Samuel Ruth, Union Spy

LoriAnn

Retired User
Joined
Oct 9, 2015
I'm reading Southern Lady, Yankee Spy by Elizabeth Varon, and just a couple of days ago, ran across one particular member of Richmond's Union spy network: Samuel Ruth. He caught my eye because he was the superintendent of the Richmond, Fredericksburg, and Potomac Railroad. Varon says he was charged with a crucial supply line for the Confederate army. She writes:

"But beneath the veneer of loyalty to the rebellion Ruth masterminded a series of schemes ~ ones he hoped were undetectable ~ to reduce the efficiency of the railroad and thus slow the movements of Lee's army." (pg 96-97)

She speaks, for example, of slow troop trains, fewer railroad employees, certain bridges waiting too long for repairs, and non-military trains being given priority. Lee noticed and complained! Ruth, apparently, would straighten up and fly right for a bit to avoid detection, only to later slip back into his inefficient ways.

Obviously, Ruth's actions must have had some kind of effect since Lee zeroed in on him. But for those of you who know these battles well (I do not at this point), are there any in particular that you think may have been directly affected by Ruth's sabotage?
 
Interesting... I had not heard of this but it makes sense given the notoriously slow and bad rail logistics in the Confederacy.

Wonder if he had anything to do with Longstreet's 1st Corps having to take the extremely "long way around" to get to Chickamauga? They did get there in time, but just barely...
 
Same here, with having to wait for the historians. The thing is, does she give proof beyond how poor service was?` I mean, our whole air passenger system could be a secret plot based on treason right now if sheer poor service proved anything.

Not having enough employees- no one did in the South, did they? Unless your job was specifically protected, off to war you went. I'm sure not scoffing at her theory since gee whiz, who knows what research she may have done? It's just that ' spy ' can sometimes be the result of some things which get glued together that sound pretty good. This would be an amazing one, if true- but once took 3 days door to door, PA to Somerset, UK. Transportation isn't notorious for being set up for customer service. Surely this began somewhere when it was discovered they'd given the Pilgrims a ship that leaked.

Nice thread, Lori Ann!
 
Same here, with having to wait for the historians. The thing is, does she give proof beyond how poor service was?` I mean, our whole air passenger system could be a secret plot based on treason right now if sheer poor service proved anything.

Not having enough employees- no one did in the South, did they? Unless your job was specifically protected, off to war you went. I'm sure not scoffing at her theory since gee whiz, who knows what research she may have done? It's just that ' spy ' can sometimes be the result of some things which get glued together that sound pretty good. This would be an amazing one, if true- but once took 3 days door to door, PA to Somerset, UK. Transportation isn't notorious for being set up for customer service. Surely this began somewhere when it was discovered they'd given the Pilgrims a ship that leaked.

Nice thread, Lori Ann!
Just a quick Google search, not anything authoritative, but it seems the main evidence is that Ruth said so in a Claims report and was paid for his spy services after the war.
 
The most complete study that I am aware of is by Meriwether Stuart, "Samuel Ruth and General R. E. Lee: Disloyalty and the Line of Supply to Fredericksburg, 1862-1863," Virginia Magazine of History and Biography, Vol. 71 (1963). I don't have it in front of me, but my memory is that there is nothing specific against Ruth in '62-63. His later "spying" appears to have been in late'64 and '65. Yes he did put in claim for services, but it is lacking specifics.
 
Interesting... I had not heard of this but it makes sense given the notoriously slow and bad rail logistics in the Confederacy.

Wonder if he had anything to do with Longstreet's 1st Corps having to take the extremely "long way around" to get to Chickamauga? They did get there in time, but just barely...
He had nothing to do with this. The long way was required when the Union captured Knoxville. Troops headed to Chickamauga were delivered to Richmond on a schedule that kept the railroads involved fully utilized. Lee was careful to keep from filling Richmond with troops that could not leave for a day or two.
 
The thing is, does she give proof beyond how poor service was?
She states Ruth influenced the "spring campaigns of 1862" and continued to hamper things throughout the year. Lee is said to have accused him of "operating the railroad 'without zeal or energy' " in January, 1863.

As for hard evidence, this I do not know. I would guess, though, that considering it was sabotage, maybe there's not a whole lot of paperwork on the matter. Maybe perhaps Lee's complaint? I don't know if other Union spies specifically mention Ruth (like Elizabeth Van Lew) post-war and corroborate his claims.

This has me wondering: Did spies/saboteurs talk after the war? Speak of their work? And if so, how much?

The most complete study that I am aware of is by Meriwether Stuart, "Samuel Ruth and General R. E. Lee: Disloyalty and the Line of Supply to Fredericksburg, 1862-1863," Virginia Magazine of History and Biography, Vol. 71 (1963). I don't have it in front of me, but my memory is that there is nothing specific against Ruth in '62-63. His later "spying" appears to have been in late'64 and '65. Yes he did put in claim for services, but it is lacking specifics.
Varon listed this as a source. :thumbsup:
 
She states Ruth influenced the "spring campaigns of 1862" and continued to hamper things throughout the year. Lee is said to have accused him of "operating the railroad 'without zeal or energy' " in January, 1863.

As for hard evidence, this I do not know. I would guess, though, that considering it was sabotage, maybe there's not a whole lot of paperwork on the matter. Maybe perhaps Lee's complaint? I don't know if other Union spies specifically mention Ruth (like Elizabeth Van Lew) post-war and corroborate his claims.

This has me wondering: Did spies/saboteurs talk after the war? Speak of their work? And if so, how much?


Varon listed this as a source. :thumbsup:
I don't think they did. I know Moxley Sorrel ran across Harrison years after the war. He watched a play in NY and Harrison was starring in it. So Harrison did return to acting for all you "The Movie Gettysburg" fans.
 
Last edited:
Just a quick Google search, not anything authoritative, but it seems the main evidence is that Ruth said so in a Claims report and was paid for his spy services after the war.


Well, can't get better than Ruth saying he did something, thanks for looking that up! Ha! DaveBrt furthers things with no one leaving us specifics plus it seems at least for the piece of tomfoolery referred to here, he either did not do it, did not take credit or just couldn't get paid. So interesting! ' What ifs ' are ridiculous but this one is crazy, cannot imagine how successfully one man could have changed the course of a war, if it's true.

With Lee himself accusing Ruth, wonder how he was able to stay in his position?

She states Ruth influenced the "spring campaigns of 1862" and continued to hamper things throughout the year. Lee is said to have accused him of "operating the railroad 'without zeal or energy' " in January, 1863.

Ah. So this seems to be where the hole in information lies- the source Davebrt quoted states his service was later, for one thing and for another apparently Ruth never stated what, exactly, he did. May be one of those honest stretches. Sounds like all the pieces are there. You know a) Ruth was the big boss in charge of efficiency b) Efficiency was beyond poor c) Lee complained about him d) Ruth later made a claim for ' spy ' services performed later in the war. A case could be made using ' possibly' or probably', on those facts but perhaps there's something else?

Spies talk post war? Guessing there wasn't a lot but that would be a guess based on those who would have been spied upon. Feelings still ran high ( this came up in a thread recently, that veterans could have a tough time letting go of war time animosity ), can't imagine it would have been healthy to speak of one's work during the war? Just a guess, it's not like I know this stuff.
 
With Lee himself accusing Ruth, wonder how he was able to stay in his position?
Varon says Ruth kept his position because "powerful Confederate friends, such as the RF and P's owner Peter V. Daniel Jr., " were convinced of Ruth's loyalty. According to one source I just found, he was arrested at some point but later let go for a lack of evidence.

Can't say if the source is acceptable to historians, but here you go:

"Grant was also getting help from Samuel Ruth, superintendent of the Richmond, Fredericksburg, and
Potomac Railroad—and a secret Unionist. Ruth provided information about Confederate Army move-
ments and, as a railroad executive, managed to slow down the repairing of bridges and the shipping of
supplies to embattled Richmond. Under instructions from Sharpe, Elizabeth Van Lew, the most important
Union agent in the Richmond underground, had recruited Ruth. He apparently formed an interlocking
spy ring, using railroad workers and others as his sub-agents.

Ruth was arrested in a sudden Confederate sweep on suspected agents, but he was soon released because, as
The Richmond Whig reported, "There was not the slightest shadow of evidence against him." After the court released
him, The Whig indignantly said, "The charge against Ruth was trumped up." For the rest of the war, Ruth
remained a respected Richmond citizen—and a Yankee spy serving the Bureau of Military Information"

cia.gov on page 23, lower right hand columnhttps://www.cia.gov/library/publications/intelligence-history/civil-war/Intel_in_the_CW1.pdf
 
Varon says Ruth kept his position because "powerful Confederate friends, such as the RF and P's owner Peter V. Daniel Jr., " were convinced of Ruth's loyalty. According to one source I just found, he was arrested at some point but later let go for a lack of evidence.

Can't say if the source is acceptable to historians, but here you go:

"Grant was also getting help from Samuel Ruth, superintendent of the Richmond, Fredericksburg, and
Potomac Railroad—and a secret Unionist. Ruth provided information about Confederate Army move-
ments and, as a railroad executive, managed to slow down the repairing of bridges and the shipping of
supplies to embattled Richmond. Under instructions from Sharpe, Elizabeth Van Lew, the most important
Union agent in the Richmond underground, had recruited Ruth. He apparently formed an interlocking
spy ring, using railroad workers and others as his sub-agents.

Ruth was arrested in a sudden Confederate sweep on suspected agents, but he was soon released because, as
The Richmond Whig reported, "There was not the slightest shadow of evidence against him." After the court released
him, The Whig indignantly said, "The charge against Ruth was trumped up." For the rest of the war, Ruth
remained a respected Richmond citizen—and a Yankee spy serving the Bureau of Military Information"

cia.gov on page 23, lower right hand column
We are playing with two different time periods. Lee's complaint was in '63 and is backed with no specifics. Grant's receiving information is from later '64 and '65 and is confirmed by the capture of a railroad train of tobacco suspiciously placed in Fredericksburg by Ruth and by his claim for services, which was approved for work in '64/'65.

We must not give Ruth too much credit for what he accomplished during the siege. The RF&P provided almost no supplies from a region completely used up by the armies, and, though Ruth may have gathered information from other railroad superintendents in Richmond about what they were doing, he would have had little control over business on other roads.
 
I had wondered if Van Lew ever mentioned Ruth. I did find this:

"Van Lew was certainly instrumental in the Union's war effort against the Confederacy. In one letter, Van Lew recounts how, working under orders from Union Colonel George H. Sharpe, the head of the Bureau of Military Information (the first formal intelligence agency in the U.S.), she had recruited Samuel Ruth, a Virginia railroad superintendent, as a spy: "The US Government wanted to communicate with Mr. Ruth The Superintendent of the R & Fred. RR. Word was sent to me that it must be done. . . . I finally undertook it myself, and succeeded." She then details events that led up to Ruth's arrest. (Ruth used his position with the railroad, as well as his railroad employees as agents, to work against the Confederacy.) He was eventually arrested, but Van Lew insisted that "He would not be safe now should this be known." "

Elizabeth Van Lew Collection

I have no idea if these letters are the real deal, but if they are, I wonder what they went for!
 
We are playing with two different time periods. Lee's complaint was in '63 and is backed with no specifics. Grant's receiving information is from later '64 and '65 and is confirmed by the capture of a railroad train of tobacco suspiciously placed in Fredericksburg by Ruth and by his claim for services, which was approved for work in '64/'65.

We must not give Ruth too much credit for what he accomplished during the siege. The RF&P provided almost no supplies from a region completely used up by the armies, and, though Ruth may have gathered information from other railroad superintendents in Richmond about what they were doing, he would have had little control over business on other roads.
I appreciate any light you can shed on this. :) It's a fun story for sure. Well. Maybe "fun" isn't the word. You know what I'm trying to say. An intriguing story.
 
This has me wondering: Did spies/saboteurs talk after the war? Speak of their work? And if so, how much?

I can't speak for people who spied or did work during the ACW, but my dad's father did some work after WWII for military intelligence and when my dad questioned him about it, he always said he couldn't discuss it. My dad also did some intelligence work in the 1960's and said it's top secret not so much for the information at this point, but how you go about obtaining it and methods used. You don't your 'enemy' to know how you collect information on them or how you sabotage them. So discussing there work is on the taboo side.

Ruth provided information about Confederate Army move-
ments and, as a railroad executive, managed to slow down the repairing of bridges and the shipping of
supplies to embattled Richmond. Under instructions from Sharpe, Elizabeth Van Lew, the most important
Union agent in the Richmond underground, had recruited Ruth. He apparently formed an interlocking
spy ring, using railroad workers and others as his sub-agents.

Having read "Liar, Temptress, Soldier, Spy" by Karen Abbott which chronicles Van Lew and her extensive network, I remember reading of someone who worked with the railroads she was connected with and if I remember correct his connection proved useful when she would help spirit away escaped prisoners from Libby Prison in moving them out of Richmond.
 
For those interested, here's the section of the book that introduces Ruth.

Note Varon mentions that the Federal government didn't make use of Richmond loyalists right away:

"The Richmond underground, then, spent the better part of 1862 and 1863 improvising, working without direction or compensation from the Union army."
 
I appreciate any light you can shed on this. :smile: It's a fun story for sure. Well. Maybe "fun" isn't the word. You know what I'm trying to say. An intriguing story.
From the Richmond Sentinel
January 26, 1865

Conveying Intelligence to the Enemy

Samuel Ruth, Superintendent of the Richmond and Fredericksburg {Richmond, Fredericksburg & Potomac} Railroad; Hugh Silva of King George, and John H. Timberlake, a policeman of Fredericksburg, were on Monday committed to Castle Thunder, on the charge of being regularly engaged in carrying information to the enemy. The parties have as yet had no examination, owing to the absence of a witness upon whom the authorities mainly rely, and therefore nothing is known of the evidence upon which they were arrested.
Mr. Ruth has been long and favorably known in this city as a most efficient railroad officer, and a respectable, prudent and cautions man. His friends are slow to believe him guilty, not only because of his previous good character, but because of his peculiar and remarkable caution and reticence, and a most marked disposition to mind only his own business.
The authorities expect to prove by one Mrs. Dade, of King George, that Ruth, Timberlake and Silva have long been leagued together and engaged in running a regular mail to the Yankees on the Potomac.
At the request of the police authorities, we forbore to mention this case before.

From the Richmond Whig
January 26, 1865

Arrested on a Charge of Treason

It frequently happens that the ends of justice may be defeated by the premature publication of facts connected with an arrest. This was believed to be the case when Samuel Ruth, Superintendent of the Fredericksburg R. R. Co. {Richmond, Fredericksburg & Potomac RR}, was taken into custody, and the authorities requested that for the present nothing should be said about the matter by the press. This request, we regret to say, has been disregarded by some of the city papers. Information obtained by some of the detective police led to the belief that Mr. Ruth had for a long time taken advantage of his position as Superintendent of the Richmond & Fredericksburg Railroad to convey important information to the enemy; and on Monday evening he was arrested on this charge and committed to Castle Thunder. John H. Timberlake, a policeman of Fredericksburg, and Hugh W. Silver, a resident of King George, who had been previously arrested on the same charge, were also committed to the Castle. The Government depend upon the testimony of Mrs. Dade, of King George, and upon circumstantial evidence, to make out a case against the parties. Mr. Ruth's friends, among whom are many gentlemen of influence, believe Mr. Ruth to be innocent. The authorities are, however, fully satisfied of his guilt. His case will be examined so soon as Mrs. Dade can be gotton to the city.

From the Richmond Sentinel
January 30, 1865

Mr. Ruth's Case

Mrs. Dade, of King George county, who is the principal witness on the part of the Government against Mr. Samuel Ruth, Superintendent of the Fredericksburg railroad {Richmond, Fredericksburg & Potomac RR}, having arrived in this city Saturday evening, Mr. Ruth will have an examination before Commissioner Sidney S. Baxter, this morning. It will be recollected he is charged with communicating contraband information to the enemy.

From the Richmond Dispatch
February 2, 1865

Discharged and Recommitted

Before Commissioner H. Sands yesterday, the cases of Samuel Ruth, charged with treason, and John Hancock, suspected of being a spy, were brought up and disposed of. Hancock was committed to the county jail for examination before Judge Halyburton; but Mr. Ruth was discharged, there being no evidence adduced sufficient to warrant his further detention.

OR 1 Vol. 46 Part 4 Page 544
Applewood, Caroline [County]
March 8, 1865 -- 3 a.m.

Colonel Ewell
Assistant Adjutant-General

Colonel,
Early yesterday morning one of my scouts reported the enemy in Fredericksburg. I went to ascertain the truth of the report. I proceeded to Fredericksburg, passing by Hamilton's Crossing {A station on the Richmond, Fredericksburg & Potomac RR 5 miles south of Fredericksburg.}. At the crossing they burnt everything of value, some thirty cars, seventeen of which were loaded with tobacco. The bridge over the Massaponax was also burned. No other injury to the road. They captured fifty-six mules and burned the wagons. All the colored drivers but one went with them. In the city they took and carried off some 500 boxes of tobacco. The provost-marshal (Captain Doggett), with most of his men, escaped. The expedition consisted of two gun-boats and five transports, conveying one brigade of infantry, under the command of Brigadier-General Roberts, and one regiment of cavalry, commanded by Colonel Sumner.
General Roberts informed Mr. Slaughter (the mayor) that the expedition was fitted out by General Grant to break up the illicit trade in tobacco, which he had heard was carried on in Fredericksburg, and which he was determined to break up. They left at 5 o'clock this afternoon, and proceeded down the river. I left the city at 7 o'clock, and am now at home on my way to camp.
Most respectfully, your obedient servant,
L. W. Allen
Captain, Co. F, 24th Virginia Cavalry
Comdg. at Taylorsville

From the Richmond Dispatch

March 9, 1865

A commercial Transaction
For some days past parties in this city have been sending large quantities of manufactured tobacco hence to Fredericksburg. Report said that this tobacco was to be traded with the Yankees for bacon, and that General Singleton was the prime mover in the arrangement, this being the business that brought him again to Richmond. It was transported to Hamilton's crossing by rail, and thence hauled to Fredericksburg, five miles distant, in wagons. The Yankees were expected to come up in vessels to Fredericksburg, bring bacon, and carry off the tobacco.
On Monday last, two hundred thousand pounds of tobacco had been sent up the Fredericksburg railroad {Richmond, Fredericksburg & Potomac RR}, forty thousand pounds of which had been hauled to Fredericksburg and stored in a warehouse on the Rappahannock, convenient for shipping, and the other hundred and sixty thousand pounds was in thirty-one box railroad cars at Hamilton's crossing. The enemy came up to Fredericksburg in gunboats on Monday night, but brought no bacon that we have been able to hear of. Their first step was to send a part of cavalry to Hamilton's crossing, who set fire to and destroyed all the cars and all the tobacco there. This party also burnt the bridge over the Massaponax creek, a short distance this side of Hamilton's crossing.
There are two reports as to what was done with the tobacco in Fredericksburg -- one, that the enemy carried it off; the other, that they set fire to the warehouse and destroyed both house and tobacco. It is ascertained that they burned the wagons (five in number) employed in hauling the tobacco from Hamilton's to Fredericksburg, and carried off the teams. So ends one of the most brilliant schemes of our latter-day speculators. The only thing to be seriously regretted about the business is the loss by the Fredericksburg Railroad Company of the thirty-one valuable freight cars. We presume the company would not have risked its property by leaving it at so exposed a point as Hamilton's crossing unless they had felt satisfied that some understanding had been come to with the enemy that it would not be molested.
The common report was, that the enemy would interfere neither with the road nor the tobacco while this bacon tobacco traffic was going on. The whole thing seemed ridiculous enough, it must be admitted; but there can, at the present time, be no report so absurd as not to find believers. The loss of the tobacco is a small matter. There is much more of the article still left in Richmond than either Government or people know what to do with.
 
Well he was sure good at it! This is all new to me but then it's been so difficult separating proverbial wheat from chaff, admit it's been quite awhile since paying attention to spy stories. The last one I read had Van Lew and Bowser not working together plus had Van Lew as some kind of pretend, unimportant poser so gave up ' spy ' stories. I don't know. It does sound genuine as heck no matter when he had a hand in operations. SO risky! It does blow you away, thinking the guy in charge of this major source of transportation for the Confederacy was a Union loyalist.

In one letter, Van Lew recounts how, working under orders from Union Colonel George H. Sharpe, the head of the Bureau of Military Information (the first formal intelligence agency in the U.S.), she had recruited Samuel Ruth, a Virginia railroad superintendent, as a spy: "The US Government wanted to communicate with Mr. Ruth The Superintendent of the R & Fred. RR. Word was sent to me that it must be done. . . . I finally undertook it myself, and succeeded." She then details events that led up to Ruth's arrest. (Ruth used his position with the railroad, as well as his railroad employees as agents, to work against the Confederacy.) He was eventually arrested, but Van Lew insisted that "He would not be safe now should this be known." "

Yes, her letters are real. So is her journal- found buried in her back yard with pages ripped out. Even buried Van Lew mistrusted some information getting around so destroyed it. Sharpe was amazing- Pinkerton a mess, really ( I could get it in the neck for saying that but he wasn't a terrific intelligence guy ) but Sharpe knew his stuff. What these show even more is how wide was Van Lew's network, gee whiz! She's frequently portrayed as just visiting prisons and bringing back information from there- it was a ton more. Boy did she pay for it.


I can't speak for people who spied or did work during the ACW, but my dad's father did some work after WWII for military intelligence and when my dad questioned him about it, he always said he couldn't discuss it. My dad also did some intelligence work in the 1960's and said it's top secret not so much for the information at this point, but how you go about obtaining it and methods used. You don't your 'enemy' to know how you collect information on them or how you sabotage them. So discussing there work is on the taboo side.

Having read "Liar, Temptress, Soldier, Spy" by Karen Abbott which chronicles Van Lew and her extensive network, I remember reading of someone who worked with the railroads she was connected with and if I remember correct his connection proved useful when she would help spirit away escaped prisoners from Libby Prison in moving them out of Richmond.


So intricate! Just collected quite a few newspaper article on the escaped prisoners, how she posted men to watch for escapes and where they were taken. This final step was pretty genius- to think of one woman gluing the whole thing together is crazy. SO glad Karen did her justice, with the whole network, to Elizabeth's real genius. You get tired of ' Crazy ' Van Lew because she wasn't. A crazy person could not have managed her network plus it seems clear she would not have drawn attention to herself this way. Karen did her homework, forever and ever, too- she's member here. I could be prejudice, my uncle ( JPK's brother ) perished in Richmond, died in Van Lew's home. She'd taken him home out of sheer compassion- a lot of people miss that part of Elizabeth's personality. It's really important. She saw him, almost dead with typhoid, a ' political ' prisoner. Couldn't stand seeing him like that- talked the commandant into allowing her to take him home. It's part of the book- illustrating her compassion. We don't think she knew him? He had a ton of connections in Richmond pre-war, it was a political family but we can't find where the Van Lews were one.

It's just that, with an entire war raging, her world in shambles, a Southern woman took a man suffering from Typhoid into her home, a Federal politician/prisoner. That is crazy kind. Incidentally, she had him buried in the Van Lew plot- he's still there, unmarked. Someone appeared here on the forum asking if the family wished a headstone, but never heard anything else. Maybe one of Calvin's direct family answered- if they did not, my mother certainly does. Her grandmother's generation lived with this story- she grew up hearing it.
 
From the Richmond Sentinel
January 26, 1865
Nice! Thank you. :) So. Mrs. Dade nearly blew his cover. I think I will do a little searching for her later.

Regarding the tobacco, is Ruth suspected of having been a part of that? (My apologies if the puzzle pieces are obvious, and I'm just missing it.)
 
SO risky! It does blow you away, thinking the guy in charge of this major source of transportation for the Confederacy was a Union loyalist.
Exactly. And the risks he took were well matched by many others in this secret network according to Varon. It's hard for me to keep all the names straight, but every time I'm introduced to a new player, I'm stunned by their dedication and courage.

I could see...sort of...the women thinking they might be caught and punished, but never executed. But I don't think the men could assume that!
SO glad Karen did her justice, with the whole network, to Elizabeth's real genius.
So far, this author does a good job too. :thumbsup: Elizabeth comes across as a compassionate, shrewd, and tough lady.

There is another woman in this spy network Varon keeps mentioning who was very much like Van Lew. I don't have the book in front of me, but later I will look her up and see if there's any information online about her.

Sharpe was amazing- Pinkerton a mess, really ( I could get it in the neck for saying that but he wasn't a terrific intelligence guy ) but Sharpe knew his stuff.
I'm just reading about Sharpe now. And Ben Butler! After reading about him in other, unrelated threads, it was a surprise to see his name resurface with Van Lew.
 
Nice! Thank you. :smile: So. Mrs. Dade nearly blew his cover. I think I will do a little searching for her later.

Regarding the tobacco, is Ruth suspected of having been a part of that? (My apologies if the puzzle pieces are obvious, and I'm just missing it.)
Since he was the Superintendent of the RF&P Railroad, the cars could not have been assigned or used without his knowledge, so he had to be involved in the tobacco trading. The question was whether he knew the Union was going to raid Fredericksburg and take the tobacco without making the trade.

There are other documents that I did not save, such as his request for payment. I did the research about 5 years ago and no longer remember where they were located.
 

Learn About Us
About CivilWarTalk
Contact the Webmaster
Meet the Staff
Link to CivilWarTalk
Join Our Community
Register
Browse Forums
View Today's Discussions
Search the Forum
Get Help
FAQ
Student Guide
Forum Rules & Etiquette
Copyright / DMCA

     Contact Us CivilwarTalk on Facebook CivilWarTalk on YouTube CivilWarTalk on Twitter RSS Feed

Bringing the American Civil War and More to Life.
© 1999 - , CIVILWARTALK, LLC - Site Version 10.0

SlaveryTalk.com - SecessionTalk.com - CivilWarTalk.com - ReconstructionTalk.com
Back
Top