Stryker65
Captain
- Joined
- Jun 5, 2023
- Location
- William & Mary
Found the following in the official Battle of Bentonville Wikipedia article:
The wording of the phrase was suspicious as well: "killed by an artillery fragmentation" was something I've never heard of before, but I ran it through two separate AI-detection websites and failed to turn up any AI involvement.
As shown below, the sentences end with a source -- Nathaniel Cheairs Hughes Jr.'s Bentonville: The Final Battle of Sherman and Johnston, pages 188-204 -- but there is no mention of a "5th Cavalry Battalion," a "Sample," or even a "twenty-three year old" in that section.
After seeing other strange edits on Wikipedia, I'm inclined to think that this is just made up (like this), or cited from a historical fiction novel (like this) -- what are your thoughts?
There was no Confederate lieutenant colonel named Sample, and at this time the only "5th Cavalry Battalion" in Confederate service was a Florida unit, which was still in Florida and nowhere near Bentonville. Additionally, I know of no cavalry unit that was permanently dismounted in fall of 1864 -- I don't believe there were any permanently-dismounted cavalry fighting at Bentonville other than Granbury's brigade, and those were Texans.Among the Confederate casualties ... was the twenty-three year old Lieutenant Colonel of the 5th Cavalry Battalion, which had been fighting dismounted since the fall of 1864. Sample was killed by an artillery fragmentation, having sustained his 9th and last wound during the war.
The wording of the phrase was suspicious as well: "killed by an artillery fragmentation" was something I've never heard of before, but I ran it through two separate AI-detection websites and failed to turn up any AI involvement.
As shown below, the sentences end with a source -- Nathaniel Cheairs Hughes Jr.'s Bentonville: The Final Battle of Sherman and Johnston, pages 188-204 -- but there is no mention of a "5th Cavalry Battalion," a "Sample," or even a "twenty-three year old" in that section.
After seeing other strange edits on Wikipedia, I'm inclined to think that this is just made up (like this), or cited from a historical fiction novel (like this) -- what are your thoughts?
