- Joined
- Apr 4, 2017
Has anyone ever seen this photo? Know anything about it?
Is it correct that Union officers and nco's wore rectangular belt plates but privates wore an oval plate?With the belt plate he's wearing I'm leaning CS
Is it correct that Union officers and nco's wore rectangular belt plates but privates wore an oval plate?
Most of the time, but sometimes you see photos with what appears to be their own weapons.One thing that people don't realizes is that when a soldier (either side) when into town to get his photo taken most weren't allowed to take weapons etc. The photographer had props. In this photo you can see he had a pistol tucked in his belt.
Is it correct that Union officers and nco's wore rectangular belt plates but privates wore an oval plate?
civilwartalk.com
But first-class military-style arms like the musket and its bayonet seen here likely aren't props. Another factor to consider regarding photos of common enlisted soldiers like this was the prevalence, especially while in camp, of traveling photographers who would visit permanent camps, especially during periods of inactive campaigning. Even and especially then soldiers had easy recourse to their own weapons.One thing that people don't realizes is that when a soldier (either side) when into town to get his photo taken most weren't allowed to take weapons etc. The photographer had props. In this photo you can see he had a pistol tucked in his belt.
Is it correct that Union officers and nco's wore rectangular belt plates but privates wore an oval plate?
Baloney - and especially note the question was about Union soldiers, not Confederates who were possibly more prone to improvisation in their gear.Privates would wear mainly any of their own belts they could find. Only NCO's and Officers had belt plates.
Baloney - and especially note the question was about Union soldiers, not Confederates who were possibly more prone to improvisation in their gear.
But first-class military-style arms like the musket and its bayonet seen here likely aren't props. Another factor to consider regarding photos of common enlisted soldiers like this was the prevalence, especially while in camp, of traveling photographers who would visit permanent camps, especially during periods of inactive campaigning. Even and especially then soldiers had easy recourse to their own weapons.
The Model 1851 Sword Belt Plate was worn by officers and enlisted men in the cavalry. Infantry sergeants, although authorized to wear them, usually stuck with the standard oval belt plate.Is it correct that Union officers and nco's wore rectangular belt plates but privates wore an oval plate?
I'm not questioning the pistol as a possible prop - notice in my post I didn't mention IT - but the musket and bayonet are almost certainly his issue arm. These two tintypes from my collection which I've posted before illustrate what I was talking about in regard to traveling photographers in camp. The fellow above is likely in an improvised field studio - notice the lack of any large props, painted backdrop, etc. other than the simple canvas stretched around some sort of frame - and although he too has a pistol stuck in his belt, everything else looks like regulation issue. The chap below, however, is totally lacking in almost everything EXCEPT his longarm and bayonet, including jacket and accouterments. I can imagine him strolling through camp and seeing the photo session going on and not bothering to return to his tent and "prettying up." In that particular case, his weapon might well be a borrowed one, making it a "prop" of sorts, but from one of his mates for the photo and not the photographer.Several thing tell me they may be props. Most infantry soldiers did not carry pistols stuck in their belts and I don't see a cap or cartridge box.
View attachment 373430
From Wikipedia:I found the source of the photo. It was published in The Visual Dictionary of the Civil War, p.16. It is described as "photograph of 1st Louisiana Native Guard member, collection of Dr. Keith Cangelosi, Confederate Memorial Hall" (New Orleans, LA).
Several years ago I asked Art Bergeron if he knew of any photos of Confederate NG members. This was his reply:I found the source of the photo. It was published in The Visual Dictionary of the Civil War, p.16. It is described as "photograph of 1st Louisiana Native Guard member, collection of Dr. Keith Cangelosi, Confederate Memorial Hall" (New Orleans, LA).