Ames 1860 Confederate Saber

Bonedaddy

Corporal
Joined
Jan 2, 2020
Pictures of my Ames 1860 Cavalry Saber dated 1860 that was one of the group sent to Virginia before the war to Jeb Stuart's Cavalry. According to Mr. John Thillman, these sabers were marked with a star to designate their shipment to Virginia, which mine has. It is very tight, with normal wear, but only one strand of the wrapped wire is present. It certainly shows a lot of use! This is a keeper and one I am very proud to own and pass down to my grandson eventually.
IMG_20210104_104733032.jpg
View attachment 386754
IMG_20210104_113937187.jpg
IMG_20210104_113951940.jpg
View attachment 386755
IMG_20210104_111902767.jpg
IMG_20210104_111945073.jpg
 
Some other swords which were sent South were not marked with the "Southern Star", i.e. those swords with no inspectors' marks which were early shipments made before Ames received the memo from Chief of Ordnance Craig instructing them that the Virginia swords were to be inspected in the same manner as usual. On these, the reverse ricasso is stamped with the "1860" date with no
'U.S." or inspector's initial.

M1860 Ames 1860 Virginia 9.JPG
 
If you decide to have the grip re-done, do the wire only. Tom will do a good job for you without damaging the leather wrap.

The leather appears to be in good condition with worn areas exactly where a Virginia troopers hand would have gripped it in the 1860's. Let your Grandson touch that same leather. Two of mine {sorta rushed the photos} are below which, because of the wear, I'd not touch. IMHO. (I too shoot competition pistol...noticed your patches in one of your photos}
20210106_144824_resized (2).jpg


20210106_145429_resized (2).jpg
 
I am curious how sharply honed these swords were on shipment.
Lubliner.
They shouldn't have been at all! Although some swords and sabers were sharpened in the field, especially by volunteer troops who admittedly were by far the majority, that was nevertheless against regulations. The blow from a saber was considered sufficient, and sharpened weapons presented a greater danger to their wielders and all their comrades around them than they did to the enemy. Besides, fencing taught the use of the point over the edge in close combat.
 
They shouldn't have been at all! Although some swords and sabers were sharpened in the field, especially by volunteer troops who admittedly were by far the majority, that was nevertheless against regulations. The blow from a saber was considered sufficient, and sharpened weapons presented a greater danger to their wielders and all their comrades around them than they did to the enemy. Besides, fencing taught the use of the point over the edge in close combat.

Yes, I've always heard that there was a danger that a sharpened edge could cut deep and get stuck in bone, and so the trooper would be disarmed as the sword would be pulled from his hand.
 

Learn About Us
About CivilWarTalk
Contact the Webmaster
Meet the Staff
Link to CivilWarTalk
Join Our Community
Register
Browse Forums
View Today's Discussions
Search the Forum
Get Help
FAQ
Student Guide
Forum Rules & Etiquette
Copyright / DMCA

     Contact Us CivilwarTalk on Facebook CivilWarTalk on YouTube CivilWarTalk on Twitter RSS Feed

Bringing the American Civil War and More to Life.
© 1999 - , CIVILWARTALK, LLC - Site Version 10.0

SlaveryTalk.com - SecessionTalk.com - CivilWarTalk.com - ReconstructionTalk.com
Back
Top