JPK Huson 1863
Brev. Brig. Gen'l
- Joined
- Feb 14, 2012
- Location
- Central Pennsylvania
" Our Young Folks ' was an era. magazine type periodical aimed specifically at ' youth' published beginning ( I think ) around 1862. One site claims the genesis at 1865 but there's an 1862 edition entitled " Tim Tramp ' from 1862 and another from 1864, " The Color Bearer ".
Different authors vied to become the latest providing stories which would stir patriotic fervor in American youngsters- to what purpose considering 18 was the age one had to attain in order to serve in the armed forces ( at least in the North ) it is hard to say. " Stirring, popular stories circulated widely during the war, bringing tales of combat into the homes of readers of many ages. " http://publications.newberry.org/digitalexhibitions/exhibits/show/homefront/women/womenyoung Many ages? Clearly, children and youth, not adults.
Although the age of consent was 18, TWO of my own grgrgrandfathers were 16 when they enlisted. I'm assuming from this it was downright easily done, lying to enlist in the armies. Youngest on record? 8 year old Edmund Black of the 21st Indiana although have a claim 7 year old , Co. G. Alex Gillenwater managed to enlist in the 45th Virginia Infantry, Co. G It's not only our Johnny Clem we can look to with horror- somehow, some with pride, small boys in the path of bullets, artillery and death. And no, it was not in some way ' good ' for them. It was very, very bad for them.
Glorifying war as today some of our ridiculous magazines and periodicals glorify whateveronearth we're selling our youth seems to have worked. At the very least it cannot have helped. What was anyone thinking, creating images of noble, admirable characters to stuff into children's heads? It would have been one thing to have approached the topic from an adult perspective; to approach it from a peer perspective was insanity. I'm not stating there was a direct correlation between these mini-adult periodicals and so many veritable children running off to war. I am saying it cannot have helped.
"I passed… the corpse of a beautiful boy in gray who lay with his blond curls scattered about his face and his hand folded peacefully across his breast. He was clad in a bright and neat uniform, well garnished with gold, which seemed to tell the story of a loving mother and sisters who had sent their household pet to the field of war. His neat little hat lying beside him bore the number of a Georgia regiment… He was about my age… At the sight of the poor boy's corpse, I burst into a regular boo hoo and started on."
John A. Cockerhill, 16 years old
" The image of "The Color Bearer" waving a banner in Our Young Folks, an illustrated magazine for children, romantically glorifies the storming of a fortress. "
http://publications.newberry.org/digitalexhibitions/exhibits/show/homefront/women/womenyoung
48 soldiers under the age of 18 received the Congressional Medal of Honor, 48! They did well, our youth. That isn't the point. Between 7 and 18 there is a vast and heart rending difference. I've heard it surmised why, exactly some of the extremely young boys ran off to war. We'll never know- running into some of these, makes me wonder about yet another possible and ridiculous- and avoidable factor.
Different authors vied to become the latest providing stories which would stir patriotic fervor in American youngsters- to what purpose considering 18 was the age one had to attain in order to serve in the armed forces ( at least in the North ) it is hard to say. " Stirring, popular stories circulated widely during the war, bringing tales of combat into the homes of readers of many ages. " http://publications.newberry.org/digitalexhibitions/exhibits/show/homefront/women/womenyoung Many ages? Clearly, children and youth, not adults.
Although the age of consent was 18, TWO of my own grgrgrandfathers were 16 when they enlisted. I'm assuming from this it was downright easily done, lying to enlist in the armies. Youngest on record? 8 year old Edmund Black of the 21st Indiana although have a claim 7 year old , Co. G. Alex Gillenwater managed to enlist in the 45th Virginia Infantry, Co. G It's not only our Johnny Clem we can look to with horror- somehow, some with pride, small boys in the path of bullets, artillery and death. And no, it was not in some way ' good ' for them. It was very, very bad for them.
Glorifying war as today some of our ridiculous magazines and periodicals glorify whateveronearth we're selling our youth seems to have worked. At the very least it cannot have helped. What was anyone thinking, creating images of noble, admirable characters to stuff into children's heads? It would have been one thing to have approached the topic from an adult perspective; to approach it from a peer perspective was insanity. I'm not stating there was a direct correlation between these mini-adult periodicals and so many veritable children running off to war. I am saying it cannot have helped.
"I passed… the corpse of a beautiful boy in gray who lay with his blond curls scattered about his face and his hand folded peacefully across his breast. He was clad in a bright and neat uniform, well garnished with gold, which seemed to tell the story of a loving mother and sisters who had sent their household pet to the field of war. His neat little hat lying beside him bore the number of a Georgia regiment… He was about my age… At the sight of the poor boy's corpse, I burst into a regular boo hoo and started on."
John A. Cockerhill, 16 years old
" The image of "The Color Bearer" waving a banner in Our Young Folks, an illustrated magazine for children, romantically glorifies the storming of a fortress. "
http://publications.newberry.org/digitalexhibitions/exhibits/show/homefront/women/womenyoung
48 soldiers under the age of 18 received the Congressional Medal of Honor, 48! They did well, our youth. That isn't the point. Between 7 and 18 there is a vast and heart rending difference. I've heard it surmised why, exactly some of the extremely young boys ran off to war. We'll never know- running into some of these, makes me wonder about yet another possible and ridiculous- and avoidable factor.