Breechldrs 1859 sharps RIFLE?

Steveoko922

Private
Joined
Dec 4, 2020
Just purchased this 1859 sharps rifle from an antique store. Would anyone be able to tell me if this is a parts gun, reproduction or orginal? There is no SN on the tang..looks unfired. Very good fitting of the parts and no Italian marks to be seen anywhere.

Antique-1859-SHARPS-CIVIL-WAR-MILITARY-TYPE-54-CALIBER-PERCUSSION-RIFLE_103227759_79924_AF8AD6...jpg


Antique-1859-SHARPS-CIVIL-WAR-MILITARY-TYPE-54-CALIBER-PERCUSSION-RIFLE_103227759_79924_BC5259...jpg


Antique-1859-SHARPS-CIVIL-WAR-MILITARY-TYPE-54-CALIBER-PERCUSSION-RIFLE_103227759_79924_EC83F7...jpg


Screenshot_20251003_064422_Chrome.jpg


Antique-1859-SHARPS-CIVIL-WAR-MILITARY-TYPE-54-CALIBER-PERCUSSION-RIFLE_103227759_79924_62F13D...jpg


Antique-1859-SHARPS-CIVIL-WAR-MILITARY-TYPE-54-CALIBER-PERCUSSION-RIFLE_103227759_79924_35528A...jpg
 
Sorry, IMHO it is not original. It may have some original parts that have been crudely resurfaced. Barrel looks to be new replacement reproduction part.
What do you mean by crude? I wouldn't say the rifle looks bad. It certainly isn't a shiloh but I've bought and sold several orginal sharps rifles and carbines that have been 2k plus and have been very dissapointed by their condition inside and out
 
I'm not a Sharps expert but I can't recall seeing a mark like that M K on the side of the barrel.
The wood of that butt stock looks like those recent India made Enfield carbines and not walnut
I sure don't know
 
Last edited:
You can see two cartouches on the buttstock, but I agree one of the pieces of wood are a replacement. That whole barrel has a different feel to it. Does it have New Model 1859 or 1863 stamped on it?
 
What do you mean by crude? I wouldn't say the rifle looks bad. It certainly isn't a shiloh but I've bought and sold several orginal sharps rifles and carbines that have been 2k plus and have been very dissapointed by their condition inside and out
Any metal that might have been refreshed should still leave stamping that are readable. The barrel has what appears to be a WK in raised letters. No inspector WK. The stock could be original as I stated. Cartouches on stock are not readable, but that didn't mean anything wrong and it may very well be original. Is there any other marking on barrel? Any stock that indicated wear should be somewhat similar to wear on rest of rifle. As long as you are satisfied that is all that counts, but you asked for input. I own seven other Civil War and before variations of Sharps rifles and carbines along with a Model 1859 rifle in Berdan serial range.
 
Last edited:
I have a good friend who has a sharps rifle with "MK" stamped on the barrel in the same location.
If it does say MK, then at minimum the barrel is a reproduction from a company in the 1980s. MK stands for a foreign name, one that I can not pronounce nor spell.
 
At $1600 you weren't robbed even if parts are repro. The lock plate and Lawrence pellet primer are original. Pederson's repops are selling near to $2k now.

Someone may have put an original lock on a Farmingdale Sharps mashup but my gut feel is it's put together from disassociated original and repop parts. I'd be happy with it in my collection but on display would put the caveat on it that your not sure it's 100% original.
 
What's the goal? Just as a shooter I wouldn't mess with it because redoing a stock can be time consuming and I can't say positively what you have. Instead id find a proper replacement stock set
 
Its just for shooting. Does anyone recall any barrel makers in the 80s with wk as the name? All I can think of is kreiger.
 

Learn About Us
About CivilWarTalk
Contact the Webmaster
Meet the Staff
Link to CivilWarTalk
Join Our Community
Register
Browse Forums
View Today's Discussions
Search the Forum
Get Help
FAQ
Student Guide
Forum Rules & Etiquette
Copyright / DMCA

     Contact Us CivilwarTalk on Facebook CivilWarTalk on YouTube CivilWarTalk on Twitter RSS Feed

Bringing the American Civil War and More to Life.
© 1999 - , CIVILWARTALK, LLC - Site Version 10.0

SlaveryTalk.com - SecessionTalk.com - CivilWarTalk.com - ReconstructionTalk.com
Back
Top