After the Battle at the Sunken Road

ErnieMac

Colonel
Forum Host
Retired Moderator
Joined
May 3, 2013
Location
Pennsylvania
Josiah M. Favill, a 21 year old resident of Brooklyn NY was commissioned as 2nd Lieutenant, Company E, 57th New York. Five months later he was promoted to 1st Lieutenant and Adjutant. In 1909 Favill published his war recollections entitled The Diary of a Young Officer Serving with the Armies of the United States during the War of the Rebellion. Unlike many war memoirs created from recollections recorded years later Favill's memoir was his diary, painstakingly recorded in the field during his service. The following is his entries from the aftermath of the Battle of Antietam (pages 189-190).

"At eight o'clock the next morning, the 19th, the men on the skirmish line, suspecting by the stillness in front that something was up, advanced and found the enemy gone. Immediately the men stood up and all was excitement. The commanding general was notified and promptly ordered Porter's corps in pursuit, while our corps set to work to succor the wounded and bury the dead. Advancing over the hill we found it covered with dead, mostly our men, but just below in the sunken road over which we originally charged, the rebel dead lay in regular ranks, so close together that it was hard to believe they were not living men in line of battle. Most of them had turned black with the two days' exposure and it required more than a glance to convince ourselves they were not negro troops. A lot of the gallant Fifty-seventh fellows lay scattered about the hill, the ditch, and cornfield. Amongst them, conspicuous for his neatness and soldierly appearance, was Sergeant Risley, of Co. E, firmly grasping his musket, his features almost as natural as in life, and his appointments perfect in all respects. He was a fine fellow, much above the average in intelligence, and a splendid soldier, and like a soldier died, his face towards the foe. Several men were shot while climbing a rail fence near by, and some of them stuck fast, looking in one or two cases, from a distance, exactly like live men. There were men in every state of mutilation, sans arms, sans legs, heads, and intestines, and in greater number than on any field we have seen before. About noon Colonel Brooke directed me to bury the dead in front of our brigade, and with a strong fatigue party I immediately went to work. In one long grave we buried fifty-three U. S. soldiers gathered on this side of the sunken road, and in two others respectively, one hundred and seventy-three, and eighty-five rebel soldiers ; we dug the ditches wide enough to hold two bodies, feet together, heads out, and long enough to hold all those the men had collected. When they were all carefully laid away, we threw over them some army blankets gathered on the field, and then replaced the earth. How many shattered hopes we buried there none of us may ever guess. War is certainly a dreadful thing, and a battlefield an ugly blot on civilization.

The country people flocked to the battlefield like vultures, their curiosity and inquisitiveness most astonishing; while my men were all at work many of them stood around, dazed and awe-stricken by the terrible evidence of the great fight; hundreds were scatered (sic) over the field, eagerly searching for souvenirs in the shape of cannon balls, guns, bayonets, swords, canteens, etc. They were all jubilant over the rebel defeat, of course, and claimed for us a mighty victory. I was much amused at the way they stared at me. Had I been the veritable Hector of Troy, I could have scarcely excited more curiosity than while in command of this burial party.

Our brigade moved down to the foot of the hill, immediately after it was known the enemy had decamped, and prepared hot coffee for the first time in three days. We took no immediate part in the pursuit of the rebels, that duty being taken by the cavalry and Porter's corps."
 
Last edited:
I guess people never change, unfortunately. It must have been a horrendous job, burying the dead of the battles. My husband's uncle did that in the 2nd World War. He became an alcoholic. May have become one anyway, but who knows.
 
By the time of Antietam Favill was a seasoned veteran, having experienced battle at First Manassas and on the Peninsula. His description of the Sunken Road is pretty matter of fact. Fourteen months earlier, at Manassas, the tone was different. From Diary of a Young Officer .... (page 34).

"Butler and I strolled down the hill side, and were soon amongst the dead and dying rebels, who up to this time had been neglected. What a horrible sight it was! here a man, grasping his musket firmly in his hands, stone dead; several with distorted features, and all of them horribly dirty. Many were terribly wounded, some with legs shot off; others with arms gone, all of them, in fact, so badly wounded that they could not drag themselves away; many of the wretches were slowly bleeding to death, with no one to do anything for them. We stopped many times to give some a drink and soon saw enough to satisfy us with the horrors of war; and so picking up some swords, and bayonets, we turned about and retraced our steps."
 
8er6mMZ.gif


The 130th Pennsylvania Regiment of Volunteers burying the Confederate dead around the sunken road, Friday, September 19th, 1862. The 130th Pennsylvania found one hundred and thirty-eight dead Confederates in and around the road.

Frank Leslie Famous Leaders and Battle Scenes of the Civil War (New York, NY: Mrs. Frank Leslie, 1896)
 
Last edited:
The 113th Pennsylvania Regiment of Volunteers burying the Confederate dead around the sunken road, Friday, September 19th, 1862. The 113th Pennsylvania found one hundred and thirty-eight dead Confederates in and around the road.

Frank Leslie Famous Leaders and Battle Scenes of the Civil War (New York, NY: Mrs. Frank Leslie, 1896)
I think you've got a typo - 113th Pennsylvania should be 130th Pennsylvania. The 57th New York was part of Richardson's Division on the left of the Union line along the Sunken Road, the 130th was in French's Division further right above the bend in the road.
http://antietam.aotw.org/maps.php?map_number=7
map_attack_seq_7.gif

http://antietam.aotw.org/maps.php?map_number=7

The 113th Pennsylvania (aka 12th Pennsylvania Cavalry) was present at the battle. One of its members, Corporal James P. Stewart of Company G, wrote a letter describing burial parties he observed. He describes digging the burial trench "like we would dig a ditch at home". Then the burial party would "drag all that was in the field up & throw them in & shovel a little dirt in on them." Stewart was convinced the burials were so shallow hogs would have no problem rooting them up.
http://12thpacavalry.8k.com/antietam.html
 
I think you've got a typo - 113th Pennsylvania should be 130th Pennsylvania. The 57th New York was part of Richardson's Division on the left of the Union line along the Sunken Road, the 130th was in French's Division further right above the bend in the road.
http://antietam.aotw.org/maps.php?map_number=7View attachment 48020
http://antietam.aotw.org/maps.php?map_number=7

The 113th Pennsylvania (aka 12th Pennsylvania Cavalry) was present at the battle. One of its members, Corporal James P. Stewart of Company G, wrote a letter describing burial parties he observed. He describes digging the burial trench "like we would dig a ditch at home". Then the burial party would "drag all that was in the field up & throw them in & shovel a little dirt in on them." Stewart was convinced the burials were so shallow hogs would have no problem rooting them up.
http://12thpacavalry.8k.com/antietam.html
Whoops! When I read the description I must have read 113th PA rather than 130th. It was a little late when I posted.

The sketch was drawn by illustrator Francis H. Schell working for Frank Leslie's Illustrated Newspaper. He did a series of sketches of Antietam after he witnessed the battle. I found a great article here showcasing some of Schell's other sketches from Antietam, along with his narrative of what he saw, which was later published in Sketching Under Fire at Antietam, McClure's Magazine, Vol. XXII.

schell_fh_sumner_lg.jpg

General Sumner and Sedgwick at Antietam by Francis H. Schell.
 
Last edited:
oops, but yes. When I read the description I must have read 113th PA rather than 130th. It was a little late when I posted.

The sketch was drawn by illustrator Francis H. Schell working for Frank Leslie's Illustrated Newspaper. He did a series of sketches of Antietam after he witnessed the battle. I found a great article here showcasing some of Schell's other sketches from Antietam, along with his narrative of what he saw, which was later published in Sketching Under Fire at Antietam, McClure's Magazine, Vol. XXII.
You're right about the quality of Schell's work. Thanks for the link. The following sketch published by Leslie is one of his showing "sightseers" on the battlefield while the burial parties were still at work.
index.jpg
 
You're right about the quality of Schell's work. Thanks for the link. The following sketch published by Leslie is one of his showing "sightseers" on the battlefield while the burial parties were still at work.
View attachment 48049
Who would not want to take his young son for a ride through the fields of gore?
 
Who would not want to take his young son for a ride through the fields of gore?
I don't know if I'd say it was common, but it did happen early in the war, especially in the east. Accounts of 1st Manassas / Bull Run speak of numerous civilians clogging the roads; fleeing back to D.C. after their excursion to see the big battle turned into a disaster. Gregory Coco's book A Strange and Blighted Land: Gettysburg, the Aftermath of a Battle makes a number of references to sightseers and relic hunters. In fairness, not all civilians arriving after the battle were sightseers in the common meaning of the word. The following is an excerpt (pages 220 - 221) of George Freeman Noyes' book The Bivouac And The Battlefield: Or Campaign Sketches In Virginia And Maryland (1863). His book was written from a diary covering the time from May, 1862, thru January, 1863, that Noyes kept while serving as a captain on the staff of Brigadier General Abner Doubleday. This account is written of his observations beginning on September 20 of the retrieval of the bodies of fallen soldiers by relatives after the battle.

"The van of that immense army of visitors, which for several weeks came pouring in to visit Antietam, had already arrived, and many citizens were now picking up relics of the battle, and exploring every part of the field. Hither came the father or the brother from New England searching for his dead ; here, also, the distracted wife sought out the grave of her heroic husband. The Hagerstown turnpike for weeks saw every afternoon almost one continuous funeral procession, bearing away to the North the bruised bodies of the North's bravest sons. More than a thousand, perhaps, were thus carried home to sleep among their kindred, to repose beneath commemorative stones, to which all of their name and family shall point hereafter with natural and patriotic pride.

At first it had seemed to me better to permit our brave boys to rest undisturbed under the bullet-scarred trees, in the little glens, or out in the fields, where they died for the good cause, and where they had been laid to rest by their comrades ; but when I saw the gratification with which their graves were discovered by relatives who had come hundreds of miles to claim their own, and the affectionate tenderness, not unmixed with pride, with which they lifted the beloved forms, shrouded only in uniforms of blue, into their coffins, and the evident relief with which they commenced their journey home, I had reason to change my mind."
 
The mass burial of the dead did not begin until after the Confederate retreat during the night of September 18-19. Few, if any, of their impressions are recorded; none that I have found at any rate. Nine months later the Confederate Army returned to the area during the Gettysburg Campaign. A soldier in the 23rd Virginia Infantry, Corporal George K. Harlow took the opportunity to visit the battlefield. Which areas he viewed are not determined, but the Cornfield / West Woods area is likely since that is where the 23d Virginia fought. Harlow's observations were written in a letter to his family dated June 21, 1863, a portion of which John Michael Priest included in the Epilogue his book, Antietam: The Soldiers' Battle. The excerpt follows.

"Dear Father Mother and Family,
...I have been this morning over the old Sharpsburg battle field this morning and have witnessed the most horrible sights that my eyes ever beheld I saw dead yankees in any number just lying on the top of the ground with a little dirt throwed over them and the hogs rooting them out of the ground and eating them and others lying on the top of the ground with the flesh picked off and their bones bleaching and they by many hundreds! oh what a horrible sight for human beings to look upon in a civilized Country! When will this horrid war ever end; God grant the time may spedily (sic) the time may soon come that piece (sic) may return to our once happy Country and our lives may be spared to meet each other again on earth; may the Lord take care of you all and shield you from all harme (sic) is the prayer of your unworthy son and Brother. G. K. Harlow"

George Harlow was not to receive his wish. On the morning of May 12, 1864, the 23rd Virginia was posted at the southeast end of the Mule Shoe salient when Hancock's Second Corps assaulted the position. The 23rd was shattered and George was one of 147 men of his regiment captured. He would spend the remainder of his foreshortened life at the Fort Delaware Prisoner-of-War Camp. There he would die of chronic diarrhea on April 10, 1865.
 
You're right about the quality of Schell's work. Thanks for the link. The following sketch published by Leslie is one of his showing "sightseers" on the battlefield while the burial parties were still at work.
View attachment 48049
I just can't imagine asking your wife or child to hop on a horse or in a buggy and watch burial parties at work.
 
...."Advancing over the hill we found it covered with dead, mostly our men, but just below in the sunken road over which we originally charged, the rebel dead lay in regular ranks, so close together that it was hard to believe they were not living men in line of battle. Most of them had turned black with the two days' exposure..."

I've always wondered why the skin tone of the Confederate dead at Antietam turned black? I know that lying in the heat for 2 days is the obvious reason but are there any discriptions of Union dead decomposing in a similar manner?
I believe I've read it may have been due to malnutrition of the Rebel soldiers while alive, but can't recall where I read that.

By contrast to the rebel dead Favill discribed a dead comrade thus:

"Amongst them, conspicuous for his neatness and soldierly appearance, was Sergeant Risley, of Co. E, firmly grasping his musket, his features almost as natural as in life..."

It's also interesting that in battlefield photos of the dead at Antietam the skin tone of the dead (even rebel dead) appears to remain white.

So, did a soldiers diet/nutritional status prior to death effect the rate or way his body decomposed? Sorry, It's a macabre topic but one that interests me.
 

Learn About Us
About CivilWarTalk
Contact the Webmaster
Meet the Staff
Link to CivilWarTalk
Join Our Community
Register
Browse Forums
View Today's Discussions
Search the Forum
Get Help
FAQ
Student Guide
Forum Rules & Etiquette
Copyright / DMCA

     Contact Us CivilwarTalk on Facebook CivilWarTalk on YouTube CivilWarTalk on Twitter RSS Feed

Bringing the American Civil War and More to Life.
© 1999 - , CIVILWARTALK, LLC - Site Version 10.0

SlaveryTalk.com - SecessionTalk.com - CivilWarTalk.com - ReconstructionTalk.com
Back
Top