I'm new here, and hope I'm posting this in the right place.
I can't find an answer to this question anywhere.
How were the Enfield and Springfield rifle originally carried safely when it could be needed quickly?
When marching into battle it makes sense the powder and ball would loaded but no cap placed so when the line was ready a cap is loaded and you're ready to fire. Or maybe I'm wrong and they marched in empty. But the meat of the question is when one is scouting, on patrol, or otherwise in a situation where they may need to fire at a moments notice, how would the rifle be carried. There may also be regulation vs. common practice to this as well. I assume two possibilities. One: rifle loaded with a primer and hammer on half cock, though this risks losing the primer. And two: rifle loaded with a primer and hammer lowered onto primer(obviously a dangerous option). to me its like the "conditions" of a 1911 pistol with safety vs. speed. Does anyone have any thoughts or material to answer this?
Thank you
I can't find an answer to this question anywhere.
How were the Enfield and Springfield rifle originally carried safely when it could be needed quickly?
When marching into battle it makes sense the powder and ball would loaded but no cap placed so when the line was ready a cap is loaded and you're ready to fire. Or maybe I'm wrong and they marched in empty. But the meat of the question is when one is scouting, on patrol, or otherwise in a situation where they may need to fire at a moments notice, how would the rifle be carried. There may also be regulation vs. common practice to this as well. I assume two possibilities. One: rifle loaded with a primer and hammer on half cock, though this risks losing the primer. And two: rifle loaded with a primer and hammer lowered onto primer(obviously a dangerous option). to me its like the "conditions" of a 1911 pistol with safety vs. speed. Does anyone have any thoughts or material to answer this?
Thank you