Regular Army Organization

From the Army Regulations of 1857, there were no brigades or divisions in peacetime generally, unless required to be formed for combat purposes.

1755883216006.png



The only permanent legal organizations in the Regular Army before mid-1861 were staff and regimental.

1755882394558.png



Notice there is only one major-general, and three brigadier-generals before the war. Many of the officers held "brevets" besides their regular commissions. For example, the major General, Winfield Scott, held a brevet of lieutenant general. There were three brigadiers. Brig. Gen.s Wool and Twiggs held brevets of major general.

The Army was distributed among territorial Commands. These were the Departments of the East, West, Texas, New Mexico, Oregon, Utah, and California. When combat forces were organized within these departments, they were organized as was found best by the officers in command.
1755890371060.png


During 1861-65 the departmental boundaries changed, as necessary.


Where it was necessary to form brigades, the senior officer present, frequently acting under a brevet rank, would assume command.
Same with battalions. It was frequently the case that companies from several different regiments were combined to form battalions for field service where necessary. As brigades/divisions were not fixed by law, the terms were not always employed in the usual manner. For example, in the Utah war, Brevet Brigadier General A.S. Johnston (colonel of the 2nd US Cavalry Regiment), commanding the Dept. of Utah, formed his active force into three brigades which he called "divisions."

1755882606635.png


During the 1861-66 period the regular Army's territorial Department commands continued, though modified relative to the exigencies of the war. They continued after the war too. As did the general bar upon permanent brigades/divisions/corps. From Kautz's 1866 "Customs of the Service"

1755883408312.png

1755883446570.png
 
Last edited:
@RedRover I've noticed that the size of the regulars in January of 61 was 16,367. One of your photos says 13,024. Is this because of the regulars in Twiggs command who were captured in Texas?

The legal size of the army was 16,367.

As usual all units were more or less understrength. Recruiting in the regular service was always difficult, and about the commencement of the war it was a few thousand personnel short.

It continued so during the war, in spite of the legal expansion of the Regular Army. By January, 1864 the legal strength of the Regular Army was 44,500. However at that time only 24,636 were serving (55 percent of the authorized number).

Several of the Regular Army units authorized during the war were never actually organized for lack of recruits.
 
The legal size of the army was 16,367.

As usual all units were more or less understrength. Recruiting in the regular service was always difficult, and about the commencement of the war it was a few thousand personnel short.

It continued so during the war, in spite of the legal expansion of the Regular Army. By January, 1864 the legal strength of the Regular Army was 44,500. However at that time only 24,636 were serving (55 percent of the authorized number).

Several of the Regular Army units authorized during the war were never actually organized for lack of recruits.
Are you sure that it was the authorized number? I have read in "The Regular Army on the Eve of the Civil War" by George Ness that the strength was 16,367 with 1,108 officer and 803 absent.
 
Are you sure that it was the authorized number? I have read in "The Regular Army on the Eve of the Civil War" by George Ness that the strength was 16,367 with 1,108 officer and 803 absent.

Not particularly. Mr. Ness would be correct...

The total serving as officers and enlisted men, present and absent (including AWOLs and Deserters) as of January 1, 1861 was given as follows...

1755982251561.png



The Authorized number varied.

1755979483772.png


But there was an act from June 17, 1850 which gave an increase in authorized strength for companies while serving in the West, versus the east....beyond their normal organization.

1755980014665.png


Consequently, if no companies of the Army were in the west, there was a small aggregate on paper than otherwise...

1755979740545.png



Looking around, I see that the Army reported in 1861 a "mean" strength present and effective for duty (as in an average) of just over 13,000.

1755982645085.png
 
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1bnGkZ1fwoaHLttc0VPWN9-N7wiYMHxe-Tjk7hcTdUdM/edit?tab=t.0

Document I made last year to show the organization of the Regular Army from January 1 to May 31, 1861. TLDR, the organization was as follows:
Department of the East: Dtch 1st, 2nd US Artillery
Department of Texas: 1st, 3rd, 8th US Infantry, 2nd US Cavalry, 1st US Artillery
Department of the West: 2nd US Infantry, 1st US Cavalry, Dtch 4th US Artillery
Department of New Mexico: 5th, 7th, Dtch 10th US Infantry, US Mounted Riflemen
Department of Utah: Dtch 10th US Infantry, 2nd US Dragoons, Dtch 4th US Artillery
Department of the Pacific: 4th, 6th, and 9th US Infantry, 1st US Dragoons, 3rd US Artillery
 
In peacetime, the individual Regiments rarely operated together. The Companies were usually scattered to different postings.

During the war, the regular Infantry regiments had 12 companies (instead of 10), organized into 3 Battalions of 4 Companies each. Since the peacetime Army was heavily dispersed and frequently understrength I don't know if that was done in peacetime.

Artillery companies before the Civil War were often used as Infantry for garrison purposes and even during some conflicts, like the Second Seminole War, where cannons were not effective.
 

Learn About Us
About CivilWarTalk
Contact the Webmaster
Meet the Staff
Link to CivilWarTalk
Join Our Community
Register
Browse Forums
View Today's Discussions
Search the Forum
Get Help
FAQ
Student Guide
Forum Rules & Etiquette
Copyright / DMCA

     Contact Us CivilwarTalk on Facebook CivilWarTalk on YouTube CivilWarTalk on Twitter RSS Feed

Bringing the American Civil War and More to Life.
© 1999 - , CIVILWARTALK, LLC - Site Version 10.0

SlaveryTalk.com - SecessionTalk.com - CivilWarTalk.com - ReconstructionTalk.com
Back
Top