Strange P1853

vl5150

Cadet
Joined
May 29, 2022
Hi everyone. I recently inherited my Dad's musket that has been a wall hanger for a long while. I never paid much attention to it, but now that I have it I decided to take a closer look. I've started researching the markings and it doesn't jive with what other ones are stamped with. No proofs, strange stampings on the lock plate and simple rear sight. It has a crown, and the 24 pin punched into the top of the barrel.What do you guys make of it? I haven't touched it or opened it up yet to look for anything else, but for now I'm stumped. Thinking Asian? Thoughts?

IMG_20220529_193453398_HDR.jpg


IMG_20220529_195748747_HDR.jpg


IMG_20220529_193502415_HDR.jpg


IMG_20220529_193529370_HDR.jpg


IMG_20220529_193528840_HDR.jpg


IMG_20220529_195608439.jpg


IMG_20220529_195622412.jpg


IMG_20220529_195658446.jpg


IMG_20220529_195709864.jpg


IMG_20220529_195730614_HDR.jpg


IMG_20220529_195741584_HDR.jpg


IMG_20220529_195745156_HDR.jpg


IMG_20220529_195800267.jpg


IMG_20220529_195821083.jpg


IMG_20220529_195826080_HDR.jpg


IMG_20220529_200005378.jpg


IMG_20220529_200038834.jpg


IMG_20220529_200043935.jpg


IMG_20220529_200052490.jpg
 
Thanks for the reply. I've enjoyed historical firearms for many years and somehow skipped researching this one. I guess hanging on the wall for so many years and playing with it as a kid makes it a part of furniture of the house. And my friend there it Bruno, an American Bulldog!:bear:
 
More than likely an Afghan copy of an Indian Army issue P53 smoothbore. The butt screws are not standard being too countersunk. The lock plate screws have too wide a slot in them - most are disfigured with the use of tapered screwdrivers. The date and the attempt at the makers name, with reversed figures and letters, is fairly typical of these. It does not look long enough to be a 3-band (barrel length?) and the bands and ramrod are Type 1 - a rare beast today, if it were real. Is it rifled? The Nepalese rifles had letters and figures in Devanagari script and they also had the standard ramp sight. Indian production would not have the maker/date on the lock plate. Having said that, it looks to be one of the better ones, but not a 'real' Enfield.
 
Thanks Gents! Always appreciate expert feedback. I don't see rifling, just surface rust so I'm not sure if it's there or not. I think I'll just hang it on the wall in my son's room. He's in the USMC and when he's home on leave he'll have a nice surprise on the wall when he visits, lol.
 
Smooth bore Pattern 1853ish copies were widely made in India as well as Afghanistan for the local market. Pattern 1853 being the 'cool' look of the day. Both origin copies were usually in 24ish bore whilst the Indian Army Pattern 1859 was in 17 bore. This one does not have the 1859 fore nor rear sight so is not a Pattern 1859 whatever it's bore size.

It has the appearance of one of the better made ones but a look in the lock would be an additional guide.
 
Old time collectors used to call this type of locally copied arm a Khyber Pass product - this name likely came from the fact that the town of Darra in the tribal area between Afghanistan and Pakistan made and still makes copies of old and new arms were make with hand tools. The makers would stamp random letters and marks on these - I once saw one where the fellow marking the lock used on a capital "E" stamp, so he just rotated it a quarter turn between each strike of his hammer.
They still make copies of the Thompson Sub-Machine Gun, AK-47s, Sig 230s, Colt 1911s, as well as single shot Enfields and they used to offer copies of the Swedish Bofors anti aircraft guns!
 

Learn About Us
About CivilWarTalk
Contact the Webmaster
Meet the Staff
Link to CivilWarTalk
Join Our Community
Register
Browse Forums
View Today's Discussions
Search the Forum
Get Help
FAQ
Student Guide
Forum Rules & Etiquette
Copyright / DMCA

     Contact Us CivilwarTalk on Facebook CivilWarTalk on YouTube CivilWarTalk on Twitter RSS Feed

Bringing the American Civil War and More to Life.
© 1999 - , CIVILWARTALK, LLC - Site Version 10.0

SlaveryTalk.com - SecessionTalk.com - CivilWarTalk.com - ReconstructionTalk.com
Back
Top