Polk or Hardee?

Stryker65

Captain
Joined
Jun 5, 2023
Location
William & Mary
Both were extremely reliable corps commanders (Polk less so), and both had command of various large-scale army groups at different times (Polk, the Army of Mississippi; Hardee, the Department of South Carolina, Georgia, and Florida). Polk gets hammered a lot because of his tendency to play politics, and Hardee sometimes gets hammered for being too defensive. As far as I know, they never had an argument, but then again never really had a friendship.

Who do you think was the better commander, corps or otherwise?
 
I know who @HatEnjoyer would chose

IMG_2127.jpeg
 
Both were extremely reliable corps commanders (Polk less so), and both had command of various large-scale army groups at different times (Polk, the Army of Mississippi; Hardee, the Department of South Carolina, Georgia, and Florida). Polk gets hammered a lot because of his tendency to play politics, and Hardee sometimes gets hammered for being too defensive. As far as I know, they never had an argument, but then again never really had a friendship.

Who do you think was the better commander, corps or otherwise?
I'm just guessing but Gen. Hardee was a by the book man, and Bishop Polk tended to preach way too much. I wonder if Polk hadn't been killed would they have been a great team. With Hardee's grip on tactics and Polks ability to lead men…..
 
There is no close comparison of them, as corps commanders.

Don't think Polk even made the grade of 'mediocrity' for competency as a corps commander. He supposedly had a positive morale effect on the men, though. But there's more to being an effective corps commander, than morale effects.

Hardee was a competent corps commander and arguably the best Confederate corps commander in the western theater. In my view, he was a suitable candidate for army command, but he didn't want it as a permanent role.
 
What were the Yankees thinking when they literally cut Polk in half? Hardee looks like he could be Beauregard's uncle or cousin.
 
Both of them seem to have been particularly touchy, but I suppose working under Bragg brings that out pretty easily.
 
TallTallMan answered my preference for corps commander (but I eschew fast "food" restaurants as unpalatable).
 
My vote goes to Hardee. Polk did like to play politics but IMHO he wasn't a particularly good general. Harder does take flak for being on the defense. Considering what was going on in his department I don't think he had too much choice. Those states were full of minor incursions.

He had the added headache of supplies arriving at Florida by runners and keeping those supplies from the enemy. He also watched over an infrastructure that was totally different than rail and road. They used rivers, trails, rails, wagons, ETC. I'd be a little defensive myself.

And everytime troops moved or fought he could say, "I wrote the book on that."
 

Learn About Us
About CivilWarTalk
Contact the Webmaster
Meet the Staff
Link to CivilWarTalk
Join Our Community
Register
Browse Forums
View Today's Discussions
Search the Forum
Get Help
FAQ
Student Guide
Forum Rules & Etiquette
Copyright / DMCA

     Contact Us CivilwarTalk on Facebook CivilWarTalk on YouTube CivilWarTalk on Twitter RSS Feed

Bringing the American Civil War and More to Life.
© 1999 - , CIVILWARTALK, LLC - Site Version 10.0

SlaveryTalk.com - SecessionTalk.com - CivilWarTalk.com - ReconstructionTalk.com
Back
Top