How bad? 1832 Springfield

Correct. My Joslyn lockplate is dated 1864, breach block and tang have matching serial number 424. Will start new post when I can get to taking pics.
 
I agree there are some things I have paid too much for but I plan to keep them. I like the cut down Springfield myself.
And I have done the same thing. Paid more for something than what it would be worth on the market, but it was a "gotta have it" item for my collection. And then there have been times I was incredulous that I was able to purchase an item WAY less than I knew it was worth simply because no one else was interested in the item. I guess it all evens out in the end.
 
I lost my mind bidding when I came across this cut down 1832 Springfield at the last minute. Gavel $625. My question to you guys is how bad I'm in the hole - $2, 3, 400?
Well with the premium and delivery my guess is around $800. The good news is it has excellent markings and you could sell the lock plate for almost $600 if you had too. I have got caught up more times then I like to admit, you are not alone my friend and you did win it.
 
I lost my mind bidding when I came across this cut down 1832 Springfield at the last minute. Gavel $625. My question to you guys is how bad I'm in the hole - $2, 3, 400?
View attachment 178319
View attachment 178320
View attachment 178321
View attachment 178322
You might want to pick up a copy of North South Trader's Civil War Volume 37 No 3:

s-l640.jpg
 
That is a fascinating firearm and it bothers me not a bit to have in my collection arms that may have modified post war. I like my weapons to show that they were actually used. In your case, I am not sure that it was altered post war. If I were assigned to drive a supply wagon during the war, that arm, with a flared muzzle and cut down length,would be the perfect gun to store under my seat for things "that go bump in the night". If I saw that arm at a show I just might have paid $600 for it. On the wall in a den, I'll bet it would be the first thing a visitor noted and asked about. You have a good eye for the collectable.
 
That is a fascinating firearm and it bothers me not a bit to have in my collection arms that may have modified post war. I like my weapons to show that they were actually used. In your case, I am not sure that it was altered post war. If I were assigned to drive a supply wagon during the war, that arm, with a flared muzzle and cut down length,would be the perfect gun to store under my seat for things "that go bump in the night". If I saw that arm at a show I just might have paid $600 for it. On the wall in a den, I'll bet it would be the first thing a visitor noted and asked about. You have a good eye for the collectable.
It could prob do some damage with a load of buck and ball.
 
N
Depends. Do any of your kids need braces, or are you past all that?
No, not past those kinds of expenses. But I'm co-collecting with my 13 year old son who loves history and the hunt. At his request, we're doing Gettysburg to Appomattox April school vacation week for second year in a row. Horse Soldier is his favorite stop. I told him that when he has a family, he can keep everything, or sell it all with no emotional regrets for a down payment on a house or whatever he wants. So, for me it's part collecting, educational, inspirational, and a better investment than video games.
 

Learn About Us
►About CivilWarTalk
►Contact the Webmaster
►Meet the Staff
►Link to CivilWarTalk
Join Our Community
►Register
►Browse Forums
►View Today's Discussions
►Search the Forum
Get Help
►FAQ
►Student Guide
►Forum Rules & Etiquette
►Copyright / DMCA

     Contact Us CivilwarTalk on Facebook CivilWarTalk on YouTube CivilWarTalk on Twitter RSS Feed

Bringing the American Civil War and More to Life.
© 1999 - , CIVILWARTALK, LLC - Site Version 10.0

SlaveryTalk.com - SecessionTalk.com - CivilWarTalk.com - ReconstructionTalk.com
Back
Top