"Shermanized"

DBF

1st Lieutenant
Forum Host
Joined
Aug 6, 2016
84C36B7F-C651-40B6-B818-D4C6DB5A8595_1_201_a.jpeg


March 16, 1825 - In a beautiful estate in Virginia, Lucy Virginia Smith was born to Mease & Elizabeth French. She came from a prestigious line of ancestors known for their bravery in battle ("Fighting Tom Parker" of the American Revolutionary War) as well as a line of wealthy merchants. her father had served as various presidents of colleges and was a well known attorney. She was a graduate from Mrs. Hannah's School in Washington, Pennsylvania, an education that although her father was wealthy, she was forced to pay for herself {3}.

After her mother's death and her father's remarriage, she and her sister relocated to Memphis, where they both became tutors. It was here Lucy began to write and publish poetry to help pay for her schooling. It was also in Memphis in 1853 where she met her husband a wealthy man named John French. After their marriage the couple took up residence at "Forest Home," near McMinnville, Tennessee, the homestead of the French family. They were the parents of three children and Lucy continued to write her poetry and was making as much as $400.00-$500.00 annually.

During the war, her family home was located on land that saw action between both armies. As early as July 13, 1862 when Confederate General Nathan Bedford Forest raided Murfreesboro, the town was faced with questions regarding war, patriotism and loyalty. As Lucy had spent some of her early years in Pennsylvania she was torn especially as she witnessed the over one thousand Union soldiers captured by Forest and marched in front of her home. The sight of the American flag as a "captured symbol" caused her to write:

"I shall never forget the scene which passed before us upon this evening. Did I ever think to see the old "stars & stripes," a captive banner & not weep over it? I felt badly to see it thus I confess—it was the old flag I had loved so long. But was I sorry to see the men who had treated us all so badly a few weeks before, brought up again as prisoners—no—you may be sure I didn't weep over that! Well here they were—and here were their conquerors!" {3}

She may have grieved over the stars and stripes but felt no sympathy for the soldiers that carried it. She was Southern born and Southern would remain. In August of 1865 she described her emotions:

"I have tried to do my duty—but those whom we know have been mean and inconsistent, nay even wrong, but have been successful in life and we have lost—lost until there is little left now to lose. I do feel discouraged—so weary—so worn out with hoping and working and all to no purpose. I have tried so hard, and still seemed to go back all the time that I now feel pleasantly ready to sit down by the wayside and never strike another lick.

Heaven help us all—why do we write thus? I am ready to exclaim with the Preacher "Vanity of vanities—all is vanity!" What a wretched, savage mood I am in today. It wears me so. I wish I had a live book to read to take me out of myself. I will try Shakespeare then for my amusement." {3}

Perhaps nothing expresses her thoughts more than when she penned the poem "Shermanized". It was read by Miss Lucy Powell Harris on May 1, 1866 during a concert at the Houston Female High School in Atlanta, Georgia.

"In this city of Atlanta, on a dire and dreadful day,
'Mid the raging of the conflict, 'mid the thunder of the fray -
In the blaze of burning roof-trees - under clouds of smoke and flame -
Sprang a new word into being, from a stern and dreaded name;
Gaunt, and grim, and like a specter, rose that word before the world,
from a land of bloom and beauty, into ruin rudely hurled -
From a people scourged by exile - from a city ostracized -
Pallis-like it sprang to being, and that word is - Shermanized!

And forevermore hereafter, where the fierce Destroyer reigns,
Where Destruction pours her lava over cultivated plains -
Where Want and Woe hold carnival - where bitter Blight and Blood,
Sweep over prosperous nations in a strong relentless flood;
Where the golden crown of Harvest trodden into ashes lies,
and Desolation stares abroad with famine-frenzied eyes -
Where the wrong with iron scepter crushes every Right we prized,
There shall people groan in anguish - 'God! the Right is Shermanized'!

Man may rule the raids of Ruin - lead the legions that despoil -
From the lips of honest Labor dash the guerdon of its toil -
'Sow with salt' the smiling valleys, and on every breezy height.
Kindle bale-fires of destruction, lurid in the solemn night;
He may sacrifice the aged, and exult when Woman stands,
'Mid the sunken sodden ashes of her home, with palsied hands,
Drooping over hungered children - man may thus immortalize,
His name with haggard infamy - his watchword - 'Shermanized"!

Nobler deeds are Woman's province - she must not destroy, but build,
She must bring the urns of Plenty with the wine of Pleasure filled,
She must be the 'sweet restorer' of this sunny Southern land;
Fill our schools, rebuild our churches, take the feeble by the hand,
Aid the Press, befriend the teacher, give to Want it's daily bread,
And never, never fail to weave above our 'noble dead',
The laurel garland due to deeds of valor's high emprise,
And won by men whom failure could not sink, or - Shermanize!

With her wakened love of labor, let her labor on in love,
Still, in softness and in stillness, as the starry circles move,
Bearing light and bringing gladness, from the leaden clouds unfurled,
As the soft rise of the sunlight bringers morning to the world;
Gradually urging on Endeavor, as the gates of Day unclose,
Till the 'solitary place again shall blossom as the rose,"
And Woman - the Re-builder - shall be freely eulogized,
By the triumph of her people, then no longer Shermanized.

God bless our noble Georgia! though her soil was over run,
And her lands in desolation laid, beneath an Autumn sun;
With the signal shout 'To action!' - like the boom of signal guns,
She has roused the iron mettle of her strong and stalwart sons.
May her daughters aid that effort to rebuild and to restore,
Working on for Southern freedom as they never worked before!
May Georgia as a laggard never once be stigmatized,

and her People, Press or Pulpit, never more be Shermanized! {1}


51024200-39DF-459F-ADBB-D7059FBCDA47_1_201_a.jpeg







Sources
1. "The Southern Amaranth", 1869
2. https://tennesseeencyclopedia.net/entries/lucy-virginia-french/
3. https://www.tnvacation.com/civil-war/files/2/Lucy-Virginia-Frenchs-Civil-War-by-Connie-L-Lester.pdf

Photos (Public Domain)
 
@NH Civil War Gal & @lupaglupa - My source had no explanation except to stress this was rather unusual, however when I read Lucy's story I suspect it had something to do with her father's remarriage. Her mother had died when she was younger and after graduation the sisters did not stick around but went to Memphis to teach. It made me wonder if there was a rocky relationship between the sisters and the remarriage.
 
Last edited:
Do any of your sources say how she earned the money to pay for her schooling?
According to various sources she and her sister worked to pay back their debt by tutoring and teaching in Memphis. After her marriage she was an editor for several southern journals where she earned money and some fame. Since she lived in a strategic area during the war it was reported soldiers from both armies would stop in to her and in some cases would get her opinion on their writings. She believed in equal education for ladies and was active in the temperance movement. Ironically she did not believe in secession and after the war she wrote "The Palmetto and the Pine" in the spirit of reconciliation. She ends her poem:

"Oh! thou voice of God outflowing from the lips of holy Peace,
Smooth the turmoil and the tumult, bid this strife and sorrow cease!
O'er savannas steeped in sunshine, over mountains dark with rain.
Send the glad and thrilling tidings in thy sweetly solemn strain;
Let snowy North and sunny South send up the shout "All's well"!
And the music of the coming strike our heart strings with its swell.
(As to Jessie Brown at Lucknow, struck the air of 'Auld Lang Syne'!
From the Highland pipes of Havelock) - save the Palm and save the Pine!

God plant them still together! let them flourish side by side,
In the halls of our Centennial, mailed in more than marble pride;
With kindly deeds and noble names we'll grave them o'er and o'er.
With brave historic legends of the glorious days of yore.
While the clear, exultant chorus, rising from united hands,
The echo of our triumph peals to earth's remotest lands;
While 'Faith, Fraternity and Love' shall joyfully entwine,
Around our chosen emblems, the Palmetto and the Pine.

'Together' shouts Niagara his thunder-toned decree;
'Together' echo back the waves upon the Mexican sea;
'Together' sing the sylvan hills where old Atlantic roars;
'Together' boom the breakers on the wild Pacific shores;
'Together' cry the People - and 'together' still shall be,
An everlasting charter-bond forever for the free;
Of liberty the signet-seal - the one eternal sign -

Be those 'mited emblems, the Palmetto and the Pine!"
 
View attachment 454444

March 16, 1825 - In a beautiful estate in Virginia, Lucy Virginia Smith was born to Mease & Elizabeth French. She came from a prestigious line of ancestors known for their bravery in battle ("Fighting Tom Parker" of the American Revolutionary War) as well as a line of wealthy merchants. her father had served as various presidents of colleges and was a well known attorney. She was a graduate from Mrs. Hannah's School in Washington, Pennsylvania, an education that although her father was wealthy, she was forced to pay for herself {3}.

After her mother's death and her father's remarriage, she and her sister relocated to Memphis, where they both became tutors. It was here Lucy began to write and publish poetry to help pay for her schooling. It was also in Memphis in 1853 where she met her husband a wealthy man named John French. After their marriage the couple took up residence at "Forest Home," near McMinnville, Tennessee, the homestead of the French family. They were the parents of three children and Lucy continued to write her poetry and was making as much as $400.00-$500.00 annually.

During the war, her family home was located on land that saw action between both armies. As early as July 13, 1862 when Confederate General Nathan Bedford Forest raided Murfreesboro, the town was faced with questions regarding war, patriotism and loyalty. As Lucy had spent some of her early years in Pennsylvania she was torn especially as she witnessed the over one thousand Union soldiers captured by Forest and marched in front of her home. The sight of the American flag as a "captured symbol" caused her to write:

"I shall never forget the scene which passed before us upon this evening. Did I ever think to see the old "stars & stripes," a captive banner & not weep over it? I felt badly to see it thus I confess—it was the old flag I had loved so long. But was I sorry to see the men who had treated us all so badly a few weeks before, brought up again as prisoners—no—you may be sure I didn't weep over that! Well here they were—and here were their conquerors!" {3}

She may have grieved over the stars and stripes but felt no sympathy for the soldiers that carried it. She was Southern born and Southern would remain. In August of 1865 she described her emotions:

"I have tried to do my duty—but those whom we know have been mean and inconsistent, nay even wrong, but have been successful in life and we have lost—lost until there is little left now to lose. I do feel discouraged—so weary—so worn out with hoping and working and all to no purpose. I have tried so hard, and still seemed to go back all the time that I now feel pleasantly ready to sit down by the wayside and never strike another lick.

Heaven help us all—why do we write thus? I am ready to exclaim with the Preacher "Vanity of vanities—all is vanity!" What a wretched, savage mood I am in today. It wears me so. I wish I had a live book to read to take me out of myself. I will try Shakespeare then for my amusement."
{3}

Perhaps nothing expresses her thoughts more than when she penned the poem "Shermanized". It was read by Miss Lucy Powell Harris on May 1, 1866 during a concert at the Houston Female High School in Atlanta, Georgia.

"In this city of Atlanta, on a dire and dreadful day,
'Mid the raging of the conflict, 'mid the thunder of the fray -
In the blaze of burning roof-trees - under clouds of smoke and flame -
Sprang a new word into being, from a stern and dreaded name;
Gaunt, and grim, and like a specter, rose that word before the world,
from a land of bloom and beauty, into ruin rudely hurled -
From a people scourged by exile - from a city ostracized -
Pallis-like it sprang to being, and that word is - Shermanized!

And forevermore hereafter, where the fierce Destroyer reigns,
Where Destruction pours her lava over cultivated plains -
Where Want and Woe hold carnival - where bitter Blight and Blood,
Sweep over prosperous nations in a strong relentless flood;
Where the golden crown of Harvest trodden into ashes lies,
and Desolation stares abroad with famine-frenzied eyes -
Where the wrong with iron scepter crushes every Right we prized,
There shall people groan in anguish - 'God! the Right is Shermanized'!

Man may rule the raids of Ruin - lead the legions that despoil -
From the lips of honest Labor dash the guerdon of its toil -
'Sow with salt' the smiling valleys, and on every breezy height.
Kindle bale-fires of destruction, lurid in the solemn night;
He may sacrifice the aged, and exult when Woman stands,
'Mid the sunken sodden ashes of her home, with palsied hands,
Drooping over hungered children - man may thus immortalize,
His name with haggard infamy - his watchword - 'Shermanized"!

Nobler deeds are Woman's province - she must not destroy, but build,
She must bring the urns of Plenty with the wine of Pleasure filled,
She must be the 'sweet restorer' of this sunny Southern land;
Fill our schools, rebuild our churches, take the feeble by the hand,
Aid the Press, befriend the teacher, give to Want it's daily bread,
And never, never fail to weave above our 'noble dead',
The laurel garland due to deeds of valor's high emprise,
And won by men whom failure could not sink, or - Shermanize!

With her wakened love of labor, let her labor on in love,
Still, in softness and in stillness, as the starry circles move,
Bearing light and bringing gladness, from the leaden clouds unfurled,
As the soft rise of the sunlight bringers morning to the world;
Gradually urging on Endeavor, as the gates of Day unclose,
Till the 'solitary place again shall blossom as the rose,"
And Woman - the Re-builder - shall be freely eulogized,
By the triumph of her people, then no longer Shermanized.

God bless our noble Georgia! though her soil was over run,
And her lands in desolation laid, beneath an Autumn sun;
With the signal shout 'To action!' - like the boom of signal guns,
She has roused the iron mettle of her strong and stalwart sons.
May her daughters aid that effort to rebuild and to restore,
Working on for Southern freedom as they never worked before!
May Georgia as a laggard never once be stigmatized,

and her People, Press or Pulpit, never more be Shermanized! {1}


View attachment 454445






Sources
1. "The Southern Amaranth", 1869
2. https://tennesseeencyclopedia.net/entries/lucy-virginia-french/
3. https://www.tnvacation.com/civil-war/files/2/Lucy-Virginia-Frenchs-Civil-War-by-Connie-L-Lester.pdf


Photos (Public Domain)
Why oh Why do your wonderful post always make me cry!!😎..A great write-up.

Here's a bit I put on my Ancestry tree about a Georgia cousin, Sam Farrar, and his mother, as they were exiled from their Atlanta home. They moved to Macon and stayed there.
B80AD127-2F3B-43FD-97AC-3C41ACFE646B.jpeg
 
Thank you @farrargirl - you just gave me another great subject to research - the women and children forced to leave Atlanta. Imagine the exodus of 860 children. At least they allowed the residents to bring some personal items out and it appears the families with the most children had the most packages. They must have allowed them to have wagons to haul their stuff away.
 
I have to admit I wonder how different her writing might have been had she not come from a well off family? I really don;t know why this reminded me of a story from Chattanooga.

I paraphrase and don't ask for a source because I'm working from memory and it is from a letter I read years ago.

As a column of US troops marched through Chattanooga on their way to the front they stopped and started repeatedly, as army columns are prone to do, in front of a well dressed woman. She loudly commented upon the quality of people the war had brought to her fine city. She then moved onto uncomplimentary commentary upon the officers, politicians and such. All taken with a grain of humor by the soldiery. But when the train of laundresses came into sight she aimed her vitriol at the women who followed the army to war. At that point one Sgt had had enough and stepped from the column. He proceeded to pull her fine dress up over her head and put her over his knee where he proceeded to treat her as he would a boychild using a poor choice of words. The corporal punishment being a ramrod applied liberally across her rather broad backside. He then sent her upon her way home screaming to the four winds that she had been violated. The Sgt then tossed the fine dress to one of the laundresses and quipped that those women were sisters and wives of men in the regiment and he would allow no one to speak poorly of them.
 
The Sgt then tossed the fine dress to one of the laundresses and quipped that those women were sisters and wives of men in the regiment and he would allow no one to speak poorly of them.
I like his style! I just got done reading a book called (I think) "Soapsuds Alley." Yes, there's always a few laundresses that have another business on the side, but most did not. The US Army was just starting to grapple with the whole issue of keeping clothes clean and requiring the laundresses to have letters of reference (that picked up more importance in the 1870s). But you couldn't be an open s-l-u-t and be working for the army. Most were hard working women that had children and it was about the ONLY job women that had children could BRING their children to. There wasn't any daycare. Some of the laundresses were educated and had fallen on hard times with their husbands dead and they weren't afraid to work hard and go against social mores, others were ignorant and lower social class. Others were freed Blacks just starting to climb up the social ladder economically.

@farrargirl what a fascinating list! I've never seen anything like it! Now I'm fascinated by the "packages." How big were they? Were they suitcase size? Trunk size? Only what you could carry? I'm sure @DBF will find out for us.
 
Thank you for this wonderful post, DBF! I've not heard of her before but she's a very interesting lady, and like others, I was intrigued by her having to pay for her own education.

I have to admit I wonder how different her writing might have been had she not come from a well off family?

It's quite likely she wouldn't have even been writing at all in that case. I have my fair share of ancestors who come up as illiterate in censuses, and it's never the ones who had money.

Not specific to the Civil War, but one of my favorite history professors in college often commented on how much more common historic memoirs and written accounts of war are from officers versus enlisted and that education was a prime factor in that but that it also means our knowledge is often slanted more toward those who were capable of leaving a written account. I don't think it's a stretch to apply the same logic to historic accounts left by women. It is usually well-to-do women simply because they were much more likely to have the means to be educated and the leisure time to actually write.
 
the leisure time to actually write.
I think that is the biggest thing. Who had leisure time to write? My paternal grandparents were VERY successful farmers in NH. They had full-time farm help, staying on the farm with them, yet… both my grandparents worked FULL-TIME on the farm too! My grandparents needed the extra farm help to do these incredibly hard chores. My father and his siblings - I think there were 8 of them, were incredibly lucky that their parents valued school and education as much as they did. None of the children were pulled out of school to work on the farm full-time. Most of the children in the neighborhood were.

It took women two full days to do laundry and that's if they were lucky and the weather and getting water was cooperating. My father could remember his mother boiling laundry in the yard, etc, every Monday. His father and the hired help carried the water for her. What if your husband was a drunk or not interested in helping you? Then you had to tote gallons of water with kids hanging off of you. Then there was the feeding of everyone and there wasn't any Hamburger Helper or anything like that. Everything was totally scratch. Who had time to write?
 
I think that is the biggest thing. Who had leisure time to write? My paternal grandparents were VERY successful farmers in NH. They had full-time farm help, staying on the farm with them, yet… both my grandparents worked FULL-TIME on the farm too! My grandparents needed the extra farm help to do these incredibly hard chores. My father and his siblings - I think there were 8 of them, were incredibly lucky that their parents valued school and education as much as they did. None of the children were pulled out of school to work on the farm full-time. Most of the children in the neighborhood were.

It took women two full days to do laundry and that's if they were lucky and the weather and getting water was cooperating. My father could remember his mother boiling laundry in the yard, etc, every Monday. His father and the hired help carried the water for her. What if your husband was a drunk or not interested in helping you? Then you had to tote gallons of water with kids hanging off of you. Then there was the feeding of everyone and there wasn't any Hamburger Helper or anything like that. Everything was totally scratch. Who had time to write?
Agreed 100%! My grandparents have talked to me a lot about growing up on farms in North Carolina during the 1940s, and they've also talked about those labor-intensive laundry days and all the chores. I was actually talking to someone today who said his long-time girlfriend when she first moved to Arkansas didn't have running water for 6 years in the 80s, so she was toting water from a well. All those chores add up and don't leave much time or energy for the additional labor of writing, even if you are an avid and talented writer.
 
I think the biggest labor saving device for women was the washing machine whether manual or powered by something.
Perhaps that's why a woman holds a United States patent on a washing machine improvement. Ellen F. Eglin (before 1849-after 1890). The African American, Maryland born lady invented a hand crank mechanical wringer - August, 1888.

https://www.ipwatchdog.com/2021/02/22/eighteen-dollars-patent-ellen-elgin-clothes-wringer/id=130108/

And kudos to Josephine Cochrane (1839-1913) who invented the dish washer - December, 1886.

https://forgottennewsmakers.com/2010/04/20/josephine-cochrane-1839-1913-invented-the-dishwasher/
 
Troy, New York, near where I live, is called "collar city" because one of the major industries was detachable collars. In 1827 a woman named Hannah Montague took her husband's shirt collar off to wash it - since that was the part that most needed it and washing the whole shirt was so much more work. A local businessman was inspired to make shirts with detachable collars and they, along with detachable cuffs, became all the rage - just because it lessened the laundry burden!
 
I like his style! I just got done reading a book called (I think) "Soapsuds Alley." Yes, there's always a few laundresses that have another business on the side, but most did not. The US Army was just starting to grapple with the whole issue of keeping clothes clean and requiring the laundresses to have letters of reference (that picked up more importance in the 1870s). But you couldn't be an open s-l-u-t and be working for the army. Most were hard working women that had children and it was about the ONLY job women that had children could BRING their children to. There wasn't any daycare. Some of the laundresses were educated and had fallen on hard times with their husbands dead and they weren't afraid to work hard and go against social mores, others were ignorant and lower social class. Others were freed Blacks just starting to climb up the social ladder economically.

@farrargirl what a fascinating list! I've never seen anything like it! Now I'm fascinated by the "packages." How big were they? Were they suitcase size? Trunk size? Only what you could carry? I'm sure @DBF will find out for us.
Thank you @farrargirl - you just gave me another great subject to research - the women and children forced to leave Atlanta. Imagine the exodus of 860 children. At least they allowed the residents to bring some personal items out and it appears the families with the most children had the most packages. They must have allowed them to have wagons to haul their stuff away.
Hey folks…
Thanks for the interest in the Atlanta exodus! Here's my two favorite worn out books I like on the situation there:

D296B580-FE09-48A9-AE1B-5ED55FF8CF67.jpeg
62C02DA6-CF62-4AEC-B8BC-597D74D976F7.jpeg

Above book is the one I quoted from.

This other one you would love if you can find it, a massive old 1958 book:
6F4BB28E-8BDE-4FAD-8174-E93985E885B5.jpeg
17E86A0E-AFE5-4D3D-9666-C23FCF24AE0C.jpeg

Hey, @DBF , I am sending you by message, some pages from this book, in case you can't find it. And a few pages of his sources…
Glad this has whetted your appetite for one of your future posts!
 

Learn About Us
About CivilWarTalk
Contact the Webmaster
Meet the Staff
Link to CivilWarTalk
Join Our Community
Register
Browse Forums
View Today's Discussions
Search the Forum
Get Help
FAQ
Student Guide
Forum Rules & Etiquette
Copyright / DMCA

     Contact Us CivilwarTalk on Facebook CivilWarTalk on YouTube CivilWarTalk on Twitter RSS Feed

Bringing the American Civil War and More to Life.
© 1999 - , CIVILWARTALK, LLC - Site Version 10.0

SlaveryTalk.com - SecessionTalk.com - CivilWarTalk.com - ReconstructionTalk.com
Back
Top