The Nashville Experiment...Prostitution

5fish

Captain
Joined
Aug 26, 2007
Location
Central Florida
The Nashville Experiment started Aug. 20th 1863. Union General Granger legalized prostitution in the city of Nashville, TN. He enacted on August 20, 1863, the order declared: 1st That a license be issued to each prostitute, a record of which shall be kept at this office, together with the number and street of her residence. 2nd That one skillful surgeon be appointed as a Board of Examination whose duty it shall be to examine personally every week, each licensed prostitute, giving certificate of soundness to those who are healthy and ordering those into hospital those who are in the slightest degree diseased. 3rd That a building suitable for a hospital for the invalids be taken for that purpose, and that a weekly tax of fifty cents be levied on each prostitute for the purpose of defraying the expenses of said hospital. 4th That all public women found plying their vocation without license and certificate be at once arrested and incarcerated in the workhouse for a period of not less than thirty days.

General Granger legalized and regulated prostitution to save the union army from STDs. In doing so, Nashville became the first place in the United States where prostitution was legally protected. In the summer of 1864 Memphis, TN. followed Nashville lead and legalize prostitution to save the union army. The experiment was consider a great success.


Here is a link to a paper from Tenn. U about prostitution in the civil war and chapter 3 is about the Nashville Experiment...
http://trace.tennessee.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1306&context=utk_gradthes

Link NY TIMES... http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/12/05/the-nashville-experiment/
The Nashville Experiment


Here are some excerpts from the article in the NY Times

Like other radical developments during the war, Nashville's experiment with legalized prostitution evolved as a practical solution to a military problem. Nearly one in 10 Union soldiers were reported to have contracted gonorrhea or syphilis during the war; rates were even higher for troops garrisoned in and around cities.

Here is the second excerpt...

Once deportation proved a failure, Granger and Spalding initiated a second, more radical solution. On Aug. 20, 1863, the Spalding released orders that required all of Nashville's prostitutes to register with the military government, which would in turn issue each woman a license to practice her trade. In exchange for a weekly fee of 50 cents, these women would receive a regular medical checkup, and if healthy, issued a certificate. Infected prostitutes would be hospitalized and treated at no additional charge. Failure to register would be penalized with a 30-day sentence in a workhouse.

Shockingly, legalization did not draw the same vitriol from the press that had accompanied deportation. The City Council delivered de facto endorsement of military regulation on Aug. 24, when Nashville's aldermen voted to "postpone indefinitely" legislation banning prostitutes "from riding in hacks with soldiers."

Here is the last excerpt...

A hospital for federal officers in Nashville, Tenn.Credit Library of Congress
Nashville's prostitutes embraced the new scheme. More than 300 licenses were issued in the first six months. By August 1864, Spalding had included black prostitutes in the program; of the 500-plus licensed prostitutes in Nashville, 50 were black women. Women took pride as they flashed their credentials and prominently displayed their health certificates. Observers also noted a decrease in street walking in favor of less-risky brothel work. Part of the licensing surge was attributed to an influx of prostitutes from Northern cities who perceived the increased safety and better working conditions provided by regulation.

Here is the link the NY Times article...
Link... http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/12/05/the-nashville-experiment/
.
Like I say you can find roots about or to almost anything in our Civil War history...
 
Last edited:
As moderator.
This thread is closed pending the thread author cutting down on the quotes to 2-3 per source to prevent copyright beefs.

He can PM me or any staff to reopen.
 
Looks better.
CWT rules on copyright Fair use does not necessarily apply.

Terms of Use
(C) User shall not upload, post or otherwise make available on CivilWarTalk.com Web site any material protected by copyright, trademark or other proprietary right without the express permission of the owner of the copyright, trademark or other proprietary right and the burden of determining that any material is not protected by copyright rests with the User.

By submitting material to any public area of CivilWarTalk.com Web site, User automatically grants, or warrants that the owner of such material has expressly granted CivilWarTalk.com the royalty-free, perpetual, irrevocable, non-exclusive right and license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate and distribute such material (in whole or in part) worldwide and/or to incorporate it in other works in any form, media or technology now known or hereafter developed for the full term of any copyright that may exist in such material. User also permits any other User to access, view, store or reproduce the material for that User's personal use. User hereby grants CivilWarTalk.com the right to edit, copy, publish and distribute any material made available on CivilWarTalk.com Web site by User.
 
The civil war experiment showed legalizing the sex trade was the best practice. It benefited both the practitioner of the trade and their clients....
 
Soldiering and prostitution are two of the World's oldest professions. No matter how many regulations you have and how strictly they are enforced, soldiers will find female companionship.

I think many take the subject of prostitution way to lightly. Sexually transmitted diseases can cripple a military unit. If I remember correctly, VD cost the Allied Armies 18,000 soldiers per day in WW I and the US Army 606 soldiers per day in WW II.

Over the years the US Army had to get involved with the acceptance and control of prostitution. Italy in 1943-1944, Japan 1945-1946 and Viet Nam are just a few examples. Here is an interesting article on the US Military and prostitution in Viet Nam.

http://zeroempty000.blogspot.com/2007/04/official-brothel-during-vietnam-war.html

Military control of prostitution cuts down on sexually transmitted disease and on violent crimes like rape.

Some countries like France and Germany had official military brothels.
 
Soldiering and prostitution are two of the World's oldest professions. No matter how many regulations you have and how strictly they are enforced, soldiers will find female companionship.

I think many take the subject of prostitution way to lightly. Sexually transmitted diseases can cripple a military unit. If I remember correctly, VD cost the Allied Armies 18,000 soldiers per day in WW I and the US Army 606 soldiers per day in WW II.

Over the years the US Army had to get involved with the acceptance and control of prostitution. Italy in 1943-1944, Japan 1945-1946 and Viet Nam are just a few examples. Here is an interesting article on the US Military and prostitution in Viet Nam.

http://zeroempty000.blogspot.com/2007/04/official-brothel-during-vietnam-war.html

Military control of prostitution cuts down on sexually transmitted disease and on violent crimes like rape.

Some countries like France and Germany had official military brothels.
Honolulu under martial law, 1941-1945.
 
This would be Union General Gordon Granger? The original American pimp, I guess.

No, General Robert S. Granger was in charge in Nashville...

Yes, let's organize women into a system that benefits men, I suppose? From the OP:

If you read the article the ladies practicing the oldest profession were very happy with the arrangement. It benefited them as well as the soldiers...

I can't believe I'm seeing this at CivilWarTalk. Really, I can't.

Odd statement, this is our civil war history...
 
I see this event described as Nashville legalizing prostitution when it was the Union Army that took this step. The elected officials of the city did not do this.

True but if you read the article the city leaders passed a resolution indirectly supporting it. This order cleaned up the street walkers because many went and worked in brothels after this order was enforced...

Rather than being legalized it was decriminalized with unlicensed activities being crimes.

I can agree with this...
 
No, General Robert S. Granger was in charge in Nashville...



If you read the article the ladies practicing the oldest profession were very happy with the arrangement. It benefited them as well as the soldiers...



Odd statement, this is our civil war history...

Yes, the Union Army organizing the ladies into prostitution made them very happy. :nah disagree:

I'm sure it was a really good deal. :unsure:
 
This would be Union General Gordon Granger? The original American pimp, I guess.

Yes, let's organize women into a system that benefits men, I suppose? From the OP:

(Sic)

I can't believe I'm seeing this at CivilWarTalk. Really, I can't.
Boys will be boys. It's a good idea to keep them safe from stds. Would you want your son , husband or boyfriend to get an std infection? Do you think men sent into combat are going to be saints? Ask any former serviceman if he as used prostitutes and most likely he will say no but he will most likely say his buddies did.
Let's keep in mind that their was no welfare back then and children have to eat .An unskilled women can only make so much money and most likely it's not safe back on the farm so she needs to pay rent. Their is an excellent chance that her husband is either dead, physically or mentally incapacitated, in a POW camp or even if in either army especially the Confederate Army is making next to nothing money wise. Sometimes in life tough choices have to be made.
Leftyhunter
 
@Drew , right?

The reason these women were where they were was mostly being displaced by war. I suppose they could have gone off somewhere to an honorable death in ditch but many had children. Perhaps they felt it to be their job to support them. ( First person to say ' they made the choice to become prostitutes ' runs their own risk here ) Husbands off to war, unable to support households alone- a Dickensian state of affairs existed where one's children ate and did not live on the street if this last resort was turned to.

What this thread is really about is displaced women. It is possible to further dehumanize them all over again 150 years later by showing what a ' problem ' they were. To men.
 
Let's keep in mind that their was no welfare back then and children have to eat .An unskilled women can only make so much money and most likely it's not safe back on the farm so she needs to pay rent. Their is an excellent chance that her husband is either dead, physically or mentally incapacitated, in a POW camp or even if in either army especially the Confederate Army is making next to nothing money wise. Sometimes in life tough choices have to be made.

One only has to be reminded of Fantine from the play Les Misérables . Whilst a fictional character in a fictional story (1862), the circumstances Fantine faced were quite real, and her solutions to them, also quite real:

After he abandons her, she is forced to look after their child, Cosette, on her own. Originally a pretty and naïve girl, Fantine is eventually forced by circumstances to become a prostitute, selling her hair and front teeth, losing her beauty and health. The money she earns is sent to support her daughter.
A woman will do anything to provide and protect her children. She would cut off a limb and serve it up if practical. The life of a prostitute was short lived, and riddled with disease and abuse. The most many of the women could hope for was to be viable long enough to raise the children to independence......in those days, ages 8-10 would not be unusual for a child to be turned loose. A very sad situation.
 

Learn About Us
About CivilWarTalk
Contact the Webmaster
Meet the Staff
Link to CivilWarTalk
Join Our Community
Register
Browse Forums
View Today's Discussions
Search the Forum
Get Help
FAQ
Student Guide
Forum Rules & Etiquette
Copyright / DMCA

     Contact Us CivilwarTalk on Facebook CivilWarTalk on YouTube CivilWarTalk on Twitter RSS Feed

Bringing the American Civil War and More to Life.
© 1999 - , CIVILWARTALK, LLC - Site Version 10.0

SlaveryTalk.com - SecessionTalk.com - CivilWarTalk.com - ReconstructionTalk.com
Back
Top