White Flint Bill
Sergeant
- Joined
- Oct 9, 2017
- Location
- Southern Virginia
While researching something else I came across a reference to Paul Octave Hebert, Confederate general and a prewar governor of Louisiana.
Hebert graduated first in his class at West Point in 1840. He served as an officer in the Mexican War, where he was cited for gallantry and brevetted Colonel for bravery. He was evidently a talented engineer, serving as the Louisiana state engineer both before and after the war and supervising construction of levees on the Mississippi.
BUT, despite these credentials his service in the war was relatively insignificant. He briefly commanded the Department of Texas. Wikipedia says Jefferson Davis dismissed him for imposing martial law and harsh conscription requirements. Texas History Online (the only other source I've looked at) says nothing of that, saying instead "Hébert proved unpopular with Texas troops, who considered him aristocratic and imperious. Further, he did not win the approval of Governor Francis R. Lubbock , who considered him 'somewhat bewildered by the magnitude of the task assigned him, and not to have matured...any definite line of policy.'" The two sources also disagree about how he finished the war. Wikipedia says Hebert returned to Texas after Vicksburg, but THO says "Thereafter he commanded the subdistrict of North Louisiana, where, in the words of Lt. Col. James Arthur Lyon Fremantle of Her Majesty's Coldstream Guard, he was 'shelved at Monroe, where he expects to be taken prisoner any day.'" Both sources agree that the only combat experience Hebert ever saw was at Milliken's Bend on June 7, 1863.
So I'm wondering if anyone here has any info about Hebert--specifically why was such an ostensibly valuable resource so little used? West Pointer, decorated combat veteran, engineer, executive experience--those seem to be attributes that the Confederate army could have well-used. Would enjoy hearing from anyone with thoughts or info on this. Thanks
Hebert graduated first in his class at West Point in 1840. He served as an officer in the Mexican War, where he was cited for gallantry and brevetted Colonel for bravery. He was evidently a talented engineer, serving as the Louisiana state engineer both before and after the war and supervising construction of levees on the Mississippi.
BUT, despite these credentials his service in the war was relatively insignificant. He briefly commanded the Department of Texas. Wikipedia says Jefferson Davis dismissed him for imposing martial law and harsh conscription requirements. Texas History Online (the only other source I've looked at) says nothing of that, saying instead "Hébert proved unpopular with Texas troops, who considered him aristocratic and imperious. Further, he did not win the approval of Governor Francis R. Lubbock , who considered him 'somewhat bewildered by the magnitude of the task assigned him, and not to have matured...any definite line of policy.'" The two sources also disagree about how he finished the war. Wikipedia says Hebert returned to Texas after Vicksburg, but THO says "Thereafter he commanded the subdistrict of North Louisiana, where, in the words of Lt. Col. James Arthur Lyon Fremantle of Her Majesty's Coldstream Guard, he was 'shelved at Monroe, where he expects to be taken prisoner any day.'" Both sources agree that the only combat experience Hebert ever saw was at Milliken's Bend on June 7, 1863.
So I'm wondering if anyone here has any info about Hebert--specifically why was such an ostensibly valuable resource so little used? West Pointer, decorated combat veteran, engineer, executive experience--those seem to be attributes that the Confederate army could have well-used. Would enjoy hearing from anyone with thoughts or info on this. Thanks