- Joined
- Aug 25, 2012
I do not believe the US Army had published clear decision on this. Without any official decision we are left to our own opinions. Still let us look a a few things.
1. Some people believe slouch hats were better, but were they? Hardee hats were not all that popular with Union troops, but a Hardee hat worn a month at a mobilization center and them a couple of weeks in the field was basically then a slough hat. Still many Union soldiers preferred the cap.
2. Despite a great amount of experience during the Civil War, the US Army adopted a fatigue cap and dress cap in 1973. Why did not the Army adopt a hat if they were better?
3. The Confederacy still made and issued caps until the end of the War. Perhaps this was a cost issue.
4. While the US Army went to hats for the Spanish American War, hat had been phased out by World War Two.
5. Post World War Two the US Army mostly wore caps. A few hats were worn during the Vietnam War but caps were standard issue.
6. Caps could be worn with waterproof rain covers, hats can not.
I will leave it to others to defend hats over caps.
1. Some people believe slouch hats were better, but were they? Hardee hats were not all that popular with Union troops, but a Hardee hat worn a month at a mobilization center and them a couple of weeks in the field was basically then a slough hat. Still many Union soldiers preferred the cap.
2. Despite a great amount of experience during the Civil War, the US Army adopted a fatigue cap and dress cap in 1973. Why did not the Army adopt a hat if they were better?
3. The Confederacy still made and issued caps until the end of the War. Perhaps this was a cost issue.
4. While the US Army went to hats for the Spanish American War, hat had been phased out by World War Two.
5. Post World War Two the US Army mostly wore caps. A few hats were worn during the Vietnam War but caps were standard issue.
6. Caps could be worn with waterproof rain covers, hats can not.
I will leave it to others to defend hats over caps.