attack on the stone wall

MikeyB

Sergeant
Joined
Sep 13, 2018
What was Burnside's tactical rationale for focusing the attack on the northern flank and the stone wall versus the south where they actually had some success? There must have been something in the terrain or approaches or logistics that made attacking the stone wall appealing?
 
What was Burnside's tactical rationale for focusing the attack on the northern flank and the stone wall versus the south where they actually had some success? There must have been something in the terrain or approaches or logistics that made attacking the stone wall appealing?
The plan was for Franklin to make the primary attack in the south while the attacks against the stone wall were distractions to pin the defenders in place. Unfortunately, William Franklin was the exactly wrong commander to rely on for aggressive actions and the attack by his wing sputtered out quickly with Meade's assault and retreat. Even more unfortunately, Franklin never communicated his halting of the attack and so Burnside continued to throw troops at Marye's Heights and they organically grew far beyond what they were initially intended to be.

Ryan
 

Learn About Us
About CivilWarTalk
Contact the Webmaster
Meet the Staff
Link to CivilWarTalk
Join Our Community
Register
Browse Forums
View Today's Discussions
Search the Forum
Get Help
FAQ
Student Guide
Forum Rules & Etiquette
Copyright / DMCA

     Contact Us CivilwarTalk on Facebook CivilWarTalk on YouTube CivilWarTalk on Twitter RSS Feed

Bringing the American Civil War and More to Life.
© 1999 - , CIVILWARTALK, LLC - Site Version 10.0

SlaveryTalk.com - SecessionTalk.com - CivilWarTalk.com - ReconstructionTalk.com
Back
Top