Patrick Henry v. the Federal Constitution

Status
Not open for further replies.

OpnCoronet

Lt. Colonel
Joined
Feb 23, 2010
"I rose yesterday to ask a question which arose in my own mind. When I asked that question, I thought the meaning of my interrogation was obvious. The fate of this question and of America may depend on this. Have they said, We, the states? Have they made a proposal of a compact between states? If they had, this would be a confederation. It is otherwise most clearly a consoloidated government."​

The question, turns, sir, on that poor little thing--the expression, We, the people, instead of the states, of America. I need not take much pains to show the principle of this system are extremely pernicious, impolitic, and dangerous. Is this a monarchy, like England--a compact between prince and people, with checks on the forfmer to secure the liberty of the latter? Is this a confederacy, like Holland--an association of a number of independent states, each of which retains its individual sovereignty? It is not a democracy wherein the people retain all their rights securely.​

Had these principles been adhered to, we should not have been bought to this alarming transition, from a confederracy to a consolidated government.​

Patrick Henry, Against the Federal Constitution; Junw
e 5, 1788​
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Learn About Us
About CivilWarTalk
Contact the Webmaster
Meet the Staff
Link to CivilWarTalk
Join Our Community
Register
Browse Forums
View Today's Discussions
Search the Forum
Get Help
FAQ
Student Guide
Forum Rules & Etiquette
Copyright / DMCA

     Contact Us CivilwarTalk on Facebook CivilWarTalk on YouTube CivilWarTalk on Twitter RSS Feed

Bringing the American Civil War and More to Life.
© 1999 - , CIVILWARTALK, LLC - Site Version 10.0

SlaveryTalk.com - SecessionTalk.com - CivilWarTalk.com - ReconstructionTalk.com
Back
Top