Sentiments of War

Joined
Jan 24, 2017
This thread is designed to get behind the sentiments of those involved in the Civil War, and therefore the motivations of its participants. It is not designed to be argumentative, but expressive, and an aid to understanding the reason men fought, and the reason they were prepared to die for what they believed in. The accounts can be pre, during or post Civil War, and from any perspective, but only from the perspective of those who served during the war (i.e. doesn't include politicians/political rhetoric)

"The Confederate States had, as I said, no naval vessels and none or very few that could be converted into cruisers. They had, however, a fine, loyal, able and true personnel, composed of officers educated and commissioned in the United States Navy before the war. They were Southern-born men, who represented their respective States in the United States Navy, just as their representative in Congress and other governmental branches represented them in their respective spheres. The expense of educating and qualifying them for their positions was borne from the general fund collected from all the States, their respective States bearing their just proportion for the qualifying of their quota. These men were not politicians, but when the war clouds gathered felt bound by every sense of duty, love and devotion, many of them against their judgment as to the judiciousness of disruption, and all of them against the professional hopes, aspirations and pecuniary interests, when their mother States withdrew, to rally to their standard, resigned and tendered their services. They were accepted and given commissions properly signed by the executive and confirmed by the Congress of the Confederate States. These men officered the cruisers of the Confederate States".

The Cruise of the Shenandoah
The Stirring Story of Her Circumnavigation of the Globe and Many Conquests on the High Sea. From the Pen of Her Executive Officer, Captain William C. Whittle.

By Captain William C. Whittle, CSN
From: Southern Historical Society Papers, Vol. XXXV, Richmond, Va. December, 1907, Pages 235-258.
 
Last edited:
if people get involved honestly without taking sides this could be a very good post to talk about the people of that time. I myself have just started going over personal diaries of the people of that time I thought it would be interesting to know what they were thinking I spoke about this yesterday I hope this post continues and possibly some people can let us know what books are out there it would be nice as you said for civil discussion. Not who's wrong or who is right.
 
This thread is designed to get behind the sentiments of those involved in the Civil War, and therefore the motivations of its participants.
By Captain William C. Whittle, CSN
From: Southern Historical Society Papers, Vol. XXXV, Richmond, Va. December, 1907, Pages 235-258.
The references appear to be at odds with the OP of the thread. Is it your intent to use references 40 years later by a very biased source to discuss sentiments of 40 years before?
 
The references appear to be at odds with the OP of the thread. Is it your intent to use references 40 years later by a very biased source to discuss sentiments of 40 years before?
I did say the sentiments expressed could be post CW...assuming they are sentiments that stand from the time the war occurred. I also don't consider them' biased' as they can be sentiments expressed from any point of view. Happy to engage in further discussion, though, if necessary.
 
I did say the sentiments expressed could be post CW...assuming they are sentiments that stand from the time the war occurred. I also don't consider them' biased' as they can be sentiments expressed from any point of view. Happy to engage in further discussion, though, if necessary.
That will probably get involved with a discussion of the Lost Cause and its perversion of history.
 
That will probably get involved with a discussion of the Lost Cause and its perversion of history.
OK. I understand your perspective, and that is not the intent of the thread as posted. It is open to all perspectives, and as I said is meant to be 'expressive', to alert us to the sentiments that inspired men to fight and die. I see these things as legitimate, and if they lend themselves to the Lost Cause narrative that is purely accidental.

Here are a couple of things from my post that indicate the level of internal conflict inspired by the war:

against their judgment as to the judiciousness of disruption,
all of them against the professional hopes, aspirations and pecuniary interests,

These are sentiments that force a questioning of the individuals motivation, and show that these men were tested in the circumstances, needing to give consideration to more than just a blind sense of duty. I find this fascinating, and it indicates a depth to their thinking that shows theirs was not a decision taken lightly.

As 'duty' has already been considered in the first highlighted paragraph, I will take out the second with respect to your concerns around the Lost Cause narrative. Hopefully, that will keep the thread to its intended purpose.
 

Learn About Us
About CivilWarTalk
Contact the Webmaster
Meet the Staff
Link to CivilWarTalk
Join Our Community
Register
Browse Forums
View Today's Discussions
Search the Forum
Get Help
FAQ
Student Guide
Forum Rules & Etiquette
Copyright / DMCA

     Contact Us CivilwarTalk on Facebook CivilWarTalk on YouTube CivilWarTalk on Twitter RSS Feed

Bringing the American Civil War and More to Life.
© 1999 - , CIVILWARTALK, LLC - Site Version 10.0

SlaveryTalk.com - SecessionTalk.com - CivilWarTalk.com - ReconstructionTalk.com
Back
Top