- Joined
- Apr 18, 2019
- Location
- Upstate New York
@USS ALASKA it looks like you will never run out of new articles to post on this topic!
An aside. For those of us without Google, JSTR allows free access to anyone for 100 articles per year. From that same page, click on "another way" (something like that), decline the university log-and set up your own account.Full article at above link on JSTOR with Google sign-in (In the upper right-hand corner of the linked page, there is a 'Log in' button. If you have a Gmail account, you have a Google sign-in and this will allow for free reading of 100 articles a month).
The same thing happened to an extent in Arkansas, immediately to the south of Missouri.Journal Article
Indebtedness and the Origins of Guerrilla Violence in Civil War Missouri
Mark W. Geiger
The Journal of Southern History
Vol. 75, No. 1 (Feb., 2009), pp. 49-82
Southern Historical Association
View attachment 539511
Indebtedness and the Origins of Guerrilla Violence in Civil War Missouri on JSTOR
Mark W. Geiger, Indebtedness and the Origins of Guerrilla Violence in Civil War Missouri, The Journal of Southern History, Vol. 75, No. 1 (Feb., 2009), pp. 49-82www.jstor.org
Full article at above link on JSTOR with Google sign-in (In the upper right-hand corner of the linked page, there is a 'Log in' button. If you have a Gmail account, you have a Google sign-in and this will allow for free reading of 100 articles a month).
Cheers,
USS ALASKA
civilwartalk.com
Guerilla just means Little War. War within war. CW Guerrillas probably did stick to a locale where neighbors and friends could help them. In the 2nd Boer War then cammandoes ranged far but had a home base. The British finally rounded up all the alleged supporters into concentration camps and burned the farmhouses. That really put a damper on Boer commando operations. It turned out horribly with disease running rampant. I think the only way to stop partisan operations would have been to do something similar to the British in South Afrika. The only problem being that the families of both sides lived in close proximity to each other. Weeding out the enemy would have been impossible.Technically a guerrilla is the old name for insurgent. A guerrilla could truly only exist in its own envioronment. Any force that ventures outside its area would not be considered as such.
We need to focus in specifics.
For instance:
How did union guerrillas perform in middle and west tennessee?
How did rebel guerrillas perform in East Tennessee?
Border states such as Kentucky and Missouri are a tough nut to crack.
It may be dependent on who controlled what and when.
This is a hard question indeed, but there is an answer.
Guerrillas are hard to operate against and still are. I think they may have been equally effective until the dominating side began to take control.
That being said, I would suppose the rebel guerrillas would be more effective simply base off the fact the had more time to be effective. The south rarely encroached on the north, but when they did they certainly paid in unconventional warfare.
Partisans.Good point in that Confederate guerrillas (Samuel Hildebrand arguably the most infamous example) used captured Union uniforms and supplies. Of course the flip side of the coin is that federal soldiers in Missouri some times disguised themselves
as Confederate guerrillas . Imagine being a farmer your house is surrounded by armed men and you have no idea who they really are and anything you do may very well be wrong move.
Apparently this COIN technique worked because the British, Portuguese and Rhodesians used this technique in their twentieth century COIN wars. The Taliban and ISIS use disguises to this day. You just can't go wrong with the classics.
I would argue light uniformed cavalry that makes raids behind enemy lines and is based in its own territory are not guerrillas.
I would argue that the basic definition of a guerrilla is a band of fighters that are not members of a recognized armed force and for the most part use hit and run techniques.
Leftyhunter
Those tactics are ancient. Just different weapons and different causes.Their was as this thread notes guerrilla warfare in all eleven states of the Confederacy plus major guerrilla activity in Missouri, Kentucky, and West Virginia. Their were some guerrilla raids in Kansas and apparently limited guerrilla warfare in Southern Illinois.
The amount of guerrilla warfare varies from state to state and country to country.
The guerrilla warfare of the Civil War is in a sense the most modern aspect of the Civil War in that other nations as previously mentioned use Civil War guerrilla techniques to this day
Also has in the present day rules of warfare are meant to be broken.
Leftyhunter
A real civil war is two or more factions fighting for control of the one government. 1861-1865 was not that. Brother against Brother has nothing to do with it. Although that can happen it is not a defining characteristic of civil war. Missouri became a free for all over Pre war issues that still simmered and occasionally boiled over. Extremely brutal at times. Bloody. Not civil war but Clanism. No matter what uniforms were worn it wasn't about CSA or USA.It was an entirely different war in Missouri and to an extent Kansas.The Border had been at war since roughly 1854 on and off, that eventually morphed and heated up in 61 causing Kansas to renew it's raids and attacks on Missouri and also people from slave states living within Kansas, not slave holders as slavery was not legal in the beknighted flatland to west, just people of southern background, Missourians during the border war did raid into Kansas, however the first small partisan bands were in response to Lane and Jennisons raids into Missouri as pretty much retribution for Missouri raids during the Border war and to punish "evil" slave holders and "secesh". Who everyone in the North knew where "secesh and slave holders thanks to that Twit Horace Greely's published screed's against Missouri during the Border Troubles.
The Partisan's units grew from small to larfer and Large when the Union Occupied the "Black Belt" of the MRV blocking routes to the MSG and CS forces for man wishing to enlist. TRhey further enlarged when Gamble required mandetory enrollment in the Unionist EMM,
Missouri's war became every thing a real Civil War is. Nieghbor against Nieghbor father against son brother against brother.It was not the honrable war of the "great" war in the east , excuse me the stalemate in the easet. it was bloody horrible and it in many ways continued well after Saint Bobby E. Lee, gave up the Ghost in Virginny.That's the short of it,
A quick question, do you all consider the Jayhawkers and Redlegs Union guerrillas? I have done some research on their activities during the war.
I do.A quick question, do you all consider the Jayhawkers and Redlegs Union guerrillas? I have done some research on their activities during the war.
Oh yeah, I saw that on Sharpe.It would be very difficult to catalog which each and every regiment did or did not do in terms of violating military law in Missouri and or other states. Has you know I am slowly complying a reasonably accurate list of all regiments on all sides involved in COIN duty at some point in their regimental duties.
Other posters have pointed out that French forces in Spain at the turn of the nineteenth century were far more brutal fighting Spanish guerrillas the Union forces 60 odd years later.
Compared to future COIN conflicts including those of the U.S. the mistreatment of civilians by the Union is mild. One could argue that the COIN war against the American Indians was also more brutal.
Leftyhunter
Unless you were the victim.I think you are right. Looking at COIN conflicts as a whole, the Civil War in Missouri was not that bad. I definitely think that the COIN war against the American Indians was more brutal.
I don't think Davis was less then noble when leaving. He had a guard and the government officials and the treasury. He wasn't just giving up.Without Lee calling it "quits". This could have gone on for at least another 50 years via bushwacking - which would have been devastating to both sides but I think much more so to the South. In April 1865, I think Lee was a much more commanding presence than Davis, Lee surrendered with Honor, Davis fled in a less than noble fashion
The concept of protected villages and civic action aka hearts and minds arguably goes back to USAF Colonel Landsdale who was an advisor to the Philippines Secretary of Defense in the post WW2 Huk Rebellion. The concept of tracking down guerrillas, ambushing them and population removal are rather old school.Those tactics are ancient. Just different weapons and different causes.
Gray was also an officer with the 2 TN CAV. USA. He served honorably there also. A couple of my Horton relatives served under him in the 3rd. Just to show how how confusing the war was in East TN. 3 or 4 of the Kirkland clan served under him for the Union...Charles Kirkland, William T Kirkland and two James A Kirklands, don't know if that is a typo or maybe father and son.View attachment 551889
"Bushwhacker" John Kirkland
Kirkland was a 1st Lieutenant in Vaughn's 3rd Tennessee until he deserted. He applied for a Confederate pension, then left most of the questions blank.
View attachment 551892
View attachment 551895
(My 4 x removed 2nd cousin)
Captain Joseph C. Gray, a Union officer in the 3rd Tennessee Mounted Infantry (Union), was ambushed at his home near the Little Tennessee River on January 15, 1865. The gang murdered Gray and celebrated with a drunken party, during which their women allegedly danced around a campfire wearing Gray's stolen cavalry boots. Years later, Gray's widow, Rachel McCall Gray, reportedly refused to forgive one of the gang members on his deathbed, responsible for her husband's death, "damming his soul to hell."
John Jackson Kirkland and his brother Jesse were the most feared of Confederate partisans in the Unaka Mountains. Tim Lyons and James K. Morrow (my g g uncle) were their counterpart for the Union. Jesse had at one time infiltrated Lyons company. Lyons and his men later tracked Jesse down and killed him across the State line in Graham County NC.Gray was also an officer with the 2 TN CAV. USA. He served honorably there also. A couple of my Horton relatives served under him in the 3rd. Just to show how how confusing the war was in East TN. 3 or 4 of the Kirkland clan served under him for the Union...Charles Kirkland, William T Kirkland and two James A Kirklands, don't know if that is a typo or maybe father and son.
Very interesting to me, as my great grandfather Thomas Rich of the 13th Illinois Cavalry was assigned to Arkansas under General Steele.Journal Article
Guerrillas: The Real War in Arkansas
Daniel E. Sutherland
The Arkansas Historical Quarterly
Vol. 52, No. 3 (Autumn, 1993), pp. 257-285
Arkansas Historical Association
View attachment 551928
Full article at above link on JSTOR with Google sign-in (In the upper right-hand corner of the linked page, there is a 'Log in' button. If you have a Gmail account, you have a Google sign-in and this will allow for free reading of 100 articles a month).
Cheers,
USS ALASKA