battlefield that we did not stop at or get any info on. We did visit Wauhatchie because the Texas Brigade was there and we followed Hood's route from the hospital where his leg was amputated to Tunnel Hill where he caught a train to Richmond to continue convalescing.

The CWT 2018 gathering is at Chickamauga next month so I have been studying the battle a little more in depth prior to this visit. I know the anniversary is coming up but I wanna discuss the battle now or at least some of it. Maybe when the anniversary rolls around some folks will tack their commentary on to this thread. I reread Lee White's book and then I read Peter Cozzens' This Terrible Sound, which I finished on Labor Day. Don't wanna post a book review. I just wanna post a few things that stuck out to me while reading that book. Responders can feel free to toss in whatever they want to about the battle. I'm anxious to hear others' commentary.

1. Artillery. In Cozzens' chapter on Cleburne's night attack he specifically mentioned Semple's Alabama Battery and Calvert's Arkansas Battery in that attack and said that combined "It was the first and only instance of effective close artillery support provided attacking Confederate Infantry that day." It seems at least from the 2 books I've read,that Union artillery was generally much more effective at Chickamauga and that the woods,hills and ravines at the battlefield limited the use of artillery on both sides.

2. Spencer and Colt Rifles. I recall at least 3 instances where Confederate attacks were stopped dead when they ran up against Union troops armed with Spencer and Colt rifles. One specifically was Ector's Brigade at Jay's Mill on Day 2. I remembered that specifically because I have an ancestor who was in Ector's Brigade at Chickamauga and I'm gonna look for that site this October.

3. Water. According to Cozzens,it hadn't rained at the Chickamauga battlefield for a month or 2 prior to the battle,so there was no appreciable water on the battlefield and it was very hot in the day. Very little fighting occurred at the best water sources,Crawfish Springs and Chickamauga Creek.

4. The "Angel Of Marye's Heights",Sgt. Richard R. Kirkland,was killed at Chickamauga.

5. A soldiers' fight. Lotta fighting occurred at Brock,Winfrey,Viniard,Brotherton,Poe,Kelly,Dyer,Glenn, Snodgrass and McDonald Fields,but the rest of the battlefield was a mass of thick woods,underbrush,ravines and hills that troops and even artillery had to march through and fight in. Couriers and scouts frequently couldn't find what and who they were looking for. Often-times,regimental and brigade commanders could not even see their flanks. Companies and regiments often got separated and in some instances were commandeered by officers of other units to plug gaps in the line or serve as reinforcements to a hot spot. The action frequently devolved into a soldier's fight. Seems that was a bit less so on the Confederate side because brigade and regimental commanders were less inclined to act independently because of the wrath of Bragg for acting without orders.

6. Casualties. Don't have the numbers in front of me but I recall in Cozzens' book that KIAs were less than 2,000 on both sides but there were 7-8 times more wounded on both sides. Don't recall reading how many wounded died later from their wounds. After reading about the savagery of the combat at Chickamauga,it stunned me that there weren't more KIA

7. According to Cozzens,it was very cold and quiet on the battlefield on the nights of September 18th and 19th and the Union troops could hear the trains rolling into Catoosa Platform bringing Confederate reinforcements.

8. Uncoordinated attacks. It seems there was a lotta that on the Confederate side and but for that,it could've been a much more decisive victory. At the end of the day on September 20th,Confederates had a large number of Union troops practically trapped in Kelly Field just as orders from Thomas to withdraw were being recieved. Uncoordinated attacks allowed a large number of the Union troops to escape the trap.

9. Edited to add: Skulkers and stragglers. Many written accounts of soldiers laying back and hiding in the woods etc. and officers beating them back into line.

My notes are at home but that's what I remember as things that stuck out after doing deeper reading on Chickamauga.
 
6. Casualties. Don't have the numbers in front of me but I recall in Cozzens' book that KIAs were less than 2,000 on both sides but there were 7-8 times more wounded on both sides. Don't recall reading how many wounded died later from their wounds. After reading about the savagery of the combat at Chickamauga,it stunned me that there weren't more KIA
Those ratios may be true for Chickamauga, but they would violate the "normal" statistical averages for most civil war battles. Col. Trevor Dupuy's classic study, HANDBOOK ON GROUND FORCES ATTRITION IN MODERN WARFARE, SEPTEMBER 1986, shows that for the American Civil War, the ratio of killed to wounded was 4.55:1 and the ratio of surviving wounded to battle deaths was 2.38:1. You could try applying those ratios to come up with a reasonable estimate of the total number of deaths, both KIA'd and later died of wounds, and wounded but survived. I'd be surprised if Chickamauga actually differed statistically that much from the other major Civil War battles.
 
Those ratios may be true for Chickamauga, but they would violate the "normal" statistical averages for most civil war battles. Col. Trevor Dupuy's classic study, HANDBOOK ON GROUND FORCES ATTRITION IN MODERN WARFARE, SEPTEMBER 1986, shows that for the American Civil War, the ratio of killed to wounded was 4.55:1 and the ratio of surviving wounded to battle deaths was 2.38:1. You could try applying those ratios to come up with a reasonable estimate of the total number of deaths, both KIA'd and later died of wounds, and wounded but survived. I'd be surprised if Chickamauga actually differed statistically that much from the other major Civil War battles.
Ima double check those numbers when I get home and post exact numbers cited by Cozzens.
 
Ima double check those numbers when I get home and post exact numbers cited by Cozzens
I don't have Cozzens' book handy, but I see Livermore lists Union strength at 53,919 and Confederate strength at 66,326. He gives Federal losses as 1,657 killed, 9,756 wounded, and 4,757 missing for a total of 16,170. Confederate losses are given as 2,312 killed, 14,674 wounded, and 1,468 missing for a total of 18,454. I know Livermore rarely agrees with other historians on casualties. Even his numbers look low in the KIA/WIA ratio's. The statistical variances may lay in the "missing" category. How many of those men on both sides were really captured versus killed or mortally wounded and just not accounted for correctly? Or maybe Chickamauga really was, due to some combination of unusual conditions, a statistical anomaly in that regard.
 
I don't have Cozzens' book handy, but I see Livermore lists Union strength at 53,919 and Confederate strength at 66,326. He gives Federal losses as 1,657 killed, 9,756 wounded, and 4,757 missing for a total of 16,170. Confederate losses are given as 2,312 killed, 14,674 wounded, and 1,468 missing for a total of 18,454. I know Livermore rarely agrees with other historians on casualties. Even his numbers look low in the KIA/WIA ratio's. The statistical variances may lay in the "missing" category. How many of those men on both sides were really captured versus killed or mortally wounded and just not accounted for correctly? Or maybe Chickamauga really was, due to some combination of unusual conditions, a statistical anomaly in that regard.
Cozzens cites those numbers for Confederate and Union losses but also cites John Turchin on the low end and Glenn Tucker on the high end for Confederate losses. Turchin lists 1790 KIA, 11,158 wounded and 1380 missing. Tucker lists 2673 KIA, 14,674 wounded and 2003 missing.

For whatever reason,after reading about the fighting for those 3 days I expected the KIA numbers to be higher than Livermore's tabulation. Don't know how Tucker came up with his numbers but they sounded more like the battle that I read about.
 
Regarding weather and rain - or lack of it - here are the quotes from the diary of Robt P Myers, Surgeon of the 16th GA that mention weather:

Sunday, September 20
....– At 5 Pm received order to march which we did until dark, over as sandy & dusty a road as I ever saw, the dust, the dust rising in clouds you could not see ten paces a head.


Monday, September 21
....- today quite warm and very dusty, we are expecting to march some time to day – troops moving in every direction. Genl Bragg rode down the lines to day and was cheered long and loud, he had no uniform on simply a loose blouse, he rode a beautiful bay horse, his staff and escort very large – quite different from the Genl's of the Army of Northern Va....


Sunday, September 27
.....To day warm. Last night very cold; I got up several times to rebuild a fire.

Wednesday, September 30
.....Cloudy & damp. threatening rain.

Thursday, October 1
.....On the night of the 30th it set into rain & continued all night & to day without intermission: We have a tent fly but it leaks like a sieve, every thing we have under it as well as ourselves are wet.


 
For whatever reason,after reading about the fighting for those 3 days I expected the KIA numbers to be higher than Livermore's tabulation. Don't know how Tucker came up with his numbers but they sounded more like the battle that I read about.
If I did the math right (no guarantee...it's been a long day!), using Livermore's numbers, the Federals should have had 2,054 KIA'd and the Confederates should have lost 3,057 KIA'd. So the Federal KIA'd numbers are about 19% too low statistically, and the Confederates are 24% low. Interestingly, if you added 50% of the Confederate missing to the KIA'd number they reported, it would be 3,046 or almost exactly what Dupuy's ratio would have predicted. That is perhaps just a coincidence however.
 
Regarding weather and rain - or lack of it - here are the quotes from the diary of Robt P Myers, Surgeon of the 16th GA that mention weather:

Sunday, September 20
....– At 5 Pm received order to march which we did until dark, over as sandy & dusty a road as I ever saw, the dust, the dust rising in clouds you could not see ten paces a head.

Monday, September 21
....- today quite warm and very dusty, we are expecting to march some time to day – troops moving in every direction. Genl Bragg rode down the lines to day and was cheered long and loud, he had no uniform on simply a loose blouse, he rode a beautiful bay horse, his staff and escort very large – quite different from the Genl's of the Army of Northern Va....

Sunday, September 27
.....To day warm. Last night very cold; I got up several times to rebuild a fire.

Wednesday, September 30
.....Cloudy & damp. threatening rain.

Thursday, October 1
.....On the night of the 30th it set into rain & continued all night & to day without intermission: We have a tent fly but it leaks like a sieve, every thing we have under it as well as ourselves are wet.

I am reading a small book about the lifting of the Chattanooga siege and Lookout Mountain right now and it says that a lotta rain fell there in October 1863.
 
I am reading a small book about the lifting of the Chattanooga siege and Lookout Mountain right now and it says that a lotta rain fell there in October 1863.
Correct.
October 14/15
It has been raining for 3 days, every thing wet & muddy our fly leaks so badly my blankets an[d] &c have been wet since it commenced to rain – ..... we are quite uneasy about the constant rains causing the Chickamauga river to rise & preventing the hauling of Commissary supplies & forage our horses have been very poorly fed since we left Virginia

October 22
Rode out with Capt S to look at horse in Hoods Division but when we got to the creek – bet. Lookout mountain & missionary ridge – could not cross it – I attempted it & got in water over my mare's back –
 
As I'm sitting here tonight and reading the comments, another thing I recall that stuck out to me was the number of times other soldiers commented about the physical appearance of both Rosecrans and Bragg at Chickamauga and how bad they looked. The months leading up to Chickamauga and the battle itself apparently took a big toll on the commanders.
 
As I'm sitting here tonight and reading the comments, another thing I recall that stuck out to me was the number of times other soldiers commented about the physical appearance of both Rosecrans and Bragg at Chickamauga and how bad they looked. The months leading up to Chickamauga and the battle itself apparently took a big toll on the commanders.
From the start of the Tullahoma Campaign they were some trying times for both commanders.
 
I'm by no means an expert on Chickamauga, I really should read up on it, my GG-Grandfather Pvt. John Wilson Pepper was in Hilliard's Legion, which went through h**l when they were finally engaged. I've mentioned it before in another thread, but I had met some distant cousins who had either met him when they were young, or heard the story from some other family member who had. Either way someone in the family was given a school assignment on Chickamauga when he was still around, and instead of opening a book they went to just ask him, and all he told them of Chickamauga was, "It was the worst fight I saw, after it was over you could walk the entire field and not touch the ground for all the bodies an parts."

I'd say there's a chance casualties got relatively higher than normal, as a lot of older folks will have heard, round down here at least "tempers flare as the temperature rises" and it was hot, dry and dusty at Chickamauga.

2. Spencer and Colt Rifles. I recall at least 3 instances where Confederate attacks were stopped dead when they ran up against Union troops armed with Spencer and Colt rifles. One specifically was Ector's Brigade at Jay's Mill on Day 2. I remembered that specifically because I have an ancestor who was in Ector's Brigade at Chickamauga and I'm gonna look for that site this October.

I don't know about Spencers in the battle, but M1855 Colt Root Rifles were used by the 21st Ohio, I believe, defending Horseshoe Ridge.

And typing that last part I just remembered Hilliard's Legion attacked Horseshoe Ridge...
Huh, I wonder if that was a factor in what my GG-Grandaddy saw lol.
 
2. Spencer and Colt Rifles. I recall at least 3 instances where Confederate attacks were stopped dead when they ran up against Union troops armed with Spencer and Colt rifles. One specifically was Ector's Brigade at Jay's Mill on Day 2. I remembered that specifically because I have an ancestor who was in Ector's Brigade at Chickamauga and I'm gonna look for that site this October.
Or as the Confederates called them, "Sunday rifles"...load them on Sunday and shoot all week...:wink:
 
I do recall reading about Union troops with Colt rifles at Horseshoe Ridge.

Hey as I warned I'm not an expert, but I recall Keith Rocco did a painting of the fight on Horseshoe Ridge with the troops armed with such, (albeit not the best of sources), and I recall reading in an article from "America's Civil War" years, and years ago covering the fight making mention of it, which is why I mentioned it lol.

I assumed it was established narrative, now I got to go digging for references, or evidence lol.
 
Before going to dig through my constantly expanding library, I googled it, (more like after a long day I felt lazy), I don't know anything of sharing links, but "Chickamaugablog.wordpress" has a relatively decent write up on the 21st Ohio using M1855's at Horseshoe Ridge.

Also after some thought, I am pretty sure the "America's Civil War" issue that had a write up on Horseshoe Ridge I read was the January 2007 issue. I rarely read CW magazines anymore, not enough info to satisfy me anymore, plus some are too shall we say modern, but I think I may still have that old issue in the bookcase, now I gotta find it lol.
 
Don't know where else to post this so I am just gonna put it here. Been reading this issue of Blue & Gray Magazine:

smchick3cover.jpg


Even with the excellent maps,the reading about the movement and concentration of troops from September 12-17,1863 is difficult to follow. It is really tedious reading. I experienced the same thing with the same time period when reading Cozzens' This Terrible Sound.
 
Don't know where else to post this so I am just gonna put it here. Been reading this issue of Blue & Gray Magazine:

View attachment 207247

Even with the excellent maps,the reading about the movement and concentration of troops from September 12-17,1863 is difficult to follow. It is really tedious reading. I experienced the same thing with the same time period when reading Cozzens' This Terrible Sound.
Old B&G - I miss that magazine.
 
I don't have Cozzens' book handy, but I see Livermore lists Union strength at 53,919 and Confederate strength at 66,326. He gives Federal losses as 1,657 killed, 9,756 wounded, and 4,757 missing for a total of 16,170. Confederate losses are given as 2,312 killed, 14,674 wounded, and 1,468 missing for a total of 18,454. I know Livermore rarely agrees with other historians on casualties. Even his numbers look low in the KIA/WIA ratio's. The statistical variances may lay in the "missing" category. How many of those men on both sides were really captured versus killed or mortally wounded and just not accounted for correctly? Or maybe Chickamauga really was, due to some combination of unusual conditions, a statistical anomaly in that regard.

I'm willing to bet that a good portion of the missing were, in fact, killed, especially for the Confederates. Does anyone know what the Confederate estimates for Union prisoners were? That estimate could give us an approximate number of missing who were possibly killed.

Ryan
 

Learn About Us
About CivilWarTalk
Contact the Webmaster
Meet the Staff
Link to CivilWarTalk
Join Our Community
Register
Browse Forums
View Today's Discussions
Search the Forum
Get Help
FAQ
Student Guide
Forum Rules & Etiquette
Copyright / DMCA

     Contact Us CivilwarTalk on Facebook CivilWarTalk on YouTube CivilWarTalk on Twitter RSS Feed

Bringing the American Civil War and More to Life.
© 1999 - , CIVILWARTALK, LLC - Site Version 10.0

SlaveryTalk.com - SecessionTalk.com - CivilWarTalk.com - ReconstructionTalk.com
Back
Top