ChatGPT; trusted resource

Grok insists this is June 8, 1862, at Cross Keys. In all fairness, I did request it add smoke signals 😔
image.jpg
 
AI is good for programming/scripting but it still has bugs that you have to debug as you have to do for anything you have to rely on. The real advantage is that it gets the syntax/logic 95-100% correct for the most part and it is up to you to run tests on it which you have to do anyway for everything you write but it saves you a lot of time just getting most of that code put on the screen that you didn't have to copy and paste from a past program/script or type it in yourself.

But getting away from tech stuff into social areas it can go really crazy...and it seems no "debugging" can help and sometimes it will just plain fabricate something as if it's writing a novel for you hoping you will appreciate how good it looks and sounds even though it is a total lie. I pointed this out and its response was that I should have asked it for something "true" (I forgot the phrase I had to include). Now, I just assume everything it comes back is not accurate and go "debug" it by looking up every point that I can.
 
Last edited:
Chatgpt googles your question and spits out an answer. It is a worse resource than wikipedia because there is no human proofing your results.

I will add that if you ask Chatgpt to create an image, it will think you are asking it to create art. So it gave you gettysburg map art.
 
AI is good for programming/scripting but it still has bugs that you have to debug as you have to do for anything you have to rely on. The real advantage is that it gets the syntax/logic 95-100% correct for the most part and it is up to you to run tests on it which you have to do anyway for everything you write but it saves you a lot of time just getting most of that code put on the screen that you didn't have to copy and paste from a past program/script or type it in yourself.

But getting away from tech stuff into social areas it can go really crazy...and it seems no "debugging" can help and sometimes it will just plain fabricate something as if it's writing a novel for you hoping you will appreciate how good it looks and sounds even though it is a total lie. I pointed this out and its response was that I should have asked it for something "true" (I forgot the phrase I had to include). Now, I just assume everything it comes back is not accurate and go "debug" it by looking up every point that I can.
In my business (appellate litigation), just for s and giggles I occasionally experiment with it. It is frequently one third or half right - which is the equivalent of being half run over by a freight train.
 
Well, I think that the descendants of those "Dutchmen" in Howard's corps should sue for reparations. Of course, and on the other hand, if they ran based on this map they should be posthumously drummed out of the ranks. I'm impressed with Stonewall's boys, however. Blasted through the woods with no road and then across the "Rappanhaock" (probably the indigenous name) with no bridges. Ask it where Hooker got bonked.

Dare I request a map of White Oak Swamp/Glendale on June 30, 1862?
In seriousness where did Longstreet and McLaws come from?
 
I use it all the time to provide suggested travel itineraries. And it does a good job. But obviously when it comes to maps it has some kind of bug.
Use it for creating healthy menus for the week, and to break the meals down by serving size, measurements for two people. Actually does well.
 

Learn About Us
About CivilWarTalk
Contact the Webmaster
Meet the Staff
Link to CivilWarTalk
Join Our Community
Register
Browse Forums
View Today's Discussions
Search the Forum
Get Help
FAQ
Student Guide
Forum Rules & Etiquette
Copyright / DMCA

     Contact Us CivilwarTalk on Facebook CivilWarTalk on YouTube CivilWarTalk on Twitter RSS Feed

Bringing the American Civil War and More to Life.
© 1999 - , CIVILWARTALK, LLC - Site Version 10.0

SlaveryTalk.com - SecessionTalk.com - CivilWarTalk.com - ReconstructionTalk.com
Back
Top