10/14/63 TM Dept G O #48-Published for guidance & information of those concerned:
G O # 123 Richmond, Sept 16, 1863.
The following order is published for the information of all concerned: Exchange Notice # 6.
Richmond, Sept 12, 1863. The following CS officers & men captured at Vicksburg, July 4, 1863, & subsequently paroled, have been duly exchanged, & are hereby so declared:
1. The officers & men of Gen C. L. Stevenson's Div.
2. The officers & men of Gen Bowen's Div.
3. The officers & men of Gen Moore's Bgde.
4. The officers & men of the 2nd Texas Regt.
5. The officers & men of Waul's Legion.
6. Also, all CS officers & men who have been delivered at City Point at any time previous to July 25, 1863, have been duly exchanged, & are hereby so declared.
10/24/63 S O #289 Col Ashbel Smith of the 2
nd Tex having been assigned as IG of the state troops, Lt Col McGinnis of the 2
nd Tex is charged with collecting the Regt at Camp Lubbock & will carry out the provisions of S O #282 promptly
[Note: In this volume I found another S O #289 of same date but with entirely different subject]
After being exchanged in Nov 1863, the Regt was reassembled at Camp Bee & placed under Gen
Magruder, cdr of the District of Texas, New Mexico, & Arizona. But the Regt, decimated by its service in Ms, could muster no more than a Bn of effective troops. It was never re-staffed, but continued to carry the Regimental designation throughout the remainder of the war. The unit was stationed in Galveston & assigned to guard the port against capture. It then participated in a last skirmish at the mouth of Caney Creek in Feb 1864
11/18/63 Shreveport-K Smith issues S O #194
I-Gen Waul having reported to these Hqs in obedience to instructions from the War Dept will at once proceed to collect the men of the 2
nd Tex Regt, the Bn of La Zouaves, & the several Bns & Arty Co's of the Waul Legion.
He is authorized to fill the same by voluntary enlistment of persons not liable to conscription & through the enrolling officers of the different counties & parishes by volunteers within the conscript age whether enrolled or not. When taking them from men not enrolled he will furnish the enrolling officers a duplicate descriptive list of the same.
Under instructions of the Sec of War, he is authorized to organize this force as mounted Infy.
All officers or enlisted of any of these organizations will send them to such points as may be designated by Gen Waul.
IV-No enrolling officer will interfere with the Mexicans Gen Waul may have in his employ as teamsters.
11/30/63 S O #326 The 2
nd Tex Infy is about to take the field
11/30/63 Houston, Magruder to Smith-Gen Waul has reported today with instructions, known to the Gen cdg, by which he is authorized to mount Waul's Legion & the 2nd Tex Infy. I have Brigaded the 2nd Tex & Waul's Legion with Likens' Regt & the 3rd Tex Infy, all, with the exception of Likens' Regt, splendidly drilled Infy- the best Bgde under my command, which I have reserved for Gen Waul. If he attempts to mount the 2nd Tex & his Legion, it will be a failure, as the horses are not to be had, the State troops & other calls having exhausted the country. To disband his Legion & 2nd Tex & send them home, in the hopeless task of procuring horses, will disorganize this excellent Bgde, whose services are indispensably necessary to the defense of the State, where they will soon be in front of the enemy.
I hope, under these circumstances, that the Gen cdg will not permit Waul's Legion & 2nd Tex Infy, numbering 600 veteran Infy, even if it could be done, their services would be lost for several months
Gen Waul states that he would like to serve under me in Tex, & he could not have a better Bgde anywhere than the one to which I have assigned him.
12/3/63 Shreveport to Gen Waul-Gen Smith sends you the extracts from the following letters from Gen Magruder referring to the mounting of your Bgde & its present position.
If he attempts to remount the 2
nd Tex & the Waul Legion it will be a failure because the horses are not to be had- The state troops & other calls have exhausted the supply. To disband his Legion & 2
nd Tex & send them home in the hopeless task of procuring horses will disorganize this excellent Bgde whose services are indispensable to the defense of the state where they will be soon in the front of the enemy.
I hope under the circumstance the cdg Gen will not permit the Waul Legion & 2
nd Tex Infy numbering 600 veteran Infy & armed by me with a part of the Enfield Rifles lately received to be disorganized & being transformed into inefficient mtd Infy, even if it could be done, their services would be lost for several months. Gen Waul states that he would like to serve under me in Tex & he could not have a better Bgde than the one to which I have assigned him.
In consideration of these facts, & the present threatening positions of the enemy, the Gen cdg directed that the order for remounting your command & instructing you to Gen Holmes is to be revoked & you are ordered to be assigned to Gen Magruder to be assigned to the command of the Bgde of which your Legion forms a part.
12/4/63 Shreveport-K Smith S O #208-So much of S O #194 as directs Gen Waul to remount his command & report to Gen Holmes cdg Dist of Ark is revoked. Gen Waul will report to Gen Magruder for assignment to duty.
1/27/64 #27 G O #16 is amended to permit all enlisted men of the state troops of conscript age to join Co's of their choosing in the following commands:
1
st -Waul's Legion
2nd-2nd Tex Infy
3
rd-Green's Cav Div
4/12/64 Dist to Gen Greer-assign all conscripts between 18 & 45 to be assigned to the 2
nd Tex Infy much reduced. The remaining material in this Regt is excellent troops & it is the Gen'ls opinion that with the conscripts a very fine Regt could be formed
5/30/64 Magruder to Boggs-in reference of yours as to assignment of conscripts, & stating the oldest Regts & Bns should be filled to the max first. The 2
nd Tex Infy is one of the oldest in the District & numbers only about 250 & I very much desire to fill it up. I also want men for the Btrys left after sending Taylor 4 splendid Btrys.
1/10/65 Houston, Col A. Smith of 2
nd Tex Infy-showing the failure of the conscript service to fill his Regt as ordered by Gen Smith.
Endorsed-When called upon by me to know why the 300 conscripts now at Camp Greer have not been assigned to this Regt as ordered by the Gen cdg, Capt Bragg informs me that his instructions from Col Martin do not warrant any further assignment of conscripts. I request that this Regt now reduced to a hand full be filled up for immediate service.
3/2/65 Walker to Boggs-I have published no order yet as to a Bgde for Col A Smith. It is a most delicate subject & has to be approached cautiously
3/22/65 to Gen Greer cdg conscript bureau-The IG reports that the 2
nd Tex Regt has not been filled up with conscripts. The cdg Gen directs that you explain why this has not been done.