Cartridge Tubes

I only roll 60-65...I guess I'm cheap. lol (I've done as little as 35 depending on how far I'm needing to stretch my powder.)
I had a Navy Arms 1863 that would fire on 35 grains. It was great. I settled on 70 because my Sharps likes a little heavier load than my Springfield, and for the flintlocks I have to account for the priming charge.
 
I had a Navy Arms 1863 that would fire on 35 grains. It was great. I settled on 70 because my Sharps likes a little heavier load than my Springfield, and for the flintlocks I have to account for the priming charge.
I could probably scale it down but I like the satisfying BANG of a 60 grain shot. lol
 
I could probably scale it down but I like the satisfying BANG of a 60 grain shot. lol
60 grains is pretty standard in the hobby for rifles. Sometimes you have to know how your gun shoots and adjust a little, but heavy loads are just a waste of powder. I´ve been shooting since powder was $4 a can and it hurts my soul to look at the price tag now.
 
60 grains is pretty standard in the hobby for rifles. Sometimes you have to know how your gun shoots and adjust a little, but heavy loads are just a waste of powder. I´ve been shooting since powder was $4 a can and it hurts my soul to look at the price tag now.
My dear lord... $4 a can. If only I knew a $4 can of FFF blackpowder haha.
 

Learn About Us
About CivilWarTalk
Contact the Webmaster
Meet the Staff
Link to CivilWarTalk
Join Our Community
Register
Browse Forums
View Today's Discussions
Search the Forum
Get Help
FAQ
Student Guide
Forum Rules & Etiquette
Copyright / DMCA

     Contact Us CivilwarTalk on Facebook CivilWarTalk on YouTube CivilWarTalk on Twitter RSS Feed

Bringing the American Civil War and More to Life.
© 1999 - , CIVILWARTALK, LLC - Site Version 10.0

SlaveryTalk.com - SecessionTalk.com - CivilWarTalk.com - ReconstructionTalk.com
Back
Top