Josh The Lighthouse Guy
Major
- Joined
- Apr 30, 2012
- Location
- Jupiter, FL
I think the reputation of some authors is well-know, especially within Civil War circles. Examples: Freeman, Catton, Foote, Bearss, McPherson, Sears, Cozzens, and Hess. But what authors of Civil War history and/or biography seem to be underrated?
I suppose that's actually two questions.
What author - preferably of multiple books - doesn't seem to be as well-known among Civil War buffs as they should be?
What author that is well-known to Civil War buffs but isn't well-known to a more general history audience, despite the quality of their work deserving more acclaim? Catton and Foote are mainstream. Freeman and McPherson are probably among the better known Civil War authors because of their Pulitzers.
Cozzens is probably better known to the average history reader for his Indian Wars books than his Civil War books, but I wouldn't consider him underrated in that regard because most of his Civil War books are regimental-level battle studies that are a little too deep for average history reader's interest level. Sears or Trudeau are probably more on on the level of a single-volume battle study for a general history reader. Similairly, Timothy Smith and David Powell have written great books, but if you're not a Civil War buff you're not going read multivolume book series about the Chickamauga or Vicksburg Campaigns.
Erik Larson's The Demon of Unrest is another example of good Civil War history that appeals to a broader history reading audience.
I suppose that's actually two questions.
What author - preferably of multiple books - doesn't seem to be as well-known among Civil War buffs as they should be?
What author that is well-known to Civil War buffs but isn't well-known to a more general history audience, despite the quality of their work deserving more acclaim? Catton and Foote are mainstream. Freeman and McPherson are probably among the better known Civil War authors because of their Pulitzers.
Cozzens is probably better known to the average history reader for his Indian Wars books than his Civil War books, but I wouldn't consider him underrated in that regard because most of his Civil War books are regimental-level battle studies that are a little too deep for average history reader's interest level. Sears or Trudeau are probably more on on the level of a single-volume battle study for a general history reader. Similairly, Timothy Smith and David Powell have written great books, but if you're not a Civil War buff you're not going read multivolume book series about the Chickamauga or Vicksburg Campaigns.
Erik Larson's The Demon of Unrest is another example of good Civil War history that appeals to a broader history reading audience.