Shoeless Soldiers

Wasn't previously aware that CW era worn brogans typically worn by infantry on both sides had such very short lifespans (usually less than several months), depending on the intensity of active campaigning.

As the war continued, Confederate soldiers wore a variety of footwear, if any, as the Southern manufacturing resources for producing standardized shoes disappeared.

The Confederate Army never had the means to provide standardized shoes in any quantity. During 1861-62 the soldiers had to supply themselves. But the blockade and lack of materials, workmen, or capitol had its effects. According to British visitor to the South W.C. Corsan, it was the spring of 1862 when the market failed, and no man's shoes, of any type, were safe in the South unless on your feet...

1770510864735.webp


When Corsan wrote, the lack of suitable shoes was severe in some Confederate units in late 1862. The veterans of the 1st Georgia Regulars noted...

1770511571527.webp


Large quantities were imported through the blockade of various quality... From 1863, none reported to meet the quality standard preferred...

"The Shoeing of Lee's Army.
A correspondent of the Savannah Republican gives the following account of the feet on which Lee's Army returned from Pennsylvania.
We came out of Maryland with nearly ten thousand barefooted men, and all had suffered more or less in the wear and tear of clothing.—These wants have been pretty well supplied by the quartermasters, who have displayed, commendable zeal in the matter, and by some of the State authorities. The German shoes furnished the men just before they started to Pennsylvania were of a very inferior description. They were low quartered russets, light and thin, and the leather very poor. Such shoes would answer the purpose of a vine dresser, a gardener, or an artisan, who had but little walking to do, but are totally unfit for a soldier, whose marches are long and frequently over rough roads and through drenching rains. They last from three days to six weeks, generally not longer than a week or two, especially if the weather is wet or a river is forded; for the leather being inferior, the soles spread when they get wet, and soon become part of the uppers, as it were, from which they separate when they get dry again.
We hauled pontoon boats from Fredericksburg to the Shenandoah, and thence to the Potomac, and back again to the Shenandoah; and yet the army forded both rivers as we marched north, and a considerable portion of it did the same thin on our return. You are ready to inquire, why is this? I can only reply that it is owing the want of staff officers educated in their duties, and especially to the want of a corps of practical engineers. It remains to be added in this connection, that the English shoes issued to the men since our return to Virginia, are well made, and that the leather is excellent. The only defect in them is the narrowness of the bottom—a defect which all shoe dealers have noticed in boots and shoes of English manufacture. It is a little remarkable that our agents in Europe, instead of making their selections from the stock on hand, do not have shoes made to order—that is, a strong, substantial army shoe, suited to the general shape and size of the foot of southern men. To march well or fight well, a soldier must be well shod. Wide bottomed, roomy shoes, which can be securely tied on the feet and which fit snugly around the ankle, are the best. Such as we have, the supply has not been sufficient to meet the demand; there is still a considerable number of men who are barefooted."

[Richmond Examiner, VA, Aug. 13, 1863.]

From the Confederate prisoners at Gettysburg...

1770509961033.webp


By mid-1864 efforts to produce shoes for the army were underway, with Quartermaster General Lawton making arrangements to make up 600K pair...

1770509567862.webp


But imports were still widely relied upon, with over half a million pair of shoes imported to Charleston and Wilmington through the blockade in the last months of 1864...

1770509923247.webp



The shoes found among Confederates even in that last year of the war were far from suitable for military service. For example Confederate dead found in crude "stitch down" shoes...

"The yellow, butternut clothes and stitched-down shoes of Hankin's artillerists as their dead lay almost amongst their enemies, bore sad and striking contrast to the gaily-decked dead of the enemy. The Federal troops were of regiments which had been brought around from Florida, and their uniforms were bright and new." [Claiborne, John H., Seventy-five Years in Old Virginia, The Neale Publishing Company, New York, 1904, 215.]

And Hood's army in October, 1864 butchered oxen and used the hides to make up moccasins for barefooted troops... Albert Goodloe of Hood's army recalling...

1770511846979.webp

1770511871301.webp


Leander Stillwell of the Union Army subsequently noted of prisoners taken from Hood's army several weeks later...

1770511995018.webp
 
Inspired by @RedRover I did a search online using 'brogan'; 'shoes'; 'boot'; 'confederate' and got these:
1770549174609.webp
1770549293980.webp

1770549474860.webp
1770549518764.webp

1770549567407.webp
1770549633974.webp


All are 'used'! Note that the color is not the 'standard' black, but often bare leather, ie undyed. There were also confederate WOODEN-SOLED shoes! Many would have been made on older lasts meaning there was one shape - no left or right.

 
In the March North which ended at Gettysburg - the 1863 Pennsylvania Campaign - Lee's troops were marching far beyond their base supply line. OK, so it was only 15 or so miles a day, but this was over 30 days! However, on poor roads and with these brogan-type shoes, their footwear would not have lasted long. Resupply seems to have been prioritised along the lines of ammunition and food - although both could be debated given the effort involved and the stories from the survivors.


After all, a popular story is told that they were heading for Gettysburg to get shoes/boots from the warehouses there! An army of that size - 70-75,000 troops - on the march, at that time, the lead troops would be living off the land as they would be far ahead of the supply train. Although we quote the '15 miles a day', some units could do 30 or more BUT their Quartermasters would be some way behind and the route clogged with troops. Horses and mules get tired too.

The role and work of the Quartermaster and his team of waggons, drivers and sources of supply are a story in themselves and are never glamorous enough to gain much interest. As any regular soldier can tell you, the guys at the front are ALWAYS poorly provided for, not because the QM is a mean old barsteward, but they just cannot get the supplies to them easily and in time. Those that do are hailed as heroes - but only by the guys at the front. No Medals of Honor for them, just a sigh of relief from Joe.
 
In the March North which ended at Gettysburg - the 1863 Pennsylvania Campaign - Lee's troops were marching far beyond their base supply line. OK, so it was only 15 or so miles a day, but this was over 30 days! However, on poor roads and with these brogan-type shoes, their footwear would not have lasted long. Resupply seems to have been prioritised along the lines of ammunition and food - although both could be debated given the effort involved and the stories from the survivors.

After all, a popular story is told that they were heading for Gettysburg to get shoes/boots from the warehouses there! An army of that size - 70-75,000 troops - on the march, at that time, the lead troops would be living off the land as they would be far ahead of the supply train. Although we quote the '15 miles a day', some units could do 30 or more BUT their Quartermasters would be some way behind and the route clogged with troops. Horses and mules get tired too.

One of the purposes of the movement of Lee's army into Pennsylvania was to draw supplies from that State, including shoes. The Army's Quartermaster General expected lots of shoes to have been available there... enough to keep Lee's troops shod perhaps, and to send a surplus back to Virginia...

1770564815984.webp


Like at York, all the stores were cleared out of shoes...

1770564973435.webp


Regardless, according to Wilson's "Confederate Industry" as of the Battle of Gettysburg, Lee's quartermasters were writing Richmond that 20,000 pairs of shoes were immediately necessary. Quartermaster General Myers found there were none on hand in Richmond, and only a few thousand imported pairs at Charleston available to send to Staunton, Virginia.

1770565200453.webp
 
Anyone who has ever re-enacted can share their experiences and frustration with period correct footwear. It is both expensive and short lived. Especially if they get wet. I had one pair of pegged soles that I literally walked out of at Saylors Creek 1984.
I had to do the route march and surrender ceremony the next day barefoot. Would not recommend by the way.
 
On my post above. This reenactment was filmed and it was one of the first CW films by Classic Images. I'm in a close up near the end-all grey, black slouch hat and no shoes. I had a VHS copy but it disappeared. I think my spousal unit put it in the Goodwill donation...
I've tried to find that video on YouTube to no avail. I may have the year wrong. Could be 1985-it was more than 40 years ago and I went to half a dozen Saylors Creeks.
I'll keep trying Youtube, but if anyone has any links I'd appreciate it.
 
Is there any evidence that soldiers could have used leather to make simple moccasins? We made them in Boy Scouts out of deer hide.


View attachment 575084
Search "Longstreet Moccasins" one of the few attempts to make moccasins from fresh cow hides that were butchered for food. I believe some Army of Tennessee soldiers tried the same if I remember the stories right. Not a bad idea I guess but didn't last very long on the march.
 
The other part of the equation is the condition of the roads and trails they had to march on, having to walk through streams or in mud or frozen conditions in poorly made shoes made from quickly processed leather, of course shoes didn't last long.
Let's not be too quick to judge either side, the same problems faced combatants in every war, during WWI the Italian Army famously issued carboard foot wear to the Alpine Troops fighting in the same mountains the 2026 Winter Olympics are currently taking place.
 
@captaindrew you might be interested in the footwear stuff I just read.

I'm currently reading, "Bully For The Band" about the 10th Vermonters. It was rough. There were three brothers from Vermont and they were very musical. Herbert was the band leader for their company and then brigade band. His brother's, Charlie and Osman were musical too. In this trio, who wrote A LOT of letters home, you see a sort of Darwinian selection going on. Osman gets chronically sick with diarrhea and just plain weakness and various illnesses from the camp and dies in a hospital in DC. His brothers are surprised and devastated. Charles takes out his frustration on the camp doctor, along with the Colonel because the doctor had told both of them (Charles knew Osman was really sick) that Charles was being an "old maid" which was a term used for soldiers who were faking sick call. They wanted to know if the surgeon was happy now?

All the brothers stuck with each other, btw and his brother, Herbert, particularly tries over and over to get Osman furloughed permanently back to Vermont because he simply can't take the marching and demands on his body. All of them are down to about 120 to 130 lbs and describe themselves as "fat as pigs." Charlie is actually the strongest and can't be outmarched and can work long hours. Herbert is starting to break down physically.

"Camp near Tanleytown, 3 miles from Georgetown, DC July 24th/64

They have marched from DC to Edwards Ferry, forded the Potomac and marched through and past Leesburg and Snickers Gap, forded the Shenandoah River and valley and gone up to Berryville. They've crossed the Chain bridge and did some more marching and then a "40 mile retreat" from Frederick City to Baltimore. Herbert writes, "if we aint just about all all played out." "I'll give up. I am completely worn out and so are all the soldiers in our corps… If they march us much more I shall have to fall out & go to a hospital to get rested — I wore my boots all out on the last march & had to travel in my stocking feet one day (on the stones). I picked up two or three old stockings & put on my feet to save my own stockings. A man in the 87th Penn Band took pity on me & gave me a pair of shoes he had with him that he didn't wear so I was all [hunk] then I saw a good many soldiers barefoot & in their stocking feet on the road. Rather rough!! ….. If they want to save the spirits of the Soldiers they must not use them so hard."

This is HARD marching and they hadn't seen anything yet because they were part of the Monocacy fight between Wallace and Early. Herbert got so "used up" in that retreat and worn out, that he couldn't even keep his eyes open or keep going. His brother Charles is also in that fight and retreat. Charles describes in a letter home how he takes Herbert's hand and guides him through the retreat, down the banking, through the woods, river, etc. And at times he had to half carry his brother along who was in a state of collapse. And Herbert wasn't the only one by far. A number of men became prisoners simply because they were so heat struck (this fight and all the marching before and after) was during hellish heat and a number of men died just on the march going there and exhausted that they just laid down where they were. They couldn't keep going - it was that simple.

Anyway, Charles makes it clear that if he hadn't "stuck with Herbert" that Herbert would have either been killed or taken prisoner. After this huge long march of ultimately 700 miles from where they originally were, Herbert is now in need of serious rest and recooperation. Charles starts finding rides from him in different wagons, on a horse, has his gun carried by someone else (he's already carrying a bunch of their stuff), in an ambulance, etc. At one point Charles writes, "I can't carry everything!"

Both Charles and Herbert write about marching in dust so thick (in Maryland) that you can't see the man three feet in front of you or dust so thick it is over your ankles or mud (more in Virginia) that is up to your knees and you have to keep marching in that. I think they think the thick dust is the worst because of all the choking and breathing issues too. We can never imagine or recreate just how terrible it was, even when there wasn't any fighting going on.
 
Last edited:
I've been to Monocacy a number of times and have done the walk down to the river and along the railroad cuts, etc. I highly encourage a visit to that battlefield. It is small but elegant. You can really see, with the rises, how well artillery works there. The only drawback to Monocacy is the highway goes through it now (and has for decades) but the rest of it is till pretty pristine. The fields are still used for planting, there hasn't been a lot of development in the immediate battlefield area and if you park down by the mill and get out and actually walk down by the river on that side, and then get in the car and get on the other side and follow along, you will get so much more out of the whole visit - once you do the NPS center of course.
 
@captaindrew you might be interested in the footwear stuff I just read.

I'm currently reading, "Bully For The Band" about the 10th Vermonters. It was rough. There were three brothers from Vermont and they were very musical. Herbert was the band leader for their company and then brigade band. His brother's, Charlie and Osman were musical too. In this trio, who wrote A LOT of letters home, you see a sort of Darwinian selection going on. Osman gets chronically sick with diarrhea and just plain weakness and various illnesses from the camp and dies in a hospital in DC. His brothers are surprised and devastated. Charles takes out his frustration on the camp doctor, along with the Colonel because the doctor had told both of them (Charles knew Osman was really sick) that Charles was being an "old maid" which was a term used for soldiers who were faking sick call. They wanted to know if the surgeon was happy now?

All the brothers stuck with each other, btw and his brother, Herbert, particularly tries over and over to get Osman furloughed permanently back to Vermont because he simply can't take the marching and demands on his body. All of them are down to about 120 to 130 lbs and describe themselves as "fat as pigs." Charlie is actually the strongest and can't be outmarched and can work long hours. Herbert is starting to break down physically.

"Camp near Tanleytown, 3 miles from Georgetown, DC July 24th/64

They have marched from DC to Edwards Ferry, forded the Potomac and marched through and past Leesburg and Snickers Gap, forded the Shenandoah River and valley and gone up to Berryville. They've crossed the Chain bridge and did some more marching and then a "40 mile retreat" from Frederick City to Baltimore. Herbert writes, "if we aint just about all all played out." "I'll give up. I am completely worn out and so are all the soldiers in our corps… If they march us much more I shall have to fall out & go to a hospital to get rested — I wore my boots all out on the last march & had to travel in my stocking feet one day (on the stones). I picked up two or three old stockings & put on my feet to save my own stockings. A man in the 87th Penn Band took pity on me & gave me a pair of shoes he had with him that he didn't wear so I was all [hunk] then I saw a good many soldiers barefoot & in their stocking feet on the road. Rather rough!! ….. If they want to save the spirits of the Soldiers they must not use them so hard."

This is HARD marching and they hadn't seen anything yet because they were part of the Monocacy fight between Wallace and Early. Herbert got so "used up" in that retreat and worn out, that he couldn't even keep his eyes open or keep going. His brother Charles is also in that fight and retreat. Charles describes in a letter home how he takes Herbert's hand and guides him through the retreat, down the banking, through the woods, river, etc. And at times he had to half carry his brother along who was in a state of collapse. And Herbert wasn't the only one by far. A number of men became prisoners simply because they were so heat struck (this fight and all the marching before and after) was during hellish heat and a number of men died just on the march going there and exhausted that they just laid down where they were. They couldn't keep going - it was that simple.

Anyway, Charles makes it clear that if he hadn't "stuck with Herbert" that Herbert would have either been killed or taken prisoner. After this huge long march of ultimately 700 miles from where they originally were, Herbert is now in need of serious rest and recooperation. Charles starts finding rides from him in different wagons, on a horse, has his gun carried by someone else (he's already carrying a bunch of their stuff), in an ambulance, etc. At one point Charles writes, "I can't carry everything!"

Both Charles and Herbert write about marching in dust so thick (in Maryland) that you can't see the man three feet in front of you or dust so thick it is over your ankles or mud (more in Virginia) that is up to your knees and you have to keep marching in that. I think they think the thick dust is the worst because of all the choking and breathing issues too. We can never imagine or recreate just how terrible it was, even when there wasn't any fighting going on.
To reiterate your point about hard marching, here is Brigadier General George S. Greene's itinerary of the Gettysburg Campaign, taken from his OR, Volume 43, pages 859-860:

June 28.--Marched from Knoxville to Frederick, Md.; 11 miles.
June 29.--Marched to Big Pipe Creek; 21 miles.
June 30.--Marched to Littlestown, Pa.; 12 miles.
July 1.--Marched to Two Taverns, Pa.; 8 miles; thence to the left of the battle-field near Gettysburg; 5 miles.
July 2.--Marched to the right of the line of battle; 1½ miles.
July 5.--Marched to Littlestown, Pa.; 13 miles.
July 7.--Marched to Walkersville and through Frederick, Md.; 29 miles.
July 8.--Marched to Jefferson, Md.; 15 miles.
July 9.--Marched to Rohrersville, Md.; 11 miles.
July 10.--Marched to near Bakersville, Md.; 7 miles.
July 11.--Marched to Fair Play; 6 miles.
July 13.--Changed position to the right, to the left of the First Division of the Twelfth Corps, this brigade being the right of the Second Division; threw up intrenchments, covering our front and in continuation of the intrenchments in the other brigades of the division, and in position with the intrenchments of the First Division, on our right.
July 14.--Brigade remained in line of battle behind intrenchments, and worked on intrenchments while the troops on our right advanced to the front.
July 15, 5 a.m.--Marched toward Pleasant Valley, through Sharps-burg and Antietam Furnace. Bivouacked near Harper's Ferry, on northwest of Maryland Heights; 16 miles.
July 16.--Marched to Pleasant Valley; 3 miles.
July 17 and 18.--Remained in camp. Received supplies of clothing and provisions.
July 19.--Crossed the Potomac to Harper's Ferry on pontoon bridge, and the Shenandoah, and marched up Loudoun Valley; 9 miles.
July 20.--Marched to Snickersville; 11 miles.
July 21 and 22.--Remained in camp at Snickersville.
July 23.--Marched to Ashby's Gap, and thence to near Markham Station; 23 miles. <ar43_860>
July 24.--Marched to Linden Station; thence to Markham and to Piedmont; 22 miles.
July 25.--Marched to Thoroughfare Gap; 16 miles.
July 26.--Marched to Warrenton Junction; 22 miles.
July 27 to 30.--Encamped at Warrenton Junction.
July 31.--Marched to Ellis Ford, on the Rappahannock River; 26 miles.
That's 287.5 miles in 34 days. It's not a wonder that men marched their shoes (and clothing) to shreds while on campaign. And they received clothing twice (not mentioned here but the Twelfth Corps received an allotment of clothing on June 30 while in Littlestown) in that time so most men were able to replace worn shoes pretty regularly.

Ryan
 
Inspired by @RedRover I did a search online using 'brogan'; 'shoes'; 'boot'; 'confederate' and got these:



All are 'used'! Note that the color is not the 'standard' black, but often bare leather, ie undyed. There were also confederate WOODEN-SOLED shoes! Many would have been made on older lasts meaning there was one shape - no left or right.

Good point here on the color, recently while going over New Orleans business invoices in the Confederate Citizens File, I was amazed looking at the invoices for shoes and boots and seeing how many were indicated as natural leather or russet and not black.

As for the shoe wearing, I seem to remember reading an anecdote somewhere about men (I believe in the ANV) avoiding guard duty/watch in the winter because they had no shoes, when this became a widespread problem (excuse) the order was given that bare feet was not an excuse to avoid duty, suddenly men everywhere miraculously had shoes again. Not to say no shoes was not a problem (because it certainly was) but I just thought this was amusing.
 
The footwear was not like modern military boots. The standard footwear (if there actually was a standard) seem to be 'brogues' or 'Jefferson' boots
View attachment 574209View attachment 574210
These examples are pretty typical - an 'ankle boot' = all-leather, sewn, with minimal lacing. Often the soles, heel in particular, would be iron-shod (nails). The height to ankle varied. Traditionally, the leather for the uppers was rough side out and laces were either leather or fabric. These boots wore out quickly. The brogue is traditional Irish/Scottish outdoor footwear. Why black? Tradition. They were easily maintained with either black shoe polish, which was readily available, or with clear wax with soot added to eliminate scuffs..

Comparison - The traditional European infantry ankle boot* was more elaborate with or without a toe cap. Nails and metal shoes on the thick leather soles were common, but a number of armies had the pull-on full boot - the 'jackboot' for infantry. In the majority of armies, the full boot was the preserve of the cavalry and often had a thinner sole without nails, but provision for spurs. Officers could often make their own choice - they bought their kit.
View attachment 574212View attachment 574213
*The Brits called them 'ammunition boots' because they were procured by the Master of Ordnance and were of 'ammunition quality'.
The purpose of the metal heels and hob nails is to protect the bottom of the shoe from wear. Shoes would otherwise wear out quickly.
 
Interestingly enough, the fellow shown as my avatar, was a cordwainer prior to the war. He was likely in some stage of apprenticeship prior to the war. Another soldier in his company with the same last name was also an apprentice cordwainer prior to enlistment. I suspect this fellow was either a brother or close cousin. It makes me wonder, considering they made new shoes, if their skills were valuable with respect to repairing shoes. They were infantry and after the war neither of them returned to the business of making shoes for whatever reason.

On a side note, an Irishman with the same surname pronunciation as said man, and also at Gettysburg, was a Roman Catholic Priest named James Sheeran. He was chaplain of the 14th La. and left a journal of his war time experiences. With regard to shoes on the Gettysburg Campaign, he makes some entries, both human and horse. A few excerpts include:

June 8 1863 "...got a new set of English Shoes--the blacksmith...refusing to take any renumeration (sic?).

June 14 1863 (Sunday) ...the La. boys...helped themselves to shoes etc. from the Yankee sutlers.

June 25 1863 I again visit Chambersburg (PA)...We obtained a good supply of shoes, hats, clothes, ...etc.

June 29 1863 Here (Scotland PA) We halted some time and captured some stores....We captured a considerable number of guns, shoes and some other stores...

July 1 1863 ...It was a remarkable sight to see with what cool indifference one of our ambulance corps stripped the shoes of the dead Yankees and carried them to some of our men now barefooted."
 
With regard to the question on western troops, I can say that while there were complaints from time to time about supplies, I've never read a specific quote about anyone being shoeless in the 9th Ohio, or even Van Derveer's brigade (AOC 3rd Brigade/3rd Division: 2nd MN, 35th OH, 18th US, and later 87th IN).

The 9th had their supplies in storage stolen from the depot in Nashville including a lot of shoes and boots, but even after that, no complaints in particular about footwear.
 
Saw the below illustration by Charles Henry Smith (alias Bill Arp) in 'Bill Arp's Peace Papers' (see https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=hvd.32044037135043&seq=22 ). The image contains an element of relevant truth on the subject by satirically comparing the striking differences and deterioration in the wear of GA militia men between the start and end of the war.
1781591285031.webp
 
North has such a large problem with corruption. Estimated 25% of the war effort was lost. Substandard materials used to make things like shoes. Rise of the Shoddy Aristocracy. Lincoln had to keep his business class happy and much was detrimental to the war effort. Makes you wonder what they were fighting for. Self enrichment a big part of it.
 
"Substandard materials used "
Who accepted them? No receipt - no money. If they were accepted, someone got a generous backhander!

Or was it a bad specification or design? Was it corruption - or a bad system? Was it a system designed around another way of fighting and supply? From the outside, the Civil War was a real mix of modern and old-fashioned. Napoleonic in nature with a sprinkling of modern arms and new ideas. Those boots were made for marching* - on the parade ground, not the road - and marching on a road is a BIG part of a war of manoever.
* Could be a song in that!!

We learned the lesson the hard way during the Falklands War - issued equipment NOT fitted for the environment. Sure, lessons were learned, but it did not help the guys down there! But that was a short war.

In the 4 years of fighting in the civil war - and marching - were lessons learned and new kit issued?
 

Learn About Us
About CivilWarTalk
Contact the Webmaster
Meet the Staff
Link to CivilWarTalk
Join Our Community
Register
Browse Forums
View Today's Discussions
Search the Forum
Get Help
FAQ
Student Guide
Forum Rules & Etiquette
Copyright / DMCA

     Contact Us CivilwarTalk on Facebook CivilWarTalk on YouTube CivilWarTalk on Twitter RSS Feed

Bringing the American Civil War and More to Life.
© 1999 - , CIVILWARTALK, LLC - Site Version 10.0

SlaveryTalk.com - SecessionTalk.com - CivilWarTalk.com - ReconstructionTalk.com
Back
Top