In the Field Red Leg Eye Candy

Rhea Cole

Lt. Colonel
Joined
Nov 2, 2019
Location
Murfreesboro, Tennessee
IMG_0631.JPG


This is an 1841 model Six Pound smoothbore Cannon loaded with 10 ounces of black powder. The number four man, camera left, has placed a friction primer into the vent. A friction primer is essentially a .22 blank with a wire kitchen match passed through the base. The number three, camera right, has punctured the powder bag. Number four has placed the friction primer with the lanyard hook attached to a loop in the priming wire. Number three is holding the lanyard against the side if the breech as number four steps out & takes a strain on the lanyard. Civil War drill had number three put the palm over the primer in the vent. He jumped away when the gunner, camera center, orders fire. The modern day National Park drill carefully follows the Civil War practice, however, now Number three holds the laynyard beside the vent & steps out before the order to fire. I know a man who found out why we do it that way. Fortunately for him, the primer tube missed any bone & exited through the flesh between thumb & forefinger.

The Stones River Living History Volunteer crew have placed their piece where the six pounders of the Chicago Board of Trade Battery stood on December 31, 1862. The photos were taken on the anniversary of the Battle in 2018. The far tree line, about 800 yards away is where General Raines led his men out of the tree line.


IMG_0639.JPG


At the gunner's order of fire, the number four bends a knee, the lanyard goes taught, stretches, springs back yanking the wire cleanly through the primer. In this extraordinary image, you can see a fine horizontal line above the breech. That is the jet of fire shooting out through the tiny hole where the priming wire was. Camera left, the lanyard is springing toward number four. The light from the ignition of the charge has left the muzzle, but the expanding gas of the explosion, traveling at just below the speed of sound has not traveled the 5 feet to the open air.

The small vertical object above the breech is the primer tube. The time line can be calculated by the tube's velocity, around 800 mph.


IMG_0796.JPG


Camera left, the springing lanyard gives you an idea of the time line. The expanding gas of the charge has reached the open air & is creating an oxygen fueled fireball. If you look carefully, the friction primer's copper tube is visible above the jet of flame rising through the vent. Two seconds later, a six pound ball would have grazed the ground & bounded into Raines' tight packed line along the edge of the cedars. General Raines only survived the first few steps into the cotton field. Over fifty guns would have flogged the advancing infantry in gray.

IMG_0643.JPG


Camera left, the squiggly line of the lanyard has yet to reach number four's hand. The enormous plume of white smoke is due to 60 percent of the solids in a blackpowder explosion exiting the bore as a solid.

Firing live, the gun crew would have grabbed the wheels & rolled the gun back into line. The recoil would have been three or four feet. The gunner would have aimed the piece as the crew reloaded. Once reloaded, he would have waited for the order to repoint the piece or fire at the same target. Each cannon had roughly 200 rounds readily available. Fire was deliberate in order to hit the target. Even in an extreme situation a rate of no more that a round a minute was allowed. Any faster than that & it was impossible to aim. In addition, not properly sponging the bore could result in the traumatic amputation of Number one's arm.

Note the position of the cannoneers. These are the postures ordered by the manual. The exaggerated, bent over hands on ears posture of some reenactors is a modern affectation. The often dramatic flailing antics of cannoneer number one seen at reenactments is also not historic. The number of reenactors who have suffered injuries from premature detonation over the years is Testiment to the hard won wisdom of the deliberate pace of fire during the Civil War. I don't intend this as a criticism of reenactor drill, I just want to point out the difference between what spectators see at a reenactment & the actual historical practice.

Images made by the author. I was number six & placed my iPad atop the limber chest. Photos taken in National Parks are public domain. You are welcome to use them, please credit me & Stones River N.B.
 
Last edited:
View attachment 335112

This is an 1841 model Six Pound smoothbore Cannon loaded with 10 ounces of black powder. The number four man, camera left, has placed a friction primer into the vent. A friction primer is essentially a .22 blank with a wire kitchen match passed through the base. The number three, camera right, has punctured the powder bag. Number four has placed the friction primer with the lanyard hook attached to a loop in the priming wire. Number three is holding the lanyard against the side if the breech as number four steps out & takes a strain on the lanyard. Civil War drill had number three put the palm over the primer in the vent. He jumped away when the gunner, camera center, orders fire. The modern day National Park drill carefully follows the Civil War practice, however, now Number three holds the laynyard beside the vent & steps out before the order to fire. I know a man who found out why we do it that way. Fortunately for him, the primer tube missed any bone & exited through the flesh between thumb & forefinger.

The Stones River Living History Volunteer crew have placed their piece where the six pounders of the Chicago Board of Trade Battery stood on December 31, 1862. The photos were taken on the anniversary of the Battle in 2018. The far tree line, about 800 yards away is where General Raines led his men out of the tree line.


View attachment 335113

At the gunner's order of fire, the number four bends a knee, the lanyard goes taught, stretches, springs back yanking the wire cleanly through the primer. In this extraordinary image, you can see a fine horizontal line above the breech. That is the jet of fire shooting out through the tiny hole where the priming wire was. Camera left, the lanyard is springing toward number four. The light from the ignition of the charge has left the muzzle, but the expanding gas of the explosion, traveling at just below the speed of sound has not traveled the 5 feet to the open air.

The small vertical object above the breech is the primer tube. The time line can be calculated by the tube's velocity, around 800 mph.


View attachment 335115

Camera left, the springing lanyard gives you an idea of the time line. The expanding gas of the charge has reached the open air & is creating an oxygen fueled fireball. If you look carefully, the friction primer's copper tube is visible above the jet of flame rising through the vent. Two seconds later, a six pound ball would have grazed the ground & bounded into Raines' tight packed line along the edge of the cedars. General Raines only survived the first few steps into the cotton field. Over fifty guns would have flogged the advancing infantry in gray.

View attachment 335114

Camera left, the squiggly line of the lanyard has yet to reach number four's hand. The enormous plume of white smoke is due to 60 percent of the solids in a blackpowder explosion exiting the bore as a solid.

Firing live, the gun crew would have grabbed the wheels & rolled the gun back into line. The recoil would have been three or four feet. The gunner would have aimed the piece as the crew reloaded. Once reloaded, he would have waited for the order to repoint the piece or fire at the same target. Each cannon had roughly 200 rounds readily available. Fire was deliberate in order to hit the target. Even in an extreme situation a rate of no more that a round a minute was allowed. Any faster than that & it was impossible to aim. In addition, not properly sponging the bore could result in the traumatic amputation of Number one's arm.

Note the position of the cannoneers. These are the postures ordered by the manual. The exaggerated, bent over hands on ears posture of some reenactors is a modern affectation. The often dramatic flailing antics of cannoneer number one seen at reenactments is also not historic. The number of reenactors who have suffered injuries from premature detonation over the years is Testiment to the hard won wisdom of the deliberate pace of fire during the Civil War. I don't intend this as a criticism of reenactor drill, I just want to point out the difference between what spectators see at a reenactment & the actual historical practice.

Images made by the author. I was number six & placed my iPad atop the limber chest. Photos taken in National Parks are public domain. You are welcome to use them, please credit me & Stones River N.B.
Thanks. Very nice photos.
 
...A friction primer is essentially a .22 blank with a wire kitchen match passed through the base.

...that seems too rough a shorthand. The thing doesn't really look or function much like a .22 blank or kitchen match at all * -- but ok, close enough description for the 'taters I suppose.

...These are the postures ordered by the manual. The exaggerated, bent over hands on ears posture of some reenactors is a modern affectation...

Yes, the bent-over-hands-on-ears posture is a modern reenacting affectation, but for hobby warriors it is a reasonable safety concession. The admittedly too-obvious maneuver clearly signals that the gun will fire now! ...It's no more extreme or improper a concession than not palming the vent hole.

...The often dramatic flailing antics of cannoneer number one seen at reenactments is also not historic...

What "dramatic flailing antics" of #1 are you referring to here? Sponging the barrel is historic and the action seems reserved enough; merely standard period drill. Is it that at reenactments we find #1 occasionally dipping the sponge in the water bucket and spinning off the excess water? Yes dipping the sponge during active combat is not specifically historic, but again for hobby warriors it's a reasonable and regular function of the #1 position, not at all "drama", "flailing" or "antics." To avoid casting aspersions, the NPS drill is not historic in all details either.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
* The thing is actually a longer (one-and-a-half inch or so) roughly ".22" caliber copper tube with no cartridge rim at the base, instead a plain base sealed with wax inside. The tube is filled with a friction "match head" composition imbedded with a wire that exits from the top crimped end of the tube and bent at a right angle, extending for an inch or more and terminating as a loop on which the lanyard hook can be attached. Variable fine dimensions depending on the source.
 
Last edited:
...that seems too rough a shorthand. The thing doesn't really look or function much like a .22 blank or kitchen match at all * -- but ok, close enough description for the 'taters I suppose.



Yes, the bent-over-hands-on-ears posture is a modern reenacting affectation, but for hobby warriors it is a reasonable safety concession. The admittedly too-obvious maneuver clearly signals that the gun will fire now! ...It's no more extreme or improper a concession than not palming the vent hole.



What "dramatic flailing antics" of #1 are you referring to here? Sponging the barrel is historic and the action seems reserved enough; merely standard period drill. Is it that at reenactments we find #1 occasionally dipping the sponge in the water bucket and spinning off the excess water? Yes dipping the sponge during active combat is not specifically historic, but again for hobby warriors it's a reasonable and regular function of the #1 position, not at all "drama", "flailing" or "antics." To avoid casting aspersions, the NPS drill is not historic in all details either.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
* The thing is actually a longer (one-and-a-half inch or so) roughly ".22" caliber copper tube with no cartridge rim at the base, instead a plain base sealed with wax inside. The tube is filled with a friction "match head" composition imbedded with a wire that exits from the top crimped end of the tube and bent at a right angle, extending for an inch or more and terminating as a loop on which the lanyard hook can be attached. Variable fine dimensions depending on the source.
I am not going to go into the weeds on a forum like this one. I have a profound understanding of the manufacture of friction primers. I have my copy of the manual lying next to me. When I am communicating with people who know absolutely nothing about the subject, keeping it simple & easily understood is always the first order of business.

Actually, during the Civil War, they discovered that using a wet sponge was very dangerous. The water caused the residue in the barrel to chill & form a crust. Live embers would be trapped inside. When the round was rammed, premature misfires would happen. The solution was to order the use of dry sponging. NPS drill is to use a damp sponge because it forms a better seal & thus a better vacuum when the sponge is removed. Parks Canada does the same. The year to year casualty list from reenacting cannon crews is enough to give anyone pause. That is not an aspersion, that is a fact. Preparing safety lectures based on accidents is one of my duties, so I am well versed on both historic & current dismemberments. The last major casualty in a National Park demo was in the 1960's before anybody knew what they were doing.

As to the NPS drill. I participated in the development of the current manual. Ranger Jim Lewis, who wrote the manual is here at Stones River N.B. I can assure you that the current NPS drill is as close to the late Civil War practice as can be & comport with modern safety concerns. Part of the research involved study of stacks of C.W. photos. I assure you that there are no photos of gun crews bent over with hands on their ears in any of them.

I made my comments about reenacter drill, which include a disclaimer, because people who are not conversant with the Civil War don't know what the drill is supposed to look like. I mean no reflection on reenacting in general, but I have seen too many gun drills with absurd crouching kneeling postures & melodramatic number ones flinging the sponge rammer into the bore to not include a note about it. Getting the history right is my only priority.

If you google National Park living history & historic weapons program policies, you will find the NPS manual for 20 different classes of weapons. That includes WWII weapons as well. "Beach Apparatus Drill Manual (including use of Lyle Gun)" is something that I have absolutely no idea what it is. It is right above Matchlock, I will have to look at that. The photo header includes a shot of the back of my head. My wife is number two on the gun to my left. I believe you will find the drill manuals both interesting & useful.

Absolutely the best C.W. artillery manual is 'ARTILLERIST'S MANUAL, Compiled from various sources & adapted to the service of the United States" By Brig-Gen. John Gibbon, U.S. Vols., Captain Fourth Artillery, U.S. Army. Second Edition, Revised & Enlarged.' (aint that a mouth full?) It is the was produced in 1863 to include Rifled Ordnance that was not in the prewar manual. It starts with the discovery of gun powder, how to manufacture it & continues right up the the state of the art in rifled cannon practice. It is available online. It is the how to book of all how to books.
 
If you google National Park living history & historic weapons program policies, you will find the NPS manual for 20 different classes of weapons.
https://www.nps.gov/stri/manuals.htm

Absolutely the best C.W. artillery manual is 'ARTILLERIST'S MANUAL, Compiled from various sources & adapted to the service of the United States" By Brig-Gen. John Gibbon, U.S. Vols., Captain Fourth Artillery, U.S. Army. Second Edition, Revised & Enlarged.' .... It is available online.
http://www.artilleryreserve.org/Artillerists Mannual.pdf
 
...When I am communicating with people who know absolutely nothing about the subject, keeping it simple & easily understood...
I agreed there:
...ok, close enough description for the 'taters...
...but this is a CW site. We can handle more than "its like a .22 blank"

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Actually, during the Civil War, they discovered that using a wet sponge was very dangerous...
I agreed there:
...dipping the sponge during active combat is not specifically historic...


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
...The year to year casualty list from reenacting cannon crews is enough to give anyone pause. That is not an aspersion, that is a fact.
Overplayed. There is no national yearly CW artillery casualty list collected by anyone. The artillery schools, NPS or otherwise, project (estimate) from the incidents they happen to find out about, those that made it beyond local news outlets or as volunteered by venues, unit commands or the artillery associations -- none of whom are beholding to report that information to a central data base. Anyway compared to casualties from other causes (small arms, horses, heart, heat) the artillery toll is not especially high.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
...Preparing safety lectures based on accidents is one of my duties, so I am well versed on both historic & current dismemberments.
Overplayed. There's been very few "dismemberments" in reenactment history. But I agree there have been too many artillery accidents that could have been avoided with consistent application of safety procedures and regular safety lectures. Thank you and your fellows for doing that. It's much appreciated by pards, significant others, spouses, children, parents, cousins and nervous venue organizers.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
...I can assure you that the current NPS drill is as close to the late Civil War practice as can be & comport with modern safety concerns...the research involved study of stacks of C.W. photos...I assure you that there are no photos of gun crews bent over with hands on their ears in any of them.
I agreed there:
...Yes, the bent-over-hands-on-ears posture is a modern reenacting affectation...

We only differ in attitude. For me the posture has some safety value in mainstream reenacting, with little downside. Yes I too think it looks a bit silly and inauthentic. I have supported our unit going a more authentic stance and we do it when we can.

btw in my experience when somebody says something like "I have a profound understanding" or "I am well versed" it's a prelude to an accident about to happen. Artillery is about crew concurrence.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
...I believe you will find the drill manuals both interesting & useful...Absolutely the best C.W. artillery manual is 'ARTILLERIST'S MANUAL, Compiled from various sources & adapted to the service of the United States" By Brig-Gen. John Gibbon, U.S. Vols., Captain Fourth Artillery, U.S. Army. Second Edition, Revised & Enlarged [etc., etc.]...

Say what? I have for many years found the drill manuals both interesting & useful, including the Gibbon fat book but not only that. Is it useful or interesting that either of us would claim the ne ultra of CW artillery knowledge based on what we've each managed to accrue on the topic?

Rather, thanks for the discussion.
 
Last edited:
btw, in these photos the limber is too close to the piece by period drill standards, but the view is cool nonetheless.
 
So adding a bit of drama maybe to the regulations? I am sure the real deal needed no addition to make it interesting; but then again who can forget the natural clown such as Custer at West Point. This also gives me time to wonder on Jackson's teaching cadets at VMI who were full of pranks. Showmanship isn't necessarily a discredit to the practice unless it interferes with the safety of crew or spectators. Really enjoyed the pics and text. Thanks @Rhea Cole.
Lubliner.
 
I agreed there:

...but this is a CW site. We can handle more than "its like a .22 blank"

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

I agreed there:



- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Overplayed. There is no national yearly CW artillery casualty list collected by anyone. The artillery schools, NPS or otherwise, project (estimate) from the incidents they happen to find out about, those that made it beyond local news outlets or as volunteered either by venues, unit commands or the artillery associations -- none of whom are beholding to report that information to a central data base. Anyway compared to casualties from other causes (small arms, horses, heart, heat) the artillery toll is not especially high.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Overplayed. There's been very few "dismemberments" in reenactment history. But I agree there have been too many artillery accidents that could have been avoided with consistent application of safety procedures and regular safety lectures. Thank you and your fellows for doing that. It's much appreciated by pards, significant others, spouses, children, parents, cousins and nervous venue organizers.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

I agreed there:


We only differ in the way we feel about it. For me the posture has some safety value in mainstream reenacting, with little downside. Yes I too think it looks a bit silly and inauthentic (I have supported our unit going a more authentic stance -- when and if allowed by overall Artillery command at an event, some insisting on consistency of drill at the line).


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -


Say what? I have for many years found the drill manuals both interesting & useful, including the Gibbon fat book but not only that. Is it useful or interesting that either of us would claim the ne ultra of CW artillery knowledge based on what we've each managed to accrue on the topic? The "I have a profound understanding" stuff is a bit overplayed

Rather, thanks for the discussion.
You might try reading it before commenting on the book. It isn't a drill book, it is an everything you need to know book. It was meant for real soldiers applying the lessons of a real war. I have been studying the Civil War artillery & firing cannons since 1994. Frankly, I have been privileged to have been enlightened by real experts, real historians the insight that comes from walking e ground time & again. So, with the humility that comes from realizing that the more you know, the more there is to know, I assure you that I really do have both a profound understanding of what I have learned & a profound realization of how very much I don't.
 
@Rhea Cole when is the artillerist supposed to use the protective thumb cover over the vent hole? It seems to me, looking at the picture, that the flame coming out would scorch right through the leather protecting the thumb. Since I know nothing about it, when and how long would they use the protective thumb guard over the vent hole?
 
@John Winn, as an artillery aficionado, you will love these photos and comments!

Great photos, very informative text and indeed "eye candy". Every single one of them is a "one in a million" shot, thank you!

Indeed. I've been following the thread since the photos were posted. Thanks for thinking of me, though, cousin !

@Rhea Cole when is the artillerist supposed to use the protective thumb cover over the vent hole? It seems to me, looking at the picture, that the flame coming out would scorch right through the leather protecting the thumb. Since I know nothing about it, when and how long would they use the protective thumb guard over the vent hole?

Man number 3 cleaned the vent and put his thumb over it before the bore was sponged. He kept his thumb on the vent until the new round was rammed home. He then spiked the powder bag and inserted a primer into the vent. He held the primer in place until number 4 had extended the lanyard and was ready to fire the piece. The purpose of the thumb was to help prevent air from being sucked into the tube and creating sparks while the new round was being rammed. So, the thumb was removed before the big bang.
 
@John Winn, as an artillery aficionado, you will love these photos and comments!

Great photos, very informative text and indeed "eye candy". Every single one of them is a "one in a million" shot, thank you!
Thank you very much. Until I bought an iPad, I was the worst photographer imaginable. Really happy that you enjoy them.
 

Learn About Us
About CivilWarTalk
Contact the Webmaster
Meet the Staff
Link to CivilWarTalk
Join Our Community
Register
Browse Forums
View Today's Discussions
Search the Forum
Get Help
FAQ
Student Guide
Forum Rules & Etiquette
Copyright / DMCA

     Contact Us CivilwarTalk on Facebook CivilWarTalk on YouTube CivilWarTalk on Twitter RSS Feed

Bringing the American Civil War and More to Life.
© 1999 - , CIVILWARTALK, LLC - Site Version 10.0

SlaveryTalk.com - SecessionTalk.com - CivilWarTalk.com - ReconstructionTalk.com
Back
Top