Barlow's Coat

Joined
Mar 3, 2024
Location
Florida
Something I noticed in this photo of general Francis C. Barlow is that his coat is a bit unusual. The spacing of the buttons tell me that he isn't wearing either a general's coat or a private purchased sack. Since he was known for being out of regulations (hence the checkered shirt), could this be a junior officer's coat with the brigadier general chevrons sewed on?
low-50f8da63-d989-4ef1-9e93-b1fb4d70454-resize-750.jpg
 
Maybe he's just a slob or a little boy dressing up like a Man. Why the Mans uniform don't fit on a boy. Mommy was not around to dress him. Or they just didn't make uniforms to fit skinny boys. Drink more Milk Barlow. Oh sorry you must think I don't like him......Yeah he almost got my GG Grandfathers Regiment wiped out in which case I would not exist and never been born because of his arrogance and stupidity!
 
Cannot explain the reasons for Barlow's slovenly dress in this photograph. In other images viewed of him, he appears to be properly attired with his coat fastened. Anyhow, if he merely fastened his coat in this situation, that would hide his checkered shirt.

Apart from his unbuttoned coat, Barlow does not look to be otherwise dishevelled or dressed untidily in this particular image. It seems he made a deliberate decision to wear his coat open for the pose. (Wonder what he was thinking about at the time.)

The single star on the shoulder strap of the worn coat here designates he was a B-G. This was in fact his rank at the supposed time this photograph was taken by Brady. (Believe the picture was taken at Cold Harbor, VA, on June 2, '64, when he was commanding the First Division, in Hancock's II Corps of the Army of the Potomac.)
 
Last edited:
The Generals could dress as they pleased in the field.

Barlow is wearing a soldiers' jacket, with his shoulder-straps showing rank. In the below image General Hancock is also wearing a non-regulation sack coat, though double-breasted, with buttons in threes (notice it does not have the dark velvet cuffs or collar of the uniform coat). General Gibbon at right in a common sack coat with rank, and at center-rear General Birney alone wears the regulations uniform coat:

1720439114274.png


Here's General Meade in double-breasted sack, made-military, like Hancocks' in lieu of his uniform coat:
1720440385358.png




Wearing a jacket or coat unbuttoned in the field wasn't odd, at least in the heat of spring/summer. Notice these cavalrymen with the Army of the Potomac headquarters escort standing behind lieutenant-general (and general-in-chief of the army of the United States) Grant, seated with map (his own coat unbuttoned):
1720439550673.png


Or some of General Meade's staff...
1720439615019.png

General Grant as summer came on adopted a non regulation citizens' blue sack, with his rank insignia... probably rarely buttoned...
1720439818771.png


Here's Generals Merritt, Torbert, and Wilson, the first in a common sack, Torbert in a fancy jacket, and Wilson in a jacket... something like Barlow's (except for the buttons).
1720440064189.png
 
The Generals could dress as they pleased in the field.
Point made about the unbuttoned coat of high-ranking officers in the field. Thanks.

Not sure it would be inspirational to rankers during field maneuvers though, where those commanders were trying to instill order and discipline in their charges. In other words, what effect would a senior officer exercising field leadership with his uniform coat unbuttoned and left widely open, have on common soldiers organized in battle formation?

Back to Barlow. Did Barlow properly wear his coat in combat conditions? For a distinct contrast, compare his dress appearance in the OP photograph with Winslow Homer's postwar painting of him addressing captured Confederate soldiers at the Spotsylvania front shortly before Cold Harbor.
 
Last edited:
Something I noticed in this photo of general Francis C. Barlow is that his coat is a bit unusual. The spacing of the buttons tell me that he isn't wearing either a general's coat or a private purchased sack. Since he was known for being out of regulations (hence the checkered shirt), could this be a junior officer's coat with the brigadier general chevrons sewed on?
View attachment 513552
It is certain that "uniformity" among generals played second fiddle to effectiveness.
 
Point made about the unbuttoned coat of high-ranking officers in the field. Thanks.

Not sure it would be inspirational to rankers during field maneuvers though, where those commanders were trying to instill order and discipline in their charges. In other words, what effect would a senior officer exercising field leadership with his uniform coat unbuttoned and left widely open, have on common soldiers organized in battle formation?

Seemed to work for Zack Taylor in Florida and Mexico...

1720449491554.png


1720449865719.png


1720449790572.png


In the assault upon Mexico City, General Shields led his brigade in his shirt-sleeves without too much trouble...

1720455730825.png

1720455796553.png



And for Major-General Barlow too in the 1860s:

1720450214250.png

Major-General Hancock, and Barlow and the others, probably put on their coats for the photographer in the group image shown above. A war correspondent noted in summer '64 Hancock was generally found in his shirt-sleeves...

1720442982400.png


or from a Surgeon:

1720443313850.png


Hancock and his division commanders were considered by many, second to none in inspiring the fighting qualities of their troops... even without coats on.

1720443599899.png

Theodore Lyman, Meade's Headquarters, p. 107.

Discipline in the field didn't come from uniforms...

1720443701029.png

1720443737850.png


He was in his shirt-sleeves at Spotsylvania... and his division and the Second Corps did some of the best day's work yet seen by the Army of the Potomac;

1720443942704.png



Officers frequently dressed for the weather. General A.A. Humphreys, USA, noted wearing his uniform coat in the winter, and a thin summer blouse in the summer "encounters..."

1720454632777.png

1720454662548.png



Certainly General Grant generally at least switched to a non-regulation summer sack coat, with its rank insignia, for hot weather in 1864-65. But previously he was not unknown in his shirt-sleeves in the deep south, or a common sack coat. Major Hogane of the CS Engineers noted him entering Vicksburg, with his son in shirt-sleeves...

1720446044904.png


Grant was generally described in an unbuttoned sack coat...

1720482903156.png


1720482801937.png


And occasionally in his shirt-sleeves...

1720483018346.png


Grant occasionally saw generals do good work in their shirt-sleeves, like General Lawler's charge at the Battle of Big Black River bridge, May 17, 1863:

1720483183049.png


General Sheridan, 1864-5:

1720454397290.png


A correspondent notes of General Grant's views on fancy uniforms, etc. in the field...

1720447794803.png

1720447855662.png

Portsmouth Journal, Portsmouth, NH, 5-21-1864.


1720453039301.png




In the assault on the Vicksburg mine on June 25, the assault troops were in their shirt-sleeves...

1720452082030.png

Boston Post, 7-9-1863.

Wearing uniforms, in a parade manner, was best attended to in camp or garrison, and not in the field. The veterans of the 58th Indiana lamented their colonel blasted them after a long march in the summer heat for the sake of show...

1720453354024.png

1720453422071.png


Homer Calkins with the 12th Illinois Cavalry at Antietam, with the headquarters, Army of the Potomac, noted the tendency to strip in extreme heat, especially in battle...

"Why are our soldiers in battle represented as on parade or in marching order? Why, at Antietam, as was the custom generally in regularly set engagements, the men divested themselves of pretty much everything "that was loose." So many threw the old hat or cap high in the air on their first charge. In the morning the knapsacks, blankets and with most their jackets were piled up in the rear with a regimental guard over them. Sometimes, of course, they never saw them again, as was the case in so many instances during the seven days. Many regiments lost all such impedimenta the first of those days at Mechanicsville. But they would prefer to lose them than be so incumbered in battle. Of those men in the cornfield [at Antietam] probably not many had a coat or cap on, most assuredly not one with a ponderous blanket hanging around his neck. The artillerymen that day were stripped almost to the buff, and looked more like devils than men working in the battery smoke. So, Mr. Editor, if you desire to convey an idea to the generations that have and are growing up since those days, please forbear loading down American soldiers with all their supposed belongings in such engagements as was Antietam, especially on so warm a day as was that 17th of September, 1862." [National Tribune, 10-22-1908.]

Despite Mr. Calkins' artistic criticism, the trend perhaps continues.

General Sherman, just returned from the Meridian campaign: a soiled vest, suggesting little in the way of coat buttoning...

1720446721842.png


G.W. Childs recalled after the war...

1720447002854.png


Grant was right. During the Atlanta campaign, General Sherman was described generally in a gray flannel shirt, with or without a faded blouse. The latter evidently unbuttoned...

1720450983716.png



In 1881, while General-in-chief of the Army, General Sherman approved the famous US Army standard blue flannel shirts for fatigue wear without the blouse...

1720447199978.png



General Meade was evidently slightly more fastidious....

1720454226987.png


Here's a notice of General Meagher leading the Irish Brigade into action in the Peninsula in 1862:

1720455056451.png


His men similarly undressed...

1720455177374.png



In Lee's army, the generals customarily wore only shirts in warm weather, from General Hagood:

1720445036118.png



General Jackson's shirt-sleeves were no impediment to drill at least...

1720445429254.png


And General A.P. Hill did a good bit of fighting in his shirt-sleeves...

1720445540233.png


According to Colonel Fremantle, neither Generals Lee nor Bragg cared particularly how their troops dressed, as long as their guns were clean and they did their duty.




Supposedly, as an amusing anecdote goes, even President Lincoln appreciated men of practical sagacity in warm weather...

1720448382793.png
 
Last edited:
Likely not. He would likely want to feel comfortable in a condition like that, and nobody was going to yell at him for having his uniform unbuttoned.
But he had no problem discipling those under him to include whacking them with his sword. Had Regimental Commanders arrested (lame) if some of their troops simply ran forth to fill their canteens on the long, hot, dusty road to Gettysburg. Guess he'd rather have them drop dead from heat exhaustion.
 
Something I noticed in this photo of general Francis C. Barlow is that his coat is a bit unusual. The spacing of the buttons tell me that he isn't wearing either a general's coat or a private purchased sack. Since he was known for being out of regulations (hence the checkered shirt), could this be a junior officer's coat with the brigadier general chevrons sewed on?
If I'm remembering correctly, Barlow had been so severely wounded at Gettysburg that he was hospitalized until April 1864 and then had to absent himself on sick leave again in August of 1864. Prior to that he was wounded at Antietam (face and groin). Some sources say he also suffered from a malarial illness at that time.

He didn't return to the army until April 6, 1865. I think he looks rather ill in these photos and is it possible, if not likely, that he lost a lot of weight as a result of his (abdominal?) wounds and illnesses? Perhaps he is trying to hid that by wearing larger clothes, or he is wearing the clothes he had before he was wounded and they are now too large.
 
Barlow had been so severely wounded at Gettysburg that he was hospitalized until April 1864 and then had to absent himself on sick leave again in August of 1864.

Thought Barlow's 'boyish unshaven face' would always make him a 'stand-out' in any group pose of senior officers. His unbuttoned coat and exposed checkered shirt underneath only made him look more conspicuous in this image.

Barlow still suffered from the lingering effects of a serious minie ball wound he received at Gettysburg to the left side (about halfway between the armpit and the hip). Apparently, it took a long time for him to recover from this wound, as he did not return to command until April, '64.

As from Aug. '64, Barlow became disabled with chronic diarrhea and he did not return to active service until in the final month of the war.
 
Thought Barlow's 'boyish unshaven face' would always make him a 'stand-out' in any group pose of senior officers. His unbuttoned coat and exposed checkered shirt underneath only made him look more conspicuous in this image.

Barlow still suffered from the lingering effects of a serious minie ball wound he received at Gettysburg to the left side (about halfway between the armpit and the hip). Apparently, it took a long time for him to recover from this wound, as he did not return to command until April, '64.

As from Aug. '64, Barlow became disabled with chronic diarrhea and he did not return to active service until in the final month of the war.
He had also suffered from malaria during the spring and summer of 1862 on the Peninsula.

Ryan
 
View attachment 513923

I've been looking at this thread and it dawned on me. These were slow exposure times. How on earth did they get this gaggle of people to sit so still?

The artist took a few images. I suspect that when he was ready, he called out and everybody froze for a bit... more or less...
1720579205355.png


In the below, Grant is at left, looking at a map...
1720579282116.png





1720579250309.png



Here's some more info:

Massaponax Church...
 

Learn About Us
About CivilWarTalk
Contact the Webmaster
Meet the Staff
Link to CivilWarTalk
Join Our Community
Register
Browse Forums
View Today's Discussions
Search the Forum
Get Help
FAQ
Student Guide
Forum Rules & Etiquette
Copyright / DMCA

     Contact Us CivilwarTalk on Facebook CivilWarTalk on YouTube CivilWarTalk on Twitter RSS Feed

Bringing the American Civil War and More to Life.
© 1999 - , CIVILWARTALK, LLC - Site Version 10.0

SlaveryTalk.com - SecessionTalk.com - CivilWarTalk.com - ReconstructionTalk.com
Back
Top