A Case of Rape

DBF

1st Lieutenant
Forum Host
Joined
Aug 6, 2016
President Abraham Lincoln approved the following action in the spring of 1864: Private William H Cole serving in the 109th New York Volunteer Infantry has been sentenced to ten years of hard labor at a penitentiary in New York for the crime of rape. Despite the punishment this subject is not over; it's only beginning and it gives an insight as to how sexual assaults in the military were handled during a time of war.

Laurel, Maryland - Private Cole had been drinking heavily and Lieutenant G.A. Matthews was looking for his soldier. Matthew hears Cole is at the home of Olivia Brown. Mrs. Brown is a woman somewhere between the ages of fifty to fifty-five. When Lieutenant Matthews arrives at the Brown home he discovers Olivia crying with "the skin knocked off one side of her face". {1}

It appears there are witnesses to Cole's attack, or at least parts of it. Her daughter will testify she saw Cole throw her mother to the floor while her mother was "screaming murder". She runs to get help. Two other witnesses will testify they saw Olivia's bleeding face. Another neighbor, who has known her for six years, will tell authorities "he had never heard anything bad about her." {1}

Mrs. Brown will testify she was raped. On the other hand, Cole will claim it was "battery not rape" Cole will argue that due to the fact Mrs. Brown had no injury to her private parts therefore there is no proof of rape. However the military court will find him guilty and the President will give his blessing to his sentence.

Boys will be Boys; Girls will be Blamed

Mrs. Brown runs a bawdy house, so "declared" four members of the 109th New York Infantry. Not only did she run a bawdy house, those living there were not moral citizens their statement would go on to say.

"We each of us further depose that we are satisfied that the said Alvisa and the said Ellen are lewd women and that the said Nicholas Brown is cognizant of the fact that they keep a bawdy house." {2}

The accusations didn't stop there when another letter was sent to President Lincoln regarding the nature of Mrs. Brown:

"the character of the woman if not absolutely bad, was such at least as was well calculated to invite the advances of a soldier. She is not a woman of fair reputation in her neighborhood and beyond question she encouraged soldiers to visit her house where she supplied them with whiskey & where her conversation and conduct were well calculated to influence and excite to violence the passions of a drunken man." {2}

It also included a request to release Cole at once for he has served enough time sufficient for his crime (after all how did you expect a young, drunk man to act around a loose and immoral woman). And furthermore, Cole was a soldier in good standing never having had a problem before this incident.

Then came this request:

"Your petitioners further represent that we have been acquainted with the said William H. Cole from his childhood and that he has been a peaceable and quiet citizen and that we have never heard any charge or complaint against him or anything against his character as a good citizen except that he was occasionally a little wild." {2}

This request was signed by thirty-five citizens from Nichols, New York. Private Cole was pardoned by President Lincoln when Congressman Giles Waldo Hotchkiss personally requested for his mercy. He returned to duty with the 109th New York. No record of whatever happened to Mrs. Olivia Brown, after all, she was asking for it.

This was the model case for how rape was handled. Some men when convicted would be rapidly pardoned another example of how a charge of rape was not taken seriously.

"A common defense seems to have been 'that women in or near military camps were sexually available and that sexual transgressions against women during were understandable, if not excusable when committee by otherwise valiant and honorable men who were spilling their blood for their country'." {3}

In May of 1864, Jennie Green was sexually assaulted while living near Fortress Monroe, Virginia. Attacked and raped by Andrew J. Smith a white officer in the 11th Pennsylvania Cavalry, Jennie a young black girl testified how she was dragged into an empty room, threw on the floor and threatened to be killed. She was forced to tell the court how he "did the same thing that married people do". With the corroboration by a Black Chaplain of the 4th U.S. Colored Troops as well as another young slave, Smith was found guilty of rape and conduct unbecoming an officer and a gentleman, Smith was quickly pardoned and freed from serving another nine and one-half years of his sentence.

A "He said; She said" case is always difficult. Take the case of African American Grace Barnes in 1864. She was ganged rape by four soldiers from the 20th New York Cavalry. She suffered permanent disabilities after her attack, yet the soldiers insisted she wanted to engaged in a sexual act. She had been their laundress and admitted she stopped fighting their attack when one of the soldiers raised a stick over her head and said if she didn't stop yelling he would kill her. The military found all four men guilty however Brigadier General Foster Shepley (1819-1878) overturned their convictions claiming the only testimony that the woman who was raped was the only woman who claimed she never consented. I wonder if Shepley as the husband of two women in his life as well as three daughters would have believed their stories if they had been sexually assaulted as opposed to Grace Barnes.

From the earliest written laws found in "the Code of Hammurabi" rape has been recognized as some type of criminal act. Originally viewed as a crime of damaging ones property (usually a male in relationship to his wife or a father's virgin daughter), society was coming to the realization of how rape was a violent violation of a woman's body and could not be tolerated in a civilized society.

During the civil war it has been estimated some four hundred men were prosecuted for the crime of rape. The number is probably higher due to the hesitancy for a woman to come forward to report the crime. Bringing a man to justice was not an easy task to accomplish especially when many times if the woman happened to be working in the camp as cook or laundress she was unwilling to risk losing her employment.

Attitudes were slow to change. I found this quote from a Kentucky legislator written in 1895 proving that he certainly did not understand anything on the subject; "I regard the twelve-year-old girl as being capable of resisting the wiles of the seducer as any older woman." {5}

Pity the poor woman or girl who had to endure a sexual assault and then be accused of causing her own rape.​





Sources
1. "I Had Rather Die: Rape in the Civil War", by Kim Murphy
2. https://www.archives.gov/publications/prologue/1998/winter/union-court-martials
3. https://gettysburgcompiler.org/2015/10/05/finally-speaking-up-sexual-assault-in-the-civil-war-era/
4. "Afro-Virginian History and Culture", edited by John Saillant
5.
https://ualr.edu/socialchange/2018/04/15/reflection-history-sexual-assault-laws-united-states/
 
President Abraham Lincoln approved the following action in the spring of 1864: Private William H Cole serving in the 109th New York Volunteer Infantry has been sentenced to ten years of hard labor at a penitentiary in New York for the crime of rape. Despite the punishment this subject is not over; it's only beginning and it gives an insight as to how sexual assaults in the military were handled during a time of war.

Laurel, Maryland - Private Cole had been drinking heavily and Lieutenant G.A. Matthews was looking for his soldier. Matthew hears Cole is at the home of Olivia Brown. Mrs. Brown is a woman somewhere between the ages of fifty to fifty-five. When Lieutenant Matthews arrives at the Brown home he discovers Olivia crying with "the skin knocked off one side of her face". {1}

It appears there are witnesses to Cole's attack, or at least parts of it. Her daughter will testify she saw Cole throw her mother to the floor while her mother was "screaming murder". She runs to get help. Two other witnesses will testify they saw Olivia's bleeding face. Another neighbor, who has known her for six years, will tell authorities "he had never heard anything bad about her." {1}

Mrs. Brown will testify she was raped. On the other hand, Cole will claim it was "battery not rape" Cole will argue that due to the fact Mrs. Brown had no injury to her private parts therefore there is no proof of rape. However the military court will find him guilty and the President will give his blessing to his sentence.

Boys will be Boys; Girls will be Blamed

Mrs. Brown runs a bawdy house, so "declared" four members of the 109th New York Infantry. Not only did she run a bawdy house, those living there were not moral citizens their statement would go on to say.

"We each of us further depose that we are satisfied that the said Alvisa and the said Ellen are lewd women and that the said Nicholas Brown is cognizant of the fact that they keep a bawdy house." {2}

The accusations didn't stop there when another letter was sent to President Lincoln regarding the nature of Mrs. Brown:

"the character of the woman if not absolutely bad, was such at least as was well calculated to invite the advances of a soldier. She is not a woman of fair reputation in her neighborhood and beyond question she encouraged soldiers to visit her house where she supplied them with whiskey & where her conversation and conduct were well calculated to influence and excite to violence the passions of a drunken man." {2}

It also included a request to release Cole at once for he has served enough time sufficient for his crime (after all how did you expect a young, drunk man to act around a loose and immoral woman). And furthermore, Cole was a soldier in good standing never having had a problem before this incident.

Then came this request:

"Your petitioners further represent that we have been acquainted with the said William H. Cole from his childhood and that he has been a peaceable and quiet citizen and that we have never heard any charge or complaint against him or anything against his character as a good citizen except that he was occasionally a little wild." {2}

This request was signed by thirty-five citizens from Nichols, New York. Private Cole was pardoned by President Lincoln when Congressman Giles Waldo Hotchkiss personally requested for his mercy. He returned to duty with the 109th New York. No record of whatever happened to Mrs. Olivia Brown, after all, she was asking for it.

This was the model case for how rape was handled. Some men when convicted would be rapidly pardoned another example of how a charge of rape was not taken seriously.

"A common defense seems to have been 'that women in or near military camps were sexually available and that sexual transgressions against women during were understandable, if not excusable when committee by otherwise valiant and honorable men who were spilling their blood for their country'." {3}

In May of 1864, Jennie Green was sexually assaulted while living near Fortress Monroe, Virginia. Attacked and raped by Andrew J. Smith a white officer in the 11th Pennsylvania Cavalry, Jennie a young black girl testified how she was dragged into an empty room, threw on the floor and threatened to be killed. She was forced to tell the court how he "did the same thing that married people do". With the corroboration by a Black Chaplain of the 4th U.S. Colored Troops as well as another young slave, Smith was found guilty of rape and conduct unbecoming an officer and a gentleman, Smith was quickly pardoned and freed from serving another nine and one-half years of his sentence.

A "He said; She said" case is always difficult. Take the case of African American Grace Barnes in 1864. She was ganged rape by four soldiers from the 20th New York Cavalry. She suffered permanent disabilities after her attack, yet the soldiers insisted she wanted to engaged in a sexual act. She had been their laundress and admitted she stopped fighting their attack when one of the soldiers raised a stick over her head and said if she didn't stop yelling he would kill her. The military found all four men guilty however Brigadier General Foster Shepley (1819-1878) overturned their convictions claiming the only testimony that the woman who was raped was the only woman who claimed she never consented. I wonder if Shepley as the husband of two women in his life as well as three daughters would have believed their stories if they had been sexually assaulted as opposed to Grace Barnes.

From the earliest written laws found in "the Code of Hammurabi" rape has been recognized as some type of criminal act. Originally viewed as a crime of damaging ones property (usually a male in relationship to his wife or a father's virgin daughter), society was coming to the realization of how rape was a violent violation of a woman's body and could not be tolerated in a civilized society.

During the civil war it has been estimated some four hundred men were prosecuted for the crime of rape. The number is probably higher due to the hesitancy for a woman to come forward to report the crime. Bringing a man to justice was not an easy task to accomplish especially when many times if the woman happened to be working in the camp as cook or laundress she was unwilling to risk losing her employment.

Attitudes were slow to change. I found this quote from a Kentucky legislator written in 1895 proving that he certainly did not understand anything on the subject; "I regard the twelve-year-old girl as being capable of resisting the wiles of the seducer as any older woman." {5}

Pity the poor woman or girl who had to endure a sexual assault and then be accused of causing her own rape.​





Sources
1. "I Had Rather Die: Rape in the Civil War", by Kim Murphy
2. https://www.archives.gov/publications/prologue/1998/winter/union-court-martials
3. https://gettysburgcompiler.org/2015/10/05/finally-speaking-up-sexual-assault-in-the-civil-war-era/
4. "Afro-Virginian History and Culture", edited by John Saillant
5.
https://ualr.edu/socialchange/2018/04/15/reflection-history-sexual-assault-laws-united-states/
That's plain awful. But the beliefs of the time make this understandable, as ugly as it is.
 
Speaking as a woman, I'm not sure that beliefs have changed all that much. Take a look at on-campus rapes and rapes in the military and see how successful the victims are in (1) getting their case prosecuted and (2) winning their case. Take a look at the backlog for rape kit testing prior to about 2019. Take a look at the percentage of rape cases the NYC District Attorney's office drops. The reality doesn't quite match Law and Order: SVU. Even Mr. Weinstein's conviction in New York got overturned.
 
Speaking as a woman, I'm not sure that beliefs have changed all that much. Take a look at on-campus rapes and rapes in the military and see how successful the victims are in (1) getting their case prosecuted and (2) winning their case. Take a look at the backlog for rape kit testing prior to about 2019. Take a look at the percentage of rape cases the NYC District Attorney's office drops. The reality doesn't quite match Law and Order: SVU. Even Mr. Weinstein's conviction in New York got overturned.
Well the circumstances haven't changed all that much either. It's still often a case of he said, she said.
 
And it hasn't changed that the default for belief is what he said.
Not sure that's the case, neither position carries much weight without collaborating evidence. Our system is however indeed based on the presumption of innocence, which puts burden on prosecution regardless of the crime. Which is rather difficult, regardless of the crime, without collaborating evidence of a crime.
 
Last edited:
Remember these trials were done by the Military which of course means men deciding the fate of a fellow soldier. In some cases they found the man guilty only to be overturned by higher-ups. Without DNA the only real evidence a woman had was physical damage such was the case of Mrs. Olivia Brown when Lieutenant observed "the skin knocked off one side of her face". If I remember correctly regarding the ten year old girl, it was an army doctor that verified her assault upon an internal examination.

I did not discuss the rapes that went on before the war when Southern plantation owners and slave overseers.
https://civilwartalk.com/threads/taking-a-difficult-look-into-slave-labor.203521/
 
It is depressing to see the number of males who have repeated charges for misdemeanor crimes of domestic violence. Many times the accused will go through probation which is successfully completed and have a charge dismissed. They may have three or more of these incidents over a 10 year period. Probation and dismissal of charges does not seem to change behavior in the long run. Police reports will typically indicate the use of force. Some of these descriptions are rather brutal. Sometimes there are convictions. It's not unusual to see these incidents occur with unmarried couples only to find that the couples later marry. The incidents almost always continue after marriage.

This is the case today. Sometimes a couple stays together for children or because one of the two feels there is no way to support themself. There are other reasons. The support systems in place to allow for a couple in conflict to separate today are much much better than they were in the past, but obviously they are not good enough. There are cultural and psychological hurdles that still must be overcome. We are still learning and trying to understand what these hurdles are and how to reduce or remove them. In the past they were not recognized as hurdles by most. Today they are not recognized as hurdles by many. We, in the U. S., have come a long way, but we have a long way yet to go. History shows us where we have been and where we should not return.
 
Not sure that's the case, neither position carries much weight without collaborating evidence. Our system is however indeed based on the presumption of innocence, which puts burden on prosecution regardless of the crime. Which is rather difficult, regardless of the crime, without collaborating evidence of a crime.
And in the 1860s there were no no rape kits in ERs or DNA collection or in DNA registries , forensic science didn't really exist. So it it wasn't really about collecting " dead bang" evidence just verbal accusations and verbal denials. The Prosecuting Attorney and the Defense Attorney had their work cut out for them.
 
And in the 1860s there were no no rape kits in ERs or DNA collection or in DNA registries , forensic science didn't really exist. So it it wasn't really about collecting " dead bang" evidence just verbal accusations and verbal denials. The Prosecuting Attorney and the Defense Attorney had their work cut out for them.
Indeed and will always be one those tawdry things where sexual desire is rather strong........yet remains a strong societal/familial pressure in my boy/girl wouldn't have either raped or had consensual sex to lead to false claims of innocence or crime.
 
Race had a lot to do with it. The accounts of the black females. One instance gang raped. One soldier threaten her with violence if she rejected. She relents which is viewed as confirmation she wanted the engagement. So, she got the double whammy X 4. Soldiers must not of been Republicans?

Just read a study of the Dakota War of 62'. Author said that rape was a capitol offense. Basis for the hanging of the 37 Dakota. Guess colored against white was a capitol offense.
 
Race had a lot to do with it. The accounts of the black females. One instance gang raped. One soldier threaten her with violence if she rejected. She relents which is viewed as confirmation she wanted the engagement. So, she got the double whammy X 4. Soldiers must not of been Republicans?

Just read a study of the Dakota War of 62'. Author said that rape was a capitol offense. Basis for the hanging of the 37 Dakota. Guess colored against white was a capitol offense.
Yeah I'm thinking that the deaths and such had something, alot of something to with the hangings in the wake of Little Crows war. Rape certainly happened but I think the deaths, mutilation and other acts that were part and parcel of that type of conflict had a something to with it. But race did play a larger role in that act especially if a in White female was involved.
 
Race also seems to played to play a role in false claims. In cases like Rosewood, a black male could be fingered as the culprit..........which not only could result in false convictions, but race riots/war.
 
I wonder if Shepley as the husband of two women in his life as well as three daughters would have believed their stories if they had been sexually assaulted as opposed to Grace Barnes.
That's the beauty in believing that victims somehow "asked for it." Shepley couldn't conceive of the women in his life being anything like Grace Barnes. They certainly weren't Black which would make their right to control the use of their own bodies tenuous at best. They were unlikely to have to work for a living, especially at something so demeaning as being a laundress. He provided for them and husbands would provide for the daughters in due time.

Or just maybe he would expect them to fight to the death. "A fate worse than death" was taken seriously in the 1860s. Yes, it was the "polite" way of saying rape. A woman who would rather die than submit saved her honor and the honor of her family.
 
President Abraham Lincoln approved the following action in the spring of 1864: Private William H Cole serving in the 109th New York Volunteer Infantry has been sentenced to ten years of hard labor at a penitentiary in New York for the crime of rape. Despite the punishment this subject is not over; it's only beginning and it gives an insight as to how sexual assaults in the military were handled during a time of war.

Laurel, Maryland - Private Cole had been drinking heavily and Lieutenant G.A. Matthews was looking for his soldier. Matthew hears Cole is at the home of Olivia Brown. Mrs. Brown is a woman somewhere between the ages of fifty to fifty-five. When Lieutenant Matthews arrives at the Brown home he discovers Olivia crying with "the skin knocked off one side of her face". {1}

It appears there are witnesses to Cole's attack, or at least parts of it. Her daughter will testify she saw Cole throw her mother to the floor while her mother was "screaming murder". She runs to get help. Two other witnesses will testify they saw Olivia's bleeding face. Another neighbor, who has known her for six years, will tell authorities "he had never heard anything bad about her." {1}

Mrs. Brown will testify she was raped. On the other hand, Cole will claim it was "battery not rape" Cole will argue that due to the fact Mrs. Brown had no injury to her private parts therefore there is no proof of rape. However the military court will find him guilty and the President will give his blessing to his sentence.

Boys will be Boys; Girls will be Blamed

Mrs. Brown runs a bawdy house, so "declared" four members of the 109th New York Infantry. Not only did she run a bawdy house, those living there were not moral citizens their statement would go on to say.

"We each of us further depose that we are satisfied that the said Alvisa and the said Ellen are lewd women and that the said Nicholas Brown is cognizant of the fact that they keep a bawdy house." {2}

The accusations didn't stop there when another letter was sent to President Lincoln regarding the nature of Mrs. Brown:

"the character of the woman if not absolutely bad, was such at least as was well calculated to invite the advances of a soldier. She is not a woman of fair reputation in her neighborhood and beyond question she encouraged soldiers to visit her house where she supplied them with whiskey & where her conversation and conduct were well calculated to influence and excite to violence the passions of a drunken man." {2}

It also included a request to release Cole at once for he has served enough time sufficient for his crime (after all how did you expect a young, drunk man to act around a loose and immoral woman). And furthermore, Cole was a soldier in good standing never having had a problem before this incident.

Then came this request:

"Your petitioners further represent that we have been acquainted with the said William H. Cole from his childhood and that he has been a peaceable and quiet citizen and that we have never heard any charge or complaint against him or anything against his character as a good citizen except that he was occasionally a little wild." {2}

This request was signed by thirty-five citizens from Nichols, New York. Private Cole was pardoned by President Lincoln when Congressman Giles Waldo Hotchkiss personally requested for his mercy. He returned to duty with the 109th New York. No record of whatever happened to Mrs. Olivia Brown, after all, she was asking for it.

This was the model case for how rape was handled. Some men when convicted would be rapidly pardoned another example of how a charge of rape was not taken seriously.

"A common defense seems to have been 'that women in or near military camps were sexually available and that sexual transgressions against women during were understandable, if not excusable when committee by otherwise valiant and honorable men who were spilling their blood for their country'." {3}

In May of 1864, Jennie Green was sexually assaulted while living near Fortress Monroe, Virginia. Attacked and raped by Andrew J. Smith a white officer in the 11th Pennsylvania Cavalry, Jennie a young black girl testified how she was dragged into an empty room, threw on the floor and threatened to be killed. She was forced to tell the court how he "did the same thing that married people do". With the corroboration by a Black Chaplain of the 4th U.S. Colored Troops as well as another young slave, Smith was found guilty of rape and conduct unbecoming an officer and a gentleman, Smith was quickly pardoned and freed from serving another nine and one-half years of his sentence.

A "He said; She said" case is always difficult. Take the case of African American Grace Barnes in 1864. She was ganged rape by four soldiers from the 20th New York Cavalry. She suffered permanent disabilities after her attack, yet the soldiers insisted she wanted to engaged in a sexual act. She had been their laundress and admitted she stopped fighting their attack when one of the soldiers raised a stick over her head and said if she didn't stop yelling he would kill her. The military found all four men guilty however Brigadier General Foster Shepley (1819-1878) overturned their convictions claiming the only testimony that the woman who was raped was the only woman who claimed she never consented. I wonder if Shepley as the husband of two women in his life as well as three daughters would have believed their stories if they had been sexually assaulted as opposed to Grace Barnes.

From the earliest written laws found in "the Code of Hammurabi" rape has been recognized as some type of criminal act. Originally viewed as a crime of damaging ones property (usually a male in relationship to his wife or a father's virgin daughter), society was coming to the realization of how rape was a violent violation of a woman's body and could not be tolerated in a civilized society.

During the civil war it has been estimated some four hundred men were prosecuted for the crime of rape. The number is probably higher due to the hesitancy for a woman to come forward to report the crime. Bringing a man to justice was not an easy task to accomplish especially when many times if the woman happened to be working in the camp as cook or laundress she was unwilling to risk losing her employment.

Attitudes were slow to change. I found this quote from a Kentucky legislator written in 1895 proving that he certainly did not understand anything on the subject; "I regard the twelve-year-old girl as being capable of resisting the wiles of the seducer as any older woman." {5}

Pity the poor woman or girl who had to endure a sexual assault and then be accused of causing her own rape.​





Sources
1. "I Had Rather Die: Rape in the Civil War", by Kim Murphy
2. https://www.archives.gov/publications/prologue/1998/winter/union-court-martials
3. https://gettysburgcompiler.org/2015/10/05/finally-speaking-up-sexual-assault-in-the-civil-war-era/
4. "Afro-Virginian History and Culture", edited by John Saillant
5.
https://ualr.edu/socialchange/2018/04/15/reflection-history-sexual-assault-laws-united-states/
Very interesting post. I wonder if the stories of multiple rapes in Georgia by Union soldiers during Sherman's march to the sea were ever documented. Living in middle Georgia as a young boy in the 1950's I and others heard such stories, but I haven't looked into their veracity yet after all these years. Will probably do so now.
 
Regarding the occurrences of sexual assaults, there seems to be quite a few "Privates" being charged. One account was the rape of Susan Ward (1862 Missouri) was attacked by three soldiers. Susan was in the home with her eighty year old mother as well as her married daughter Rebecca. By the time the night was done all three women were violated with two of the men being found guilty while the third was never located. The two men, both Privates, William Evans and Benjamin Davis were found guilty of rape and their punishment - have their heads shaved, and marched out of the military to the tune of Rogue's March. If they were ever found to be serving in the military again - they would be shot.

There were other names of Privates: Joseph Halroyed, Frank Enger of the 1st Louisiana Cavalry (found guilty of rape and sentenced to dishonorable discharges and ten years of hard labor however no record what happened after an appeal); Charles Billingsly and William Cutsinger (found guilty and dishonorably discharged).

Then there was Private Hugh Burns. He was charged with murder (not rape for a dead woman could not prove she had been raped despite a physical examination proving a violent violation of her body). Private Burns was given a dishonorable discharge and ten years and was pardoned by President Andrew Johnson (after all as one soldier lamented he had a wife and child at home depending on him).

@Library Lady - Perhaps it cleaned their conscious if they believed the lady was only getting what she was asking for or deserved. Young men away from home for the first time, encouragement from other men, in many instances alcohol is involved, and perception of a slave woman the perfect storm for trouble.

@uaskme - You are so right on the race issue. In the book "I Had Rather Die", Kim Murphy tells this story:

In December of 1864 a chaplain was giving his first sermon on the upper deck of a boat. During the service men (about one hundred) had gone ashore where one man shot a dog and another caught a calf. He writes in his diary:

"Still another soldier stepped up to a colored lady, who had come out of her cabin, and grasping her round the waist, forcibly marched off with her under his arm, while she struggled to get loose and a hundred voices cheered".

The chaplain was afraid to do anything for his fear or losing his "discourse, and thus render my first sermon a failure."
I wonder if things would have been different if it had been a white woman the soldier was carrying off?

@13 IL Cav & 64 GA Inf - Many historians believe rape was not common on Sherman's March to the Sea. I do know humiliation was a primary activity the bummers performed (searching through their drawers containing their unmentionables). Most of what I've read or researched speak more of the bummers leaving nothing behind before they moved on.

There was also the sad story of "Sarah" raped by Private Eden Hill and when questioned she had no idea what had happened to her, only that he had hurt her and made her bleed. Hill was found guilty and sentenced to be shot, however his conviction was overturned due to a technicality. Sarah was ten years old
 
Very interesting post. I wonder if the stories of multiple rapes in Georgia by Union soldiers during Sherman's march to the sea were ever documented. Living in middle Georgia as a young boy in the 1950's I and others heard such stories, but I haven't looked into their veracity yet after all these years. Will probably do so now.
Might give you a start. Women would have been at their most vulnerable.

 
President Abraham Lincoln approved the following action in the spring of 1864: Private William H Cole serving in the 109th New York Volunteer Infantry has been sentenced to ten years of hard labor at a penitentiary in New York for the crime of rape. Despite the punishment this subject is not over; it's only beginning and it gives an insight as to how sexual assaults in the military were handled during a time of war.

Laurel, Maryland - Private Cole had been drinking heavily and Lieutenant G.A. Matthews was looking for his soldier. Matthew hears Cole is at the home of Olivia Brown. Mrs. Brown is a woman somewhere between the ages of fifty to fifty-five. When Lieutenant Matthews arrives at the Brown home he discovers Olivia crying with "the skin knocked off one side of her face". {1}

It appears there are witnesses to Cole's attack, or at least parts of it. Her daughter will testify she saw Cole throw her mother to the floor while her mother was "screaming murder". She runs to get help. Two other witnesses will testify they saw Olivia's bleeding face. Another neighbor, who has known her for six years, will tell authorities "he had never heard anything bad about her." {1}

Mrs. Brown will testify she was raped. On the other hand, Cole will claim it was "battery not rape" Cole will argue that due to the fact Mrs. Brown had no injury to her private parts therefore there is no proof of rape. However the military court will find him guilty and the President will give his blessing to his sentence.

Boys will be Boys; Girls will be Blamed

Mrs. Brown runs a bawdy house, so "declared" four members of the 109th New York Infantry. Not only did she run a bawdy house, those living there were not moral citizens their statement would go on to say.

"We each of us further depose that we are satisfied that the said Alvisa and the said Ellen are lewd women and that the said Nicholas Brown is cognizant of the fact that they keep a bawdy house." {2}

The accusations didn't stop there when another letter was sent to President Lincoln regarding the nature of Mrs. Brown:

"the character of the woman if not absolutely bad, was such at least as was well calculated to invite the advances of a soldier. She is not a woman of fair reputation in her neighborhood and beyond question she encouraged soldiers to visit her house where she supplied them with whiskey & where her conversation and conduct were well calculated to influence and excite to violence the passions of a drunken man." {2}

It also included a request to release Cole at once for he has served enough time sufficient for his crime (after all how did you expect a young, drunk man to act around a loose and immoral woman). And furthermore, Cole was a soldier in good standing never having had a problem before this incident.

Then came this request:

"Your petitioners further represent that we have been acquainted with the said William H. Cole from his childhood and that he has been a peaceable and quiet citizen and that we have never heard any charge or complaint against him or anything against his character as a good citizen except that he was occasionally a little wild." {2}

This request was signed by thirty-five citizens from Nichols, New York. Private Cole was pardoned by President Lincoln when Congressman Giles Waldo Hotchkiss personally requested for his mercy. He returned to duty with the 109th New York. No record of whatever happened to Mrs. Olivia Brown, after all, she was asking for it.

This was the model case for how rape was handled. Some men when convicted would be rapidly pardoned another example of how a charge of rape was not taken seriously.

"A common defense seems to have been 'that women in or near military camps were sexually available and that sexual transgressions against women during were understandable, if not excusable when committee by otherwise valiant and honorable men who were spilling their blood for their country'." {3}

In May of 1864, Jennie Green was sexually assaulted while living near Fortress Monroe, Virginia. Attacked and raped by Andrew J. Smith a white officer in the 11th Pennsylvania Cavalry, Jennie a young black girl testified how she was dragged into an empty room, threw on the floor and threatened to be killed. She was forced to tell the court how he "did the same thing that married people do". With the corroboration by a Black Chaplain of the 4th U.S. Colored Troops as well as another young slave, Smith was found guilty of rape and conduct unbecoming an officer and a gentleman, Smith was quickly pardoned and freed from serving another nine and one-half years of his sentence.

A "He said; She said" case is always difficult. Take the case of African American Grace Barnes in 1864. She was ganged rape by four soldiers from the 20th New York Cavalry. She suffered permanent disabilities after her attack, yet the soldiers insisted she wanted to engaged in a sexual act. She had been their laundress and admitted she stopped fighting their attack when one of the soldiers raised a stick over her head and said if she didn't stop yelling he would kill her. The military found all four men guilty however Brigadier General Foster Shepley (1819-1878) overturned their convictions claiming the only testimony that the woman who was raped was the only woman who claimed she never consented. I wonder if Shepley as the husband of two women in his life as well as three daughters would have believed their stories if they had been sexually assaulted as opposed to Grace Barnes.

From the earliest written laws found in "the Code of Hammurabi" rape has been recognized as some type of criminal act. Originally viewed as a crime of damaging ones property (usually a male in relationship to his wife or a father's virgin daughter), society was coming to the realization of how rape was a violent violation of a woman's body and could not be tolerated in a civilized society.

During the civil war it has been estimated some four hundred men were prosecuted for the crime of rape. The number is probably higher due to the hesitancy for a woman to come forward to report the crime. Bringing a man to justice was not an easy task to accomplish especially when many times if the woman happened to be working in the camp as cook or laundress she was unwilling to risk losing her employment.

Attitudes were slow to change. I found this quote from a Kentucky legislator written in 1895 proving that he certainly did not understand anything on the subject; "I regard the twelve-year-old girl as being capable of resisting the wiles of the seducer as any older woman." {5}

Pity the poor woman or girl who had to endure a sexual assault and then be accused of causing her own rape.​





Sources
1. "I Had Rather Die: Rape in the Civil War", by Kim Murphy
2. https://www.archives.gov/publications/prologue/1998/winter/union-court-martials
3. https://gettysburgcompiler.org/2015/10/05/finally-speaking-up-sexual-assault-in-the-civil-war-era/
4. "Afro-Virginian History and Culture", edited by John Saillant
5.
https://ualr.edu/socialchange/2018/04/15/reflection-history-sexual-assault-laws-united-states/
The OP took a bunch of quotes out of context here in order to paint society in the way in which they wanted to. I am certainly not convinced by the argument.
 

Learn About Us
About CivilWarTalk
Contact the Webmaster
Meet the Staff
Link to CivilWarTalk
Join Our Community
Register
Browse Forums
View Today's Discussions
Search the Forum
Get Help
FAQ
Student Guide
Forum Rules & Etiquette
Copyright / DMCA

     Contact Us CivilwarTalk on Facebook CivilWarTalk on YouTube CivilWarTalk on Twitter RSS Feed

Bringing the American Civil War and More to Life.
© 1999 - , CIVILWARTALK, LLC - Site Version 10.0

SlaveryTalk.com - SecessionTalk.com - CivilWarTalk.com - ReconstructionTalk.com
Back
Top